Journal of Radiotherapy / 2014 / Article / Tab 3 / Research Article
Variations in Rectal Volumes and Dosimetry Values Including NTCP due to Interfractional Variability When Administering 2D-Based IG-IMRT for Prostate Cancer Table 3 Summary of differences in DVH parameters presented as relative differences. These values are relative differences represented as the median (range) defined in (
5 ) (see text).
Patient number
(Gy)
(Gy)
(Gy)
(Gy)
(Gy)1 3.2 (−0.4–3.5) 2.6 (−1.7–4.3) 2.6 (0.6–12.5) 3.9 (−1.9–6.5) 2.1 (−0.7–3.8) 2 2.9 (1.7–3.4) 4.2 (2.1–6.3) 2.2 (−0.6–6.1) 3.4 (1.2–6.9) 2.8 (1.3–3.9) 3 3.0 (2.5–3.4) 5.9 (3.1–6.4) 7.5 (2.0–11.8) 8.0 (3.7–8.9) 4.4 (2.9–4.7) 4 −3.0 (−12.5–2.4) −4.6 (−15.8–4.3) −2.0 (−6.0–5.0) −5.0 (−16.9–7.0) −3.3 (−14.2–3.5) 5 1.8 (−2.2–2.7) 3.7 (−2.6–6.3) 3.6 (−1.2–5.9) 6.6 (−3.5–10.8) 2.8 (−2.3–4.3) 6 2.4 (1.5–2.6) 4.4 (0.2–4.9) 6.1 (−0.3–9.9) 6.0 (1.6–7.9) 3.3 (1.6–3.7) 7 2.5 (−10.5–4.1) 2.8 (−14.8–6.1) 1.1 (−7.9–13.0) 2.2 (−18.4–8.3) 2.8 (−11.7–5.0) 8 0.8 (0.2–0.8) 4.4 (2.3–5.4) 7.6 (4.0–14.0) 6.2 (3.2–8.3) 1.8 (0.7–2.1) 9 1.4 (0.3–3.2) 5.6 (4.4–6.7) 5.8 (3.6–12.4) 6.6 (5.0–8.2) 2.6 (1.7–3.7) 10 0.8 (−1.5–2.1) 3.5 (−2.2–5.8) 8.4 (0.0–14.4) 4.3 (−2.7–8.1) 2.0 (−1.3–3.2) 11 1.6 (0.7–2.9) 2.1 (0.4–8.2) 0.0 (−2.6–4.5) 1.8 (−3.3–9.6) 1.9 (0.4–3.8) 12 4.2 (0.6–4.5) 6.8 (3.9–10.4) 5.4 (0.2–7.1) 6.7 (−1.5–8.4) 4.2 (−0.5–5.2) 13 0.1 (−1.4–1.6) −0.8 (−2.6–3.1) 0.4 (−5.2–1.6) −1.4 (−3.2–4.5) −0.2 (−1.5–2.1) 14 3.4 (3.2–3.4) 5.6 (5.2–5.9) 14.6 (9.9–19.2) 7.9 (6.4–8.1) 4.0 (3.5–4.1) 15 1.4 (−5.3–3.9) 0.8 (−7.7–7.1) 0.8 (−6.8–14.2) 2.7 (−10.7–11.7) 1.2 (−5.6–4.8) 16 1.3 (0.1–2.0) 2.4 (0.6–5.1) 6.3 (4.2–15.0) 2.2 (−0.8–7.8) 1.7 (0.3–2.9) 17 2.3 (0.7–3.0) 4.0 (0.3–4.9) 6.9 (−0.9–10.2) 5.9 (−0.8–7.1) 2.8 (0.6–3.6) 18 2.3 (1.3–2.4) 3.1 (1.3–3.6) 3.5 (1.8–6.1) 3.5 (1.0–4.5) 2.5 (1.1–2.9) 19 −0.7 (−4.3–2.0) −3.1 (−8.9–4.4) −3.8 (−6.0–0.3) −4.1 (−13.1–6.8) −1.6 (−5.8–3.0) 20 4.8 (3.4–6.0) 7.1 (2.7–9.2) 4.4 (−4.0–6.8) 10.9 (4.4–14.5) 5.5 (2.9–6.6)