Estradiol Supplement or Induced Hypertension May Attenuate the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonist-Promoted Renal Blood Flow Response to Graded Angiotensin II Administration in Ovariectomized Rats

Choopani, Samira; Nematbakhsh, Mehdi

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3223008

Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 3223008 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3223008

Estradiol Supplement or Induced Hypertension May Attenuate the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonist-Promoted Renal Blood Flow Response to Graded Angiotensin II Administration in Ovariectomized Rats

Samira Choopani^1,2and Mehdi Nematbakhsh²

Academic Editor: Divakar Sharma

Received12 Jan 2022

Revised05 Mar 2022

Accepted03 Jun 2022

Published01 Jul 2022

Abstract

Backgrounds. Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and hypertension may influence females’ renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and its components. The angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor (AT1R) antagonist (losartan) may promote renal blood flow (RBF), and it is widely used in the clinic to control hypertension. The main objective of this study was the effects of estradiol or induced hypertension on RBF response to Ang II in losartan-treated ovariectomized (OVX) rats. Methods. Two groups of OVX rats were treated with placebo (group 1) and estradiol (group 2) for period of four weeks, and another group of OVX rats was subjected to induce hypertension by two-kidney one clip (2K1C) model (group 3). All the groups were subjected to the surgical procedure under anesthesia, and AT1R was blocked by losartan. RBF and renal vascular resistance (RVR) responses to Ang II administration were determined and compared. Results. Mean arterial (MAP) and renal perfusion (RPP) pressures in group 3 and uterus weight (UT) in group 2 were significantly more than other groups (). Ang II infusion resulted in dose-related percentage change increase in RBF and decrease in RVR. However, these responses in the OVX-estradiol and OVX-hypertensive rats were significantly lower than in the OVX-control group (). For instance, at the dose of 1000 ng/kg/min of Ang II administration, the percentage change of RBF was , , and in the groups of 1 to 3, respectively. Conclusion. Losartan prescription in some conditions such as hypertension or ERT could worsen RBF and RVR responses to Ang II.

1. Introduction

High blood pressure is an important public health issue and the third leading cause of death in the world, and its incidence is expected to increase by 30% in 2025 [1]. In 2017, the American Heart Association (AHA) defined high blood pressure in adults as systolic mmHg and diastolic mmHg [2]. Therefore, the control of blood pressure is an important issue in maintaining community health, and the most common clinical intervention for controlling blood pressure is to alter the effect of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) components on hemodynamics parameters in blood circulation system.

RAS plays a critical role in regulating arterial blood pressure and body fluids [3]. Angiotensin II (Ang II) is one of the most potent biological products of RAS [3]. Most of the activity of Ang II on renal circulation and function is performed by its receptors distributed throughout the kidney. The two main groups of Ang II receptors are type I (AT1R) and type II (AT2R) [3]. AT1R and AT2R activations induce vasoconstriction and vasodilation, respectively [4]. Administration of exogenous Ang II via AT1R results in a dose-related reduction of renal blood flow (RBF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) [5]. Losartan is an antagonist for AT1R, and it is usually used in the clinic for hypertension controlling [6]. Although the clinical goal of losartan is to control blood pressure, the drug can potentially alter RBF [7–9], possibly by reducing renal vascular resistance (RVR). In normotensive and hypertensive animals, losartan increases RBF and induces either no change or an increase in GFR [10]. Experimental studies in the Ang II infused hypertensive rats showed that GFR was lower than normotensives one [11], which acute treatment with losartan could not fully restored it but chronic treatment with losartan prevents the decreases in GFR [11, 12]. Also, in two-kidney one clip (2K1C) Goldblatt hypertensive rats, acute administration of losartan due to the effects of severe vasodilation reduced GFR [13].

Also, it is well documented that RAS influence by sex chromosomes and gonadal hormones and exhibits sex-related differences [4, 14]. The vasodilatory effects of estrogen are mediated through various mechanisms such as nitric oxide (NO), opening of Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ channels, decrease levels of endothelin-1, Ang II, and catecholamines [14, 15]. Estrogen increases the activity of plasma renin, angiotensinogen, Ang I, and Ang II [16]. Despite the increase in RAS substrates, estrogen downregulates the AT1R and instead stimulates AT2R expression [16]. This sex hormone also increases renal ACE2 expression [16]. In female rats, the response to Ang II is mediated via AT2R [17] by an estrogen-dependent mechanism [18]. In ovariectomized (OVX) rats, AT1R expression in aortic tissue and vascular smooth muscle cells upregulated, and estrogen therapy downregulated this receptor [19]. An experimental study revealed that estrogen might shift the vasoconstrictor–vasodilator balance of the RAS [20]. Despite the conflicting evidence, the activation of Ang II–converting enzyme (ACE)/AT1R pathways may reduce by estrogen [21].

Hypertension is one of the most important causes of death and disability worldwide [22]. In hypertension, intrarenal Ang II receptors’ regulation seems to be more complex because vascular and tubular Ang II receptors respond differently [23]. 2K1C is an accepted model of Ang II-induced hypertension, while intrarenal RAS has an essential role in initiating and maintaining hypertension in the 2K1C model [24].

It is documented that administration of exogenous Ang II promotes RBF when AT1R is blocked [25, 26]. However, an important question remains unanswered. Do RBF and RVR responses to Ang II in the condition of AT1R blockade alter by hypertension or estrogen? To answer this question, we investigated the effective administration of high-dose estradiol or induction of 2K1C on renal hemodynamic responses to Ang II administration in the condition of AT1R blockade in OVX rats.

2. Material and Method

2.1. Animal

Eighteen adult female Wistar rats (7-9 weeks) were housed in an animal room with a 12 h light/dark cycle, temperature , and free access to food and water. The experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR.MUI.MED.REC.1397.327).

2.2. Study Groups

The animals were divided into three groups (6 animals in each group), and all the animals underwent surgery for ovariectomy by making a 2 cm incision in the subabdominal area. After ligation of ovarian tubes, the ovaries were removed very carefully. The muscle and skin were sutured, and the animals were placed under a heated lamp for recovery [27]. To induce hypertension in a group of rats, simultaneously with ovariectomy, a 2K1C model was applied. Accordingly, an incision was used on the right side of the abdomen, the right renal artery was isolated, and a U-shaped silver clip (lumen diameter of 0.2 mm) was placed around the renal artery to induce partial occlusion [28]. The non-2K1C (normotensive) animals also had a complete surgical intervention, just without a silver clip around the renal artery. Therefore, the groups were assigned as follows:

Group 1 (named OVX + losartan): the OVX and non-2K1C (normotensive) rats were subjected to receive sesame oil weekly as a placebo via intramuscular injections for period of four weeks

Group 2 (named OVX + Est + losartan): the OVX and non-2K1C (normotensive) rats received high-dose estradiol valerate (500 μg/kg/week, Aburaihan Co., Tehran, Iran) dissolved in sesame oil via intramuscular injections for period of four weeks [27]

Group 3 (named OVX+2K1C + losartan): the OVX rats were subjected to 2K1C and received sesame oil weekly as a placebo via intramuscular injections for period of four weeks

2.3. Experimental Procedure

After four weeks, the rats were anesthetized with urethane (1.7 g/kg⁻¹ i.p.; Merck, Germany). The trachea was cannulated to facilitate air ventilation, and polyethylene catheterization of carotid, femoral arteries, and jugular vein was performed to measure mean arterial pressure (MAP), renal perfusion pressure (RPP), and drug administration, respectively. The carotid and femoral catheters were connected to a Power Lab System (AD Instrument, Australia). An adjustable clamp was positioned around the abdominal aorta above the left renal artery to retain RPP at the control level during Ang II infusion [29].

The rats were placed in a lateral position, the left kidney was exposed, the renal artery was isolated, and an ultrasound flow probe was placed (TRANSONIC MA0.7PSB, Flow Probe, USA) around it for direct RBF measurement. The MAP, RPP, and RBF were measured continuously over the experiment. After 30 minutes and achieving a stabilization condition for the animal, AT1R antagonist (losartan) was infused via the vein catheter. The losartan was administrated at a bolus dose of 5 mg/kg followed by continuous infusion at 5 mg/kg/h. Thirty minutes after administration of antagonist, intravenous injection of Ang II at graded doses of 30, 100, 300, and 1000 ng/kg/min was infused using a microsyringe pump (New Era Pump System Inc., Farmingdale, NY, USA). Each dose was given until the response of MAP, RPP, and RBF reached a plateau (approx. 15 min). The last 3-5 minutes of each stage was used to measure MAP, RPP, and RBF. The RPP/RBF ratio was determined to express RVR. Then, the rats were sacrificed humanely, and the kidneys and uterus were weighed rapidly.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were presented as and were analyzed using the statistical software SPSS 20. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to baseline data. The effects of antagonist or vehicle treatments on basal variables were compared via repeated measures ANOVA. Post hoc analysis Tukey was used to determine specific effects within each group. MAP, RPP, RBF, and RVR responses to Ang II administration were compared via ANOVA for repeated measures. was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Measurements

In the equilibrium period (before administration of losartan), no significant differences were observed in basal MAP and RPP in normotensive groups (Figure 1), but in the hypertensive group (group 3), MAP and RPP were significantly increased, which confirmed the successful induction of hypertension in 2K1C rats. There was no significant difference in RBF normalized to left kidney weight (RBF/g LKW) and RVR normalized to LKW (RVR/g LKW) between the groups. Also, uterus weight per 100 g body weight (UT/100 g BW) was greater in estradiol-treated animals compared to vehicle-treated animals, which confirmed the effect of estradiol (Figure 1). There was also significant difference between left and right kidney weighs (LKW and RKW) per 100 g body weight in the 2K1C group () which indicates the effect of clipping on right renal artery during induction of hypertension (Figure 1). It is also indicated that estradiol administration increased the RKW significantly ().

Figure 1

The baseline data. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), renal perfusion pressure (RPP), renal blood flow (RBF) per g left kidney weight (LKW), renal vascular resistance (RVR) per g LKW, uterus weight (UT) per 100 g of body weight (BW), and left and right kidney weight per 100 g BW. The values were obtained by one-way ANOVA and Tukey as post hoc multiple comparisons. The value for comparison between LKW and RKW was obtained by paired -test. The star () indicates a significant difference from other groups ().

3.2. Effect of Antagonist

Before Ang II infusion, it is necessary to determine the antagonist effect on MAP, RPP, RBF, and RVR. Therefore, 30 min postantagonist administration was considered as a time for antagonist effect [25], and the hemodynamics parameters were determined. No significant differences were observed in percentage change of MAP, RPP, RBF, and RVR between the groups after administration of losartan (Figure 2). However, a significant decrease in MAP, RPP, and RVR () and a significant increase of RBF () from the baseline were observed by losartan. For example, in groups 1 to 3, the percentage increase of RBF was , , and , respectively, but no significant differences were detected between the groups (). These findings revealed that losartan reduced MAP, RPP, and RVR as expected. However, it increased RBF in all the three groups.

3.3. Responses to Ang II Infusion

Ang II infusion resulted in dose-related percentage change increase in RBF and decrease in RVR in all of the groups (Figure 3). In the group 1 (OVX + losartan), as the dose of the Ang II infusion increased, the RBF and RVR responses increased. However, these responses in group 2 (OVX + Est + losartan) and group 3 (OVX+2K1C + losartan) were significantly lower than group 1 (OVX + losartan) (, Figure 3). For example, at the dose of 1000 ng/kg/min of Ang II administration, the percentage change of RBF was , , and in the groups of 1 to 3, respectively (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

The study’s main objective was to determine the role of high-dose estradiol and induce hypertension on renal hemodynamic responses to Ang II infusion when AT1R was blocked by losartan in OVX rats. The results demonstrated that estradiol administration and 2K1C-induced hypertension attenuated the effect of losartan on RBF and RVR responses to Ang II infusion in female OVX rats.

In the present study, we observed that RBF response to Ang II infusion in group 2 (OVX + Est + losartan) was different from group 1 (OVX + losartan) due to the role of estrogen. This issue has been proven that the dose of estradiol is an important factor affecting RAS components. In physiological doses, estrogen through different signaling pathways causes vasorelaxation [30], but in this study, we used supraphysiological dose of estradiol. Laragh et al. have shown that high levels of estrogen during pregnancy or the use of oral contraceptives stimulate RAS, and it may lead to a significant increase in plasma renin level [31] followed by Ang II formation. Safari et al. reported that administration of high-dose estradiol in normotensive ovariectomized rats increases RBF and RVR responses to Ang II infusion [27], and this response was not remained when AT2R were acutely blocked with PD123319, while physiological levels of estrogen might promote the vasodilator actions of AT2R activation in the renal vasculature. So maybe supraphysiological levels of estrogen are also able to promote the vasoconstrictor actions of AT2R with an unknown mechanism. Many studies have shown that AT2R-mediated vasoconstriction has been observed under a variety of conditions, such as in the mesenteric vasculature of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) in vitro [32], the rat hydronephrotic kidney [33], the kidneys of rats with heart failure [34], and the renal medullary circulation of both normal rats and rabbits [35] and rats with renovascular hypertension [36].

Another finding of the present study was that in group 3 (OVX+2K1C + losartan), RBF response to Ang II infusion was more than group 1 (OVX + losartan). Many experimental studies have shown that hypertension affects RAS components [24, 37, 38]. For example, Kim et al. showed that AT1R expression decreased slowly in both kidneys in the 2K1C model [24]. AT1R protein also was reduced in both kidneys in 2K1C hypertensive rats and Ang II-induced hypertensive rats [38]. AT1R binding was decreased in the glomeruli and the inner stripe of the outer medulla in Ang II-induced hypertensive rats, but AT1R density is maintained in the proximal tubules along with increased ACE binding [39]. Also, glomerular AT1R diminished at two weeks after clipping, but those vascular receptors did not reduce until 16 weeks in 2K1C rats [40]. So, it could be that more AT1R expression in the normotensive group than the 2K1C group causes RBF to be more in this group than the hypertensive group after losartan administration.

Another issue that might be discussed is the decreased ACE2 expression in hypertensive rats. Experimental studies proved MasR expressions remain unchanged in hypertensive rats [41] or downregulated in kidneys of SHRs [42]. ACE2 is the primary enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of Ang II to Ang 1-7, and it is reduced in spontaneous hypertensive rats (SHR) model compared with Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats [43]. Crackower et al. showed that ACE2 was decreased in kidneys from three separate hypertensive rat strains: salt-sensitive sabra hypertensive rats (SBH/y), SHR, and stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR-SP) [44]. Prieto et al. demonstrated ACE2 mRNA levels, and its activity reduced in both kidneys of Goldblatt hypertensive rats [45]. In OVX renal-wrap rats, ACE2 activity reduced, but estrogen therapy improves ACE2 activity and protein expression [46]. Ang II also reduces the expression of ACE2 in the heart, kidneys, and astrocytes [47–49]. On the other hand, the decrease of ACE2 expression exacerbates hypertension [46]. Accordingly, decrease activation of ACE2/MasR pathway also is another reason that affects RBF response to Ang II in the OVX+2K1C + losartan group.

Finally, we had some limitation in this study. We did not investigate the expression of the receptors and the dosage of ACE. Having this information may provide a more comprehensive interpretation of the results.

5. Conclusion

Hypertension and female sex hormones influenced RAS components. Administration of losartan increases RBF, but 2K1C induced hypertension possibly by a decrease of AT1R expression, as well as, reduce activation of ACE2/MasR pathway, and supraphysiological doses of estrogen to promote the vasoconstrictor actions of AT2R with an unknown mechanism could increase RBF and RVR responses to Ang II infusion.

Data Availability

Data will be available by request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (Grant # 397495).

References

P. K. Whelton, “Epidemiology of hypertension,” Lancet (London, England), vol. 344, no. 8915, pp. 101–106, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. K. Whelton, R. M. Carey, W. S. Aronow et al., “2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 71, no. 19, pp. e127–e248, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kobori, M. Nangaku, L. G. Navar, and A. Nishiyama, “The intrarenal renin-angiotensin system: from physiology to the pathobiology of hypertension and kidney disease,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 251–287, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Sullivan, “Sex and the renin-angiotensin system: inequality between the sexes in response to RAS stimulation and inhibition,” American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 294, no. 4, pp. R1220–R1226, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Paul, A. Poyan Mehr, and R. Kreutz, “Physiology of local renin-angiotensin systems,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 747–803, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Willenheimer, B. Dahlöf, E. Rydberg, and L. Erhardt, “AT1-receptor blockers in hypertension and heart failure: clinical experience and future directions,” European Heart Journal, vol. 20, no. 14, pp. 997–1008, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Franzén and R. Frithiof, “Pre-treatment with the angiotensin receptor 1 blocker losartan protects renal blood flow and oxygen delivery after propofol-induced hypotension in pigs,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ullman, S. Eriksson, and M. Rundgren, “Losartan increases renal blood flow during isoflurane anesthesia in sheep,” Acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1168–1175, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ullman, S. Eriksson, and M. Rundgren, “Effects of losartan, prazosin and a vasopressin V1-receptor antagonist on renal and femoral blood flow in conscious sheep,” Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 99–104, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Zhuo, D. Thomas, P. Harris, and S. Skinner, “The role of endogenous angiotensin II in the regulation of renal haemodynamics and proximal fluid reabsorption in the rat,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 453, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-T. Wang, S. Y. Chin, and L. G. Navar, “Impairment of pressure-natriuresis and renal autoregulation in ANG II-infused hypertensive rats,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 279, no. 2, pp. F319–F325, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-T. Wang, L.-X. Zou, and L. G. Navar, “Renal responses to AT1 blockade in angiotensin II-induced hypertensive rats,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 535–542, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Braam, L. G. Navar, and K. D. Mitchell, “Modulation of tubuloglomerular feedback by angiotensin II type 1 receptors during the development of Goldblatt hypertension,” Hypertension, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1232–1237, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. K. Dubey, S. Oparil, B. Imthurn, and E. K. Jackson, “Sex hormones and hypertension,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 688–708, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Mendelsohn and R. H. Karas, “The protective effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system,” New England journal of medicine, vol. 340, no. 23, pp. 1801–1811, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Hilliard, A. K. Sampson, R. D. Brown, and K. M. Denton, “The “his and hers” of the renin-angiotensin system,” Current hypertension reports, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Sampson, K. M. Moritz, E. S. Jones, R. L. Flower, R. E. Widdop, and K. M. Denton, “Enhanced angiotensin II type 2 receptor mechanisms mediate decreases in arterial pressure attributable to chronic low-dose angiotensin II in female rats,” Hypertension, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 666–671, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Sampson, L. M. Hilliard, K. M. Moritz et al., “The arterial depressor response to chronic low-dose angiotensin II infusion in female rats is estrogen dependent,” American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 302, no. 1, pp. R159–R165, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Nickenig, A. T. Bäumer, C. Grohè et al., “Estrogen modulates AT1 receptor gene expression in vitro and in vivo,” Circulation, vol. 97, no. 22, pp. 2197–2201, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. B. Brosnihan, P. Li, D. Ganten, and C. M. Ferrario, “Estrogen protects transgenic hypertensive rats by shifting the vasoconstrictor-vasodilator balance of RAS,” American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 273, no. 6, pp. R1908–R1915, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fischer, A. Baessler, and H. Schunkert, “Renin angiotensin system and gender differences in the cardiovascular system,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 672–677, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Daugherty, J. D. Powers, D. J. Magid et al., “Incidence and prognosis of resistant hypertension in hypertensive patients,” Circulation, vol. 125, no. 13, pp. 1635–1642, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. G. Navar, L. M. Harrison-Bernard, A. Nishiyama, and H. Kobori, “Regulation of intrarenal angiotensin II in hypertension,” Hypertension, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 316–322, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. G. Kim, S. H. Lee, S.-Y. Kim et al., “Sequential activation of the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system in the progression of hypertensive nephropathy in Goldblatt rats,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 311, no. 1, pp. F195–F206, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Pezeshki and M. Nematbakhsh, “Sex differences in the renal vascular responses of AT1 and Mas receptors in two-kidney-one-clip hypertension,” International Journal of Hypertension, vol. 2021, 8 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Bądzyńska, M. Grzelec‐Mojzesowicz, L. Dobrowolski, and J. Sadowski, “Differential effect of angiotensin II on blood circulation in the renal medulla and cortex of anaesthetised rats,” The Journal of physiology, vol. 538, no. 1, pp. 159–166, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Safari, M. Nematbakhsh, R. G. Evans, and K. M. Denton, “High-dose estradiol-replacement therapy enhances the renal vascular response to angiotensin II via an AT2-receptor dependent mechanism,” Advances in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 2015, 7 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Choopani and M. Nematbakhsh, “Renal vascular response to angiotensin II administration in two kidneys-one clip hypertensive rats treated with high dose of estradiol: the role of Mas receptor,” International Journal of Vascular Medicine, vol. 2021, 8 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Dehghani, S. Saberi, and M. Nematbakhsh, “Role of Mas receptor antagonist A799 in renal blood flow response to Ang 1-7 after bradykinin administration in ovariectomized estradiol-treated rats,” Advances in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 2015, 9 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fardoun, H. Dehaini, A. Shaito et al., “The hypertensive potential of estrogen: an untold story,” Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 124, article ???, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Laragh, M. Newton, J. Sealey, and J. Ledingham, “Oral Contraceptives and High Blood Pressure: Changes in Plasma Renin, Renin Substrate and Aldosterone Excretion,” Metabolic Effects of Gonadal Hormones and Contraceptive Steroids, Springer, pp. 405–421, 1969.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Touyz, D. Endemann, G. He, J.-S. Li, and E. L. Schiffrin, “Role of AT₂ receptors in angiotensin II–stimulated contraction of small mesenteric arteries in young SHR,” Hypertension, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 366–372, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Hayashi, H. Suzuki, and T. Saruta, “Segmental differences in angiotensin receptor subtypes in interlobular artery of hydronephrotic rat kidneys,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 265, no. 6, pp. F881–F885, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. F. Mento, M. E. Maita, and B. M. Wilkes, “Renal hemodynamics in rats with myocardial infarction: selective antagonism of angiotensin receptor subtypes,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 271, no. 6, pp. H2306–H2312, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Duke, G. A. Eppel, R. E. Widdop, and R. G. Evans, “Disparate roles of AT₂ receptors in the renal cortical and medullary circulations of anesthetized rabbits,” Hypertension, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 200–205, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Duke, R. E. Widdop, M. M. Kett, and R. G. Evans, “AT₂ receptors mediate tonic renal medullary vasoconstriction in renovascular hypertension,” British journal of pharmacology, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 486–492, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Lee, Y. H. Lee, S. W. Jung et al., “Sex-related differences in the intratubular renin-angiotensin system in two-kidney, one-clip hypertensive rats,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 317, no. 3, pp. F670–F682, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z.-Q. Wang, L. J. Millatt, N. T. Heiderstadt, H. M. Siragy, R. A. Johns, and R. M. Carey, “Differential regulation of renal angiotensin subtype AT_1A and AT₂ receptor protein in rats with angiotensin-dependent hypertension,” Hypertension, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 96–101, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Harrison-Bernard, J. Zhuo, H. Kobori, M. Ohishi, and L. G. Navar, “Intrarenal AT₁ receptor and ACE binding in ANG II-induced hypertensive rats,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 282, no. 1, pp. F19–F25, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Amiri and R. Garcia, “Renal angiotensin II receptor regulation in two-kidney, one clip hypertensive rats: effect of ACE inhibition,” Hypertension, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 337–344, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Meng, W. Zhao, T. Zhao et al., “Autocrine and paracrine function of angiotensin 1–7 in tissue repair during hypertension,” American journal of hypertension, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 775–782, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Klimas, M. Olvedy, K. Ochodnicka-Mackovicova et al., “Perinatally administered losartan augments renal ACE2 expression but not cardiac or renal Mas receptor in spontaneously hypertensive rats,” Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1965–1974, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-C. Zhong, D.-Y. Huang, Y.-M. Yang et al., “Upregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 by all-trans retinoic acid in spontaneously hypertensive rats,” Hypertension, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 907–912, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Crackower, R. Sarao, G. Y. Oudit et al., “Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is an essential regulator of heart function,” Nature, vol. 417, no. 6891, pp. 822–828, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Prieto, R. A. González-Villalobos, F. T. Botros et al., “Reciprocal changes in renal ACE/ANG II and ACE2/ANG 1–7 are associated with enhanced collecting duct renin in Goldblatt hypertensive rats,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 300, no. 3, pp. F749–F755, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ji, S. Menini, W. Zheng, C. Pesce, X. Wu, and K. Sandberg, “Role of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and angiotensin(1-7) in 17β-oestradiol regulation of renal pathology in renal wrap hypertension in rats,” Experimental physiology, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 648–657, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Ferrario, J. Jessup, M. C. Chappell et al., “Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiac angiotensin-converting enzyme 2,” Circulation, vol. 111, no. 20, pp. 2605–2610, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Ferrario, J. Jessup, P. E. Gallagher et al., “Effects of renin-angiotensin system blockade on renal angiotensin-(1-7) forming enzymes and receptors,” Kidney international, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 2189–2196, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. E. Gallagher, M. C. Chappell, C. M. Ferrario, and E. A. Tallant, “Distinct roles for ANG II and ANG-(1–7) in the regulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in rat astrocytes,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 290, no. 2, pp. C420–C426, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Samira Choopani and Mehdi Nematbakhsh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

590

Downloads

650

Citations