Clinical Study

The Regional Centralization of Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring and Its Impact on Neonatal Acidemia and the Cesarean Birth Rate

Table 1

The incidence of low pH values, perinatal deaths, and cesarean births before and after the introduction of FHR centralization.

Period 1 (before) Period 2 (after)Statistical significance

All institutions ()Total deliveries42514888
pH values missing2510
pH < 7.114 (0.33%)14 (0.29%)ns
Perinatal deaths at ≥37 w23ns
 Antepartum deaths12ns
 Intrapartum deaths1 (abruption)0ns
 Neonatal deaths01 (Potter syndrome)ns
CS due to NRFS260 (6.1%)265 (5.4%)ns
Total CS1082 (25.5%)1219 (24.9%)ns

Secondary hospitals ()Total deliveries782842
pH < 7.13 (0.38%)7 (0.83%)ns
pH 7.1–7.222 (2.8%)39 (4.6)ns
CS due to NRFS109 (13.9%)93 (11.0%)ns
Total CS404 (51.7%)412 (48.9%)ns

Primary hospitals ()Total deliveries34694046
pH < 7.112 (0.35%)7 (0.17%)
pH 7.1–7.249 (1.4%)68 (1.7%)ns
CS due to NRFS151 (4.4%)172 (4.3%)ns
Total CS678 (19.5%)807 (19.9%)ns

CS, cesarean section; NRFS, nonreassuring fetal status.
Including 1 intrapartum fetal death of abruption.