Table of Contents
Journal of Petroleum Engineering
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 8150752, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8150752
Review Article

An Investigation of the Robustness of Physical and Numerical Vanishing Interfacial Tension Experimentation in Determining CO2 + Crude Oil Minimum Miscibility Pressure

Department of Physics & Engineering, California State University, Bakersfield, CA 93311, USA

Received 25 August 2015; Revised 30 December 2015; Accepted 6 January 2016

Academic Editor: Alireza Bahadori

Copyright © 2016 Dayanand Saini. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. O. A. Alomair and A. A. Garrouch, “A general regression neural network model offers reliable prediction of CO2 minimum miscibility pressure,” Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. A. Shokrollahi, M. Arabloo, F. Gharagheizi, and A. H. Mohammadi, “Intelligent model for prediction of CO2—reservoir oil minimum miscibility pressure,” Fuel, vol. 112, pp. 375–384, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. C. Ayirala and D. N. Rao, “Comparative evaluation of a new gas/oil miscibility-determination technique,” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 50, no. 9-10, pp. 71–81, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Ahmadi, R. T. Johns, K. Mogensen, and R. Noman, “Limitations of current method-of-characteristics (MOC) methods using shock-jump approximations to predict MMPs for complex gas/oil displacements,” SPE Journal, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 743–750, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Mogensen, P. Hood, N. Lindeloff, S. Frank, and R. Noman, “Minimum miscibility pressure investigations for a gas-injection EOR project in Al Shaheen field, Offshore Qatar,” in Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE-124109-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers, New Orleans, La, USA, October 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. M. Elsharkawy, F. H. Poettmann, and R. L. Christiansen, “Measuring CO2 minimum miscibility pressures: slim-tube or rising-bubble method?” Energy & Fuels, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 443–449, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J.-N. Jaubert, L. Avaullee, and C. Pierre, “Is it still necessary to measure the minimum miscibility pressure?” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 303–310, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Nagarajan, K. A. M. Gasem, and R. L. Robinson Jr., “Equilibrium phase compositions, phase densities, and interfacial tensions for carbon dioxide + hydrocarbon systems. 6. Carbon dioxide + n-butane + n-decane,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 228–231, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. J.-C. Hsu, N. Nagarajan, and R. L. Robinson Jr., “Equilibrium phase compositions, phase densities, and interfacial tensions for carbon dioxide + hydrocarbon systems. 1. Carbon dioxide + n-butane,” Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 485–491, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. N. Nagarajan and R. L. Robinson Jr., “Equilibrium phase compositions, phase densities, and interfacial tensions for CO2 + hydrocarbon systems. 2. CO2 + n-decane,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 168–171, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. L. Christiansen and H. Kim, “Apparatus and Method for Determining the Minimum Miscibility Pressure of a Gas in a Liquid,” US Patent no. 4,627,273, 1986.
  12. D. N. Rao, “A new technique of vanishing interfacial tension for miscibility determination,” Fluid Phase Equilibria, vol. 139, no. 1-2, pp. 311–324, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. C. Ayirala, Measurement and modeling of fluid-fluid miscibility in multicomponent hydrocarbon systems [PhD Dissertation], Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La, USA, 2005.
  14. S. C. Ayirala and D. N. Rao, Comparative Evaluation of a New MMP Determination Technique, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. D. S. Sequeira, Compositional effects on gas-oil interfacial tension and miscibility at reservoir conditions [M.S. thesis], Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La, USA, 2006.
  16. D. S. Sequeira, S. C. Ayirala, and D. N. Rao, “Reservoir condition measurements of compositional effects on gas-oil interfacial tension and miscibility,” in Proceedings of the SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, SPE-113333-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Tulsa, Okla, USA, April 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. D. Saini and D. N. Rao, “Experimental determination of Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) by gas/oil IFT measurements for a gas injection EOR project,” in Proceedings of the SPE Western Regional Meeting, SPE-132389-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Anaheim, Calif, USA, May 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. V. Tathed, A. Y. Dandekar, and S. L. Patil, “Determination of minimum miscibility pressure using vanishing interfacial tension (VIT) in support of EOR for Alaska north slope (ANS) heavy oil,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE-I-10-585, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Beijing, China, June 2010.
  19. M. Nobakht, S. Moghadam, and Y. Gu, “Determination of CO2 minimum miscibility pressure from measured and predicted equilibrium interfacial tensions,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 47, no. 22, pp. 8918–8925, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Nguyen, D. Mohaddes, J. Riordon, F. Hossein, P. Lele, and D. Sinton, “Fast fluorescence-based microfluidic method for measuring minimum miscibility pressure of CO2 in crude oils,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 3160–3164, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  21. Y. Ghomian, G. A. Pope, and K. Sepehrnoori, Development of a Response Surface Based Model for Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) Correlation of CO2 Flooding, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. O. Alomair and M. Iqbal, CO2 Minimum Miscible Pressure (MMP) Estimation Using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) Technique, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. L. H. Bui, J.-S. Tsau, and G. P. Willhite, Laboratory Investigations of CO2 Near Miscible Application in Arbuckle Reservoir, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. B. Ju, Y.-S. Wu, J. Qin, T. Fan, and Z. Li, “Modeling CO2 miscible flooding for enhanced oil recovery,” Petroleum Science, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 192–198, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. W. Teklu, N. Alharthy, H. Kazemi, X. Yin, and R. M. Graves, “Vanishing interfacial tension algorithm for MMP determination in unconventional reservoirs,” in Proceedings of the SPE Western North American and Rocky Mountain Joint Meeting, SPE-169517-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Denver, Colo, USA, April 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. S. C. Ayirala and D. N. Rao, “Application of a new mechanistic Parachor model to predict dynamic gas-oil miscibility in reservoir crude oil-solvent systems,” in Proceedings of the SPE International Petroleum Conference in Mexico, SPE-91920-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Puebla, Mexico, November 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. S. N. Ashrafizadeh and A. A. Ghasrodashti, “An investigation on the applicability of Parachor model for the prediction of MMP using five equations of state,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 690–696, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. Yang and Y. Gu, “Visualization of interfacial interactions of crude Oil-CO2 systems under reservoir conditions,” in Proceedings of the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Tulsa, Okla, USA, April 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. S. Patil, A. Dandekar, and S. Khataniar, “Phase behavior, solid organic precipitation, and mobility characterization studies in support of enhanced heavy oil recovery on the Alaska North Slope,” Final Report DOE Award no. DE-FC26-01NT41248, United States Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  30. X. Wang, S. Zhang, and Y. Gu, “Four important onset pressures for mutual interactions between each of three crude oils and CO2,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 4390–4398, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. I. O. Awari-Yusuf, Measurement of crude oil interfacial tension to determine minimum miscibility in carbon dioxide and nitrogen [M.S. thesis], Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, 2013.
  32. I. Al-Siyabi, Effect of impurities on CO2 stream properties [Dissertation (Petroleum Engineering)], Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK, 2013, http://hdl.handle.net/10399/2643.
  33. D. S. Schechter and B. Guo, “Parachors based on modern physics and their uses in IFT prediction of reservoir fluids,” SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 207–217, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. F. M. Orr Jr. and K. Jessen, “An analysis of the vanishing interfacial tension technique for determination of minimum miscibility pressure,” Fluid Phase Equilibria, vol. 255, no. 2, pp. 99–109, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. Y.-X. Zuo and E. H. Stenby, “Prediction of interfacial tensions of reservoir crude oil and gas condensate systems,” SPE Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 134–145, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. L. Stegemeier, B. F. Pennington, E. B. Brauer, and E. W. Hough, “Interfacial tension of the methane-normal decane system,” SPE Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. K. Jessen and F. M. Orr Jr., “On interfacial-tension measurements to estimate minimum miscibility pressures,” SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, vol. 11, no. 5, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. K. A. M. Gasem, K. B. Dickson, R. D. Shaver, and R. L. Robinson Jr., “Experimental phase densities and interfacial tensions for a CO2/synthetic-oil and a CO2/reservoir-oil system,” SPE Reservoir Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 170–174, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. F. M. Orr Jr. and K. Jessen, “Response to comments on ‘an analysis of the vanishing interfacial tension technique for determination of minimum miscibility pressure’,” Fluid Phase Equilibria, vol. 259, no. 2, p. 238, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. C. L. Voon and M. Awang, “Comparison of MMP between slim tube test and vanishing interfacial tension test,” in ICIPEG 2014: Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, M. Awang, B. M. Negash, N. A. Akhir, and L. A. Lubis, Eds., pp. 137–144, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. A. Georgiadis, F. Llovell, A. Bismarck et al., “Interfacial tension measurements and modelling of (carbon dioxide + n-alkane) and (carbon dioxide + water) binary mixtures at elevated pressures and temperatures,” The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 743–754, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus