Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Robotics
Volume 2012, Article ID 542124, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/542124
Research Article

Application of On-Board Evolutionary Algorithms to Underwater Robots to Optimally Replan Missions with Energy Constraints

Defence R&D Canada, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada B2Y 3Z7

Received 16 July 2011; Revised 2 December 2011; Accepted 16 December 2011

Academic Editor: Ivo Bukovsky

Copyright © 2012 M. L. Seto. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. D. Waite, SONAR for Practising Engineers, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2002.
  2. T. Crees, C. Kaminski, J. Ferguson et al., “Preparing for UNCLOS—an historic AUV deployment in the Canadian high arctic,” in Proceedings of the Oceans / MTS Conference, p. 8, 2010.
  3. J. G. Hawley and G. T. Reader, “A knowledge-based aid for the selection of autonomous underwater Vehicle Energy Systems,” in Proceedings of the Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology (AUV '92), pp. 177–180, 1992.
  4. O. Hasvold, K. H. Johansen, and K. Vestgaard, “The alkaline aluminium hydrogen peroxide semi-fuel cell for the hugin 3000 autonomous underwater vehicle,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV '02), pp. 89–94, June 2002. View at Scopus
  5. I. Yamamoto, T. Aoki, S. Tsukioka et al., “Fuel cell system of AUV Urashima,” in Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Oceans Conference, pp. 1732–1737, November 2004. View at Scopus
  6. Z. Chang, Z. Tang, H. Cai, X. Shi, and X. Bian, “GA path planning for AUV to avoid moving obstalces based on forward looking sonar,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC '05), pp. 1498–1502, August 2005. View at Scopus
  7. H. Kawano and T. Ura, “Navigation algorithm for autonomous underwater vehicle considering cruising mission using a side scanning SONAR in disturbance,” in Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Oceans, vol. 1, pp. 403–440, November 2001. View at Scopus
  8. A. Kim and R. M. Eustice, “Toward AUV survey design for optimal coverage and localization using the Cramer Rao lower bound,” in Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Oceans Conference, pp. 1–7, Biloxi, Miss, USA, October 2009. View at Scopus
  9. A. Alvarez, A. Caiti, and R. Onken, “Evolutionary path planning for autonomous underwater vehicles in a variable ocean,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 418–429, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Kruger, R. Stolkin, A. Blum, and J. Briganti, “Optimal AUV path planning for extended missions in complex, fast-flowing estuarine environments,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '07), pp. 4265–4270, 2007.
  11. G. Yang and R. Zhang, “Path planning of AUV in turbulent ocean environments used adapted inertiaweight PSO,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Natural Computation (ICNC '09), pp. 299–302, August 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Carroll, S. McClaran, E. L. Nelson et al., “AUV path planning: an A* approach to path planning with consideration of variable vehicle speeds and multiple overlapping, time-dependent exclusion zones,” in Proceedings of the Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology (AUV '92), pp. 79–84, Washington, DC, USA, 1992.
  13. W. Hong-jian, A. Jie, B. Xin-qian, and S. Xiao-cheng, “An improved path planner based on adaptive genetic algorithm for autonomous underwater vehicle,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA '05), pp. 857–861, Niagara Falls, Canada, 2005.
  14. Z. Chang, M. Fu, Z. Tang, and H. Cai, “Autonomous mission management for an unmanned underwater vehicle,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA '05), pp. 1456–1459, August 2005. View at Scopus
  15. J. Thorliefson, T. Davies, M. Black et al., “The theseus autonomous underwater vehicle: a Canadian success story,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/MTS Oceans Conference and Exhibition, pp. 1001–1008, 1997.
  16. J. Feldman, “DTNSRDC Revised standard submarine equations of motion,” Tech. Rep. DTNSRDC/SPD-0393-09, p. 31, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. L. Seto and G. D. Watt, “Dynamics and control simulator for the THESEUS AUV,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, p. 6, Montreal, Canada, 2000.
  18. M. L. Seto, “An agent to optimally re-distribute control in an underactuated AUV,” International Journal of Intelligent Defence Support Systems, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–19, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  19. ISE Ltd., Design an Explorer, 2000.
  20. D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Boston, Mass, USA, 1989.
  21. A. Michaelewicz, Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs, AI, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  22. H. Li, A. Popa, C. Thibault, and M. Seto, “A software framework for multi-agent control of multiple autonomous underwater vehicles for underwater mine counter-measures,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Autonomous and Intelligent Systems (AIS '10), pp. 1–6, Povoa de Varzim, Portugal, June 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Brooks, “A robust layered control system for a mobile robot,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. RA-2, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus