Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Sensors
Volume 2015, Article ID 236474, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/236474
Research Article

Quantitative Assessment of ADL: A Pilot Study of Upper Extremity Reaching Tasks

1School of Engineering, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia
2Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
3School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia
4Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia

Received 1 March 2015; Accepted 26 May 2015

Academic Editor: Fanli Meng

Copyright © 2015 Saiyi Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. J. Adams, M. D. Lichter, E. T. Krepkovich, A. Ellington, M. White, and P. T. Diamond, “Assessing upper extremity motor function in practice of virtual activities of daily living,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 287–296, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. Q. Zhang, M. Karunanithi, D. Bradford, and Y. van Kasteren, “Activity of Daily Living assessment through wireless sensor data,” in Proceedings of the 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC ’14), pp. 1752–1755, Chicago, Ill, USA, August 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. H. Gokalp and M. Clarke, “Monitoring activities of daily living of the elderly and the potential for its use in telecare and telehealth: a review,” Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 910–923, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Hadjidj, M. Souil, A. Bouabdallah, Y. Challal, and H. Owen, “Wireless sensor networks for rehabilitation applications: challenges and opportunities,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Nyberg, L. Lundin-Olsson, B. Sondell et al., “Using a virtual reality system to study balance and walking in a virtual outdoor environment: a pilot study,” Cyberpsychology & Behavior, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 388–395, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Piron, A. Turolla, P. Tonin, F. Piccione, L. Lain, and M. Dam, “Satisfaction with care in post-stroke patients undergoing a telerehabilitation programme at home,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 257–260, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Desrosiers, R. Hébert, E. Dutil, G. Bravo, and L. Mercier, “Validity of the TEMPA: a measurement instrument for upper extremity performance,” The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 267–281, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. S. Dowrick, B. J. Gabbe, O. D. Williamson, and P. A. Cameron, “Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review,” Injury, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 468–476, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. P. Martin, R. Engelberg, J. Agel, D. Snapp, and M. F. Swiontkowski, “Development of a musculoskeletal extremity health status instrument: the musculoskeletal function assessment instrument,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 173–181, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. F. Swiontkowski, R. Engelberg, D. P. Martin, and J. Agel, “Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—American Volume, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 1245–1260, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. L. Hudak, P. C. Amadio, C. Bombardier et al., “Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the dash (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head),” The American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 602–608, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  12. R. E. Burke, S. Fahn, C. D. Marsden, S. B. Bressman, C. Moskowitz, and J. Friedman, “Validity and reliability of a rating scale for the primary torsion dystonias,” Neurology, vol. 35, no. 1, p. 73, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. “Sixteenth annual symposia on etiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of Parkinson’s disease and other movement disorders: program,” Movement Disorders, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1103–1114, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. “Fourth international dystonia symposium,” Movement Disorders, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1115–1142, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Albanese, F. D. Sorbo, C. Comella et al., “Dystonia rating scales: critique and recommendations,” Movement Disorders, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 874–883, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. V. Peto, C. Jenkinson, R. Fitzpatrick, and R. Greenhall, “The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and well being for individuals with Parkinson’s disease,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 241–248, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Jenkinson, R. Fitzpatrick, V. Peto, R. Greenhall, and N. Hyman, “The PDQ-8: development and validation of a short-form Parkinson’s disease questionnaire,” Psychology & Health, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 805–814, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Hobson, A. Holden, and J. Meara, “Measuring the impact of Parkinson’s disease with the Parkinson’s Disease Quality of Life questionnaire,” Age and Ageing, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 341–346, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. D. Webster, “Critical analysis of the disability in Parkinson's disease,” Modern Treatment, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 257–282, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  20. P. Martinez-Martin, A. Gil-Nagel, L. M. Gracia et al., “Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale characteristics and structure,” Movement Disorders, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 76–83, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. D. Lane, W. M. Glazer, T. E. Hansen, W. H. Berman, and S. I. Kramer, “Assessment of tardive dyskinesia using the abnormal involuntary movement scale,” The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 173, no. 6, pp. 353–357, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. G. Goetz, G. T. Stebbins, H. M. Shale et al., “Utility of an objective dyskinesia rating scale for Parkinson’s disease: inter- and intrarater reliability assessment,” Movement Disorders, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 390–394, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J.-F. Daneault, B. Carignan, A. F. Sadikot, M. Panisset, and C. Duval, “Drug-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Should success in clinical management be a function of improvement of motor repertoire rather than amplitude of dyskinesia?” BMC Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, article 76, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. V. Seeman, “Tardive dyskinesia: two-year recovery,” Comprehensive Psychiatry, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 189–192, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. M. Simpson, J. H. Lee, B. Zoubok, and G. Gardos, “A rating scale for tardive dyskinesia,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 171–179, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. M. Fitts, “The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 381–391, 1954. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. de los Reyes-Guzmán, I. Dimbwadyo-Terrer, F. Trincado-Alonso, F. Monasterio-Huelin, D. Torricelli, and A. Gil-Agudo, “Quantitative assessment based on kinematic measures of functional impairments during upper extremity movements: a review,” Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 719–727, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. J. Zariffa, N. Kapadia, J. L. K. Kramer et al., “Relationship between clinical assessments of function and measurements from an upper-limb robotic rehabilitation device in cervical spinal cord injury,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 341–350, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. B. Rohrer, S. Fasoli, H. I. Krebs et al., “Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 18, pp. 8297–8304, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. S. Lum, S. Mulroy, R. L. Amdur, P. Requejo, B. I. Prilutsky, and A. W. Dromerick, “Gains in upper extremity function after stroke via recovery or compensation: potential differential effects on amount of real-world limb use,” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 237–253, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. A. Murphy, K. S. Sunnerhagen, B. Johnels, and C. Willén, “Three-dimensional kinematic motion analysis of a daily activity drinking from a glass: a pilot study,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 3, article 18, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Balasubramanian, A. Melendez-Calderon, and E. Burdet, “A robust and sensitive metric for quantifying movement smoothness,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 2126–2136, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. J. M. Volman, A. Wijnroks, and A. Vermeer, “Effect of task context on reaching performance in children with spastic hemiparesis,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 684–692, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Alt Murphy, C. Willén, and K. S. Sunnerhagen, “Responsiveness of upper extremity kinematic measures and clinical improvement during the first three months after stroke,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 844–853, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. A. Trombly and C.-Y. Wu, “Effect of rehabilitation tasks on organization of movement after stroke,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 333–344, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. S. Jevsevar, P. O. Riley, W. A. Hodge, and D. E. Krebs, “Knee kinematics and kinetics during locomotor activities of daily living in subjects with knee arthroplasty and in healthy control subjects,” Physical Therapy, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 229–242, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. Frossard, N. Stevenson, J. Sullivan, M. Uden, and M. Pearcy, “Categorization of activities of daily living of lower limb amputees during short-term use of a portable kinetic recording system: a preliminary study,” Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 2–11, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. W. E. Pentland and L. T. Twomey, “Upper limb function in persons with long term paraplegia and implications for independence: part I,” Paraplegia, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 211–218, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. W. Langston, H. Widner, C. G. Goetz et al., “Core assessment program for intracerebral transplantations (CAPIT),” Movement Disorders, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 2–13, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. Li, M. Ferraro, T. Caelli, and P. N. Pathirana, “A syntactic two-component encoding model for the trajectories of human actions,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1903–1914, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. T. Lewiner, J. D. Gomes Jr., H. Lopes, and M. Craizer, “Curvature and torsion estimators based on parametric curve fitting,” Computers & Graphics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 641–655, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. M. Pincus, “Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 2297–2301, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  43. F. Frenet, “Sur les courbes double courbure,” Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, pp. 437–447, 1852. View at Google Scholar
  44. J.-A. Serret, “Sur quelques formules relatives la thorie des courbes double courbure,” Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, pp. 193–207, 1851. View at Google Scholar
  45. T. Breuer, C. Bodensteiner, and M. Arens, “Low-cost commodity depth sensor comparison and accuracy analysis,” in Electro-Optical Remote Sensing, Photonic Technologies, and Applications VIII; and Military Applications in Hyperspectral Imaging and High Spatial Resolution Sensing II, vol. 9250 of Proceedings of SPIE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. L. M. Pedro and G. A. de Paula Caurin, “Kinect evaluation for human body movement analysis,” in Proceedings of the 4th IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob ’12), pp. 1856–1861, June 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. C. Bezdek, Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1981. View at MathSciNet