Table of Contents
Journal of Petroleum Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 214084, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/214084
Research Article

A New Approach in Pressure Transient Analysis: Using Numerical Density Derivatives to Improve Diagnosis of Flow Regimes and Estimation of Reservoir Properties for Multiple Phase Flow

London South Bank University, UK

Received 5 April 2015; Accepted 7 June 2015

Academic Editor: Alireza Bahadori

Copyright © 2015 Victor Torkiowei Biu and Shi-Yi Zheng. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Jalali, S. D. Mohaghegh, and R. Gaskari, “Identifying infill locations and underperformer wells in mature fields using monthly production rate data, Carthage Field, Cotton Valley Formation, Texas,” in Proceedings of the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, SPE Paper 104550, Canton, Ohio, USA, October 2006.
  2. D. Tiab and A. Kumar, “Application of PD function to interference analysis,” in Proceedings of the 51st Annual Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Paper SPE 6053, New Orleans, La, USA, 1976.
  3. D. Tiab and A. Kumar, “Detection and location of two parallel sealing fault around a well,” in Proceedings of the 51st Annual Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, SPE Paper 6056, New Orleans, La, USA, 1976.
  4. D. Bourdet, T. M. Whittle, A. A. Douglas, and Y. M. Pirard, “A new set of type curves simplifies well test analysis,” World Oil, vol. 196, no. 6, pp. 95–106, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Y. Zheng, “Fighting against non-unique solution problems in heterogeneous reservoirs through numerical well testing,” in Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, SPE 100951, Adelaide, Australia, September 2006.
  6. R. N. Horne and K. O. Temeng, “Recognition and location of pinch-out boundaries by pressure transient analysis,” SPE 9905, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  7. L. C. Ayestaran, R. D. Nurmi, G. A. K. Shehab, and W. S. Elsi, “Welltest design and interpretation improved by integrated well testing and geological efforts,” SPE 17945, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  8. G. J. Massonnat and D. Bandiziol, “Interdependence between geology and well test interpretation,” SPE 22740, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  9. K. F. Du and G. Stewart, “Reservoir description from well test interpretation,” in North Sea Oil and Gas Reservoir—III, pp. 339–356, Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH), 1994. View at Google Scholar
  10. S. Y. Zheng, Well testing and characterisation of meandering fluvial channel reservoirs [Ph.D. thesis], Heriot-Watt University, 1997.
  11. V. T. Biu and S. Y. Zheng, “A new approach in pressure transient analysis part I: improved diagnosis of flow regimes in oil and gas wells,” in Proceedings of the 3rd EAGE/AAPG Workshop on Tight Reservoirs in the Middle East, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2015.
  12. R. N. Horne, Modern Welltest Analysis, Petroway, Palo Alto, Calif, USA, 1995.
  13. C. S. Matthews and D. G. Russell, Pressure Buildup and Flow Tests in Wells, vol. 1 of Monograph Series, SPE, Richardson, Tex, USA, 1967.