Table of Contents
Journal of Radiotherapy
Volume 2014, Article ID 298904, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/298904
Research Article

Variations in Rectal Volumes and Dosimetry Values Including NTCP due to Interfractional Variability When Administering 2D-Based IG-IMRT for Prostate Cancer

1Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
2Department of Radiology, Tokyo Medical Center, National Hospital Organization, Higashigaoka 2-5-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8902, Japan

Received 11 January 2014; Revised 2 July 2014; Accepted 2 July 2014; Published 15 July 2014

Academic Editor: Carlos A. Perez

Copyright © 2014 Takashi Hanada et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. J. Zelefsky, E. J. Levin, M. Hunt et al., “Incidence of late rectal and urinary toxicities after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1124–1129, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Varadhan, S. K. Hui, S. Way, and K. Nisi, “Assessing prostate, bladder and rectal doses during image guided radiation therapy—need for plan adaptation?” Journal of applied clinical medical physics, vol. 10, article 2883, no. 3, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. L. Tucker, L. Dong, W. R. Bosch et al., “Late rectal toxicity on RTOG 94-06: analysis using a mixture lyman model,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 1253–1260, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. M. Michalski, H. Gay, A. Jackson, S. L. Tucker, and J. O. Deasy, “Radiation dose-volume effects in radiation-induced rectal injury,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. S123–S129, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Rancati, C. Fiorino, G. Gagliardi et al., “Fitting late rectal bleeding data using different NTCP models: Results from an Italian multi-centric study (AIROPROS0101),” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. R. Willoughby, P. A. Kupelian, J. Pouliot et al., “Target localization and real-time tracking using the Calypso 4D localization system in patients with localized prostate cancer,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 528–534, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Boda-Heggemann, F. M. Köhler, B. Küpper et al., “Accuracy of ultrasound-based (BAT) prostate-repositioning: a three-dimensional on-line fiducial-based assessment with cone-beam computed tomography,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1247–1255, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. A. McBain, A. M. Henry, J. Sykes et al., “X-ray volumetric imaging in image-guided radiotherapy: the new standard in on-treatment imaging,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 625–634, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Palombarini, S. Mengoli, P. Fantazzini, C. Cadioli, C. Degli Esposti, and G. P. Frezza, “Analysis of inter-fraction setup errors and organ motion by daily kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography in intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer,” Radiation Oncology, vol. 7, no. 1, article 56, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Boda-Heggemann, F. M. Köhler, H. Wertz et al., “Intrafraction motion of the prostate during an IMRT session: a fiducial-based 3D measurement with Cone-beam CT,” Radiation Oncology, vol. 3, no. 1, article 37, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Sripadam, J. Stratford, A. M. Henry, A. Jackson, C. J. Moore, and P. Price, “Rectal motion can reduce CTV coverage and increase rectal dose during prostate radiotherapy: a daily cone-beam CT study,” Radiotherapy & Oncology, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 312–317, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. A. Hatton, P. B. Greer, C. Tang et al., “Does the planning dose-volume histogram represent treatment doses in image-guided prostate radiation therapy? Assessment with cone-beam computerised tomography scans,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 162–168, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. P. Hellebust, E. Dale, A. Skjønsberg, and D. R. Olsen, “Inter fraction variations in rectum and bladder volumes and dose distributions during high dose rate brachytherapy treatment of the uterine cervix investigated by repetitive CT-examinations,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 273–280, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Takam, E. Bezak, E. E. Yeoh, and L. Marcu, “Assessment of normal tissue complications following prostate cancer irradiation: comparison of radiation treatment modalities using NTCP models,” Medical Physics, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 5126–5137, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. X. Allen Li, M. Alber, J. O. Deasy et al., “The use and QA of biologically related models for treatment planning: short report of the TG-166 of the therapy physics committee of the AAPM,” Medical Physics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1386–1409, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. H. Siewerdsen and D. A. Jaffray, “Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter,” Medical Physics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 220–231, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Yoo and F. Yin, “Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1553–1561, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Yang, E. Schreibmann, T. Li, C. Wang, and L. Xing, “Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 685–705, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Yang, J. Li, L. Chen et al., “Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 869–878, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. A. Kupelian, K. M. Langen, O. A. Zeidan et al., “Daily variations in delivered doses in patients treated with radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 876–882, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. M. Pawlowski, E. S. Yang, A. W. Malcolm, C. W. Coffey, and G. X. Ding, “Reduction of dose delivered to organs at risk in prostate cancer patients via image-guided radiation therapy,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 924–934, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Niemierko, “A generalized concept of equivalent uniform dose (EUD),” Medical Physics, vol. 26, p. 1100, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. Y. Park, J. W. Lee, J. B. Chung et al., “Radiobiological model-based bio-anatomical quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer,” Journal of Radiation Research, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 978–988, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus