Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Probability and Statistics
Volume 2015, Article ID 298647, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/298647
Research Article

Confidence Region Approach for Assessing Bioequivalence and Biosimilarity Accounting for Heterogeneity of Variability

School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA

Received 27 August 2015; Accepted 23 November 2015

Academic Editor: Steve Su

Copyright © 2015 Jianghao Li and Shein-Chung Chow. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. C. Chow and J. Shao, “An alternative approach for the assessment of bioequivalence between two formulations of a drug,” Biometrical Journal, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 969–976, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. H.-C. Hsu and H.-L. Lu, “On confidence limits associated with Chow and Shao's joint confidence region approach for assessment of bioequivalence,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 125–134, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. FDA, Guidance on Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administrated Drug Products—General Considerations, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Md, USA, 2003.
  4. S. C. Chow and S. K. Tse, “A related problem in bioavailability/bioequivalence studies—estimation of the intrasubject variability with a common CV,” Biometrical Journal, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 597–607, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. Y. Lee, J. Shao, S.-C. Chow, and H. Wang, “Tests for inter-subject and total variabilities under crossover designs,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 503–534, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. W. A. Morgan, “Test for the significance of the difference between the two variances in a sample from a normal bivariate population,” Biometrika, vol. 31, no. 1-2, pp. 13–19, 1939. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. E. J. G. Pitman, “A note on normal correlation,” Biometrika, vol. 31, pp. 1–12, 1939. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. S. C. Chow and J. P. Liu, Design and Analysis of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies, Chapman & Hall, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2009.