Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Probability and Statistics
Volume 2014, Article ID 240263, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/240263
Research Article

New Indices for Refining Multiple Choice Questions

1Department of Mathematics, Institute of Applied Mathematics in Science and Engineering, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain
2Department of Medical Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain
3Medical Education Unit, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain

Received 8 September 2014; Accepted 7 December 2014; Published 23 December 2014

Academic Editor: Chin-Shang Li

Copyright © 2014 Mariano Amo-Salas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Cangelosi, Designing Tests for Evaluating Student Achievement, Addison Wellesley, New York, NY, USA, 1990.
  2. S. M. Case and D. B. Swanson, Constructing Written Test Questions for the Basic and Clinical Sciences, National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 3rd edition, 2001.
  3. J. Palés-Argullós, “Cómo elaborar correctamente preguntas de elección múltiple?” Educación Médica, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 149–155, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. K. Farley, “The multiple-choice test: writing the questions,” Nurse Educator, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 10–12, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Kehoe, “Writing multiple-choice test items,” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, vol. 4, no. 9, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Tarrant, J. Ware, and A. M. Mohammed, “An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysis,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 9, no. 1, article 40, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Shahbazova and O. Kosheleva, “‘Fuzzy’ multiple-choice quizzes and how to grade them,” Journal of Uncertain Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 216–221, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Oosterhof, “Similarity of various item discrimination indices,” Journal of Educational Measurement, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 145–150, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  9. S.-M. Sim and R. I. Rasiah, “Relationship between item difficulty and discrimination indices in true/false-type multiple choice questions of a para-clinical multidisciplinary paper,” Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 67–71, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. L. Kelley, “The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 1939. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. A. Tristrán, “Model for computer-aided item analysis,” in Foro Nacional de Evaluación Educativa, pp. 45–68, CENEVAL, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. H. DeGroot, Probability and Statistics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 1986. View at MathSciNet
  13. J. Diamond and W. Evans, “The correction for guessing,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 43, pp. 181–191, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  14. G. M. Ruch and G. D. Stoddard, “Comparative reliabilities of five types of objective examinations,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 89–103, 1925. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. M. Ruch and M. H. Degraff, “Corrections for chance and “guess” vs. “do not guess” instructions in multiple response tests,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 368–375, 1926. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. P. Espinosa and J. Gardeazabal, “Optimal correction for guessing in multiple-choice tests,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 415–425, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus