Journal of Sensors

Journal of Sensors / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Embedded Systems for Mobile Sensors

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 9364716 |

Xue-Fen Zhang, Chang-Chuan Yin, "Energy Harvesting and Information Transmission Protocol in Sensors Networks", Journal of Sensors, vol. 2016, Article ID 9364716, 5 pages, 2016.

Energy Harvesting and Information Transmission Protocol in Sensors Networks

Academic Editor: Gwanggil Jeon
Received17 Jun 2015
Revised02 Sep 2015
Accepted07 Sep 2015
Published14 Dec 2015


We focus on the design of transmission protocol for energy harvesting wireless sensors. The sensors can harvest the energy from the environment, but they cannot charge and discharge at the same time. We propose a protocol for energy harvesting and wireless transmission, which contains two steps. In the first step, the sensor harvests the energy from environment, and the energy harvesting rate is controlled by the harvested energy power of the energy saving device (ESD). In the second step, some data should be transmitted to the receiver in a certain time. Considering one slot time, the first part of the time is devoted exclusively to energy harvesting, and the remaining time of the slot is for transmitting the information data. Assume that Q bits are transmitted to the receiver within one time slot; we establish the relationship between the harvesting energy time and the transmit data time. In addition, we analyze the system outage probability performance over the Rayleigh fading channel.

1. Introduction

The energy harvesting in wireless sensor network has become increasingly attractive with sustainable and long lasting power supplies. With development of IOT, more and more sensors are embedded in medical device or building structures to sense the environment [13]. Sensor nodes are powered by batteries that often cannot be replaced because of the inaccessibility of the devices (e.g., inside the human body). Once the battery of a sensor node is exhausted, the node dies. In this case, a solution may be to harvest the energy from the environment. The energy harvesting methods include absorbing energy from the solar wind, vibration, RF radio waves, temperature differences, and airflow, thermoelectric effects, and other physical phenomena [4].

Among all these methods, radio signal radiated by ambient transmitters became a new source for wireless energy harvesting, and harvesting energy from ambient RF signals can power a wireless sensors network [5]. Besides, recent advance in designing highly efficient rectifying antennas will enable more efficient wireless energy harvesting from RF signals in the near future [6, 7]. More recently, the study of wireless powered communication networks (WPCNs) has received a lot of interest. For a WPCN, the energy harvested from ambient RF signals is used to power wireless terminals in the network [8]. In addition, the advantage of RF solution lies in the fact that RF signals can carry energy and information at the same time, and such an approach can also reduce the cost of communication networks, since peripheral equipment to take advantage of external energy sources can be avoided. Besides, ambient RF from TV and cellular communications is widely available in urban areas (day and night, indoors and outdoors) [9].

There is some progress in the recent research of energy harvesting. For example, the information theoretic capacity with an energy harvesting transmitter was discussed in [10]. The paper introduced two different capacity-achieving schemes and concluded that the capacity of an energy harvesting AWGN channel is the same as that of a traditional AWGN channel as long as the average available energy is the same. In [11], the problem of transmission time minimization in an energy harvesting setting for a point-to-point communication system was studied. In [12, 13], the authors investigated the minimization of the transmission time for a given amount of data through power control based on known energy arrivals over all the time. In [14], the authors considered the power allocation for an access-controlled transmitter with energy harvesting capability based on causal observations of the channel fading state. In addition, the problem of transmission time minimization was also solved by mapping it to the problem of throughput maximization.

In this work, we consider the design of transmission protocol for energy harvesting wireless sensor system, in which the users transmit their independent information using their individually harvested energy in the uplink. Our work is unlike traditional research on Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer (SWIPT), which assumes the simultaneous energy and information transmissions to sensors (or users) in the downlink. A major problem of this assumption is that practical circuits cannot charge and discharge at the same time. We assume that the transmitter needs to deliver bits within seconds, where is the duration of a transmission frame. The transmitter can only harvest energy or deliver information at any given time, but not both. As a result, the transmitter needs to decide when to switch between the transmission data (TD) mode and the energy harvesting (EH) mode. We derive the optimal mode switching rule at the transmitter to achieve various tradeoffs between the minimum transmission outage probability in TD mode and the average harvested energy in EH mode.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 provides the system model. We analyze the outage probability in Section 3 and establish the optimization problem in Section 4. Section 5 presents numerical examples. Finally, Section 6 concludes the paper.

2. System Model

In this paper, we assume the system includes one pair of single-antenna transmitter (Tx) and receiver (Rx). Suppose bits are transmitted to the receiver within seconds, where is the duration of a transmitter frame. In every frame, there are two phases of transmission. The first phase is called harvesting time, in which ESD collects the energy from the environment. Since the ESD cannot charge and discharge simultaneously, the second step is for the data transmission in the remaining frame time. Next, we give the key parameters in the communication protocol for energy harvesting and information processing at Tx. Define the save-ratio as the fraction of the one transmission slot time, and, during the time interval , Tx harvest energy by ESD. The remaining slot time, from time to seconds, is used for the information transmission. In this paper, the relation between and outage probability is established.

Let be the source-destination channel coefficients. The channel from the source to the destination is modeled as frequency nonselective fading and additive noise [1, 5, 7]. Therefore, the channel coefficients are assumed to be constant during a complete slot time and may vary from a slot time to another.

The receiver signal at the destination node in one slot time, , can be written aswhere is the source-to-receiver channel gain. We model   as independent zero-mean, circularly symmetric complex Gaussian random variables with variances , the envelope of which follows Rayleigh distribution (for Rayleigh fading the channel amplitude squares are exponentially distributed). The noise is modeled as independent zero-mean, circularly symmetric complex Gaussian random variables with zero means and variances. is the source-to-receiver distance, is the average power transmitted from the source in the time slot, is the path loss exponent, and is the source message with unit power; that is, , where is the expectation operator and is the absolute value operator. denotes Gaussian noise with unit variance.

According to the protocol, the total buffered energy at , which is the time of start to transmit data within a transmission slot, is given by , where is the harvested energy power of the ESD.

Denote as the average total power, which is constant over the entire transmission period.

3. Outage Probability

3.1. SNR Analysis

In this section, we analyze the instantaneous signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and derive the probability density function (PDF) of the SNR.

The instantaneous SNR in the destination is given bywhere is the variance of AWGN in the corresponding channels. We can see that the random variable is an exponential random variable with parameter . Hence, the PDF of is

3.2. Outage Probability Performance Analysis

For a given , the cluster-to-cluster amplify-and-forward relay network’s mutual information isThe outage probability at Rx can be expressed aswhere is the required target rate.


4. Optimization Problem

The outage probability is an important criterion of the system performance. In this section, we determine an optimal save-ratio to improve the performance of outage probability. Suppose bits of data are generated and transmitted within a time slot of duration seconds, and, for a given save-ratio , the data delivery only takes place in the last seconds of each time slot, which results in an effective rate of   bits/sec. In this section, we study the relation between and outage probability.

Consider the following optimization problem:According to (7), the optimization problem can be written asAccording to , , and , we can rewrite the problem asHence, the optimum is given byFor (11), we can find the numerical solution based on golden section search and parabolic interpolation techniques [15].

5. Numerical Examples

In this section, we evaluate the performance of the proposed transmission schemes. First, we will calculate the mutual information and the outage probability versus the save-ratio , respectively. Then, we will compute the minimum outage probability. Thus, we will derive the optimal save-ratio .

In our simulation, we consider the BPSK modulation communication system. The channel is Rayleigh fading, and the path loss exponent is set as 2. Without loss of generality, we assume that the source-to-receiver distance is normalized to 1, and the channel between two nodes is i.i.d. Rayleigh fading random variables with unit variance. Besides, we also assume the target transmission information , and the time slot . Hence, the target transmission rate   .

Figure 1 shows the system mutual information versus the save-ratio. Figure 2 illustrates how the save-ratio affects the outage probability for . As can be seen from Figure 2, the system mutual information is increased with the save-ratio changing from 0 to 1, due to the improvement of instantaneous SNR in the destination. The save-ratio affects outage performance very significantly, which can be seen from Figure 2. When the save-ratio is close to 0, almost no energy is needed for the transmitter to send the data, so the SNR is low, and the outage probability is almost 1. If the save-ratio is close to 1, though there is energy for the transmitter, the target transmission rate tends to . Hence, the outage probability is very high. As can be observed, there is an optimal decision on the save-ratio of the transmitters to achieve the optimal outage performance.

In Figure 3, we plot the outage probability for the optimal system. From this figure, we see that the optimal save-ratio scheme reduces the outage probability compared to the other cases.

6. Conclusions

In this paper, we studied a wireless system under energy harvesting conditions. We established the relationship between the system outage performance and the transmission protocol. Besides, we proposed an optimal method to optimize the system outage performance via finding the optimal save-ratio. We also characterized how the outage probability varies with the save-ratio and compared the outage performance between nonoptimal save-ratio and optimal save-ratio under the assumption of Rayleigh fading channel. Simulation results demonstrated that remarkable gain is achieved for the proposed optimal scheme. If we choose the optimal save-ratio for the transmission, we can achieve the outage performance minimization. And the optimal scheme can provide improved efficiency and reliability of the energy harvesting wireless sensor networks, which means such energy harvesting approaches are promising for further performance improvement.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61372088, 61271257, and 61328102 and the project funded by the Importation and Development of High-Caliber Talents Project of Beijing Municipal Institutions (CIT&TCD20130320).


  1. R. Zhang and C. K. Ho, “MIMO broadcasting for simultaneous wireless information and power transfer,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1989–2001, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Y. Chen, S. Zhang, S. Xu, and G. Y. Li, “Fundamental trade-offs on green wireless networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 30–37, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Yeh, “Green 4G communications: renewable-energy-based architectures and protocols,” in Proceedings of the Global Mobile Congress (GMC '10), pp. 1–5, IEEE, Shanghai, China, October 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. A. Paradiso and T. Starner, “Energy scavenging for mobile and wireless electronics,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. M. Zungeru, L. M. Ang, S. Prabaharan, and K. P. Seng, “Radio frequency energy harvesting and management for wireless sensor networks,” in Green Mobile Devices and Networks: Energy Optimization and Scavenging Techniques, pp. 341–368, CRC Press, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  6. R. J. M. Vullers, R. van Schaijk, I. Doms, C. Van Hoof, and R. Mertens, “Micropower energy harvesting,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 684–693, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. B. Lim, N. M. Lee, and B. K. Poh, “Feasibility study on ambient RF energy harvesting for wireless sensor network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on RF and Wireless Tecbhnologies for Biomedical and Healthcare Applications (IMWS-BIO '13), Singapore, December 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. H. Lee, R. Zhang, and K. B. Huang, “Opportunistic wireless energy harvesting in cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 4788–4799, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. V. Liu, A. Parks, V. Talla, S. Gollakota, D. Wetherall, and J. R. Smith, “Ambient backscatter: wireless communication out of thin air,” in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on SIGCOMM (SIGCOMM '13), pp. 39–50, Hong Kong, China, August 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. O. Ozel and S. Ulukus, “Information-theoretic analysis of an energy harvesting communication system,” in Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications Workshops (PIMRC Workshops '10), pp. 330–335, IEEE, Instanbul, Turkey, September 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Yang and S. Ulukus, “Optimal packet scheduling in an energy harvesting communication system,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 220–230, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Z. Wang, V. Aggarwal, and X. Wang, “Renewable energy scheduling for fading channels with maximum power constraint,” in Proceedings of the 51st Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton '13), pp. 1394–1400, Monticello, Ill, USA, October 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. O. Ozel, K. Tutuncuoglu, J. Yang, S. Ulukus, and A. Yener, “Transmission with energy harvesting nodes in fading wireless channels: optimal policies,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1732–1743, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Z. Wang and V. Aggarwal, “Power allocation for energy harvesting transmitter with causal information,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 62, no. 11, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  15. G. E. Forsythe, M. A. Malcolm, and C. B. Moler, Computer Methods for Mathematical Computations, Prentice-Hall, 1976.

Copyright © 2016 Xue-Fen Zhang and Chang-Chuan Yin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.