Table of Contents
Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 960649, 11 pages
Research Article

Performance Investigation of CMM Measurement Quality Using Flick Standard

Engineering and Surface Metrology Department, National Institute for Standards (NIS), Giza 12211-136, Egypt

Received 6 May 2014; Accepted 17 June 2014; Published 17 July 2014

Academic Editor: Shey-Huei Sheu

Copyright © 2014 Salah H. R. Ali. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Buajarern, T. Somthong, S. H. R. Ali, and A. Tonmeuanwai, “Effect of step number on roundness determination using multi-step method,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 2047–2050, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. H. R. Ali, H. H. Mohamed, and M. K. Bedewy, “Identifying cylinder liner wear using precise coordinate measurements,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 19–25, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. I. Vrba, R. Palenčar, M. Hadžistević, B. Štrbac, and J. Hodolič, “The influence of the sampling strategy and the evaluation method on the cylindricity error on a coordinate measurement machine,” Journal of Production Engineering, vol. 16, no. 2, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  4. S. H. R. Ali and J. Buajarerm, “New measurement method and uncertainty estimation for plate dimensions and surface quality,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 918380, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. H. Nouira and P. Bourdet, “Evaluation of roundness error using a new method based on a small displacement screw,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 25, no. 4, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  6. International Standard Organization, ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008, Uncertainty of Measurement—Part 3: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, GUM, 1995.
  7. International Standard Organization: Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS), “Acceptance and reverification tests for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM)—Part 2: CMMs used for Measuring Size,” ISO 10360-2, 2nd ed, 2001.
  8. International Standard Organization, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Acceptance and Reverification Tests for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM)—Part 4: CMMs Used in Scanning Measuring Mode, ISO 10360-4, 2nd edition, 2000.
  9. S. H. R. Ali, “Probing system characteristics in coordinate metrology,” Measurement Science Review, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 120–129, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. S. Nielsen and M. C. Malburg, “Traceability and correlation in roundness measurement,” Precision Engineering, vol. 19, no. 2-3, pp. 175–179, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. X. Wen, Y. Xu, H. Li, F. Wang, and D. Sheng, “Monte Carlo method for the uncertainty evaluation of spatial straightness error based on new generation geometrical product specification,” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 875–881, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus