Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Robotics
Volume 2016, Article ID 4153757, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4153757
Research Article

Motion Planning of Redundant Manipulators for Painting Uniform Thick Coating in Irregular Duct

1Department of Petroleum Supply Engineering, Logistical Engineering University, Chongqing 401331, China
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received 30 November 2015; Accepted 14 February 2016

Academic Editor: Yangmin Li

Copyright © 2016 Yan Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Liu, R. Glenn, T. J. Lawley, and F. L. Lewis, “Steward-platform-based inlet duct painting system,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 106–113, Atlanta, Ga, USA, May 1993. View at Scopus
  2. Q. Lin, C. Sha, B. Zhang et al., “The development of aircraft inlet automatic spraying equipment,” Manufacturing Automation, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 92–93, 2013 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  3. N. A. Seegmiller, J. A. Bailiff, and R. K. Franks, “Precision robotic coating application and thickness control optimization for f-35 final finishes,” SAE International Journal of Aerospace, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 284–290, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Chen, J. Shao, C. Zhang, C. Fu, and K. Chen, “Redundant-robot-based painting system for variable cross-section S-shape pipe,” in Proceedings of ASME/IFToMM International Conference on Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots, pp. 743–749, London, UK, June 2009.
  5. M. D. Prouty, Robotic Coating Thickness Measurement System, NAVAIR, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
  6. H. Hyotyniemi, “Minor moves-global results: robot trajectory planning,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International IEEE Conference on Tools for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 16–22, IEEE, Herndon, Va, USA, November 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. W. Persoons and H. Van Brussel, “CAD-based robotic coating of highly curved surfaces,” in Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, pp. 611–618, Tokyo, Japan, November 1993.
  8. T. Balkan and M. A. S. Arikan, “Modeling of paint flow rate flux for circular paint sprays by using experimental paint thickness distribution,” Mechanics Research Communications, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 609–617, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Zhang, Y. Huang, F. Gao, and W. Wang, “New model for air spray gun of robotic spray-painting,” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 226–233, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S.-H. Suh, I.-K. Woo, and S.-K. Noh, “Development of an automatic trajectory planning system (ATPS) for spray painting robots,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1948–1955, Sacramento, Calif, USA, April 1991. View at Scopus
  11. N. Asakawa and Y. Takeuchi, “Teachless spray-paintingof sculptured surface by an industrial robot,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, pp. 1875–1879, Albuquerque, NM, USA, April 1997.
  12. W. Sheng, N. Xi, M. Song, Y. Chen, and P. Macneille, “Automated CAD-guided robot path planning for spray painting of compound surfaces,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1918–1923, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, November 2000. View at Scopus
  13. H. Chen, W. Sheng, N. Xi, M. Song, and Y. Chen, “CAD-based automated robot trajectory planning for spray painting of free-form surfaces,” Industrial Robot, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 426–433, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. N. Atkar, A. Greenfield, D. C. Conner, H. Choset, and A. A. Rizzi, “Uniform coverage of automotive surface patches,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 883–898, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. S. Conkur, “Path planning using potential fields for highly redundant manipulators,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 52, no. 2-3, pp. 209–228, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. J. Yoo, K. J. Oh, Y. J. Choi, and S. C. Won, “Obstacle avoidance for redundant manipulator without information of the joint angles,” in Proceedings of the 9th Asian Control Conference (ASCC '13), pp. 1–6, Istanbul, Turkey, June 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Duguleana, F. G. Barbuceanu, A. Teirelbar, and G. Mogan, “Obstacle avoidance of redundant manipulators using neural networks based reinforcement learning,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 132–146, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Liegeois, “Automatic supervisory control of the configuration and behavior of multibody mechanisms,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 868–871, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. F. Chan and R. V. Dubey, “A weighted least-norm solution based scheme for avoiding joint limits for redundant joint manipulators,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 395–402, Atlanta, Ga, USA, May 1993. View at Scopus