Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Renewable Energy
Volume 2014, Article ID 506216, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/506216
Research Article

Material Selection for Dye Sensitized Solar Cells Using Multiple Attribute Decision Making Approach

School of Applied Sciences, Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Dwarka, New Delhi 110078, India

Received 8 August 2014; Revised 22 November 2014; Accepted 24 November 2014; Published 9 December 2014

Academic Editor: Jing Shi

Copyright © 2014 Sarita Baghel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. S. Sun and N. S. Sariciftci, Organic Photovoltaics : Mechanisms, Materials, and Devices (Optical Engineering), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2005.
  2. M. K. Siddiki, J. Li, D. Galipeau, and Q. Qiao, “A review of polymer multijunction solar cells,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 867–883, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. Xu and Q. Qiao, “Conjugated polymer-inorganic semiconductor hybrid solar cells,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 2700–2720, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Jenks and R. Gilmore, “Material selection for the quantum dot intermediate band solar cell,” in Quantum Dot Solar Cells, vol. 15 of Lecture Notes in Nanoscale Science and Technology, pp. 135–166, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  5. H. Paul, C. David, and B. P. Rand, “Strategies for increasing the efficiency of heterojunction organic solar cells: material selection and device architecture,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1740–1747, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. B. Sebitosi, “Phase change material selection for small scale solar energy storage system,” Rwanda Journal C: Mathematical Sciences, Engineering and Technology, vol. 23, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  7. C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Application Survey, vol. 186 of Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1981. View at MathSciNet
  8. P. Sen and J. B. Yang, Multiple Criteria Decision Support in Engineering Design, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  9. A. S. Milani, A. Shanian, R. Madoliat, and J. A. Nemes, “The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 312–318, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. C. Wang, J. L. Liang, and C. Y. Ho, “Multi-criteria decision analysis by using fuzzy VIKOR,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, pp. 25–27, 2006.
  11. S. Opricovic and G.-H. Tzeng, “Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 514–529, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Datta and S. Mahapatra, “Comparative study on application of utility concept and VIKOR method, for vendor selection,” in Proceedings of the AIMS International Conference on Value-Based Management, 2010.
  13. J. R. San Cristóbal, “Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in spain: the Vikor method,” Renewable Energy, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 498–502, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. V. Rao, “A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method,” Materials and Design, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1949–1954, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Shanian and O. Savadogo, “A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision making,” Materials and Design, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 329–337, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Shanian and O. Savadogo, “A non-compensatory compromised solution for material selection of bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) using ELECTRE IV,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 51, no. 25, pp. 5307–5315, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, “Material selection using preferential ranking methods,” Materials & Design, vol. 35, pp. 384–393, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Chatterjee, V. M. Athawale, and S. Chakraborty, “Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods,” Materials and Design, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 4043–4053, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. Chatterjee, V. M. Athawale, and S. Chakraborty, “Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods,” Materials and Design, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 851–860, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. R. Maity, P. Chatterjee, and S. Chakraborty, “Cutting tool material selection using grey complex proportional assessment method,” Materials & Design, vol. 36, pp. 372–378, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. R. V. Rao, “A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 431, pp. 48–55, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  22. K. Maniya and M. G. Bhatt, “A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: preference selection index method,” Materials and Design, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1785–1789, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Jahan, M. Y. Ismail, F. Mustapha, and S. M. Sapuan, “Material selection based on ordinal data,” Materials and Design, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 3180–3187, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Gupta, “Material selection for thin-film solar cells using multiple attribute decision making approach,” Materials & Design, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1667–1671, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Jahan, M. Y. Ismail, S. M. Sapuan, and F. Mustapha, “Material screening and choosing methods—a review,” Materials & Design, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 696–705, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. F. Pichot and B. A. Gregg, “The photovoltage -determining mechanism in dye-sensitized solar cells,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 6–10, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. Yanagida, T. Kitamura, and Y. Wada, “Control of charge transfer and interface structures in nano-structured dye-sensitized solar cell,” in Nanotechnology and Nano-Interface Controlled Electronic Devices, pp. 83–104, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  28. M. Nanu, J. Schoonman, and A. Goossens, “Solar-energy conversion in TiO2/CuInS2 nanocomposites,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 95–100, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. Katoh, A. Furube, T. Yoshihara et al., “Efficiencies of electron injection from excited n3 dye into nanocrystalline semiconductor (ZrO2, TiO2, ZnO, Nb2O5, SnO2, In2O3) films,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 15, pp. 4818–4822, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. B. Asbury, E. Hao, Y. Wang, H. N. Ghosh, and T. Lian, “Ultrafast electron transfer dynamics from molecular adsorbates to semiconductor nanocrystalline thin films,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 105, no. 20, pp. 4545–4557, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. W. Fessenden and P. V. Kamat, “Rate constants for charge injection from excited sensitizer into SnO2, ZnO, and TiO2 semiconductor nanocrystallites,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 99, no. 34, pp. 12902–12906, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Y. Fukai, Y. Kondo, S. Mori, and E. Suzuki, “Highly efficient dye-sensitized SnO2 solar cells having sufficient electron diffusion length,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1439–1443, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. Shanian and O. Savadogo, “TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 1095–1104, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. V. Rao and J. P. Davim, “A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 35, no. 7-8, pp. 751–760, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Chauhan and R. Vaish, “Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach,” Materials and Design, vol. 36, pp. 1–5, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Application Survey, Springer, Berlin , Germany, 1981. View at MathSciNet
  37. J. Nowotny, “Titanium dioxide-based semiconductors for solar-driven environmentally friendly applications: Impact of point defects on performance,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 565–572, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. D. E. Scaife, “Oxide semiconductors in photoelectrochemical conversion of solar energy,” Solar Energy, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 41–54, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Furube, M. Murai, S. Watanabe, K. Hara, R. Katoh, and M. Tachiya, “Near-IR transient absorption study on ultrafast electron-injection dynamics from a Ru-complex dye into nanocrystalline In2O3 thin films: comparison with SnO2, ZnO, and TiO2 films,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 182, no. 3, pp. 273–279, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. V. M. Aroutiounian, V. M. Arakelyan, and G. E. Shahnazaryan, “Investigations of the metal-oxide semiconductors promising for photoelectrochemical conversion of solar energy,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 89, no. 2-3, pp. 153–163, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. D. C. Look, D. C. Reynolds, J. R. Sizelove et al., “Electrical properties of bulk ZnO,” Solid State Communications, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 399–401, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Z. M. Jarzebski and J. P. Marton, “Physical properties of SnO2 materials II. Electrical properties,” Journal of the Electrochemistry Society, vol. 123, pp. 299C–310C, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  43. D. Jousse, C. Constantino, and I. Chambouleyron, “Highly conductive and transparent amorphous tin oxide,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 431–434, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. E. Shanthi, V. Dutta, A. Banerjee, and K. L. Chopra, “Electrical and optical properties of undoped and antimony-doped tin oxide films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 6243–6251, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. X. Ai, N. A. Andersen, J. Guo, and T. Lian, “Electron injection dynamics of Ru polypyridyl complexes on SnO2 nanocrystalline thin films,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 15, pp. 7088–7094, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. B. Enright and D. Fitzmaurice, “Spectroscopic determination of electron and hole effective masses in a nanocrystalline semiconductor film,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 1027–1035, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. Robertson, “Electronic structure of SnO2, GeO2, PbO2, TeO2 and MgF2,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 4767–4776, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. Tiwana, P. Docampo, M. B. Johnston, H. J. Snaith, and L. M. Herz, “Electron mobility and injection dynamics in mesoporous ZnO, SnO2, and TiO2 films used in dye-sensitized solar cells,” ACS Nano, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 5158–5166, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. K. Nazeeruddin, F. de Angelis, S. Fantacci et al., “Combined experimental and DFT-TDDFT computational study of photoelectrochemical cell ruthenium sensitizers,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 48, pp. 16835–16847, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. F. Gao, Y. Wang, D. Shi et al., “Enhance the optical absorptivity of nanocrystalline TiO2 film with high molar extinction coefficient ruthenium sensitizers for high performance dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 32, pp. 10720–10728, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. C.-Y. Chen, M. Wang, J.-Y. Li et al., “Highly efficient light-harvesting ruthenium sensitizer for thin-film dye-sensitized solar cells,” ACS Nano, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 3103–3109, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. Y. Chiba, A. Islam, Y. Watanabe, R. Komiya, N. Koide, and L. Han, “Dye-sensitized solar cells with conversion efficiency of 11.1%,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 2: Letters, vol. 45, no. 24–28, pp. L638–L640, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. Q. Zhang, C. S. Dandeneau, X. Zhou, and C. Cao, “ZnO nanostructures for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Advanced Materials, vol. 21, no. 41, pp. 4087–4108, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. K. Keis, E. Magnusson, H. Lindström, S.-E. Lindquist, and A. Hagfeldt, “A 5% efficient photoelectrochemical solar cell based on nanostructured ZnO electrodes,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. W. J. Lee, A. Suzuki, K. Imaeda, H. Okada, A. Wakahara, and A. Yoshida, “Fabrication and characterization of eosin-Y-sensitized ZnO solar cell,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 43, no. 1, part 1, pp. 152–155, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. Q. Zhang, T. P. Chou, B. Russo, S. A. Jenekhe, and G. Cao, “Aggregation of ZnO nanocrystallites for high conversion efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 47, no. 13, pp. 2402–2406, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. N. M. Green, E. Palomares, S. A. Haque, J. M. Kroon, and J. R. Durrant, “Charge transport versus recombination in dye-sensitized solar cells employing nanocrystalline TiO2 and SnO2 films,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 25, pp. 12525–12533, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. N.-G. Park, M. G. Kang, K. M. Kim et al., “Morphological and photoelectrochemical characterization of core-shell nanoparticle films for dye-sensitized solar cells: Zn-O type shell on SnO2 and TiO2 cores,” Langmuir, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 4246–4253, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. C. Prasittichai and J. T. Hupp, “Surface modification of SnO2 photoelectrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells: Significant improvements in photovoltage via Al2O3 atomic layer deposition,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 1611–1615, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. J. B. Xia, F. Y. Li, S. M. Yang, and C. H. Huang, “Composite electrode SnO2/TiO2 for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Chinese Chemical Letters, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 619–622, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. Z. M. Jarzebski and J. P. Marton, “Physical properties of SnO2 materials,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 123, pp. 299C–310C, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  62. M. S. Arnold, P. Avouris, Z. W. Pan, and Z. L. Wang, “Field-effect transistors based on single semiconducting oxide nanobelts,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 659–663, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. E. Hendry, M. Koeberg, B. O'Regan, and M. Bonn, “Local field effects on electron transport in nanostructured TiO2 revealed by terahertz spectroscopy,” Nano Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 755–759, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. A. Kay and M. Grätzel, “Dye-sensitized core-shell nanocrystals: improved efficiency of mesoporous tin oxide electrodes coated with a thin layer of an insulating oxide,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 2930–2935, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. M. K. I. Senevirathna, P. K. D. D. P. Pitigala, E. V. A. Premalal, K. Tennakone, G. R. A. Kumara, and A. Konno, “Stability of the SnO2/MgO dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical solar cell,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 544–547, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. D. Niinobe, Y. Makari, T. Kitamura, Y. Wada, and S. Yanagida, “Origin of enhancement in open-circuit voltage by adding ZnO to nanocrystalline SnO2 in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 38, pp. 17892–17900, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus