Table of Contents
Journal of Polymers
Volume 2015, Article ID 867928, 10 pages
Research Article

Potential Application of a Visible Light-Induced Photocured Hydrogel Film as a Wound Dressing Material

1Department of Polymer and Color Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, P.O. Box 15875-4413, Tehran 15916-34311, Iran
2Department of Drug and Food Control, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biotechnology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 14155-6451, Tehran 14176-14411, Iran
3Department of Science, Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute, P.O. Box 14965-115, Tehran 14977-13115, Iran
4Department of Novel Drug Delivery Systems, Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute, P.O. Box 14965-115, Tehran 14977-13115, Iran

Received 29 May 2015; Revised 9 August 2015; Accepted 11 August 2015

Academic Editor: Iliya Rashkov

Copyright © 2015 Aazadehsadat Hashemi Doulabi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The objective of this work was to prepare hydrogel films, as semi-interpenetrating polymer networks (semi-IPN), based on polyethylene glycol-co-fumarate (PEGF) and chitosan (Ch) blends. Hydrogel films were prepared by free radical cross-linking of PEGF, an unsaturated aliphatic polyester, in the presence of N-vinyl pyrrolidone (NVP), camphorquinone (CQ), and N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine (DMPT) as a cross-linking, photoinitiating, and accelerating agent, respectively. The effect of NVP concentration on physicochemical and biological properties of semi-IPN film properties was evaluated. The sol fraction, water vapor transmission rate, and swelling degree of the hydrogel films were also investigated. Antibacterial activity against S. aureus was observed for the photocured blend hydrogels of Ch/PEGF with no toxicity to L929 cells according to the cell viability assays. Blend hydrogel films showing 600 ± 88% of equilibrium swelling degree in water and the lowest sol fraction (3.14 ± 1.22%) were obtained at 20 wt% of NVP content whilst preserving their own cytocompatibility and antibacterial activity. Therefore, this formulation was considered as an optimal semi-IPN blend hydrogel film composition with potential application for wound dressing.

1. Introduction

There is an increasing interest in preparing of polymer blends based on synthetic resins and natural biopolymers for biomedical applications such as wound dressing [1, 2]. Recently, a lot of literature surveys covering traditional treatments to modern and sophisticated techniques including several natural and synthetic polymers have been published in wound dressing fields [3]. The preliminary requirements for a wound dressing composition intended for soft tissue applications are as follows: biocompatibility, nontoxicity, appropriate gas permeability, easy application and removal without causing secondary trauma to the wound, and providing suitable microenvironment for wound healing just to name a few [1, 4]. Using polymer blends seems advantageous in this regard and could secure more aforementioned requirements due to the improved properties not attainable by a single polymer.

Chitosan (Ch), the linear and partly deacetylated derivative of chitin, has recently received great attention for different biomedical applications due to its irreplaceable and intrinsic properties [5]. It exhibits some properties such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, nonantigenicity, nontoxicity, and intrinsic antibacterial activity; hence, this polysaccharide possesses a great potential to be used as a biomaterial for wound dressing applications [1]. Wound dressing with intrinsic antibacterial properties is preferable comparing to those loaded with antibacterial agents especially from safety viewpoint [1, 4]. Ch, however, requires modification due to its inferior mechanical properties. Several approaches including Ch blending with other synthetic or natural polymers have been examined to obviate these drawbacks while improving other properties. It can provide the wide range of physicochemical properties, processing techniques of synthetic polymers, and the biocompatibility and biological interactions of natural polymers simultaneously [69]. Blending Ch with synthetic polymers such as poly(ethylene oxide), poly(vinyl alcohol), and polylactic acid gives just a few examples of these approaches [1015]. Our group has reported the preparation of a novel blend film of Ch/poly(ethylene glycol fumarate) (Ch/PEGF) and evaluated its properties as a dressing [1, 16]. PEGF is an unsaturated polyester showing good biocompatibility, cytocompatibility, and biodegradability profile whilst being able to be photocured even with visible light irradiation [17, 18]. It also helps Ch to become ductile, in a blend, due to the presence of flexible PEG chains in its backbone [19]. Moreover, it causes enhancing moisture penetration and consequently increasing water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) value due to the existence or progress in intermolecular interactions between Ch and PEGF molecules [1, 16].

PEGF, as a water soluble polymer, would be removed from its Ch matrix even in the presence of hydrogen bonds with Ch chains, which affects blend properties to some extent [1, 20]. PEGF can be cross-linked via free radical mechanisms initiated by heat, redox reaction, and photoirradiation due to the unsaturated double bonds present in its backbone [18, 21].

The aim of this work was to prepare photocured Ch/PEGF blend films and evaluate their properties in biomedical applications as wound dressing films. To this end, semi-interpenetrating network (semi-IPN) hydrogels were prepared via photocuring of PEGF present in the Ch matrix to provide a readily adjustable network considering properties such as sol fraction, swelling degree, WVTR, antibacterial activity, and biological properties. Effects of photocuring agent concentration on physicochemical and biological properties of the samples were evaluated and one specific formulation was introduced as the optimum sample for wound dressing applications. To the best of our knowledge, photocurable blend films of Ch/PEGF and their wound healing performance have not been discussed elsewhere.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Low viscosity Ch (20–200 mPa·s, DDA = 80%, Fluka, Germany) was purified as reported elsewhere [22]. PEGF (: 19; : 16 kDa; degree of oligomerization: ≈ 4) was synthesized in house by condensation polymerization of PEG diol ( = 3 kDa, Ph Eur grade, Merck Chemicals, Dusseldorf, Germany) and fumaryl chloride 95% in the presence of propylene oxide 99% (Aldrich, Milwaukee, MN, USA) as catalysts and proton scavenger according to the procedure described in detail elsewhere [18]. Camphorquinone 97% (CQ) was purchased from Aldrich, USA. Sodium hydroxide, N-vinyl pyrrolidone (NVP), N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine 99% (DMPT), methylene chloride, and acetic acid were obtained from Merck Chemicals, Germany. Fumaryl chloride and NVP were purified by distillation as mentioned in detail, previously [18]. All of the other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade and used as received without further purification.

2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Semi-IPN Ch/PEGF Film Preparation

According to our previous studies, 80 to 20 Ch/PEGF blend ratio (w/w) was selected for preparing of samples reported here [1, 16, 22]. Ch/PEGF blend solution was prepared by dissolving Ch and PEGF in 1% (v/v) acetic acid and then let it reach concentrated form under stirring. To this end, CQ (1 wt% relative to PEGF), NVP (10, 20, and 40 wt% relative to PEGF), and DMPT (1 μL) were mixed and then added to the Ch/PEGF viscous solution. The blend was photocured similar to the procedure reported with some modifications [18]. The solutions were cast in leveled, polystyrene dishes and cured for 200 min in a photocuring box (TRAY-LUX, M5+, Taiwan). After completion of the curing reaction, the films were dried at room temperature for 48 h and then kept in a refrigerated desiccator at 5°C until being used.

2.2.2. Gel Permeation Chromatography

Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was performed using a GPC instrument (Shimadzu, CR4AX, GC15A, Japan). After obtaining the calibration curve with polystyrene standards with known molecular weights, and were calculated by running PEGF sample. THF was used as the mobile phase eluting at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. A 100 μL sample of 0.1 mg mL−1 solution of the macromer in THF, which was filtered through a 0.22 mm filter prior to use, was injected for the measurement.

2.2.3. Degree of Conversion

Degree of conversion (DC%) of the semi-IPN networks was determined by FTIR spectroscopy. FTIR spectra (4000–400 cm−1) were acquired on a Bruker (Germany), Equinox 55 spectrophotometer at 4 cm−1 resolution and 32 scans. The specimens were examined as films at ambient temperature and their spectra were recorded before and after curing reaction. DC% was determined from the ratio of absorbance intensities of aliphatic C=C (peak positioned at 1645 cm−1) against an internal reference signal belonging to CH3COH group appearing at 851 cm−1 before and after curing of the specimen. The DC% was then calculated using (1) [23]. Each FTIR spectrum was deconvoluted using Origin software to calculate due to overlapping peaks:

2.2.4. Sol Fraction

To investigate the leachable residues in the blend, sol fraction (SF) was determined as follows. First, the residual solvent was removed by immersing the films in methanol, as a nonsolvent, for 24 h. Then, the samples were taken out and dried in a vacuum oven (°C,  bar) overnight and weighed (). Subsequently, the films were immersed in distilled water for 24 h, dried in vacuo overnight, and then weighed again (). The SF was calculated using [10]

2.2.5. Equilibrium Swelling Degree

Equilibrium swelling degree (ESD) was determined using a gravimetric method. The specimens were cut into 1 cm × 1 cm rectangles and then dried in vacuo (°C,  bar) for 24 h and weighted (). Afterward, the specimens were immersed in an excess amount of PBS (0.1 M, pH = 7.4) at 25°C until an equilibrium was reached (ca. 24 h) when surface of the samples was blotted by a filter paper and weighted () again. The ESD was calculated using [4]

2.2.6. Water Vapor Transmission Rate

To determine gas permeability of the blend films, WVTR of the sample films was determined according to ASTM E96/E96M-10 [24] procedure with minor modifications described elsewhere [1]. Briefly, a glass bottle containing anhydrous silica gel desiccant was covered by the films under test (15 mm diameter of exchange area) and sealed using paraffin wax. The assembly was weighed 8 times at 1 h intervals and kept in a humidity chamber maintaining % of relative humidity (°C) using standard saturated solution of sodium chloride. Weight variations of the bottles were plotted versus time. The WVTR was determined as [24]where is the vapor exchange area under test. Control cups, without the anhydrous silica gel desiccant, were conducted in parallel. The WVTR experiment was repeated thrice for each formulation.

2.2.7. Antibacterial Activity

Antibacterial activity was determined by tracing the viable cell count after exposure of test specimens ( mm) with Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) as a Gram-positive bacterium. An overnight culture of S. aureus bacterium was used to prepare a bacterial suspension with a cell density approximately equivalent to 108 CFU mL−1. The test samples were decontaminated by immersing in 70% (v/v) ethanol for 10 min and then washing with sterile phosphate buffer solution and air-drying under laminar air flow [25]. Each film was added to 10 mL of nutrient broth medium (Merck, Germany) which was then inoculated with S. aureus suspension to reach the final concentration of 107 CFU mL−1. After 24 h exposure at room temperature, each sample was serially diluted and the number of survived bacteria was determined by pour plate method using nutrient agar medium (Merck, Germany). Plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h and the total viable bacterial counts were determined and expressed as CFU mL−1 [26]. Nutrient broth containing the same bacterial inoculum and no specimen was considered as control. Equations (5) and (6) were used to calculate the killing efficacy (Kill%) and the population reduction of the test organism, respectively [27],

2.2.8. Cell Culture

Mouse fibroblast cells (L929) were generously provided by National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. The cells were cultured in a medium consisting of Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640, Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco, BRL) and streptomycin 100 μg mL−1 and penicillin 100 IU mL−1 (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, USA). A routine subculture was used to maintain the cell line [28]. The cells were incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C. After one week of incubation, the cell monolayer was harvested by trypsinization. Ch/PEGF semi-IPN films were cut in circular pieces ( cm) and sterilized by immersing in 70% (v/v) ethanol and sterile phosphate buffer saline consecutively for ten minutes. The samples were placed separately into a multiwell plate with 5 mL of cell suspension and seeded, keeping one well as control without any sample, and then maintained in an incubator for 24 h. The samples were examined by a light microscope (Nikon, E200, Japan) equipped with CCD camera (Micros, Smart eye, Austria).

To examine cytotoxicity (i.e., mitochondrial function), reduction of the MTT reagent (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, Merck, Germany) was assessed as an assay of mitochondrial redox activity [29]. For the assay, a cell suspension was prepared and seeded onto 96-well plates and then incubated. After 24 h of culture, the supernatant of cell culture was removed and 100 μL of MTT solution (5 mg mL−1 phosphate buffer saline) was added to each sample and incubated for 4 h at 37°C, under a CO2 (5%) atmosphere to dissolve the produced purple formazan crystals. Medium was aspirated and cultured fibroblasts were treated with 200 μL of isopropanol/HCl (0.04 N) and incubated for 15 min at 37°C. Then, 100 μm of each well transferred to another 96-well plate. The optical density of the formazan solution was read on an ELISA reader (Microplate reader ELX808 Bio-Tek Instruments, USA) at 570 nm and the reference wavelength of 630 nm. Controls without samples were carried out. The results were expressed as a percentage of cell viability.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

All experiments were performed on enough number of samples, that is, at least 3 samples. Differences between groups were analyzed by one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Linear regression was also used for data analysis. The Tukey (, 95% confidence intervals) was also used to determine the significance of differences between specific means (Origin, 7.0, 2002, USA). All data were represented as mean ± SD.

3. Results and Discussion

This study was focused on the preparation and characterization of photocured film made of Ch/PEGF blend. Cross-linking of PEGF in the Ch matrix resulted in semi-IPN hydrogels (Scheme 1). Since CQ has an absorption peak at 467 nm, this makes it more favorable for the lamps with emission peaks in the range of 470 to 500 nm [30]. Visible light (in blue region) was used for film curing which obviated the drawbacks of UV light to the surrounding tissues. In this paper, more important properties such as sol fraction, swelling degree, WVTR, antibacterial activity, biocompatibility, and cytocompatibility required for wound dressing applications have been evaluated.

Scheme 1: Schematic representations of chemical structure of photocured blends of Ch/PEGF.
3.1. Degree of Conversion

To determine light curing efficacy, double bond conversion was calculated using (1). The effect of NVP as a reactive diluent and cross-linking agent on the DC% was depicted in Figure 1. With increasing in NVP concentration in feed from 10 to 20 wt%, DC% increased while by adding more NVP (up to 40 wt%) it was decreased. The viscosity of the reaction medium plays an important role in the polymerization behavior [23]. The restricted mobility of the mixture at low NVP concentrations could affect the polymerization propagation and decrease the final conversion. Increasing in NVP content made the compound (composed of PEGF-Ch-NVP-QC-DMPT-solution) low viscous; therefore, cross-linking agent was able to form more network bridges because of higher molecular mobility and finally DC% increased. At higher concentrations of NVP (40 wt%), a reduction in DC% was observed which was due to formation of NVP homopolymers. The result is confirmed with considering the PEGF degree of oligomerization (or C=C fumarate bond quantities) which will be mentioned in the next section. NVP is a monofunctional monomer with low polymerization rate and at higher concentrations the monomer tends to form more linear homopolymer chains rather than cross-linked network resulting in a decrease in final conversion [31]. The formation of the linear water soluble poly-NVP at high NVP concentrations was confirmed by sol fraction test.

Figure 1: Degree of conversion of the blend films of Ch/PEGF (80/20) with different contents of NVP as a cross-linking agent .
3.2. Sol Fraction

Sol fraction of the uncured blend and photocured blends with different NVP contents (10, 20, and 40 wt%) is determined as 11.6, 7.2, 3.1, and 6.3% respectively, as shown in Figure 2. Photocuring of Ch/PEGF blends caused a decrease in the sol fraction of the blends due to formation of PEGF networks within Ch matrix. When semi-IPN Ch/PEGF was formed, free PEGF content decreased in comparison with uncured film; therefore, sol fraction decreased. By means of GPC (: 19, : 16 kDa) and then calculating degree of oligomerization (C=C bonds quantities of PEGF), NVP 20 wt% was chosen as an optimum amount of cross-linking agent needed for photocuring. For cross-linking PEGF, the stoichiometric amount of NVP needed is equal to optimum C=C bonds quantities of PEGF. Degree of oligomerization equals /, where and represent the number average molecular weights of PEGF and monomeric PEG fumarate unit, respectively [32]. GPC result showed that each PEGF chain has approximately four fumarate double bonds; therefore, the optimum required NVP for each mole PEGF was four moles. NVP with 20 wt% concentration could meet this demand. There have still been some uncross-linked chains which dissolved in water when NVP was added in less than required amount (SF: 7.2%). In line with this, adding NVP in more than double bond quantity, extra NVP formed water soluble homopolymer, that is, PVP [31] (SF: 6.3%), as mentioned above. Hence, sol fraction of cured blends with 10 and 40 wt% NVP is more than that of 20 wt% NVP (SF: 3.1%) while all formulations of photocured blends show the SF less than that of uncured film () as shown in Figure 2, indicating the photocured films have advantages on the uncured one.

Figure 2: Sol fraction of photocured blend films of Ch/PEGF with 80/20 in blend ratio containing different contents of NVP and uncured Ch/PEGF with 80/20 .
3.3. Swelling Behavior

There are several types of wounds with different amount of exudates; therefore, exudate absorbing efficacy plays an important role for choosing an appropriate dressing to provide a proper moist environment to prevent the wound bed from dryness and also infection [1]. The swelling behavior of the films was investigated and reported as ESD. The water swelling of the semi-IPN is higher than the uncured films as shown in Figure 3. Since adequate exudate absorption is one of the essential properties for wound dressing, therefore there is another strong point of cured films in comparison with uncured ones. In the uncured film, after 24 h immersion in water to reach equilibration, the uncross-linked PEGF chains were removed from the blend and left water insoluble Ch matrix. In the cured films, however, water molecules were diffused into and placed in the networks. With the increase of NVP concentration from 10 to 40 wt%, swelling degree decreased due to higher cross-linking density of the network. This is in agreement with GPC result for degree of oligomerization. As mentioned before, the required NVP for each mole of PEGF was four moles (NVP with 20 wt% concentration). The values less than 20 wt% caused some uncross-linked PEGF remaining in the matrix which resulted in loose network and more swelling as shown in Figure 3 (ESD: ~700%). Sol fraction findings also confirmed these results. A much dense, rigid structure and less swelling were expected by increasing of NVP from 20 to 40 wt% due to the less of DC% (ESD: ~450%). Extra and unreacted NVP either remain among the network chains or in solution in PVP form; therefore, their sol fractions are more than the film with 20 wt% NVP. This concentration is chosen as an optimum concentration for cross-linking agent.

Figure 3: Swelling degree of photocured blend films of Ch/PEGF with 80/20 in blend ratio containing different contents of NVP and uncured Ch/PEGF with 80/20 .
3.4. Water Vapor Transmission Rate

An optimal value of WVTR provides an ideal environment for wound bed; therefore, preparing a wound dressing with improved healing potential is an interesting subject [33]. The WVTR results for different formulations of the blend Ch/PEGF with 80/20 ratio are shown in Figure 4. Photocuring and increasing in the cross-linking agent concentration make networks denser; therefore, diffusion and transportation of water vapor decrease through the films. In other words, when a film was placed in a moisture rich environment the hydrated film facilitates vapor transfer from that environment to a dry environment. In these photocured blend films, the interactions of the permeating water molecules with the polar groups in the Ch film should not be discarded [1]. On the other hand, it could be due to the existence in intermolecular interactions between Ch and PEGF molecules [34]. The results, ranging from to  g m−2 day−1, are comparable with the commercially available wound dressings in market such as Tegaderm and Op Site with and  g m−2 day−1, respectively [4, 35]. Considering accepted optimal WVTR value, these photocured films are promising candidates for dressing the wounds with low exudate.

Figure 4: WVTR of photocured blend films of Ch/PEGF with 80/20 in blend ratio containing different contents of NVP and uncured Ch/PEGF with 80/20 .
3.5. Antibacterial Assay

It was reported that Ch is a bacteriostatic and bactericidal agent to 297 bacterial strains [36]. Therefore, antibacterial assay was carried out for investigating whether semi-IPN hydrogels of Ch/PEGF exhibited antibacterial activity or not. The antibacterial activities as population reduction and killing efficacy (Kill%) of S. aureus for uncured and cured films are summarized in Table 1. All test samples showed antibacterial activity against S. aureus by killing efficiency of more than 99% (99.81–99.86%) and population reduction of bacterial load in the range of 2.73–2.87 log CFU mL−1 (more than 1) [37]. The killing efficiency of the blend film with 40 wt% NVP showed significant difference compared with the uncured blend film. Some decrements were seen in antibacterial activity and population reduction; however, these differences were not statistically significant (). It may be due to the entrapment of surface amino groups of Ch chains in the semi-IPN hydrogel resulting in reduction of amino groups interactions with bacterial cell wall. In other words, the susceptibility of Ch active sites in the formulation of the film plays an important role in inhibiting the growth of this test organism. This claim is also applicable for miscible blends. In these blends, polymeric chains are homogenously distributed having more chances for binding with bacterial cells and killing them [10]. The real mechanism for antibacterial effect of these films was not so clear [38] and needs more explorations; however, a suggested mechanism for cured films would be similar to uncured ones [1]. That is explained by interactions of cationic amino groups () of Ch with negatively charged essential components of bacterial cell walls (Scheme 2). These interactions lead to destabilization of bacterial cell walls by disrupting of anionic phospholipid moieties of bacterial cell walls and consequent microbial death (Scheme 2). Li et al. reported the same mechanism for quaternized chitosan hydrogel films [27]. These claims need comprehensive tests to be confirmed which is beyond the scope of this study.

Table 1: Kill% and population reduction against S. aureus values of semi-IPN hydrogels of Ch/PEGF and uncured blend ().
Scheme 2: A suggested mechanism for antibacterial activity of photocured blend films of Ch/PEGF.
3.6. Cell Culture

Since an ideal wound dressing should be biocompatible as well as nontoxic, biocompatibility and cytocompatibility of hydrogel films were investigated. Optical images of fibroblast L929 cultured on the semi-IPN hydrogels of Ch/PEGF blends (80/20) with different concentrations of NVP after 24 h incubation at 37°C are shown in Figure 5. The images showed that cell attachment and proliferation were observed even in the presence of photocured films. Cross-linking makes 3D environment which could increase proper sites for cell anchoring, growth, and propagation. It has been also reported that good cell attachment does not happen in hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces [39] while PEGs with more than 2 kDa are resistant to cell and proteins attachments [40]. It is expected that PEGF should be resistant to cell attachment. Once there is a balance between being hydrophilic and polycationic, cell attachment and propagation happened. Similar trend happens to uncured Ch/PEGF blends [1].

Figure 5: Optical microscopic images of fibroblast L929 on the control (a), uncured Ch/PEGF with 80/20 in blend ratio (b), and photocured films containing 10 wt% (c), 20 wt% (d), and 40 wt% (e) of NVP with magnification of 400x (scale: 20 μm) after 24 h of incubation.

An appropriate wound dressing should not release toxic materials. Mitochondrial activity of fibroblast cells L929 on the film surface was evaluated by MTT assay. The cell viabilities of fibroblast L929 in contact with semi-IPN hydrogel films in 80/20 in blend ratio containing different concentrations of NVP after 24 h are shown in Figure 6. Results showed all films were nontoxic and kept their properties approximately similar to Ch films. According to Figure 6, the content of NVP in the blend film could influence the cell viability; the more the NVP concentration, the less the cell viability for which optical microscopic images confirmed MTT results. It may be due to the equilibrium water absorption and more susceptible nutrient media which are key factors needed for cell anchoring, growth, and immigration. Thus, less NVP concentration makes the network looser resulting in more water absorption.

Figure 6: Cell viability of fibroblast L929 in contact with control and uncured Ch/PEGF film of 80/20 in blend ratio and photocured blend containing different contents of NVP after 24 h of incubation () .

4. Conclusions

In the present study the semi-IPN hydrogel films of Ch/PEGF were prepared using visible photocuring technique. FTIR was used to investigate the double bond conversion of PEGF section in Ch matrix for estimating the efficacy of the curing reaction in different cross-linking agent concentrations. The effect of NVP content on the biological and physicochemical properties of semi-IPN hydrogels of Ch/PEGF was evaluated. The increase in the NVP concentration from 10 to 40 wt% led to the decrease of antimicrobial activities against S. aureus but the difference was not statistically significant. MTT assay and cell culture indicated all samples were nontoxic and biocompatible to fibroblast L929. Not only did preparation of semi-IPN improve physicochemical properties but also biological properties were not destroyed. Finally, the antibacterial and biocompatible film cured with 20 wt% NVP with the highest swelling degree and the lowest sol fraction was a suitable candidate as a hydrogel dressing for wounds with low exudates.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Iran National Science Foundation (no. 89001749). Also great thanks are due to Dr. M. Daliri Joupari (National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology) and Mr. Hossein Jamalifar (Department of Drug and Food Control, Tehran University of Medical Sciences) for their kind help in cell and bacterial culture, respectively.


  1. A. H. Doulabi, H. Mirzadeh, M. Imani, and N. Samadi, “Chitosan/polyethylene glycol fumarate blend film: physical and antibacterial properties,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 48–56, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Wang, X.-K. Zhu, X.-T. Xue, and D.-Y. Wu, “Hydrogel sheets of chitosan, honey and gelatin as burn wound dressings,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 75–83, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. S. Boateng, K. H. Matthews, H. N. E. Stevens, and G. M. Eccleston, “Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: a review,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 2892–2923, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. J. Elsner, A. Shefy-Peleg, and M. Zilberman, “Novel biodegradable composite wound dressings with controlled release of antibiotics: Microstructure, mechanical and physical properties,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research—Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 425–435, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. A. A. Muzzarelli, F. Greco, A. Busilacchi, V. Sollazzo, and A. Gigante, “Chitosan, hyaluronan and chondroitin sulfate in tissue engineering for cartilage regeneration: a review,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 723–739, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. X. Ye, J. F. Kennedy, B. Li, and B. J. Xie, “Condensed state structure and biocompatibility of the konjac glucomannan/chitosan blend films,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 532–538, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Wan, Y. Fang, H. Wu, and X. Cao, “Porous polylactide/chitosan scaffolds for tissue engineering,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 776–789, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Q. Wang, N. Zhang, X. Hu, J. Yang, and Y. Du, “Chitosan/polyethylene glycol blend fibers and their properties for drug controlled release,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 881–887, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Santos, C. J. Silva, Z. Büttel et al., “Preparation and characterization of polysaccharides/PVA blend nanofibrous membranes by electrospinning method,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 99, pp. 584–592, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Zivanovic, J. Li, P. M. Davidson, and K. Kit, “Physical, mechanical, and antibacterial properties of chitosan/PEO blend films,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1505–1510, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. M. Yang, W. Y. Su, T. L. Leu, and M. C. Yang, “Evaluation of chitosan/PVA blended hydrogel membranes,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 236, no. 1-2, pp. 39–51, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. E. Suyatma, A. Copinet, L. Tighzert, and V. Coma, “Mechanical and barrier properties of biodegradable films made from chitosan and poly (lactic acid) blends,” Journal of Polymers and the Environment, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Spasova, N. Manolova, D. Paneva, and I. Rashkov, “Preparation of chitosan-containing nanofibres by electrospinning of chitosan/poly(ethylene oxide) blend solutions,” e-Polymers, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 624–635, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. Manolova, I. Rashkov, and A. Domard, “Chitosan/polyoxyethylene diacid films for drug release,” Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 221–230, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Ignatova, N. Manolova, N. Markova, and I. Rashkov, “Electrospun non-woven nanofibrous hybrid mats based on chitosan and PLA for wound-dressing applications,” Macromolecular Bioscience, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 102–111, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Hashemi Doulabi, H. Mirzadeh, and M. Imani, “Interaction and miscibility study of fumarate-based macromers with chitosan,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 139, no. 2-3, pp. 515–524, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. Shin, J. S. Temenoff, and A. G. Mikos, “In vitro cytotoxicity of unsaturated oligo[poly(ethylene glycol)fumarate] macromers and their cross-linked hydrogels,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 552–560, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. S. H. Doulabi, H. Mirzadeh, M. Imani, S. Sharifi, M. Atai, and S. Mehdipour-Ataei, “Synthesis and preparation of biodegradable and visible light crosslinkable unsaturated fumarate-based networks for biomedical applications,” Polymers for Advanced Technologies, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1199–1208, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. Kolhe and R. M. Kannan, “Improvement in ductility of chitosan through blending and copolymerization with PEG: FTIR investigation of molecular interactions,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 173–180, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Zhang, X. H. Li, Y. D. Gong, N. M. Zhao, and X. F. Zhang, “Properties and biocompatibility of chitosan films modified by blending with PEG,” Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 2641–2648, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. S. H. Doulabi, S. Sharifi, M. Imani, and H. Mirzadeh, “Synthesis and characterization of biodegradable in situ forming hydrogels via direct polycondensation of poly(ethylene glycol) and fumaric acid,” Iranian Polymer Journal (English Edition), vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 125–133, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Hashemi Doulabi, H. Mirzadeh, and M. Imani, “Miscibility study of chitosan/polyethylene glycol fumarate blends in dilute solutions,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 3514–3521, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Atai, D. C. Watts, and Z. Atai, “Shrinkage strain-rates of dental resin-monomer and composite systems,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 24, pp. 5015–5020, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. ASTM, “Standard test methods for water vapor transmission of materials,” ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  25. A. R. Sarasam, R. K. Krishnaswamy, and S. V. Madihally, “Blending chitosan with polycaprolactone: effects on physicochemical and antibacterial properties,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1131–1138, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. M. Yang, H. T. Lin, T. H. Wu, and C.-C. Chen, “Wettability and antibacterial assessment of chitosan containing radiation-induced graft nonwoven fabric of polypropylene-g-acrylic acid,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1331–1336, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Li, Y. F. Poon, W. Li et al., “A polycationic antimicrobial and biocompatible hydrogel with microbe membrane suctioning ability,” Nature Materials, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 149–156, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Farhadi, H. Mirzadeh, A. Solouk et al., “Collagen-immobilized patch for repairing small tympanic membrane perforations: in vitro and in vivo assays,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 549–553, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Sharifi, Y. Shafieyan, H. Mirzadeh et al., “Hydroxyapatite scaffolds infiltrated with thermally crosslinked polycaprolactone fumarate and polycaprolactone itaconate,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research—Part A, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 257–267, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. N. Emami and K.-J. M. Söderholm, “Influence of light-curing procedures and photo-initiator/co-initiator composition on the degree of conversion of light-curing resins,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Sharifi, H. Mirzadeh, M. Imani et al., “Synthesis, photocrosslinking characteristics, and biocompatibility evaluation of N-vinyl pyrrolidone/polycaprolactone fumarate biomaterials using a new proton scavenger,” Polymers for Advanced Technologies, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1828–1838, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Jo, H. Shin, A. K. Shung, J. P. Fisher, and A. G. Mikos, “Synthesis and characterization of oligo(poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) macromer,” Macromolecules, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 2839–2844, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. B. Balakrishnan, M. Mohanty, P. R. Umashankar, and A. Jayakrishnan, “Evaluation of an in situ forming hydrogel wound dressing based on oxidized alginate and gelatin,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 32, pp. 6335–6342, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. N. Gontard and S. Guilbert, Food Packaging and Preservation, Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK, 1st edition, 1994.
  35. H.-J. Yoo and H.-D. Kim, “Characteristics of waterborne polyurethane/poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) composite films for wound-healing dressings,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 331–338, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. A. A. Muzzarelli, R. Tarsi, O. Filippini, E. Giovanetti, G. Biagini, and P. E. Varaldo, “Antimicrobial properties of N-carboxybutyl chitosan,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2019–2023, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. J. B. Pinto, S. C. M. Fernandes, C. S. R. Freire et al., “Antibacterial activity of optically transparent nanocomposite films based on chitosan or its derivatives and silver nanoparticles,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 348, pp. 77–83, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. Y. Feng and W. Xia, “Preparation, characterization and antibacterial activity of water-soluble O-fumaryl-chitosan,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 1169–1173, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. J. Wilson, R. E. Clegg, D. I. Leavesley, and M. J. Pearcy, “Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1-2, pp. 1–18, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. B. D. Ratner, A. S. Hoffman, F. J. Schoen, and J. E. Lemons, Biomaterials Science. An Introduction to Materials in Medicine, Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2004.