Embeddable Advanced Sensors for Harsh Environment Sensing Applications
View this Special IssueResearch Article  Open Access
Design and Fabrication of AirBased 13 Piezoelectric Composite Transducer for AirCoupled Ultrasonic Applications
Abstract
The airbased 13 piezoelectric composite transducers are designed and fabricated in order to solve the acoustic impedance matching problem. Firstly, a finite element model using honeycomb structure as the piezoelectric composite matrix is built to reduce the acoustic impedance of the sensitive element. Three important factors, volume fraction of piezoelectric materials , the thickness , and the size of the square cross section of piezoelectric column, are examined and verified in simulation. Then, according to the result of simulation, the piezoelectric composites and the aircoupled transducers are fabricated. The honeycomb structures of resin are produced by the method of 3D printing technology, with the volume fraction of air being 30%. The impedance characteristics and the excitation/reception performance of the aircoupled transducers are measured and optimized. Meanwhile, a scanning experiment is carried out to demonstrate the crack detection process in monocrystalline silicon. mode of Lamb waves is excited and collected. The location and size of the defect will be determined by calculating the correlation coefficients of the received signals and reference signals. Finally, a 15 mm × 0.5 mm × 0.5 mm scratch is clearly distinguished.
1. Introduction
Silicon is one of the most important components of solar cells, and the original integrality of silicon wafer affects the photoelectric conversion efficiency and service life significantly. So, a suitable nondestructive testing and evaluation method should be performed to inspect the cracks in silicon wafer.
In many researches, the damage detection for silicon wafer is mainly classified into several methods, which include resonance ultrasonic vibrations [1] and ultrasonic guided waves [2]. With the increasing demand for highspeed inspection, nondestructive inspection modes using ultrasonic guided waves have become a research hotspot. The nondestructive inspection modes can be broadly divided into contact methods and noncontact methods. At present, the methods of noncontact ultrasonic testing are mainly aircoupled ultrasonic testing [3], laser ultrasonic testing [4], and electromagnetic ultrasonic testing [5].
Aircoupled ultrasonic testing avoids the specimen contact in order to wipe the influence of contact conditions and coupling materials. Then, only air will be used as the coupling medium, and the transducer can easily move to make it possible to do scanning quickly. Aircoupled ultrasonic testing includes penetration detection, pulseecho testing, and oblique incident detection. Kichou et al. [6] used aircoupled transducers to excite pure Lamb waves in plate. The relationship between the deviation of Lamb wave beam and the inclination angle of specimen is researched. Solodov et al. [7] demonstrated the periodic distribution of Lamb wave amplitudes and phases along the various directions in silicon wafer by aircoupled transducers. Yan et al. [8] investigated the impact of delamination in a carbonepoxy composite plate. The group velocity of air coupling Lamb waves is extracted to identify the positions of defects. Chakrapani et al. [9] experimentally located the crack in both monocrystalline and polycrystalline silicon wafer with the thickness of 200 μm using linear scanning method by mode Lamb waves. Liu et al. [10] utilized the aircoupled ultrasonic transducers to generate and receive Lamb waves in composite beams for delamination detection and analyzed the reflection and mode conversion at the ends of lamination defects.
However, the main restriction associated with air coupling method is the large acoustic impedance mismatch at the transducer/air and air/specimen interfaces, where most of the incident wave will be reflected [5]. When the ultrasound passes through an interface, only a proportion of it can be coupled into the next material. This “proportion” depends on how close the acoustic impedance of these two materials is. The acoustic impedance of traditional piezoelectric ceramic materials is almost (30~40) × 10^{6} Rayl, but that of air is only 420 Rayl. So the proportion of the ultrasound that is coupled into the air will be only 0.003%~0.005%.
The active materials, 13 type piezoelectric composites, composed of polymer (epoxy resin or polyurethane) and piezoelectric ceramic, can reduce the acoustic impedance significantly. Hence, the transmitted proportion (from transducer to air) can be increased. Generally, the 13 type piezoelectric composites possess the following attributes: low density, low acoustic impedance, wide bandwidth, and high electromechanical coupling coefficient. Newnham et al. [11] first put forward the concept of 13 piezoelectric composites. Based on their study, extensive researches have been carried out. Hayward and Bennett [12] analyzed the working characteristic of 13 piezoelectric composite transducers by finite element method. HladkyHennion and Decarpigny [13] observed the influence of geometrical parameters on 13 piezoelectric composites by establishing a cycle model. Bhardwaj [14] firstly proposed the prototype of airbased piezoelectric composites sensors, using honeycomb structure or foam material as the substrate to reduce the density and acoustic impedance.
To sum up, in this paper, airbased 13 piezoelectric composites aircoupled transducer will be introduced and evaluated. Firstly, the structure of piezoelectric composites is manipulated. Secondly, 3D finite element models are created to analyze the performance of airbased 13 piezoelectric composites. Then, the transducers based on 13 piezoelectric composites are fabricated with the honeycomb structures of resin which are produced by 3D printing. Also, the excitation and reception performance are tested. Finally, these transducers will be applied in the crack detection by generating and receiving Lamb waves.
2. 3D Simulations of 13 Piezoelectric Composites
2.1. 13 Piezoelectric Composites and Their Finite Element Model (FEM)
As shown in Figure 1, conventional 13 piezoelectric composites are composed of piezoelectric columns, which are mounted inside the polymer parallelly and periodically. The structure can reduce the density and decrease the acoustic impedance effectively. This will close the impedance between piezoelectric transducer and the air, so as to let more ultrasound through.
In order to reduce the acoustic impedance of the piezoelectric composites significantly, airbased 13 piezoelectric composites should be induced. The structure and components of airbased 13 piezoelectric composites are shown in Figure 2. Using honeycomb structure as a matrix of piezoelectric composites, the piezoelectric columns are embedded in the cellular structure. The honeycomb structure acts as a skeleton to support the piezoelectric column. However, the air gap (instead of the filling polymer in Figure 1) reduces the density and the acoustic impedance efficiently. Thus, the air becomes the main part of the composite matrix. And this is where the “air base” comes from.
According to 13 piezoelectric composites thicknessmode oscillation theory [15], the acoustic impedance of 13 piezoelectric composites can be formulated bywhere , , and are the generalized acoustic impedance, elastic constants, and density, respectively. and of 13 piezoelectric composites are determined by the volume fraction and the original elastic constants and density of each own phase. Compared with the conventional 13 piezoelectric composites, the airbased 13 piezoelectric composites use honeycomb structure as a matrix, which will inevitably reduce the acoustic impedance. For example, when %, epoxy 30%, and air 30%, we can obtain the generalized acoustic impedance which equals 1.28 × 10^{7} kg·m^{−2}·s, while the conventional one equals 1.37 × 10^{7} kg·m^{−2}·s. It shows a 7% decrease. Therefore, at the same PZT volume fraction, the acoustic impedance of airbased 13 piezoelectric composites is lower than that of epoxybased 13 piezoelectric composites.
When an electrical signal is applied to the piezoelectric materials, the equivalent impedance of the piezoelectric element will change along with the exciting frequency. The characteristic impedance curve of piezoelectric materials is shown in Figure 3. The minimum of this curve corresponds to the series resonant frequency , while the maximum of impedance represents the parallel resonant frequency .
In this research, the electromechanical coupling coefficient and the mechanical quality factor are selected as the critical factor to evaluate the performance of the piezoelectric composites. is a quantity that measures the conversion efficiency between electrical energy and acoustic energy in piezoelectric materials. For thickness vibration mode of 13 piezoelectric composites, the electromechanical coupling coefficient can be formulated by
is a quantity that measures the wastage of energy overcoming the internal friction when the piezoelectric materials resonate. Usually, this part of energy turns out to be heat. The mechanical quality factor can be formulated bywhere is the minimum of the resonant impedance; is the free capacitance. Accordingly, when is greater, more energy turns into mechanical oscillation.
Airbased 13 piezoelectric composites are formed by the same structural unit in a certain periodical arrangement. In this repeatable unit, there exist two symmetrical planes, as shown in Figure 4. Onequarter of the unit is called a cell. If symmetrical boundary conditions are set to the finite element model, actually, the performance of the airbased 13 piezoelectric composites can be obtained by only one cell model. In order to study the performance of 13 piezoelectric composites, PZT5H is selected as the piezoelectrics, while epoxy resin is the polymer matrix. The material parameters are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The 3D FE simulations are carried out using COMSOL Multiphysics (COMSOL Inc., Sweden), with symmetrical boundary conditions. The finite element model of one cell of airbased 13 piezoelectric composites is illustrated in Figure 4. In FE model, the volume fraction of PZT is gradually increased from 10% to 60% with the interval of 10%, the crosssectional area of the piezoelectric square column is increased from 1 mm × 1 mm to 3 mm × 3 mm, with the side length stepping by 0.5 mm, and the thickness of piezoelectric column is increased from 5 mm to 10 mm, with the interval of 1 mm. The element chose a 3dimensional brick type. The element sizes in length ( direction), in width ( direction), and in thickness ( direction) are all 0.2 mm, approximately 1/10 wavelength. The scanning frequency ranges from 50 kHz to 500 kHz, with the interval of 1 kHz.


2.2. Influence of PZT Volume Fraction
In the composite material, the content of piezoelectrics directly affects the piezoelectric properties. With the increase of volume fraction of PZT, the piezoelectric constant and dielectric constant of composite material will increase. Meanwhile, the acoustic impedance of the composite material will also increase. So a suitable volume fraction of PZT should be optimized to balance the piezoelectric constant/dielectric constant and the acoustic impedance.
In the finite element model of piezoelectric composite, the thickness and the crosssectional area (red area) of the piezoelectric column are 10 mm and 1 mm × 1 mm. The volume fraction of PZT is gradually increased from 10% to 60% with the interval of 10%, while keeping the volume fraction of air 30%, as shown in Figure 5.
The simulation results are shown in Figures 6 and 7. With the increase of volume fraction of the PZT, the electromechanical coupling coefficient of 13 piezoelectric composites will gradually increase, while the mechanical quality factor will gradually decrease. When volume fraction of the PZT is 40%~60%, the electromechanical coupling coefficient tends to be stable and maximum, which means this electromechanical conversion efficiency is optimized. But the mechanical quality factor changes slightly and is much lower than PZT5H. Meanwhile, at the same volume fraction, the electromechanical coupling coefficient of airbased 13 piezoelectric composites is greater than that of epoxybased 13 piezoelectric composites for almost 10%. The volume fraction of 40% for PZT is selected to ensure both high electromechanical conversion efficiency and low acoustic impedance.
2.3. Influence of PZT CrossSectional Area
In the finite element model, the thickness and the volume fraction of PZT are 10 mm and 40%. The crosssectional area of the piezoelectric square column is gradually increased from 1 mm × 1 mm to 3 mm × 3 mm, with the side length stepping by 0.5 mm, as shown in Figure 8.
The relationship between the electromechanical coupling coefficient and the crosssectional area is shown in Figure 9. The change of of PZT has little impact on . And the electromechanical conversion efficiency of airbased 13 piezoelectric composites is greater than that of epoxybased ones. The influence of the crosssectional area on the mechanical quality factor is shown in Figure 10. The change of of PZT also shows little impact on .
In the composite material, the PZT crosssectional area mainly affects the vibration mode. In general, for piezoelectrics, the vibration mode includes thickness vibration mode and lateral vibration mode [16]. Generally, the greater the thickness electromechanical coupling coefficient, the stronger the thickness vibration mode; the greater the planar electromechanical coupling coefficient, the stronger the lateral vibration mode. For 13 piezoelectric composites, when the PZT crosssectional area is larger, which means the larger aspect ratio (side length/thickness), the lateral vibration mode will affect the thickness vibration mode significantly, leading to the fact that the thickness vibration mode will be limited. So, it is important to fabricate “long and thin” PZT column. Considering both the processing procedures and the cost, the crosssectional area of 1 mm × 1 mm is selected for the PZT column.
2.4. Influence of PZT Thickness
The frequency constant of PZT5H is Hz·m. The relationship between the resonant frequency of thickness vibration mode and the thickness of PZT can be formulated by
In the finite element model, the crosssectional area and the volume fraction of PZT are 1 mm × 1 mm and 40%. The thickness of piezoelectric column is gradually increased from 5 mm to 10 mm, with the interval of 1 mm.
As is shown in Figures 11 and 12, the electromechanical conversion efficiency and the mechanical quality factor both vary slightly with the increase of the thickness of PZT . However, when the volume fraction of PZT is constant, with the increase of the PZT thickness , the center frequency of aircoupled 13 piezoelectric composites is almost linearly decreasing, as is shown in Figure 13. Therefore, according to the desired center frequency, the appropriate thickness of the piezoelectric composites should be designed.
According to the results of the above simulation analysis, the volume fraction of PZT is % to ensure the optimal electromechanical conversion efficiency and to keep the low acoustic impedance. The side length of PZT column is mm to limit the lateral vibration mode. The thickness of the sensitive element is mm to ensure the center frequency of the aircoupled transducers to be about 200 kHz.
3. Fabrication and Performance Test of AirCoupled Transducer
3.1. AirCoupled Transducer Preparation and Impedance Characteristics Analysis
Since the substrate of the airbased 13 piezoelectric composite is intensive honeycomb structure, the traditional mechanical method is not feasible for the fabrication. In this research, the honeycomb structures made of resin are constructed by the method of 3D printing technology, with the 30% volume fraction of air.
The ProJet 3510 SD (3D Systems, USA) 3D printer is used to fabricate the honeycomb structure, with the resin material of VisiJet Crystal. The honeycomb structure is divided into several layers and printed layer by layer. The resolution of the 3D printer is 32 μm to make sure the precision of the structure is at 0.025 mm–0.05 mm. Then, a precise honeycomb structure will be obtained. The piezoelectric columns are manually inserted into the honeycomb structures, both combined by epoxy adhesive. After curing, the upper and bottom surfaces are polished. Then, the gold is sputtered on the two surfaces as electrodes. Finally, when the airbased 13 piezoelectric composites are packaged up with the shield, the aircoupled transducer will be complete, as shown in Figure 14. The impedance characteristics of the aircoupled transducers are measured by an impedance analyzer (Agilent 4294A). The results are shown in Figure 15. The characteristic impedance curves of the transducers differ a little. The frequencies of series resonant and parallel resonant , shown in Table 3, are slightly different. Meanwhile, because the aspect ratio of the piezoelectric column is relatively small, the lateral vibration mode is far away from the thickness vibration mode. So, the pure thickness vibration mode is approached.

(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
(c)
3.2. AirCoupled Transducer Performance Test
The aircoupled transducers are tested. The transducer arrangement is shown in Figure 16. The distance between the transmitting transducer and the receiving transducer is 80 mm. The direct wave signals transmitted through the air are detected.
The excitation signal is a 5cycle 200 kHz sinusoidal tone burst, modulated by a Hanning window. The received signals are shown in Figure 17. As can be seen from the results, the aircoupled transducers can both excite and receive the ultrasound in the air, and the signaltonoise ratio (SNR) of direct wave signals seems to be very well. According to the received waveform signals, in the subsequent experiment of defect detection, number 3 transducer is selected as transmitter to emit an ultrasonic pulse, while number 2 transducer is selected as receiver.
According to the fabrication and performance test of aircoupled transducer, it is feasible to introduce 3D printing method to fabricate a transducer. However, because all of the aircoupled transducers are handmade, the consistency is not very good. Hence, the excitation and reception performance of aircoupled transducers differ. Meanwhile, as the transducers do not include matching and backing layer, the received waveforms trail a lot.
4. Experiment of Defect Detection
Lamb waves are ultrasonic guided waves formed by the superposition of longitudinal and transverse waves propagating in a platelike structure in which the thickness is comparable to the wavelength. Lamb waves can travel relatively long distances with little attenuation in plate structures [17], and they are sensitive to both surface and subsurface discontinuities [18].
The Lamb wave, generated by aircoupled transducers, is introduced into the production and quality control process of monocrystalline silicon, and the final purpose is to determine and detect the defects nondestructively [19]. Due to the center frequency of excitation and the thickness of the plates, different symmetric mode () and antisymmetric mode () should be induced. In this case, 200 kHz is chosen as the excitation frequency. The signal received by aircoupled transducer is the leaky wave from the silicon surface. mode possesses mainly inplane displacement, whereas outofplane displacement is dominant in mode [20]. Thus, mode can be easier to be collected with aircoupled ultrasonic transducers. Meanwhile, the wavelength of mode is shorter than that of mode at the same frequency.
When ultrasonic waves travel through air and hit the air/plate interface at an angle, both reflected and refracted waves are produced. After multiple reflections and mode conversion, one or more Lamb wave modes are excited. In order to excite Lamb wave at a specific frequency, the incident angle should satisfy Snell’s law, formulated by [21]where is the incident angle, is the velocity of the wave propagating in air, and is the phase velocity of the Lamb wave. As the velocity of air and the phase velocity of Lamb waves are known, incident angle disperse curves of Lamb waves along direction of monocrystalline silicon can be obtained by solving (5). The results are shown in Figure 18. These curves help in optimizing the orientation of the transmitting and receiving aircoupled ultrasonic transducers. According to the results, the theoretical coincidence incident angle for mode at 200 kHz should be 13°.
4.1. AirCoupled Ultrasonic Experiment System
The experimental setup consists of a high power signal generator, a high dB preamplifier, high power 50 Ω termination, a personal computer, an oscilloscope, and a scanning system. The schematic diagram of experimental setup is shown in Figure 19. The SNAP RAM5000 (RITEC, USA) ultrasonic measurement system is used to generate high power tone burst signals for excitation of the transmitting transducer (number 3) and to receive signals from the receiving transducer (number 2) with its preamplifier. The signal is then acquired by an oscilloscope (DPO4054, Tektronix, USA) with a sampling frequency of 50 MHz. A pair of transducer fixtures are used to hold and orient the aircoupled ultrasonic transducers at a special angle for exciting and receiving Lamb waves.
4.2. Specimens
Monocrystalline silicon, shown in Figure 20, is supplied in the form of plate with a crystal orientation of (001), whose diameter is 200 mm and thickness is 725 μm, and the size of the crack defect is 15 mm × 0.5 mm × 0.5 mm with the direction of .
4.3. Experiments and Results
The transmitting transducer and the receiving transducer are arranged in the same side above the silicon wafer surface, with the fixed distance of 80 mm, scanning along the direction of the crack detection. The incident angle of transmitter kept equal to the receiver is 13°. The scanning distance is totally 50 mm in step of 2 mm. The excitation signal is also a 5cycle 200 kHz sinusoidal tone burst modulated by a Hanning window. The signals received at both the defectfree position and defective position are shown in Figure 21.
(a)
(b)
In usual process of defect detection, the amplitude of direct wave that transmits through the defect is used to describe the presence and the size of the defects. In this experiment, the influence of the presence of cracks on the amplitude of signals is not that obvious. So, it is difficult to distinguish the location of the defect accurately based on amplitude characteristics.
However, when Lamb waves propagate through the crack, not only will the amplitude change, but also the phase will shift or distort. The correlation coefficient of the received signal and the reference signal is calculated to extract the influence of the crack on the signals [22]. The rectangular window is used to intercept the received signals of Lamb wave, and the signal of defectfree position is used as reference signal. The correlation coefficients of all the received signals and reference signal are calculated and established the corresponding relationship with the scan position. The results can be seen in Figure 22. The experiment has been implemented for 3 times. All of the results show that the correlation coefficients of the received signals at defective position are lower, which means the waveforms have been distorted when Lamb wave travels across the defect. The correlation coefficient of 0.6 is chosen as the threshold. The defect position determined by this method is conformed with the actual defect position. It proved that the method is feasible in monocrystalline silicon defect detection.
5. Conclusion
In this research, a new structure of airbased 13 piezoelectric composites is introduced. The influence of the structural parameters on the performance of airbased 13 piezoelectric composites has been investigated through finite element analysis. According to the results of simulation, the airbased 13 piezoelectric composites and aircoupled transducers are fabricated with the PZT volume fraction %; meanwhile, the side length of PZT column mm and the thickness of the sensitive element mm. All of the aircoupled transducers can excite and receive the ultrasound in air effectively, and the signaltonoise ratio (SNR) of direct wave seems to be very well.
Scanning method is used to detect the crack defect in the monocrystalline silicon wafer by Lamb waves. The direct wave of mode is used to identify the defect. Results reveal that the location and size of the defect can be detected by calculating the correlation coefficient of the received signals and reference signals. It proved that this method is feasible in monocrystalline silicon defect detection.
To sum up, the 3D printed airbased 13 piezoelectric composites structures are appropriate to fabricate the aircoupled transducers. They can both reduce the acoustic impedance and enhance the electromechanical conversion efficiency. In future studies, matching/backing layer should be taken into account to improve the performance of aircoupled transducers.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
The work in this paper is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 11372016 and 51235001) and the Outstanding Young Researcher Program from Organization Department of the CPC Beijing Municipal Committee (Grant no. 2014000020124G038).
References
 A. Belyaev, O. Polupan, W. Dallas, S. Ostapenko, D. Hess, and J. Wohlgemuth, “Crack detection and analyses using resonance ultrasonic vibrations in fullsize crystalline silicon wafers,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 88, no. 11, Article ID 111907, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Yun, K.M. Kim, Y. Roh, Y. Min, J.K. Lee, and Y. H. Kim, “Comparison of slowness curves of Lamb wave with elastic moduli and crystal structure in silicon wafers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS '13), pp. 1598–1601, IEEE, Prague, Czech Republic, July 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S.H. Kee and J. Zhu, “Using aircoupled sensors to determine the depth of a surfacebreaking crack in concrete,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 1279–1287, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Balogun, G. D. Cole, R. Huber, D. Chinn, T. W. Murray, and J. B. Spicer, “Highspatialresolution subsurface imaging using a laserbased acoustic microscopy technique,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 226–233, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Zhou and D. Wei, “Progress of aircoupled ultrasonic nondestructive testing technology,” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 10–14, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 H. B. Kichou, J. A. Chavez, A. Turo, J. Salazar, and M. J. GarciaHernandez, “Lamb waves beam deviation due to small inclination of the test structure in aircoupled ultrasonic NDT,” Ultrasonics, vol. 44, pp. e1077–e1082, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. Y. Solodov, R. Stoessel, and G. Busse, “Material characterization and NDE using focused slanted transmission mode of aircoupled ultrasound,” Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 65–85, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Yan, E. Hauck, T. M. Pera et al., “Ultrasonic guided wave imaging of a composite plate with aircoupled transducers,” in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, pp. 1007–1012, AIP Publishing, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
 S. K. Chakrapani, M. J. Padiyar, and K. Balasubramaniam, “Crack detection in full size Czsilicon wafers using lamb wave air coupled ultrasonic testing (LACUT),” Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 46–55, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Liu, H. Yu, C. He, and B. Wu, “Delamination damage detection of laminated composite beams using aircoupled ultrasonic transducers,” Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1269–1279, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. E. Newnham, D. P. Skinner, and L. E. Cross, “Connectivity and piezoelectricpyroelectric composites,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 525–536, 1978. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Hayward and J. Bennett, “Assessing the influence of pillar aspect ratio on the behavior of 13 connectivity composite transducers,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 98–108, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A.C. HladkyHennion and J.N. Decarpigny, “Finite element modeling of active periodic structures: application to 1–3 piezocomposites,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 94, no. 2 I, pp. 631–635, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Bhardwaj, “Piezoelectric transducer with gas matrix,” WO2004017369 A2, 2007, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 W. A. Smith and B. A. Auld, “Modeling 13 composite piezoelectrics: thicknessmode oscillations,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 1991. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. R. Gururaja, W. A. Schulze, L. E. Cross et al., “Resonant modes of vibration in piezoelectric PZTpolymer composites with two dimensional periodicity,” Ferroelectrics, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 183–186, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
 J. L. Rose, “A baseline and vision of ultrasonic guided wave inspection potential,” Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 273–282, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M.K. Song and K.Y. Jhang, “Crack detection in singlecrystalline silicon wafer using laser generated Lamb Wave,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 950791, 6 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M.K. Song and K.Y. Jhang, “Crack detection in singlecrystalline silicon wafer using laser generated Lamb wave,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 950791, 6 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Su, L. Ye, and Y. Lu, “Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: a review,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 295, no. 3–5, pp. 753–780, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Castaings, P. Cawley, R. Farlow, and G. Hayward, “Single sided inspection of composite materials using air coupled ultrasound,” Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Cepel, K. C. Ho, B. A. Rinker, D. D. Palmer Jr., T. P. Lerch, and S. P. Neal, “Spatial correlation coefficient images for ultrasonic detection,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 1841–1849, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Cunfu He et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.