Research Article  Open Access
Vahid Alipour Tabrizy, "Investigation of Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Dimensionless Groups in Wettability Modified Chalk and Sandstone Rocks", Journal of Petroleum Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 430309, 16 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/430309
Investigation of Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Dimensionless Groups in Wettability Modified Chalk and Sandstone Rocks
Abstract
The paper addresses enhanced oil recovery in chalk and sandstone rocks by CO_{2} injection, with different wettability, porosity, and permeability as well as injection rate and flooding conditions. Results indicate that an increase in Bond number has a positive effect on oil recovery whereas for capillary number, there is a limit in which recovery is improving. This limit is estimated when the pressure drop by viscous force is approximately equal to the threshold balance between capillary and gravity forces. A dimensionless group is proposed that combines the effect of capillarity, injection rate, permeability, and CO_{2} diffusion on the oil recovery. Recovery from all experiments in this study and reported data in the literature shows a satisfactory relationship with the proposed group.
1. Introduction
CO_{2} flooding is the most widely used method for medium and light oil recovery in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs during the last decades [1, 2]. In the past five decades, there have been extensive laboratory studies, numerical simulations, and field applications of CO_{2} EOR processes [1, 3–6]. The mechanisms affecting the displacement of oil by CO_{2} injection include oil swelling, IFT (interfacial tension), and viscosity reduction as well as increasing the injectivity index due to solubility of CO_{2} in water and subsequent reaction of carbonic acid with the minerals [7–9]. For immiscible CO_{2} flow in porous media, displacement efficiency could depend on the wetting properties of the fluids, the rate of CO_{2} injection and oil production, the difference of oil and CO_{2} density, the viscosity ratio of fluids, and the oil and CO_{2} relative permabilities [7]. Miscible CO_{2} EOR reduces viscosity and CO_{2} can vaporize and extract intermediate hydrocarbons from the reservoir crude oil and/or condense to the oil for developing miscibility under certain pressures and temperatures [10]. Displacement efficiency for miscible CO_{2} flooding is also influenced by wetting properties of the rock, injection and production rates, density difference between oil and gas, viscosity ratio of fluids, and oil/CO_{2} relative permabilities [10].
Investigations in the laboratories and in the field [11–18] suggest the importance of the gasoil gravity segregation in CO_{2} EOR. Kulkarni and Rao [16] presented the effect of important dimensionless groups on the final oil recovery obtained from a number of miscible and immiscible CO_{2} gravity drainage experiments. They stated that the main design parameters on a laboratory scale to evaluate the feasibility of gas injection depend on reservoir heterogeneity, rock type, fluid characteristics, injection gas, WAG ratio, and gravity considerations as well as miscibility development and compositions of oil and brine [16]. Wood et al. [19] introduced ten dimensionless groups to describe CO_{2} flooding in a dipping water flooded reservoir and used them for experimental design purposes to develop screening criteria applicable to Gulf Coast reservoirs. Trivedi and Babadagli [20] proposed a new group incorporating the matrixfracture diffusion transfer for scaling of the miscible displacement in fractured porous media.
The objective of this paper is to study CO_{2} enhanced oil recovery in chalk and sandstone rocks. The wettability of calcite and silicate minerals has been changed using fatty acid (stearic acid), amine (N,N dimethyldodecylamine), and asphaltene dissolved in the base solvents. A number of CO_{2} flood experiments are performed with various ranges of permeability, porosity, wetting state, and CO_{2} injection pressure and rate. These parameters are changed extensively to obtain a wide range of dimensionless groups. The results have been analyzed using capillary, Bond, and diffusion numbers at different wetting states. A new dimensionless group is proposed that combines the effect of capillarity, injection rate, permeability, and CO_{2} diffusion during flooding processes.
2. Theory
To quantify the relative magnitudes of the prevailing forces in CO_{2} flooding processes, the following set of dimensionless groups is usually suggested: (I) the Bond number () which is the ratio of the pore scale hydrostatic pressure drop to the capillary pressure and (II) the capillary number () which is the ratio of the pore scale viscous pressure drop to the capillary pressure [22, 24]: where is the wetting phase viscosity, is the Darcy velocity of the injected CO_{2} through porous medium, which is equal to CO_{2} volume injection rate divided by crosssectional area of the porous medium, is the interfacial tension between CO_{2} and oil, and are the permeability and porosity of the porous medium, respectively, is the density difference between two fluids, and is the gravity acceleration in the direction of flow.
The interfacial tension between CO_{2} and oil can be calculated from the following equation using Parachor method [25]: In this equation, is density (mol/cc), is Parachor number, and and are liquid and vapor mole fractions, respectively.
It should be noted that the abovedefined capillary number, , does not take into account the length and pore size for a porous medium [24], which affect the viscous force through the porous medium. In the literature, the complete capillary number, , for a circular capillary, is defined as [24] In (4), and are the length and radius of the circular capillary, respectively. In consideration of the actual pore size and shape distributions in a reservoir rock, it is useful to relate the abovedefined complete capillary number, , to some measurable reservoir characteristics, such as permeability and porosity of the oil reservoir, and Dullien [24] derived the following relation: Here, is the permeability, is the porosity, and is the radius of the identical circular capillaries. Alternatively, the complete capillary number can be defined in terms of the permeability and porosity of the porous medium: For drainage with high viscosity contrast between gas and oil, theoretical arguments based on percolation theory predict the following scaling law for the displacement under stabilized condition in threedimensional (3D) pore structures: In this equation is front width. The generalized Bond number, , is also introduced by Løvoll et al. [26] as follows: They suggested that since the front width in (7) diverges when , the following criterion for interface stabilization is expected [26]: After substitution and simplifications, the following criteria can be obtained: This critical velocity also can be calculated during modeling of free gas gravity drainage as a rate of oil recovery before gas front reaches the capillary/gravity balance threshold. The appendix shows the analytical model describing free gravity drainage and the mathematical method to find the critical oil recovery velocity. The calculation of critical oil recovery velocity with another approach has been described also by Marle [27].
The diffusion number is defined as ratio of diffusive and convective dispersion (bulk flow or viscous force): In (11), is diffusivity coefficient in Fick’s law between CO_{2} and oil and is the porosity; is the length of capillary tube and is the Darcy velocity of the injected CO_{2} through porous medium, which is equal to CO_{2} volume injection rate divided by crosssectional area of the porous medium. The number can scale the role of diffusive and convective forces in miscible processes.
Diffusivity coefficient () of CO_{2} in oil can be estimated from the following equation [28]: In this equation, is diffusivity coefficient of CO_{2} gas in oil (m^{2}/sec), is viscosity of oil (cp), is the molecular weight of CO_{2}, is the molar volume of CO_{2} (cm^{3}/mol), (psia) is the pressure of CO_{2,} and oil system in equilibrium and (Kelvin) is the temperature of CO_{2} and oil system in equilibrium.
3. Experimental Section
3.1. Materials
3.1.1. Solid Phase
The core flood experiments were done in outcrop Stevns klint chalks near Copenhagen and outcrop Benthiemer sandstones. The dimension of cores varied between 5–7 cm in length and 3.8 cm in diameter. The out crop chalks have approximate porosity of 44–48% and absolute permeability of 3–7 mD. Sandstone cores have the same porosity near 22–25%, while they are classified based on the permeability in the two groups with permeability range of 600–800 mD and with the permeability range of 1500–1700 mD. The capillary threshold of chalk cores for oil and gas system is measured near 2 bar by porous plate technique. The capillary threshold of Benthiemer sandstones was reported as 0.05 atm [29]. Table 1 is the cores detailed descriptions.
 
Repetition of experiment (first time). **Repetition of experiments (second times). Previously reported in Hamouda, A.A., Alipour Tabrizy, V., 2013, the effect of light gas on miscible CO_{2} flooding to enhance oil recovery from sandstone and chalk reservoir, and journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, volume 108, pages 259–266. 
3.1.2. Oil Phase
The investigation is done for model oil containing asphaltene dissolved in toluene (95% purity), 0.01 M stearic acid (SA) dissolved in ndecane (95% purity) for chalk cores, and 0.01 M N,Ndimethyldodecylamine (NNDMDA) dissolved in ndecane (95% purity) for sandstone cores. Synthetic seawater (SSW) has been used as irreducible water saturation. Tables 2 and 3 show the polar components used in this work and also the ionic composition of synthetic seawater.


3.1.3. Asphaltene Preparation Procedure
The model oil system is prepared from asphaltene precipitated from crude oil in excess of nheptane (1 : 40). The mixture was shaken for at least twice a day and left for 48 hours to equilibrate. The mixture solution was then centrifuged and filtered through a 0.22 micrometer filter (Millipore) and dried for 1 day using a vacuum oven at room temperature. The dried asphaltene was then dissolved in toluene.
3.2. Experimental Setup
The detailed description of the experimental set up has been addressed elsewhere [30]. The major components of the experimental setup consist of a core holder, pressure regulators, two gas flow meters, pressure manometers, Gilson pump, CO_{2} piston cell, graduated gas/oil separator, and a lab view version 7.1 connected to a digital data acquisition system. Saturated core samples with synthetic seawater were inserted into a horizontally placed core holder that consists of a steel cylindrical body and rubber/nylon sleeve. A net overburden pressure of 20 bar is applied on the sleeve. The chalk core is flooded with oil sample at flow rate of 0.1 mL/min until oil breakthrough is occurred and then it is increased to 5 mL/min to overcome the capillary threshold using Gilson pump (806 manometric modules) to establish the irreducible water. The sandstone core is flooded with oil sample at flow rate of 3 mL/min until oil breakthrough is occurred and then it is increased to 5 mL/min to overcome the capillary threshold. Table 1 shows the irreducible water saturation, which is varying between 10 and 13% for chalks and 20 and 25% for sandstones. The cores were aged for at least two weeks to change the wettability of cores toward oil wet, when the saturating oil contains polar components. Then, CO_{2} injection was carried out in two modes, namely, injection at constant rate and constant pressure. At constant rate, CO_{2} is injected from piston connected to Gilson pump (806 manometric modules) with desired rate. At constant pressure modes, CO_{2} is injected in immiscible and miscible processes. In the immiscible process, the pressure of CO_{2} injection is lower than minimum miscibility pressure. Whereas, in the miscible mode, the oil saturated core was flooded with CO_{2} at pressure equal to minimum miscibility pressure. CO_{2} was injected into the core at constant pressures of bar and temperature of 25°C for immiscible process and 90, 70, and bar and at 50, 70, and 80°C for miscible processes. The constant pressure of CO_{2} is provided by Gilson pump when the upper and lower pressure limits of pump are adjusted to the desired injection pressure plus/minus 0.5 bar. CO_{2} is injected to the core passing mass flow meter ) that records the inflow properties of CO_{2} (mass flow rate, density, and total mass). A back pressure regulator is connected downstream the core to control the pressure during CO_{2} flooding. The outflow properties (mass flow rate, density, and total mass) of the evolved gas were, also, recorded using flow meter (2) connected to the separator. The CO_{2} injection continued for at least 3 pore volumes until there was no oil production. When the injection was terminated, the core was then removed from the core holder and dried using vacuum oven at a temperature of 120°C until a constant weight was obtained.
4. Results and Discussion
The experimental results with the relation to the selected dimensionless groups are discussed in this section.
4.1. Bond Number
The variations in Bond number were primarily performed by varying the permeability of the porous medium, where reduction in permeability leads to a reduction in Bond number. As it is seen in (2), permeability does not affect the capillary number, thus allowing investigation of the effect of Bond number on the oil recovery at a constant capillary number. Recovery factor after two pore volumes of injected CO_{2} as a function of the Bound number is shown in Figure 1. Results indicate that recovery at a constant capillary number increases with increasing the Bond number. This behavior is in line with the expectation about the effect of capillarity on oil drainage by gas injection. To examine the relationship between oil recovery and Bond number, the recovery between all experiments is plotted versus Bond numbers in Figure 2. No satisfactory relation was found between the oil recovery and the balance between gravity and capillary forces.
The scaling of oil recovery using Bond number has three major limitations: (I) the effect of viscous force is not included. For example, by changing the gas injection rate, the oil recovery may be changed drastically, while the Bond number is remained unchanged; (II) the effect of viscosity ratio between displaced and displacing fluids is not included. For example, when the gas/oil viscosity ratio changes leading to a change in stability of the front and recovery, the Bond number remains unchanged. The effect of CO_{2} diffusion in oil and miscibility parameters that is, pressure, temperature, and oil composition, are not considered also in Bond number. The effects of viscous forces, viscosity ratio, and CO_{2} diffusion are incorporated in the following sections.
4.2. Capillary Number
Large viscous forces in highrate gas flooding, characterized by large capillary numbers, may result in unstable flooding fronts and the oil bypassing/trapping mechanism. From this point of view, an increase in the viscous force will result in reduction in the oil recovery because the microscopic displacement efficiency decreases. However, the lowrate gas flooding may lead to considerable residual oil since the pressure drop across the core may be lower than the capillary threshold. In the work reported by Rostami et al. [31], it has been observed that in unconsolidated bead pack porous media and high permeable waterwet outcrop sandstones, the oil recovery reduces as capillary number increases. This may not be applicable in the real reservoir cores, especially for tight oilwet carbonate rocks with considerable capillary threshold. Experimental results are shown in Figure 4(a) to Figure 5(d), where oil recovery after twopore volume CO_{2} injection is plotted versus capillary number. Results in each figure are characterized by a Bond number that remains approximately constant. The interfacial tension between CO_{2} and oil is estimated near to 20 mN/m for immiscible process and 0.1 mN/m for miscible process according to (3). Results indicate that oil recovery improves as capillary number increases up to the critical limit where afterward decreases. In other words, the recovery increases when the pressure drop due to viscous force increases near to the capillary threshold and then decreases due to flow instability. From Figure 3, it is clear that for experiments “a” and “c,” the oil recovery is increasing up to a certain value and then it is decreasing by increasing the injection rate and viscous force. The maximum oil recovery may be linked to the pressure drop in which . To observe the reliability of results, experiment “a5” and experiment “c5” are repeated and they are shown in Figure 4. The variations of oil recovery for similar conditions are near to 5%.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
It can be concluded from Figures 3 and 4 that the oil recovery is not directly proportional to the capillary number; hence, the following modified capillary number is suggested: In this equation, abs is showing the absolute value of number. The other symbols are defined previously. Figure 5 shows the relation between modified capillary number and CO_{2} enhanced oil recovery. Applying this number shows linear relationship of oil recovery to the number in semilog scale; hence, it might be more appropriate for scaling of oil recovery in gas flooding projects. The associated regression parameter for each figure is presented also in the graph.
The effect of injection rate on immiscible oil recovery can be also investigated by definition of displacement efficiency number using the critical velocity derived in the appendix as follows: In Figure 6, the oil recovery as function of displacement efficiency number is shown. This number takes into account the effect of injection rate, capillary threshold, and density difference between injected and displaced fluids and may be alternatively used instead of modified capillary number.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
To explore an appropriate dimensionless number that describes the dynamics of the oil recovery, recoveries from all experiments are plotted versus their modified capillary numbers (Figure 7). Again, no satisfactory relation is observed. This confirms that the capillary number alone is insufficient to predict the oil recovery behavior during the CO_{2} flooding.
4.3. Diffusion Number
Diffusion number expresses the ratio of diffusivity to convective dispersion (bulk flow or viscous force). The number is important in miscible processes, when the diffusion of solvent in oil is considerable and the oil production is slow; hence, the viscous force and convective dispersion are small and the diffusion number should be taken into account according to (6). Experiments in porous media “e” and “f” are done in miscible mode in chalk and sandstone cores, respectively. The minimum miscible pressure (MMP) for model oil composition at different temperatures is calculated according to SRKPeneloux EOS, PVTsim version 17. The oil recovery for miscible CO_{2} flooding experiments for porous media “e” and “f” is shown in Figure 8. The CO_{2} flooding has been done at 50°C, 70°C, and 90°C and pressures 90 bar, 120 bar, and 140 bar for experiments “e1,” “f1,” “e2,” “f2,” “e3,” and “f3,” respectively. Form the graph, it can be seen that as temperature and pressure are increasing, the diffusion number () increases and the recovery by CO_{2} flooding is increasing. It is important to mention that the oil recovery rate before CO_{2} breakthrough is kept near 0.05 cc/min for all experiments; accordingly the viscous force and capillary number of miscible experiments are small and close to each other.
The dependency of all miscible and immiscible experiments to diffusion number is shown in Figure 9. As it can be seen, no relation could be drawn down for results, since the diffusion number is not playing a critical major role in all experiments.
4.4. Combined Dimensionless Group
Examination of oil recoveries as a function of dimensionless numbers (capillary number, Bond number, modified capillary number, and diffusion number) suggests that none of the above scaling groups individually can define the oil recovery relationship to affecting parameters. In the following section, a combined dimensionless group that could show the relationship of oil displacement over the whole range of variables is investigated. Figure 10 shows the results of all experiments, when ratio of the modified capillary number over Bond number is used. Results indicate that the oil recovery by CO_{2} flooding is directly proportional to the ratio of modified capillary number over Bond number; however, no specific relation may explain this relationship.
In order to take into account the effect of diffusion number and appropriate ratio of the capillary number to Bond number, a combined dimensionless group, , is proposed as follows: where subscript Co. stands for the term “combined,” and the parameter “a” is the scaling factor. It is found that in this research, the value of provides a good relation. The small value of exponent suggests that the effect of the Bond number is much more than the importance of the capillary number. The results for the above dimensionless group are shown in Figure 11, where the recoveries of all experiments are plotted versus this number. This dimensionless group combines the effect of the three main forces that affect CO_{2} enhanced oil recovery. The results suggest that within the range of experiments performed here, there is a logarithmic relationship between the oil recovery and proposed group.
In order to validate the applicability of the new group proposed for gas injection processes, the experimental results reported by Hudigins et al., (1990), Darvish [23], and Nobakht et al. [22] are used. Table 4 summarizes the properties of literature experimental data used in this study.

The first two experimental data are related to miscible N_{2} injection in the slim tube and core, respectively; hence, the diffusion number and other relevant parameters are calculated for nitrogen. The third and fourth experiments were done for miscible CO_{2} flooding in sandstone cores and the fifth experiment was reported for CO_{2} flooding in saturated chalk core with live reservoir oil. Figure 12 compares the experimental data reported in this research and literature data reported previously.
4.5. Effect of Wettability
To understand the role of wettability in miscible and immiscible CO_{2} flooding, some experiments are done for unaged cores and the results of oil recovery at CO_{2} breakthrough and 2 PV of injected CO_{2} are compared in Figures 13 and 14. Figure 13 shows that the oil recovery after 2 PV of injected CO_{2} for unaged samples is higher than the aged samples. In fact, in aged sample (oilwet porous media), oil is the wetting phase and occupies the corner of pores; water is the nonwetting phase which occupies the center of pores. During the flowing of oil in an oilwet media, oil flows through wetting films, gas flows principally as continuous nonwetting filaments, and water is in the form of isolated ganglia; hence, the existing residual water plays a blocking role during the displacement and the recovery of aged cores after 2 PV of injected CO_{2} is significantly lower than unaged core. In contrast, for unaged core (waterwet porous media), water is not mobilized but wets the pore walls and the continuity of oil is maintained along the porous media because the spreading of oil within water and gas phases is positive. The spreading coefficient of gas, oil water system is calculated based on the equation proposed by Blunt et al. [32] as follows: Assuming mN/m [32], (measured by pendent drop technique) and (calculated by (3)) the value of spreading coefficient is +31 mN/m. According to the classification reported by Blunt et al. [32] when , the oil can flow as continuous phase among initial water and injected gas and the film flow contributes significantly to the recovery but with slow rate. From Figure 13, it is also clear that the oil recovery is decreasing as is decreasing both for aged and unaged cores at 2 PV and breakthrough of injected CO_{2}. However, the slop of this relation for aged core (oil wet) at breakthrough time is larger than unaged cores, which indicates that the recovery of aged cores is strongly dependent on the flooding parameters. This has been observed previously by ShahidzadehBonn et al. [33] for forced and free gravity drainage of gas in glass beak pack media, where the wettability of glass beads was changed by chemical treatment with TCMS (ThreeChloroMethylsilane).
Figure 14 shows that the oil recoveries after 2 PV of injected CO_{2} for unaged samples are higher than the aged samples. Similar trend to immiscible CO_{2} flooding can be seen for miscible CO_{2} flooding.
In unaged core (waterwet porous media), water is not mobilized and wets the pore walls and oil is maintained in the center of pores; hence, the CO_{2} diffuses to oil and the recoveries at CO_{2} breakthrough and 2 PV injected CO_{2} are higher than aged core. In aged core (oil wet), the water droplet occupies the center of pore and the injected CO_{2} will dissolve in water and then the mass transfer between oil and CO_{2} may occur; hence, the water will act as a barrier. Figure 15 shows the schematic of CO_{2} enhanced oil recovery in hydrophobic (aged) and hydrophilic (unaged) porous media. In this figure, oil is shown by brown; water is shown by blue and CO_{2} is represented by white color.
(a) Unaged porous medium (hydrophilic)
(b) Aged porous medium (hydrophobic)
The diffusivity of CO_{2} in seawater can be found based on the following equations [34]: where is temperature in Kelvin, is viscosity of seawater (cp), is viscosity of distilled water, and is diffusivity of CO_{2} in seawater (cm^{2}/sec). In Figure 16 the diffusivity of CO_{2} in seawater based on (17) and diffusivity of CO_{2} in model oil are calculated based on the (7) and are compared at different temperatures and corresponding minimum miscibility of CO_{2} within oil. The figure clearly indicates that the diffusion of CO_{2} in seawater is higher than oil; hence, most of CO_{2} will diffuse in water rather than oil.
5. Conclusion
Analysis of oil recovery with Bond number, at constant capillary number, shows a direct relation, but when the capillary number is changing, dependency of oil recovery with the Bond number is varying also. In addition, at constant Bond number, oil recovery increases as capillary number increases up to a certain limit and then decreases drastically as a result of higher viscous forces and fluid flow instability. Results presented in this work suggest that the Bond, capillary, and diffusion numbers could not scale the oil recovery, individually. A dimensionless group was defined to relate the competition between three forces affecting oil recovery over a wide range of petrophysical and experimental conditions. A logarithmic relationship was observed between the proposed group and oil recovery. Applicability of the proposed relation beyond the range of experiments reported in this work needs to be further examined. It is observed also that the recovery by CO_{2} injection for unaged rocks (water wet) is higher than the aged (oil wet) rocks due to higher diffusivity of CO_{2} in water (occupying the center of pores in oilwet cores) compared to that in oil.
Appendix
By using the continuity equation and Darcy’s law, and the concepts of relative permeability and capillary pressure, onedimensional displacement of multiphase flow can be described mathematically. The onedimensional Darcy’s law for twophase flow in vertical direction is where the axis is vertically downward, and are the oil and gas velocity, and is the acceleration due to gravity. The gasoil capillary pressure () is defined by By substituting the flow equation of oil in the continuity equation and combining it with gasoil capillary pressure, the equation of 1D displacement of oil by gas in vertical direction is gained: Gas has a very low viscosity with respect to oil; therefore, the assumption of infinite gas mobility is viewed as a reasonable assumption. Consider the Darcy law for gas phase in (A.2), when is a real number and mobility of gas (i.e., ) approaches infinity, the value of driving force, that is, , is relatively small. This implies that hydrostatic gas pressure gradient is a good estimation in free gravity drainage modeling. By substituting the gas pressure in (A.4) and assuming constant porosity the following equation is obtained: Since (), the above equation can be written as Equation (A.6) is written in diffusionconvection form for simplifying: In this equation is the coefficient of first derivative term and is defined in (A.9). This is a convective term and is affected by oilgas density difference and derivative of oil relative permeability. is a coefficient of second derivative term and is defined in (A.8). This diffusive term is a function of oil relative permeability and first derivative of capillary pressure with respect to the oil saturation:
The boundary and initial conditions for (A.7) are as follows.
Initial Condition. .
Inlet Boundary Condition. The inlet boundary condition occasionally can be rewritten as , . This assumption only is valid when viscosity of displaced phase (i.e., oil phase) is relatively small.
Outlet Boundary Condition. is the length of rock column and is the height of capillary/gravity equilibrium. Since the governing partial differential equation of free gravity drainage is nonlinear it is not possible to find an exact solution analytically. Instead, if the capillary pressure is neglected, (A.7) is converted to (A.11) which is linear and can be solved by separation of variable method: Equation (A.12) shows the Coreytype function for oil relative permeability; using this correlation, Equation (A.11) is written as (A.13): In this correlation is the end point oil relative permeability, is Corey exponent and affects the degree of curvature in relative permeability curve, and is the residual gasoil saturation: Assuming the above equation and following dimension less parameter this equation is simplified as (A.15): Assuming * and using (A.15) the following differential equation for and can be deduced: Equation (A.16) can be solved by calculation of and using separation of variable method. The saturation function can be found by multiplication of these two functions and can be written as
Occasionally this equation can be simplified as (A.19) using the following definition of dimensionless time:
It should be noted that the above saturation function is valid for values which are less than the gas penetration depth from top of the block at specific time. For larger values the oil column is not affected by gas invasion and oil saturation is equal to . Consequently, the solution of (A.16) should be written as In this solution represents the penetration depth of gas from top of the block and can be found when the dimensionless saturation () in (A.21) is equal to 1:
At early stage, gas invades in the column and the invasion depth can be calculated by (A.22). The gas moves down the oil in the column until it approaches capillary/gravity equilibrium. For this transition time, becomes equal to . From (A.22) one may conclude that the gas front moves linearly with time. For later stage, the gas cannot displace the oil beyond the capillary/gravity equilibrium height due to capillary end effect. The value of threshold height can be calculated by (A.23). In this equation represents the smallest pore throat of porous media:
The oil recovery factor can be found using saturation function as it is defined by following equation: In early stage when the gas does not reach the gravity/capillary equilibrium the average residual oil saturation should be calculated as follows: Using (A.25), (A.26), and (A.21) the value of average residual oil saturation and recovery factor are The value of cumulative oil production is also This equation shows that the cumulative oil production increased linearly as a function of time until the gas front reaches capillary/gravity equilibrium height. The velocity of oil in this stage is constant and is equal to
Nomenclature
:  Crosssectional area 
:  Oil saturation 
:  Gas saturation 
:  Saturation 
:  Initial water saturation 
:  Irreducible water saturation 
:  Dimensionless saturation 
Porosity  
:  Viscosity 
:  Density 
:  Injection rate, volumetric flux 
:  Vertical flow rate 
:  Capillary pressure/parachor confident 
:  Pressure 
:  Threshold pressure 
:  Dimensionless time 
:  Capillary number 
:  Gravity number 
:  Bond number 
:  Diffuision number 
.:  Combined number 
:  Displacement efficiency number 
:  End point oil permeability 
:  End point gas permeability 
:  Relative permeability 
:  Relative oil permeability 
:  Relative gas permeability 
:  Corey exponent in gas relative permeability function 
:  Corey exponent in oil relative permeability function 
:  Interfacial tension 
:  Spreading coefficient 
:  Recovery factor 
:  Mobility ratio 
:  Pore volume 
:  Length or height. 
g:  Gas 
w:  Water 
o:  Oil 
abs:  Absolute 
wg:  Watergas system 
wo:  Wateroil system 
og:  Oilgas system. 
Conflict of Interests
The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publishing of this paper. The paper will not reflect the viewpoints of the affiliated institutions by any means.
Acknowledgments
The author wish to thank the University of Stavanger for the financial support, K. P. Dziadosz and Professor Hamouda for their comments/advices in the experimental lab works, and Svein Myrhen for Lab view support and Inger Johanne for her positive contribution in getting the chemicals used in this work. This research paper is lovingly dedicated to author’s parents who have been constant source of inspiration. At time of publication of this paper, author’s father (Ibrahim Alipour Tabrizy) sadly passed away. The author never forgets his moral love and supports which without it, this research would not have been made possible.
References
 G. Moritis, “EOR survey,” Oil and Gas Journal, vol. 104, pp. 37–57, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 V. Alvarado and E. Manrique, “Enhanced oil recovery: an update review,” Energies, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 1529–1575, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. A. Chukwudeme and A. A. Hamouda, “Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by miscible CO_{2} and water flooding of asphaltenic and nonasphaltenic oils,” Energies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 714–737, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. A. Hamouda, E. A. Chukwudeme, and D. Mirza, “Investigating the effect of CO_{2} flooding on asphaltenic oil recovery and reservoir wettability,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1118–1127, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Werner, F. Behar, J. C. De Hemptinne, and E. Behar, “Thermodynamic properties of petroleum fluids during expulsion and migration from source rocks,” Organic Geochemistry, vol. 24, no. 1011, pp. 1079–1095, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. B. Grigg and D. S. Schecter, “State of the industry in CO_{2} floods,” in Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 38849, San Antonio, Tex, USA, October 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 P. M. Jarrell, C. E. Fox, M. H. Stein, and S. L. Webb, Practical Aspects of CO_{2} Flooding, vol. 22 of SPE Monograph, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2002.
 L. W. Holm and V. A. Josendal, “Mechanisms of oil displacement by carbon dioxide,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 26, pp. 1427–1438, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
 F. M. Orr Jr., M. K. Silva, C. L. Lien, and M. T. Pelletier, “Laboratory experiments to evaluate field prospects for CO_{2} flooding,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 888–898, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
 G. A. Rojas, T. Zhu, S. B. Dyer, S. Thomas, and S. M. F. Ali, “Scaled model studies of CO_{2} floods,” SPE Reservoir Engineering, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 169–178, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Hagoort, “Oil recovery by gravity drainage,” Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 139–150, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
 I. Chatzis, A. Kantzas, and F. A. L. Dullien, “On the investigation of gravityassisted inert gas injection using micromodels, long berea sandstone cores, and computerassisted tomography,” in Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (ATCE '88), SPE 18284, Houston, Tex, USA, October 1988. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. J. da Sie and D. S. Guo, “Assessment of a vertical hydrocarbon miscible flood in the Westpem Nisku D reef,” SPE Reservoir Engineering, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 8–17354, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
 D. N. Rao, S. C. Ayirala, M. M. Kulkarni, and A. P. Sharma, “Development of Gas Assisted Gravity (GAGD) process for improved light oil recovery,” in Proceedings of the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, SPE 89357, Tulsa, Okla, USA, April 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Verlaan and P. Boerrigter, “Miscible gasoil gravity drainage,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Oil Conference and Exhibition, SPE 10399, Cancun, Mexico, September 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 M. M. Kulkarni and D. N. Rao, “Characterization of operative mechanisms in gravity drainage field projects through dimensional analysis,” in Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (ATCE '06), pp. 4512–4530, San Antonio, Tex, USA, September 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 P. S. Jadhawar and H. K. Sarma, “Scaling and sensitivity analysis of gasoil gravity drainage EOR,” in Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, SPE 115065, pp. 508–521, Perth, Australia, October 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 V. K. Bangla, F. Yau, and G. R. Hendricks, “Reservoir performance of a gravity stable vertical CO_{2} miscible flood: wolf camp reservoir,” in Proceedings of the 66th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 22898, Wellman Unit, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
 D. J. Wood, L. W. Lake, R. T. Johns, and V. Nunez, “A screening model for CO_{2} flooding and storage in Gulf Coast reservoirs based on dimensionless groups,” SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 513–520, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 J. J. Trivedi and T. Babadagli, “Efficiency of diffusion controlled miscible displacement in fractured porous media,” Transport in Porous Media, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 379–394, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. A. Hudgins, F. M. Liave, and F. T. H. Chung, “Nitrogen miscible displacement of light crude oil: a laboratory study,” SPE Reservoir Engineering Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, SPE 17372, pp. 100–106, 1990. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Nobakht, S. Moghadam, and Y. Gu, “Effects of viscous and capillary forces on CO_{2} enhanced oil recovery under reservior conditions,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 3469–3476, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. H. Darvish, Physical effects controlling mass transfer in matrix fracture system during CO_{2} injection into chalk fractured reservoirs [Ph.D. thesis], Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 2007.
 F. A. L. Dullien, Porous Media—Fluid Transport and Pore Structure, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 1992.
 A. Danesh, PVT and Phase Behaviour of Petroleum Reservoir Fluids, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998.
 G. Løvoll, Y. Méheust, K. J. Måløy, E. Aker, and J. Schmittbuhl, “Competition of gravity, capillary and viscous forces during drainage in a twodimensional porous medium, a pore scale study,” Energy, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 861–872, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Marle, Multiphase Flow in Porous Media, Institut Français du Petrole (IFP) Publications, TECHNIP, Paris, France, 1981.
 T. A. Renner, “Measurement and correlation of diffusion coefficients for CO_{2} and richgas applications,” SPE Reservoir Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 517–523, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
 O. Helland and O. I. Frette, “Computation of fluid configurations and capillary pressures in mixedwet 2d pore spaces from rock images,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Water Resources (CMWR '10), J. Carrera, Ed., Barcelona, Spain, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 V. A. Tabrizy, Investigated miscible CO_{2} flooding for enhancing oil recovery in wettability altered chalk and sandstone rock [Ph.D. thesis], University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway, 2012.
 B. Rostami, R. Kharrat, M. PooladiDarvish, and C. Ghotbi, “Identification of fluid dynamics in forced gravity drainage using dimensionless groups,” Transport in Porous Media, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 725–740, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Blunt, D. Zhou, and D. Fenwick, “Threephase flow and gravity drainage in porous media,” Transport in Porous Media, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 77–103, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. ShahidzadehBonn, A. Tournié, S. Bichon et al., “Effect of wetting on the dynamics of drainage in porous media,” Transport in Porous Media, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 209–224, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. AlRawajfeh, Modeling and simulation of CO_{2} release in multipleeffect distillers for seawater desalination [Ph.D. thesis], MartinLutherUniversity HalleWittenberg, Halle, Germany, 2008.
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Vahid Alipour Tabrizy. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.