Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Probability and Statistics
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 802975, 27 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/802975
Review Article

Spurious Regression

Departamento de Economia y Finanzas, Universidad de Guanajuato, DCEA-Campus Marfil Fracc. I, 36250 El Establo, Guanajuato, Gto, Mexico

Received 23 January 2009; Revised 6 April 2009; Accepted 15 May 2009

Academic Editor: Ričardas Zitikis

Copyright © 2009 D. Ventosa-Santaulària. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. W. J. Granger and P. Newbold, “Spurious regressions in econometrics,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  2. J. Davidson, D. Hendry, F. Srba, and S. Yeo, “Econometric modelling of the aggregate time-series relationship between consumers' expenditure and income in the United Kingdom,” Economic Journal, vol. 88, pp. 661–692, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Hendry and G. Mizon, “Serial correlation as convenience simplification, not a nuissance: a comment on a study of the demand for money by the bank of England,” Economic Journal, vol. 88, pp. 549–563, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. C. I. Plosser and G. W. Schwert, “Money, income, and sunspots: measuring economic relationships and the effects of differencing,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 637–660, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. R. N. Bhattacharya, V. K. Gupta, and Ed Waymire, “The Hurst effect under trends,” Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 649–662, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. P. C. B. Phillips, “Understanding spurious regressions in econometrics,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 311–340, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. C. R. Nelson and C. R. Plosser, “Trends and random walks in macroeconmic time series: some evidence and implications,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 139–162, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. D. A. Dickey and W. A. Fuller, “Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 74, no. 366, part 1, pp. 427–431, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. P. Perron, “The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis,” Econometrica, vol. 57, pp. 1361–1401, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  10. S. N. Durlauf and P. C. B. Phillips, “Trends versus random walks in time series analysis,” Econometrica, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1333–1354, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. P. C. B. Phillips, “Trending time series and macroeconomic activity: some present and future challenges,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  12. C. W. J. Granger, N. Hyung, and Y. Jeon, “Spurious regressions with stationary series,” Applied Economics, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 899–904, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. G. Sargan, Wages and Prices in United Kingdom: A Study in Econometric Methodology, Buttewoth, London, UK, 1964.
  14. D. Hendry and G. Anderson, “Testing dynamic specification in small simultaneous systems: an application to a model of building society behaviour in the United Kingdom,” Frontiers in Quantitative Economics, vol. 3, pp. 361–383, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  15. D. Hendry, A. Pagan, and J. Sargan, “Dynamic specification,” Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 2, pp. 1023–1100, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  16. C. W. J. Granger, “Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. C. W. J. Granger and A. A. Weiss, “Time series analysis of error-correction models,” in Studies in Econometrics, Time Series, and Multivariate Statistics, pp. 255–278, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  18. R. F. Engle and C. W. J. Granger, “Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing,” Econometrica, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 251–276, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. P. C. B. Phillips, “New tools for understanding spurious regressions,” Econometrica, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1299–1325, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. P. C. B. Phillips, “Laws and limits of econometrics,” Economic Journal, vol. 113, no. 486, pp. C26–C52, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. A. Legendre, “Nouvelles méthodes pour la détermination des orbites des comètes,” F. Didot, 1805.
  22. G. Yule, “On the theory of correlation,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 812–854, 1897. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. K. Pearson, “On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. 60, pp. 489–498, 1897. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. D. F. Hendry and M. S. Morgan, The Foundations of Econometric Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995. View at MathSciNet
  25. J. Aldrich, “Correlations genuine and spurious in Pearson and Yule,” Statistical Science, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 364–376, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  26. M. S. Morgan, The History of Econometric Ideas, Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990. View at MathSciNet
  27. G. Yule, “Why do we sometimes get nonsense-correlations between time-series? A study in sampling and the nature of time-series,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 1–63, 1926. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. D. Hendry, “Econometrics-alchemy or science?” Economica, vol. 47, no. 188, pp. 387–406, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. W. Jevons, “Commercial crises and sunspots,” in Investigations in Currencies and Finance, pp. 221–243, MacMillan, London, UK, 1884. View at Google Scholar
  30. W. Ferson, S. Sarkissian, and T. Simin, “Is stock return predictability spurious?” Journal of Investment Management, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  31. J. H. Stock, “Asymptotic properties of least squares estimators of cointegrating vectors,” Econometrica, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1035–1056, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  32. H. Hurst, “Long term storage capacity reservoirs,” Transcations of The American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 116, pp. 770–799, 1951. View at Google Scholar
  33. K. W. Hipel and A. I. McLeod, “Preservation of the rescaled adjusted range parts 1, 2 and 3,” Water Resources Research, vol. 14, pp. 491–518, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. I. Adelman, “Long cycles: fact or artifact,” American Economic Review, vol. 55, pp. 444–463, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  35. C. W. J. Granger, “Long memory relationships and the aggregation of dynamic models,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 227–238, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  36. C. W. J. Granger and R. Joyeux, “An introduction to long-memory time series models and fractional differencing,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–29, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  37. J. R. M. Hosking, “Fractional differencing,” Biometrika, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 165–176, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  38. M. A. Ariño and F. Marmol, “A permanent-transitory decomposition for ARFIMA processes,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 87–97, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  39. P. Perron and T. Vogelsang, “Nonstationarity and level shifts with an application to purchasing power parity,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 301–320, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. J.-L. Wu, “Mean reversion of the current account: evidence from the panel data unit-root test,” Economics Letters, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 215–222, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  41. J.-L. Wu, S.-L. Chen, and H.-Y. Lee, “Are current account deficits sustainable? Evidence from panel cointegration,” Economics Letters, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 219–224, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  42. C. D'Adda and A. E. Scorcu, “On the time stability of the output-capital ratio,” Economic Modelling, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1175–1189, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. P. Perron, “Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 355–385, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  44. R. L. Lumsdaine and D. H. Papell, “Multiple trend breaks and the unit-root hypothesis,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 212–218, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. A. Mehl, “Unit root tests with double trend breaks and the 1990s recession in Japan,” Japan and the World Economy, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 363–379, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. K. Juselius, “A structured VAR under changing monetary policy,” Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, vol. 16, pp. 400–412, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. K. Juselius, “Price convergence in the medium and long run: an I (2) analysis of six price indices,” in Cointegration, Causality and Forecasting: A Festschrift to Clive Granger, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  48. N. Haldrup, “An econometric analysis of 1(2) variables,” Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 645–650, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. V. A. Muscatelli and F. Spinelli, “The long-run stability of the demand for money: Italy 1861–1996,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 717–739, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. G. Coenen and J.-L. Vega, “The demand for M3 in the Euro area,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 727–748, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. H. B. Nielsen, “An I(2) cointegration analysis of price and quantity formation in Danish manufactured exports,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 449–472, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. T.-H. Kim, Y.-S. Lee, and P. Newbold, “Spurious regressions with stationary processes around linear trends,” Economics Letters, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 257–262, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  53. Y. Sun, “A convergent t-statistic in spurious regressions,” Econometric Theory, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 943–962, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  54. R. Moon, A. Rubia, and R. Valkanov, “Long-horizon regressions when the predictor is slowly varying,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  55. J. Y. Park and P. C. B. Phillips, “Statistical inference in regressions with integrated processes. II,” Econometric Theory, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 95–131, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  56. F. Marmol, “Spurious regressions between I(d) processes,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 313–321, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  57. A. Banerjee, J. Dolado, J. Galbraith, and D. Hendry, Co-Integration, Error Correction, and the Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Data, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1993.
  58. F. Marmol, “Nonsense regressions between integrated processes of different orders,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 525–534, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  59. R. M. de Jong, “Logarithmic spurious regressions,” Economics Letters, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  60. H. Entorf, “Random walks with drifts: nonsense regression and spurious fixed-effect estimation,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 287–296, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  61. P. C. B. Phillips and H. R. Moon, “Linear regression limit theory for nonstationary panel data,” Econometrica, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1057–1111, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  62. C. Kao, “Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 1–44, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  63. N. Cappuccio and D. Lubian, “Spurious regressions between I(1) processes with long memory errors,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 341–354, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  64. F. Marmol, “Spurious regression theory with nonstationary fractionally integrated processes,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 233–250, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  65. W.-J. Tsay and C.-F. Chung, “The spurious regression of fractionally integrated processes,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 155–182, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  66. C. R. Nelson and H. Kang, “Spurious periodicity in inappropriately detrended time series,” Econometrica, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 741–751, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  67. D. Dickey and S. Pantula, “Determining the order of differencing in autoregressive processes,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 455–461, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  68. Y. Sun, “Spurious regressions between stationary generalized long memory processes,” Economics Letters, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 446–454, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  69. T. Mikosch and C. Stǎricǎ, “Nonstationarities in financial time series, the long-range dependence, and the IGARCH effects,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 378–390, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. T. Mikosch and C. de Vries, Tail Probabilities for Regression Estimators, Laboratory of Actuarial Mathematics, University of Copenhagen, 2006.
  71. E. Furman and R. Zitikis, “General stein-type decompositions of covariances: revisiting the capital asset pricing model,” in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Finance Association, vol. 6, pp. 1–8, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2009.
  72. E. Fama, “The behavior of stock-market prices,” Journal of Business, vol. 38, no. 1, p. 34, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. U. Hasseler, “Simple regressions with linear time trends,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  74. T.-H. Kim, S. Lee, and P. Newbold, “Spurious regressions with processes around linear trends or drifts,” 2003, Discussion Papers in Economics. View at Google Scholar
  75. A. E. Noriega and D. Ventosa-Santaulària, “Spurious regression under broken-trend stationarity,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 671–684, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  76. A. E. Noriega and D. Ventosa-Santaulària, “Spurious regression and trending variables,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 439–444, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. U. Hassler, “Spurious regressions when stationary regressors are included,” Economics Letters, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 25–31, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  78. U. Hassler, “Nonsense regressions due to neglected time-varying means,” Statistical Papers, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 169–182, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  79. W. Newey and K. West, “A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix,” Econometrica, pp. 703–708, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  80. D. Ventosa-Santaulària, Spurious Instrumental Variables, Communications in Statistics. Theory and Methods, 4th edition, 2009.
  81. D. E. A. Giles, “Spurious regressions with time-series data: further asymptotic results,” Communications in Statistics. Theory and Methods, vol. 36, no. 5–8, pp. 967–979, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  82. C. M. Jarque and A. K. Bera, “Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals,” Economics Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 255–259, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  83. T. S. Breusch and A. R. Pagan, “The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics,” The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 239–253, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  84. L. G. Godfrey, Misspecification Tests in Econometrics: The Lagrange Multiplier Principle and Other Methods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1988.
  85. D. Ventosa-Santaulària and J. E. Vera-Valdés, “Granger-causality in the presence of structural breaks,” Economics Bulletin, vol. 3, no. 61, pp. 1–14, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  86. C. Granger, “Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods,” Econometrica, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 424–438, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. Y.-S. Lee, T.-H. Kim, and P. Newbold, “Spurious nonlinear regressions in econometrics,” Economics Letters, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 301–306, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  88. J. B. Ramsey, “Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, vol. 31, pp. 350–371, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  89. A. I. McLeod and W. K. Li, “Diagnostic checking ARMA time series models using squared-residual autocorrelations,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 269–273, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  90. D. M. Keenan, “A Tukey nonadditivity-type test for time series nonlinearity,” Biometrika, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  91. H. White, “An additional hidden unit test for neglected nonlinearity in multilayer feedforward networks,” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 2, pp. 451–455, IEEE Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1989.
  92. H. White, Estimation, Inference and Specification Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1992.
  93. J. D. Hamilton, “A parametric approach to flexible nonlinear inference,” Econometrica, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 537–573, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  94. A. Noriega and D. Ventosa-Santaulària, “Spurious cointegration: the Engle-Granger test in the presence of structural breaks,” Working paper no. 2006-12, Banco de México, 2006.
  95. R. Valkanov, “Long-horizon regressions: theoretical results and applications,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 201–232, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  96. J. Lee, “Fractionally integrated long horizon regressions,” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, vol. 11, no. 1, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  97. S. J. Leybourne and P. Newbold, “Spurious rejections by cointegration tests induced by structural breaks,” Applied Economics, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1117–1121, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. P. C. B. Phillips and B. E. Hansen, “Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I (1) processes,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 99–125, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  99. B. Hansen and P. Phillips, “Estimation and inference in models of cointegration: a simulation study,” Advances in Econometrics, vol. 8, pp. 225–248, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  100. P. M. Robinson, “Efficient tests of nonstationary hypotheses,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 89, no. 428, pp. 1420–1437, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  101. D. A. Dickey and W. A. Fuller, “Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root,” Econometrica, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1057–1072, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  102. D. Kwiatkowski, P. C. B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y. Shin, “Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 54, no. 1–3, pp. 159–178, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  103. G. Elliott, T. J. Rothenberg, and J. H. Stock, “Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root,” Econometrica, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 813–836, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  104. P. C. B. Phillips and P. Perron, “Testing for a unit root in time series regression,” Biometrika, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 335–346, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  105. S. Ng and P. Perron, “Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power,” Econometrica, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1519–1554, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  106. P. Perron and S. Ng, “Useful modifications to some unit root tests with dependent errors and their local asymptotic properties,” The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 435–463, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  107. P. Perron, “Testing for a unit root in a time series with a changing mean,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, pp. 153–162.
  108. A. Montañés and M. Reyes, “Effect of a shift in the trend function on Dickey-Fuller unit root tests,” Econometric Theory, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 355–363, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  109. A. Montañés and M. Reyes, “The asymptotic behaviour of the Dickey-Fuller tests under the crash hypothesis,” Statistics & Probability Letters, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 81–89, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  110. S. J. Leybourne and P. Newbold, “Behavior of Dickey-Fuller t-tests when there is a break under the alternative hypothesis,” Econometric Theory, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 779–789, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  111. A. Sen, “Behaviour of Dickey-Fuller F-tests under the trend-break stationary alternative,” Statistics & Probability Letters, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 257–268, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  112. A. Sen, “On unit-root tests when the alternative is a trend-break stationary process,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 174–184, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  113. T.-H. Kim, S. Leybourne, and Pa. Newbold, “Behaviour of Dickey-Fuller unit-root tests under trend misspecification,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 755–764, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  114. S. Hamori and A. Tokihisa, “Testing for a unit root in the presence of a variance shift,” Economics Letters, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 245–253, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  115. S. J. Leybourne, T. C. Mills, and P. Newbold, “Spurious rejections by Dickey-Fuller tests in the presence of a break under the null,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 191–203, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  116. T.-H. Kim, S. Leybourne, and P. Newbold, “Unit root tests with a break in innovation variance,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 365–387, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  117. A. Sen, “Behaviour of Dickey-Fuller tests when there is a break under the unit root null hypothesis,” Statistics and Probability Letters, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 622–628, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  118. E. Zivot and D. W. K. Andrews, “Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 10, pp. 251–270, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  119. J. L. Carrion-i-Silvestre and A. Sansó, “Joint hypothesis specification for unit root tests with a structural break,” The Econometrics Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 196–224, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  120. J. Bai and P. Perron, “Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes,” Econometrica, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 47–78, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  121. B. B. Mandelbrot and M. S. Taqqu, “Robust R/S analysis of long-run serial correlation,” in Proceedings of the 42nd Session of the International Statistical Institute (ISI '79), vol. 48, pp. 69–99, 1979. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  122. A. Lo, “Long-term memory in stock market prices,” Econometrica, pp. 1279–1313, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  123. T. Mikosch and C. Stărică, “Is it really long memory we see in financial returns,” Extremes and Integrated Risk Management, vol. 12, pp. 149–168, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  124. V. Teverovsky and M. Taqqu, “Testing for long-range dependence in the presence of shifting means or a slowly declining trend, using a variance-type estimator,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 279–304, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  125. Y.- Liu, M. Pan, and L. Hsueh, “A modified R/S analysis of long-term dependence in currency futures prices,” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 97–113, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  126. I. Lobato and P. M. Robinson, “Averaged periodogram estimation of long memory,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 303–324, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  127. L. Giraitis, P. Kokoszka, and R. Leipus, “Testing for long memory in the presence of a general trend,” Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1033–1054, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  128. L. Giraitis, P. Kokoszka, R. Leipus, and G. Teyssière, “Rescaled variance and related tests for long memory in volatility and levels,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 265–294, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  129. I. Berkes, L. Horváth, P. Kokoszka, and Q.-M. Shao, “On discriminating between long-range dependence and changes in mean,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1140–1165, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  130. A. Zhang, R. Gabrys, and P. Kokoszka, “Discriminating between long memory and volatility shifts,” Statistics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 253–275, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  131. A. Aue, L. Horváth, M. Hušková, and P. Kokoszka, “Testing for changes in polynomial regression,” Bernoulli, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 637–660, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  132. A. Jach and P. Kokoszka, “Wavelet-domain test for long-range dependence in the presence of a trend,” Statistics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 101–113, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  133. J. Hamilton, Time Series Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1994.
  134. R. King, C. Plosser, J. Stock, and M. Watson, “Stochastic trends and economic fluctuations,” The American Economic Review, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 819–840, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  135. J. Cochrane, “Permanent and transitory components of GNP and stock prices,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 241–265, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. A. Bernard and S. Durlauf, “Convergence in International output,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 97–108, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  137. A. B. Bernard and S. N. Durlauf, “Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 71, no. 1-2, pp. 161–173, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  138. S. Durlauf, “On the convergence and divergence of growth rates,” The Economic Journal, vol. 106, no. 437, pp. 1016–1018, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  139. Z. Koustas and W. Veloce, “Unemployment hysteresis in Canada: an approach based on long-memory time series models,” Applied Economics, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 823–831, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  140. S. Durlauf and D. Quah, The New Empirics of Economic Growth, National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1998.
  141. Q. Li and D. Papell, “Convergence of international output time series evidence for 16 OECD countries,” International Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 267–280, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  142. S. N. Durlauf, “Manifesto for a growth econometrics,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 65–69, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  143. P. Aghion and S. N. Durlauf, Handbook of Economic Growth, Volume 1A, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005.
  144. J. Campbell and P. Perron, “What macroeconomist should know about unit roots,” in NBER Macroeconomics Annual, O. Blanchard and S. Fisher, Eds., pp. 141–201, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  145. J. Faust and E. M. Leeper, “When do long-run identifying restrictions give reliable results?” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 345–353, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  146. P. J. Coe and J. M. Nason, “Long-run monetary neutrality and long-horizon regressions,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 355–373, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  147. J. Taylor, “Estimation and control of a macroeconomic model with rational expectations,” Econometrica, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1267–1286, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  148. D. Corbae and S. Ouliaris, “Cointegration and tests of purchasing power parity,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 508–511, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  149. B. Diba and H. Grossman, “Explosive rational bubbles in stock prices?” The American Economic Review, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 520–530, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  150. Y. Cheung, “Long memory in foreign-exchange rates,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, pp. 93–101, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  151. N. Crato and P. J. F. de Lima, “Long-range dependence in the conditional variance of stock returns,” Economics Letters, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 281–285, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  152. W. Enders and S. Hurn, “Theory and tests of generalized purchasing-power parity: common trends and real exchange rates in the Pacific Rim,” Review of International Economics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 179–190, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  153. R. Garcia and P. Perron, “An analysis of the real interest rate under regime shifts,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 111–124, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  154. S. E. Culver and D. H. Papell, “Is there a unit root in the inflation rate? Evidence from sequential break and panel data models,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 435–444, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  155. F. J. Breidt, N. Crato, and P. de Lima, “The detection and estimation of long memory in stochastic volatility,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 83, no. 1-2, pp. 325–348, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  156. I. N. Lobato and N. E. Savin, “Real and spurious long-memory properties of stock-market data,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 261–283, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  157. Z. Zhu, “The random walk of stock prices: evidence from a panel of G-7 countries,” Applied Economics Letters, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 411–413, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  158. R. C. Cati, M. G. P. Garcia, and P. Perron, “Unit roots in the presence of abrupt governmental interventions with an application to Brazilian data,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 27–56, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  159. J. T. Cuddington and H. Liang, “Purchasing power parity over two centuries?” Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 753–757, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  160. T. Mikosch, Modeling Dependence and Tails of Financial Time Series, Extreme Values in Finance, Telecommunications, and the Environment, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2003.
  161. P. Pedroni, “Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis,” Econometric Theory, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 597–625, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  162. A. M. R. Taylor, “Fluctuation tests for a change in persistence,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 207–230, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  163. G. Cavaliere and A. M. R. Taylor, “Testing for a change in persistence in the presence of a volatility shift,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, vol. 68, supplement 1, pp. 761–781, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  164. E. Furman and R. Zitikis, “Weighted risk capital allocations,” Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 263–269, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  165. E. Furman and R. Zitikis, “Weighted pricing functionals,” in Proceedings of the 43rd Actuarial Research Conference (ARC '09), pp. 1–31, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, 2009.
  166. G. S. Alogoskoufis and R. Smith, “The Phillips curve, the persistence of inflation, and the Lucas critique: evidence from exchange rate regimes,” The American Economic Review, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 1254–1275, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  167. M. D. D. Evans and K. K. Lewis, “Do expected shifts in inflation affect estimates of the long-run Fisher relation?” The Journal of Finance, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 225–253, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  168. J. Fuhrer and G. Moore, “Inflation persistence,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 127–159, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  169. W. J. Crowder, “The long-run Fisher relation in Canada,” The Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 30, no. 4b, pp. 1124–1142, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  170. S. B. DeLoach, “More evidence in favor of the Balassa-Samuelson hypothesis,” Review of International Economics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 336–342, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  171. I. Drine and C. Rault, “Do panel data permit the rescue of the Balassa-Samuelson hypothesis for Latin American countries?” Applied Economics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 351–359, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  172. J. Ricardo Faria and M. León-Ledesma, “Testing the Balassa-Samuelson effect: implications for growth and the PPP,” Journal of Macroeconomics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 241–253, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  173. G. Bårdsen, E. S. Jansen, and R. Nymoen, “Econometric evaluation of the New Keynesian Phillips curve,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, vol. 66, supplement, pp. 671–686, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  174. Y. Sun and P. C.B. Phillips, “Understanding the fisher equation,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 869–886, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  175. J. Galí, M. Gertler, and J. López-Salido, Robustness of the Estimates of the Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve, Banco de España, 2005.
  176. P. C. B. Phillips, “Econometric analysis of Fisher's equation,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 125–168, 2005. View at Google Scholar