Journal of Pathogens

Journal of Pathogens / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 756539 | 5 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/756539

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Escherichia coli Isolated from Fresh-Marketed Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Academic Editor: Hin-Chung Wong
Received08 Jan 2014
Accepted10 Mar 2014
Published07 Apr 2014

Abstract

The contamination of seafood by bacteria of fecal origin, especially Escherichia coli, is a widely documented sanitary problem. The objective of the present study was to isolate E. coli strains from the gills, muscle, and body surface of farmed Nile tilapias (Oreochromis niloticus) fresh-marketed in supermarkets in Fortaleza (Ceará, Brazil), to determine their susceptibility to antibiotics of different families (amikacin, gentamicin, imipenem, cephalothin, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, aztreonam, ampicillin, nalidixic acid, tetracycline, and sulfametoxazol-trimetoprim), and to determine the nature of resistance by plasmid curing. Forty-four strains (body surface = 25, gills = 15, muscle = 4) were isolated, all of which were susceptible to amikacin, aztreonam, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and imipenem. Gill and body surface samples yielded 11 isolates resistant to ampicillin, tetracycline, and sulfametoxazol-trimetoprim, 4 of which of plasmidial nature. The multiple antibiotic resistance index was higher for strains isolated from body surface than from gills. The overall high antibiotic susceptibility of E. coli strains isolated from fresh-marketed tilapia was satisfactory, although the occasional finding of plasmidial resistance points to the need for close microbiological surveillance of the farming, handling, and marketing conditions of aquaculture products.

1. Introduction

The bacterium Escherichia coli is widely used as indicator of the bacteriological condition of food and environments due to its almost exclusively fecal origin [1]. The presence of E. coli in fresh-marketed seafood indicates recent contamination and is usually attributed to infected handlers or storage on contaminated ice [2].

The intensification of production and the consequent increase in stocking density have made fish farming more vulnerable to disease [3, 4]. The indiscriminate use of antibiotics to treat infections and promote growth has been shown to be inefficient in the long run and to put selective pressure on bacterial populations favoring the development of resistant strains potentially hazardous to public health [57].

In fact, bacterial strains resistant to different families of antibiotics have been isolated from environmental samples by a number of researchers [810]. Foodborne strains resistant to antibiotics pose a risk to consumers’ health and favor the transference of the phenotype to humans through the food chain [1113]. There are no reports of illnesses caused by E. coli in farmed fish, but resistant strains may be selected due to the presence of antibiotics in the culture environment, leading to the dissemination by mobile genetic elements of resistance to potentially pathogenic bacteria [1417].

Due to the importance of tilapia farming in Northeastern Brazil, the aim of the present study was to (a) investigate the presence of E. coli in fresh-marketed Nile tilapia obtained from supermarkets in Fortaleza, Brazil, (b) establish the antibiotic susceptibility profile of E. coli strains isolated from Nile tilapia samples, (c) determine whether resistance was potentially chromosomal or plasmidial, and (d) determine the multiple antibiotic resistance index of strains isolated from gills, muscle, and body surface.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Thirty-six specimens of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) were collected from twelve supermarkets in Fortaleza (Ceará, Brazil). The specimens were wrapped individually in plastic film and transported in ice-cooled isothermal boxes to the Laboratory of Seafood and Environmental Microbiology of the Marine Sciences Institute (Federal University of Ceará) for immediate bacteriological analysis.

2.2. Isolation of Escherichia coli

The E. coli investigation followed the guidelines of the fourth edition of the Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods released by the American Public Health Association [18]. Presumptive tests were performed separately for gills, muscle, and body surface. To sample the body surface, an area measuring cm was stroked with a sterile cotton swab previously soaked in Difco brain heart infusion (BHI) broth and subsequently immersed in 9 mL 0.85% NaCl solution (Vetec) diluted serially to 10−4. To sample the gills, a 25 g aliquot was homogenized in 225 mL 0.85% NaCl solution, shaken in a magnetic stirrer for 30 min, and diluted serially to 10−6. To sample the muscle, a 25 g aliquot was ground and homogenized in 225 mL 0.85% NaCl solution and diluted serially to 10−3. A 1 mL aliquot was retrieved from each saline dilution and seeded with three repetitions in a test tube containing 10 mL lauryl sulfate tryptose (LST, Difco). The samples were then placed in a bacteriological incubator at 35°C for 48 hours. Aliquots from positive LST tubes were seeded in 4 mL tubes containing EC broth and incubated in a water bath at 45°C for 48 hours. E. coli was isolated using eosin-methylene blue agar plates (Difco), from which 3–5 colonies suspected of E. coli were selectedand submitted to IMViC testing. Colonies were considered to be E. coli when positive in the indole and methyl-red test, negative in the Voges-Proskauer and citrate test, and Gram-negative with short rods in the Gram staining test [16].

2.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility

The antibiogram was done with the disk diffusion method [19] using Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco). The standard strain E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as positive control [18]. Initially, an emulsion of sample in saline solution was prepared by adjustment to the 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard, equivalent to CFU·mL−1 (CLSI 2010). The susceptibility of the E. coli strains was tested in relation to several families of antibiotics, including the aminoglycoside family: amikacin (AMI; 30 μg) and gentamicin (GEN; 10 μg); the carbapenem family: imipenem (IMP; 30 μg); the cephalosporin family: cephalothin (CET; 30 μg) and cefotaxime (CTX; 30 μg); the fluoroquinolone family: ciprofloxacin (CIP; 5 μg); the monobactam family: aztreonam (ATM; 30 μg); the penicillin family: ampicillin (AMP; 30 μg); the quinolone family: nalidixic acid (NAL; 30 μg); the sulfonamide family: sulfametoxazol-trimetoprim (SUT; 25 μg); and the tetracycline family: tetracycline (TC; 30 μg). Using sterile tweezers, commercially available antibiotic disks (Laborclin) were placed individually on the surface of Mueller-Hinton agar. After 24 hours of incubation at 35°C, the strains were scored as “susceptible,” “intermediate,” or “resistant” to each antibiotic based on the measurement of the inhibition halo, as recommended by CLSI [20].

2.4. MAR Index

The multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index was determined for the total number of E. coli strains from each type of tissue sampled (gills, muscle, and body surface) using the formula /(), where is the total resistance score of the strains, is the total number of families of antibiotics tested, and is the number of strains from each type of tissue sampled [21].

2.5. Plasmid Curing

Resistant E. coli strains were submitted to plasmid curing using acridine orange dye at 100 μg·mL−1 (Sigma). Following exposure to the mutagen, the strains were rechallenged with the antibiotics to which they were initially resistant [22].

3. Results and Discussion

Forty-four of the isolates were confirmed to be E. coli, 25 (56.82%) of which were isolated from gills, 15 (34.09%) from the body surface, and 4 (9.09%) from muscle. Eleven E. coli strains isolated from gills and body surface were resistant to AMP, SUT, and TC, especially to last of these (gills ; surface ). On the other hand, strains isolated from muscle samples were susceptible to all the antibiotics tested (Table 1). All strains isolated from gills, muscle, and body surface were susceptible to AMI, ATM, CET, CTX, CIP, GEN, and IMP.


Tissue sampledAntimicrobial agents tested
AMIAMPATMCETCTXCIPGENIMPNALSUTTC

Gills
 S1512151115151515141411
 I01040000100
 R02000000014
Body surface
 S2520252325252525242421
 I02020000101
 R03000000013
Muscle
 S44444444444
 I00000000000
 R00000000000

S: susceptible; I: intermediate; R: resistant.
AMI: amikacin; GEN: gentamicin; IMP: imipenem; CET: cephalothin; CTX: cefotaxime; CIP: ciprofloxacin; ATM: aztreonam; AMP: ampicillin; NAL: nalidixic acid; SUT: sulfametoxazol-trimetoprim; TC: tetracycline.

According to some authors, the gills have a more diversified microbiota, qualitatively and quantitatively, due to their direct contact with the water, especially in plankton feeders such as the Nile tilapia [2326]. Mandal et al. [27] also detected E. coli in Nile tilapia muscle samples, but many authors believe that the muscle is a relatively innocuous tissue [2830]. Nevertheless, the muscle may be contaminated during harvesting, a stressful process which often causes injury to the body surface, and/or during storage on contaminated ice [31, 32]. Molinari et al. [33] add that E. coli is commonly found in the gut of the tilapia; thus, to these authors, its presence in the muscle is an indication of poor handling practices.

Four resistance profiles were observed in this study: resistance to TC (), resistance to AMP (), resistance to SUT+TC (), and resistance to AMP+SUT+TC () (Table 2). The profiles SUT+TC and AMP+SUT+TC involved more than one family of drugs and were therefore considered profiles of multiple antibiotic resistance [21]. The MAR indexes for strains isolated from body surface and gills were 0.037 and 0.026, respectively.


ProfilesTissue sampled
Body surface ( )Gills ( )

AMP13
TC32
SUT + TC1
AMP + SUT + TC1

AMP: ampicillin; SUT: sulfametoxazol-trimetoprim; TC: tetracycline.

In a study by Jiao et al. [34] on the occurrence of E. coli in the gut of farmed Nile tilapia, the isolated strains were susceptible to AMI, ATM, CTX, and GEN, matching our own findings and supporting the notion that these antibiotics are little used in aquaculture. E. coli strains resistant to AMP, SUT, and TC were also reported by Ryu et al. [12]. Likewise, resistant strains of E. coli to TC were found by Wang et al. [35]. The authors suggest that improperly handled seafood is a critical reservoir for the dissemination of bacterial genes of multiple resistance. Acridine orange curing of the 11 E. coli strains resistant to AMP, SUT, and TC revealed resistance to be plasmid-mediated in 4 cases and potentially chromosomal in 7.

According to Lamshöft et al. [36], sulfonamides are highly soluble in water and persistent in the environment. Thus, residues may be detected up to 10 days after administration, suggesting the possibility of detecting bacteria resistant to SUT for a relatively long period. Gao et al. [37] point out that tetracyclines and sulfonamides have a long history of use in aquaculture.

The presence of mobile genetic elements of resistance, especially plasmids and integrons, poses a risk to public health, as evidenced by Koo and Woo [38]. Not surprisingly, Tendencia and dela Peña [39] observed that the indiscriminate use of antibiotics in aquaculture has been paralleled by a significant increase in the number of reports of resistant bacteria isolated from aquaculture stock.

4. Conclusion

The overall high antibiotic susceptibility of E. coli strains isolated from fresh-marketed Nile tilapia was satisfactory, although the occasional finding of plasmid-mediated resistance points to the need for close microbiological surveillance of the farming, handling, and marketing conditions of aquaculture products. Nevertheless, it is necessary to note the origin of marketed fish in order to evaluate the potential risk to the consumer.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. C. A. Carson, B. L. Shear, M. R. Ellersieck, and A. Asfaw, “Identification of fecal Escherichia coli from humans and animals by ribotyping,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1503–1507, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Lateef, J. K. Oloke, E. B. Gueguim Kana, and E. Pacheco, “The microbiological quality of ice used to cool drinks and foods in Ogbomoso Metropolis, Southwest, Nigeria,” Internet Journal of Food Safety, vol. 8, pp. 39–43, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  3. C. A. Shoemaker, J. J. Evans, and P. H. Klesius, “Density and dose: factors affecting mortality of Streptococcus iniae infected tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus),” Aquaculture, vol. 188, no. 3-4, pp. 229–235, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. M. El-Sayed, “Effects of stocking density and feeding levels on growth and feed efficiency of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) fry,” Aquaculture Research, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 621–626, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. O. Carneiro, H. C. P. Figueiredo, D. J. Pereira Júnior, A. G. Leal, and P. V. R. Logato, “Perfil de susceptibilidade a antimicrobianos de bactérias isoladas em diferentes sistemas de cultivo de tilápia-do-Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus),” Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 869–876, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  6. N. Kemper, “Veterinary antibiotics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. A. Akond, S. M. R. Hassan, S. Alam, and M. Shirin, “Antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli isolated from poultry and poultry environment of bangladesh,” American Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. E. van den Bogaard and E. E. Stobberingh, “Epidemiology of resistance to antibiotics: links between animals and humans,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 327–335, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. A. El-Shafai, H. J. Gijzen, F. A. Nasr, and F. A. El-Gohary, “Microbial quality of tilapia reared in fecal-contaminated ponds,” Environmental Research, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 231–238, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. M. S. Lima, P. C. H. Figueiredo, F. C. Faria, R. H. Picolli, J. S. S. B. Filho, and P. V. R. Logato, “Resistência a antimicrobianos de bactérias oriundas de ambiente de criação e filés de tilápias do Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus),” Ciência e Agrotecnologia, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 126–132, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  11. A. Sapkota, A. R. Sapkota, M. Kucharski et al., “Aquaculture practices and potential human health risks: current knowledge and future priorities,” Environment International, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1215–1226, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Ryu, S. Park, S. Choi et al., “Antimicrobial resistance and resistance genes in Escherichia coli strains isolated from commercial fish and seafood,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 152, no. 1-2, pp. 14–18, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  13. A. O. Bolarinwa, T. A. Musefiu, and E. B. Obuko, “The antibiotic resistant patterns of bacterial flora of fish from different aquatic environments from Ibadan, South-West Nigeria,” Advances in Environmental Biology, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 2039–2047, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  14. A. S. Schmidt, M. S. Bruun, I. Dalsgaard, K. Pedersen, and J. L. Larsen, “Occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fish-pathogenic and environmental bacteria associated with four danish rainbow trout farms,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 4908–4915, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. S. Bruun, L. Madsen, and I. Dalsgaard, “Efficiency of oxytetracycline treatment in rainbow trout experimentally infected with Flavobacterium psychrophilum strains having different in vitro antibiotic susceptibilities,” Aquaculture, vol. 215, no. 1–4, pp. 11–20, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. W. Alexander, G. D. Inglis, L. J. Yanke et al., “Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. I. C. Mgbemenai, U. J. Udensi, J. Nnokwe, R. K. Obi, and E. A. Ogbonna, “Antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria pathogen isolated from tilapia aquaculture system in Owerri, Imo State,” Journal of Aquatic Sciences, vol. 27, pp. 15–22, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  18. F. P. Downes and K. Ito, Compendium of Methods for Microbiological Examination of Foods, American Public Health Association, 4th edition, 2001.
  19. A. W. Bauer, W. M. Kirby, J. C. Sherris, and M. Turck, “Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 493–496, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
  20. (CLSI) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Twentieth Informational Supplement: Supplement M100-S20, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa, USA, 2010.
  21. P. H. Krumperman, “Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to identify high-risk sources of fecal contamination of foods,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 165–170, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  22. A. Molina-Aja, A. García-Gasca, A. Abreu-Grobois, C. Bolán-Mejía, A. Roque, and B. Gomez-Gil, “Plasmid profiling and antibiotic resistance of Vibrio strains isolated from cultured penaeid shrimp,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 213, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H. H. Huss, “Quality and quality changes in fresh fish. Food Agriculture Organization (FAO),” Fisheries Technical Paper 348, FAO, Rome, Italy, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  24. S. Pao, M. R. Ettinger, M. F. Khalid, A. O. Reid, and B. L. Nerrie, “Microbial quality of raw aquacultured fish fillets procured from internet and local retail markets,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 1544–1549, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. O. Yagoub, “Isolation of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. from raw fish sold in fish market in Khartoum state,” Journal of Bacteriology Research, vol. 1, pp. 85–88, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  26. T. A. Musefiu, E. B. Obuko, and A. O. Bolarinwa, “Isolation and identification of aerobic bacteria flora of the skin and stomach of wild and cultured Clarias Gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus from Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria,” Journal of Applied Sciences Research, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1047–1051, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  27. S. C. Mandal, M. Hasan, M. S. Rahman, M. H. Manik, Z. H. Mahmud, and M. D. S. Islam, “Coliform bacteria in Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus of shrimp-Gher, pond and fish market,” World Journal of Fish and Marine Science, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 160–166, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  28. L. Gram, G. Trolle, and H. H. Huss, “Detection of specific spoilage bacteria from fish stored at low (0°C) and high (20°C) temperatures,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  29. H. H. Huss, P. Dalgaard, and L. Gram, “Microbiology of fish and fish products,” in Seafood from Producer to Consumer, Integrated Approach to Quality, J. B. Luten, T. Borresen, and J. Oehlenschläger, Eds., pp. 413–430, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  30. L. Gram and P. Dalgaard, “Fish spoilage bacteria—problems and solutions,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 262–266, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. A. Ampofo and G. C. Clerk, “Diversity of bacteria contaminants in tissues of fish cultured in organic waste-fertilized ponds: health implications,” The Open Fish Science Journal, vol. 3, pp. 142–146, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  32. L. Feliciano, J. Lee, J. A. Lopes, and M. A. Pascall, “Efficacy of sanitized ice in reducing bacterial load on fish fillet and in the water collected from the melted ice,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. M231–M238, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. M. Molinari, D. O. Scoaris, R. B. Pedroso et al., “Bacterial microflora in the gastrointestinal tract of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, cultured in a semi-intensive system,” Acta Scientiarum—Biological Sciences, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 267–271, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  34. S. C. Jiao, R. M. L. Fami, V. A. D. Pedernal, and E. C. Cabrera, “Prevalence of multiple drug-resistant Escherichia coli from chicken, pig and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis nilotica) intestines sold in wet markets in Manila and the conjugative transferability of the resistance,” Philippine Agricultural Scientist, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 64–70, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  35. F. Wang, L. Jiang, Q. Yang et al., “Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of major foodborne pathogens in imported seafood,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 1451–1461, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Lamshöft, P. Sukul, S. Zühlke, and M. Spiteller, “Metabolism of 14C-labelled and non-labelled sulfadiazine after administration to pigs,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 388, no. 8, pp. 1733–1745, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. P. Gao, D. Mao, Y. Luo, L. Wang, B. Xu, and L. Xu, “Occurrence of sulfonamide and tetracycline-resistant bacteria and resistance genes in aquaculture environment,” Water Research, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 2355–2364, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. H. J. Koo and G. J. Woo, “Characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli recovered from foods of animal and fish origin in Korea,” Journal of Foof Protection, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 966–972, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  39. E. A. Tendencia and L. D. dela Peña, “Level and percentage recovery of resistance to oxytetracycline and oxolinic acid of bacteria from shrimp ponds,” Aquaculture, vol. 213, no. 1–4, pp. 1–13, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Rafael dos Santos Rocha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

3734 Views | 1308 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.