Research Article

Evaluation of Four Multiple Imputation Methods for Handling Missing Binary Outcome Data in the Presence of an Interaction between a Dummy and a Continuous Variable

Table 2

Comparison of the performance of imputation methods based on the average percent bias (PB) of regression coefficients over 1000 simulations.

VariableMethodMARMCAR
10%20%30%40%50%10%20%30%40%50%

X1 (BMIreal)MCR0.0480.1010.1650.2390.2910.0560.1090.1670.2260.315
MI0.0020.0120.0250.0330.0400.0050.0160.0240.0000.039
MRF−0.025−0.048−0.056−0.077−0.103−0.018−0.034−0.052−0.079−0.079
MS−0.143−0.246−0.355−0.455−0.556−0.138−0.259−0.355−0.471−0.552
(Betotal)MCR−0.020−0.043−0.068−0.101−0.117−0.021−0.047−0.064−0.089−0.132
MI0.0020.0010.0080.0000.0160.0010.0000.0090.0160.007
MRF−0.068−0.129−0.185−0.248−0.286−0.063−0.124−0.175−0.224−0.279
MS−0.176−0.314−0.428−0.533−0.620−0.173−0.316−0.437−0.535−0.631
(PACS4)MCR−0.047−0.072−0.103−0.146−0.172−0.020−0.032−0.061−0.081−0.106
MI−0.0060.0080.0120.0160.0220.0010.0090.0100.0160.016
MRF−0.109−0.181−0.258−0.334−0.393−0.069−0.132−0.196−0.247−0.302
MS−0.235−0.368−0.472−0.556−0.622−0.172−0.312−0.433−0.527−0.623
X4 (PSPS)MCR−0.041−0.072−0.111−0.144−0.190−0.017−0.044−0.068−0.093−0.126
MI0.000−0.0030.005−0.0010.0000.0050.0040.0030.0090.010
MRF−0.104−0.188−0.259−0.335−0.401−0.065−0.134−0.196−0.254−0.312
MS−0.227−0.375−0.477−0.563−0.631−0.175−0.318−0.438−0.545−0.633
X5 (Gender)MCR0.001−0.021−0.088−0.129−0.137−0.047−0.099−0.161−0.247−0.279
MI0.0130.0270.0080.0120.068−0.0050.014−0.027−0.0100.008
MRF−0.060−0.109−0.214−0.283−0.320−0.093−0.172−0.273−0.341−0.408
MS−0.172−0.279−0.384−0.479−0.522−0.202−0.338−0.458−0.563−0.646
(BMIreal ∗ Gender)MCR−0.076−0.144−0.228−0.304−0.391−0.072−0.136−0.225−0.301−0.401
MI−0.0020.000−0.0100.006−0.0020.0020.001−0.0010.003−0.003
MRF−0.128−0.233−0.345−0.431−0.518−0.119−0.231−0.328−0.417−0.514
MS−0.236−0.406−0.533−0.629−0.716−0.231−0.399−0.534−0.631−0.722