Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Probability and Statistics
Volume 2011, Article ID 874251, 23 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/874251
Research Article

Nonparametric Estimation of ATE and QTE: An Application of Fractile Graphical Analysis

Department of Economics, City University London, D306 Social Sciences Building, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK

Received 3 May 2011; Accepted 28 July 2011

Academic Editor: Mike Tsionas

Copyright © 2011 Gabriel V. Montes-Rojas. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. O. Ashenfelter, “Estimating the effect of training programs on earnings,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 47–57, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  2. R. LaLonde, “Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data,” American Economic Review, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 604–620, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. D. Angrist and A. Krueger, “Empirical strategies in labor economics,” in Handbook of Labor Economics, O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, Eds., vol. ume 1, pp. 1277–1366, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  4. G. W. Imbens, “Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 4–29, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. E. L. Lehmann, Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks, Holde-Bay, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1st edition, 2006.
  6. K. Doksum, “Empirical probability plots and statistical inference for nonlinear models in the two-sample case,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 2, pp. 267–277, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  7. M. P. Bitler, J. B. Gelbach, and H. W. Hoynes, “What mean impacts miss: distributional effects of welfare reform experiments,” American Economic Review, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 988–1012, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. Heckman and S. Navarro-Lozano, “Using matching, instrumental variables, and control functions to estimate economic choice models,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 30–57, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. P. R. Rosenbaum and D. B. Rubin, “The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects,” Biometrika, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 41–55, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. P. R. Rosenbaum and D. B. Rubin, “Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score,” Journal of the American Statistical Society, vol. 79, no. 387, pp. 516–524, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  11. A. Abadie and G. W. Imbens, “Simple and bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects,” NBER Technical Working Paper 0283, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  12. K. Hirano, G. W. Imbens, and G. Ridder, “Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score,” Econometrica, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 1161–1189, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. J. Hahn, “On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects,” Econometrica, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 315–331, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  14. R. Koenker and G. Bassett,, “Regression quantiles,” Econometrica, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 33–50, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  15. A. Abadie, J. Angrist, and G. Imbens, “Instrumental variables estimates of the effect of subsidized training on the quantiles of trainee earnings,” Econometrica, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 91–117, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. V. Chernozhukov and C. Hansen, “The effects of 401(k) participation on the wealth distribution: an instrumental quantile regression analysis,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 735–751, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. V. Chernozhukov and C. Hansen, “An IV model of quantile treatment effects,” Econometrica, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 245–261, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  18. S. Firpo, “Efficient semiparametric estimation of quantile treatment effects,” Econometrica, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 259–276, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. A. Diamond, Reliable estimation of average and quantile causal effects in non-experimental settings, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2005.
  20. P. C. Mahalanobis, “A method fractile graphical analysis,” Econometrica, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 325–351, 1960. View at Google Scholar
  21. A. K. Bera and A. Gosh, Fractile Regression and Its Applications, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Ill, USA, 2006.
  22. B. Sen, “Estimation and comparison of fractile graphs using kernel smoothing techniques,” Sankhya. The Indian Journal of Statistics, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 305–334, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  23. R. Koenker and K. F. Hallock, “Quantile regression,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 143–156, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  24. R. Fisher, The Design of Experiments, Boyd, London, UK, 1935.
  25. J. Splawa-Neyman, “On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9,” Statistical Science, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 465–480, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  26. D. B. Rubin, “Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 688–701, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. D. B. Rubin, “Assignment to a treatment group on the basis of a covariate,” Journal of Educational Statistics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  28. D. B. Rubin, “Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 34–58, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  29. J. J. Heckman, H. Ichimura, and P. E. Todd, “Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 605–654, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  30. M. Lechner, “Earnings and employment effects of continuous off-the-job training in East Germany after unification,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 74–90, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  31. M. Lechner, “An evaluation of public-sector-sponsored continuous vocational training programs in East Germany,” Journal of Human Resources, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 347–375, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  32. P. K. Bhattacharya and H.-G. Müller, “Asymptotics for nonparametric regression,” Sankhya. The Indian Journal of Statistics. Series A, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 420–441, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  33. P. K. Bhattacharya, “On an analog of regression analysis,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 34, pp. 1459–1473, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  34. J. J. Heckman and V. Hotz, “Choosing among alternative nonexperimental methods for estimating the impact of social programs: the case of manpower training,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 84, no. 408, pp. 862–874, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  35. R. H. Dehejia and S. Wahba, “Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: reevaluating the evaluation of training programs,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 94, no. 448, pp. 1053–1062, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  36. R. H. Dehejia and S. Wahba, “Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 151–161, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. J. J. Heckman, H. Ichimura, and P. Todd, “Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 261–294, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet