Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Probability and Statistics
Volume 2015, Article ID 581854, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/581854
Research Article

Kim and Omberg Revisited: The Duality Approach

1Department of Finance and IGIER, Bocconi University, Via Röntgen 1, 20136 Milan, Italy
2Department of Economics, University of Parma, Via Kennedy 6, 43125 Parma, Italy
3Department of Mathematical Sciences, Mathematical Finance and Econometrics, Catholic University of Milan, Via Necchi 9, 20123 Milan, Italy

Received 12 June 2015; Accepted 2 August 2015

Academic Editor: Zacharias Psaradakis

Copyright © 2015 Anna Battauz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. S. Kim and E. Omberg, “Dynamic nonmyopic portfolio behavior,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 141–161, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. C. Merton, “Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continuoustime case,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 247–257, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Kramkov and W. Schachermayer, “The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets,” The Annals of Applied Probability, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 904–950, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. D. Kramkov and W. Schachermayer, “Necessary and sufficient conditions in the problem of optimal investment in incomplete markets,” The Annals of Applied Probability, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1504–1516, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. J. Cvitanic and I. Karatzas, “Convex duality in constrained portfolio optimization,” The Annals of Applied Probability, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 767–818, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. M. B. Haugh, L. Kogan, and J. Wang, “Evaluating portfolio policies: a duality approach,” Operations Research, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 405–418, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. I. Karatzas, J. P. Lehoczky, S. P. Sethi, and S. E. Shreve, “Explicit solution of a general consumption/investment problem,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 261–294, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. I. Karatzas, J. P. Lehoczky, S. E. Shreve, and G.-L. Xu, “Martingale and duality methods for utility maximization in an incomplete market,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 702–730, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. W. Schachermayer, “Optimal investment in incomplete markets when wealth may become negative,” The Annals of Applied Probability, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 694–734, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. J. Jacod and A. Shiryaev, Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. A. S. Cherny and H.-J. Engelbert, Singular Stochastic Differential Equations, vol. 1858 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005. View at MathSciNet
  12. G. Kulinich and S. Kushnirenko, “Strong uniqueness of solutions of stochastic differential equations with jumps and non-Lipschitz random coefficients,” Modern Stochastics: Theory and Applications, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. A. Battauz, M. De Donno, and A. Sbuelz, “Reaching Nirvana with a defaultable asset?” Working Paper, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  14. I. V. Girsanov, “On transforming a certain class of stochastic processes by absolutely continuous substitution of measures,” Theory of Probability and Its Applications, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 285–301, 1960. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve, Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. F. Delbaen and H. Shirakawa, “A note on option pricing for the constant elasticity of variance model,” Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 85–99, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  17. F. Klebaner and R. Liptser, “When a stochastic exponential is a true martingale. Extension of the Beneš method,” Theory of Probability and Its Applications, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 38–62, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. V. E. Beneš, “Existence of optimal stochastic control laws,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 9, pp. 446–472, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. J. Ruf, “The martingale property in the context of stochastic differential equations,” Electronic Communications in Probability, vol. 20, no. 34, pp. 1–10, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet