Computational Study on the Aerodynamic Performance of Wind Turbine Airfoil Fitted with Coandă Jet

<table>Comparison for validation of S809 airfoil of CFD computational results using COMSOL <svg height="13.55" id="M97" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 9.8000002 13.55" width="9.8000002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.625,12.725)"><path d="M480 416q0 -21 -18 -41q-9 -11 -17 -7q-20 9 -42 9q-62 0 -140 -78q23 -69 88 -192q17 -31 27 -42t20 -11q16 0 62 46l17 -20q-64 -92 -119 -92q-35 0 -70 66q-41 73 -84 187q-36 -30 -62 -61q-27 -115 -35 -172q-41 -8 -78 -20l-6 6l140 612q7 28 0.5 34t-37.5 7l-34 1
l5 26q38 4 74 13.5t57 17t25 7.5q12 0 4 -32l-104 -443h2q35 38 97 93q39 35 65.5 56t62 41.5t58.5 20.5q19 0 30.5 -10t11.5 -22z" id="x1D458"></path></g>
</svg>-<svg height="9.0625" id="M98" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 8.2124996 9.0625" width="8.2124996" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.625,8.238)"><path d="M387 375q0 -16 -17 -31t-29 -15q-9 0 -12 13q-13 74 -80 74q-36 0 -61 -24.5t-25 -56.5t24 -51.5t68 -19.5q33 0 47 2l2 -7l-32 -42q-20 2 -54 2q-45 0 -74 -21.5t-29 -60.5q0 -41 28 -65.5t73 -24.5q78 0 145 67l17 -23q-33 -47 -84.5 -75t-111.5 -28q-70 0 -114.5 35.5
t-44.5 92.5q0 46 38 78t95 45v2q-35 10 -54.5 33t-19.5 52q0 55 53 88.5t122 33.5q67 0 98.5 -23.5t31.5 -49.5z" id="x1D700"></path></g>
</svg> turbulence model and experimental values from Somers [<a href="/journals/jre/2013/839319/#B57">50</a>] at <svg height="12.5" id="M99" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 68.337502 12.5" width="68.337502" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.625,11.675)"><path d="M631 18l-4 -26q-24 0 -35 1q-57 3 -92.5 23t-69.5 68q-21 30 -101 160q-13 22 -30.5 31t-54.5 9h-32v-159q0 -63 14 -77.5t74 -19.5v-28h-262v28q62 5 76 19.5t14 77.5v402q0 62 -13 76t-73 19v28h248q109 0 159 -34q67 -42 67 -131q0 -115 -127 -172q27 -52 89 -144
q49 -71 81 -104q31 -36 72 -47zM212 316h48q73 0 108 29q55 42 55 124q0 76 -42 112t-104 36q-41 0 -54 -10q-11 -7 -11 -44v-247z" id="x52"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,11.181,11.675)"><path d="M380 106l15 -22q-42 -52 -87 -74t-76 -22q-89 0 -142 62t-53 151q0 103 66 175q67 73 146 73h1q61 0 105.5 -46.5t44.5 -105.5q0 -16 -4.5 -22.5t-18.5 -9.5q-54 -10 -262 -17q1 -95 46 -143.5t104 -48.5q61 0 115 50zM225 412q-35 0 -64.5 -32.5t-40.5 -90.5q83 0 170 3
q14 0 19 4.5t5 15.5q1 41 -23.5 70.5t-65.5 29.5z" id="x65"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,25.953,11.675)"><path d="M535 323h-483v50h483v-50zM535 138h-483v50h483v-50z" id="x3D"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,40.657,11.675)"><path d="M384 0h-275v27q67 5 81.5 18.5t14.5 68.5v385q0 38 -7.5 47.5t-40.5 10.5l-48 2v24q85 15 178 52v-521q0 -55 14.5 -68.5t82.5 -18.5v-27z" id="x31"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,48.816,11.675)"><path d="M609 650l-19 -162l-30 -2q2 69 -14 94q-9 18 -28.5 26t-74.5 8h-88q-30 0 -37 -6.5t-12 -36.5l-41 -212h103q48 0 69 5.5t32 19t26 50.5h29l-40 -198h-30q2 58 -11.5 70.5t-85.5 12.5h-99l-30 -167q-17 -87 3 -101q18 -15 111 -15q59 0 89 7t54 27q8 7 15.5 16t16 21.5
l14 20.5t15 23.5t13.5 21.5l29 -10q-52 -129 -71 -163h-500l6 28q66 4 83 17.5t28 73.5l77 409q11 61 -0.5 75.5t-78.5 18.5l10 28h467z" id="x1D438"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,59.56,11.675)"><path d="M137 343l67 33q37 17 63 17q79 0 129.5 -53t50.5 -131q0 -92 -58 -156.5t-147 -64.5t-147 68t-58 182q0 63 17 119t43 95.5t61.5 72t69 52t67.5 31.5q62 22 128 33l6 -32q-56 -11 -108 -35q-149 -71 -184 -231zM227 337q-47 0 -95 -27q-6 -23 -6 -70q0 -93 36 -155.5
t96 -62.5q53 0 78 45.5t25 105.5q0 68 -35 116t-99 48z" id="x36"></path></g>
</svg>; (a) lift coefficient; (b) drag coefficient.</table>

Journal of Renewable Energy

fig6

Figure 6

Figure 6: Computational Study on the Aerodynamic Performance of Wind Turbine Airfoil Fitted with Coandă Jet 