Research Article

Evaluation of a Reduced Cost Active NDVI Sensor for Crop Nutrient Management

Table 2

Analysis of variance evaluating sensors and person operating sensors, Ciudad Obregon, Mexico, 2011.

Plot21132114221322142313231424132414
NDVINDVINDVINDVINDVINDVINDVINDVI

Source of variationdfMean square errors

Operator10.000310.000010.000120.000010.000040.00216*0.000030.00005
Sensor10.000990.001280.000940.000000.000070.00200*0.000340.00043
Person*sensor10.00261**0.000000.000740.000290.000420.000020.001080.00145*
Residual error80.000110.000390.000200.000260.000080.000290.000210.00022

SED 0.0090.0160.0360.0130.0070.0140.0120.012
C.V.1.73.22.42.81.33.12.72.5
0.8110.2930.5350.1250.4430.6450.4620.520

Treatment means

Person 1 PS#200.6680.6000.6080.5740.6820.5550.5350.608
Person 2 PS#200.6290.5970.5860.5830.6730.5790.5190.590
Person PS#320.6210.6200.5750.5850.6750.5270.5260.574
Person 2 PS#320.6400.6180.5840.5740.6900.5560.5490.600

*Is significant at the alpha = 0.05 level.
**Is significant at the alpha = 0.01 level.
PS: pocket sensor.
SED: Standard error of the difference between two equally replicated means.
C.V.: coefficient of variation.