Journal of Sensors

Journal of Sensors / 2017 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 8910470 |

David Naranjo-Hernández, Laura M. Roa, Javier Reina-Tosina, Gerardo Barbarov-Rostan, Omar Galdámez-Cruz, "Smart Device for the Determination of Heart Rate Variability in Real Time", Journal of Sensors, vol. 2017, Article ID 8910470, 11 pages, 2017.

Smart Device for the Determination of Heart Rate Variability in Real Time

Academic Editor: Giorgio Pennazza
Received30 Jun 2017
Revised01 Oct 2017
Accepted15 Oct 2017
Published27 Nov 2017


This work presents a first approach to the design, development, and implementation of a smart device for the real-time measurement and detection of alterations in heart rate variability (HRV). The smart device follows a modular design scheme, which consists of an electrocardiogram (ECG) signal acquisition module, a processing module and a wireless communications module. From five-minute ECG signals, the processing module algorithms perform a spectral estimation of the HRV. The experimental results demonstrate the viability of the smart device and the proposed processing algorithms.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases are among the main causes of population death [1]. It is estimated that 17.3 million people worldwide die as a result of cardiovascular disease, which represents 30% of all cases [2]. High blood pressure, smoking habits, diabetes, visceral obesity, dyslipidemia, physical inactivity, and unhealthy eating patterns are the main modifiable risk factors associated with the development of cardiovascular diseases [2]. Cardiac autonomic dysfunction is a risk factor that is also related to the development of cardiovascular diseases and can be noninvasively measured through heart rate variability (HRV) assessment [3].

HRV refers to the continuous heart rate or continuous RR wave intervals extracted from electrocardiogram (ECG) signal [4] (time distance between the R waves in the ECG signal is denoted as RR intervals). Short- and long-term variations in heart rate (HR) can be due to different causes. The parasympathetic nervous system causes that HR, and in turn, blood pressure (BP) decreases, while the sympathetic nervous system favors an antagonistic action, increasing both HR and BP. The interaction of these systems is known as the sympathetic-vagal balance of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) [5]. Many studies have shown that HRV is a useful quantitative indicator to assess the balance between the cardiac sympathetic nervous system and the parasympathetic nervous system and can be used in the diagnosis and prevention of some cardiovascular diseases such as congestive heart failure, sudden cardiac death, arrhythmia, or Holmes-Adie syndrome [4, 69].

In the last decades, an attempt has been made to analyze and quantify HRV so that it can serve as a clinical utility. Measurements of HRV are made over long- and short-term periods. Long-term recordings typically last 24 hours and are carried out by means of a Holter, while short-term recordings last 2–5 minutes and are usually performed with a dynamic ECG [10].

The analysis of HRV is of interest in other multiple conditions, such as respiratory diseases. This analysis can be used as a simple and noninvasive method for the estimation of aerobic capacity in subjects with COPD [11], and it can also be used as a prognostic tool, since in these patients, a reduced HRV has been related to an increase in morbidity and mortality [12]. In addition, respiratory muscle strength has been related to the sympathetic-vagal response, which can be evaluated by HRV [13]. Other applications of HRV range from the early biomarker for the evaluation of diabetes mellitus progress [14], and diagnostic marker in chronic neck pain [15], to mental and physical health [16], or sleep quality [17], and work stress [18], among others.

Methods for the measurement of HRV can be classified into temporal and frequency domain methods. The first ones consist mainly of a statistical analysis of RR intervals. However, their capabilities are limited, as they do not show sufficient specificity and sensitivity, in addition to the need of long recording periods [10].

The methods in the frequency domain or spectral estimation of HRV can be classified into parametric and nonparametric methods. Nonparametric methods based on the fast Fourier transform (FFT) have as main advantage their simplicity and algorithmic speed [10], while parametric methods, such as autoregressive (AR) models, provide a more defined, smooth, and easy-to-identify spectral component [10]. In addition, for short-duration measurements, parametric methods provide better spectral resolution than nonparametric methods [10].

To the knowledge of the authors, there are no devices that allow real-time analysis of HRV through the aforementioned methods. Some adapted methods have been proposed for the real-time analysis [19], such as the short-time Fourier transform (STFT), wavelet transform, Hilbert-Huang transform, and from infinite impulse response (IIR) filters [20], but always executed off-line with ECG signals from previously acquired records.

The present work shows a first approach to the design of a portable, customizable, and low-cost smart device for the real-time measurement of HRV in the frequency domain through AR models.

2. Materials and Methods

In the context of the present work, smart device is referred to as a device that not only has sensing capabilities for the measurement of certain variables, but is also equipped with a wireless communications unit and has the capability of carrying out a process of the acquired information. The design, development, and evaluation processes of the device have been performed in an iterative (or spiraling) methodology, testing the developments before and more often than in the traditional cascaded life cycle. In the design and simulation stage, Orcad software (version 16.0) of Cadence has been used. For the implementation of the prototypes CircuitCam (version 5.2) and BoardMaster (version 5.0), programs have been used, as well as a ProtoMat S62 milling machine, all of LPKF.

A first evaluation of the device performance was made by considering its most representative characteristics, comparing them with other devices and systems recently proposed in the literature. The gain and the bandwidth were calculated from the simulation of the electronic design using the Tina-TI software of Texas Instruments. The power consumption was estimated using the procedure described in [21]. For that purpose, a resistor of 10 ohms was placed in series in the line that feeds the Front-End stage from the battery. With an oscilloscope (MSO6032A of Agilent Technologies), the voltage at the resistor was measured to approximate, according to Ohm’s law, the input current to the circuit. This current, constant over time, was multiplied by the supply voltage of 3.3 V to obtain the power consumption.

The interest of the present device is its capability to compute the HRV parameters in the frequency domain in real time. For this process, it is common to make an estimation of the power spectral density (PSD) of the HRV signal. As shown in Figure 1, very low frequency (VLF) spectral components are obtained in the range 0.0033–0.04 Hz [22], low frequency (LF) spectral components in the range of 0.04–0.15 Hz, and high frequency (HF) spectral components in the range of 0.15–0.4 Hz [19]. These components provide clinical information about the variation in the sinus rhythm of the heart. LF components reflect both sympathetic and parasympathetic influences, although LF may be indicative of baroreflex sensitivity [23]. HF components are related to the parasympathetic system; thus, the LF/HF ratio is indicative of sympathovagal balance [23].

The power spectral components are quantified by measuring the area under the three frequency bands: VLF power, LF power, and HF power. The spectral components of HRV should be presented in the natural base; hence, a logarithmic transformation could be necessary. In order to ease the comparison among different studies, the components are usually presented in normalized units, according to the following expressions [24]: where and represent the power of either LF or HF components, respectively, and are indicative of the corresponding powers in normalized units (percentage), represents total power (equivalent to variance computed with time domain approaches), and indicates the power of the VLF component. ratio is calculated as the ratio of and .

For the validation of the sensor and the algorithms used, two sets of experiments were carried out. The subjects breathed spontaneously but were not allowed to talk. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

In the first set of experiments, two ECG signal acquisition experiments with a duration of 5 minutes were performed on a 23-year-old male volunteer weighing 90 kg, having an apparent healthy condition and under different situations. In the experiments, the volunteer remained motionless, without speaking and avoiding any kind of biofeedback. For the first experiment (sitting experiment), the subject was asked to sit in a chair in a comfortable and relaxed manner with the eyes closed. The second experiment (stimuli experiment) was performed under the same conditions as the first experiment, but in this case, the volunteer was subjected to random auditory stimuli with the purpose of analyzing the influence of external disturbances on the ANS. Each of the experiments was in turn repeated on two separate occasions.

In the second set of experiments, a standardized protocol for the study of HRV was used [25], to allow a comparative analysis of the system against results obtained in the previous studies [23, 2628]. The study involved 5 volunteers, of apparent healthy condition. Table 1 shows a detail of the anthropometric characteristics of the volunteers. Measurements were performed in the morning. Each subject performed two experiments, each with a duration of five minutes: (i)Rest experiment: the volunteer remains immobile in a supine position.(ii)Tilt experiment: the volunteer remains immobile in a standing position.

Number of volunteers5
Age (years)26.4 ± 4.9
Weight (kg)73.6 ± 11.1
Height (cm)174.6 ± 8.2
Body mass index24.1 ± 1.7

3. Design Results

3.1. Smart Device Design

Figure 2 shows the design of the smart device following a modular scheme comprising the following elements: (i)Sensing module: its function is to provide an electrochemical interface between the tissue and the electronic measurement subsystem (front-end module) for voltage detection. This interface is performed through the electrode-skin contact, consisting of a metal electrode, an electrolytic gel (usually containing Cl), and human skin. For such purpose, three diagnostic DORMO-TAB electrodes (Ag-AgCl pregelled flexible electrodes with dimensions of 26.4 mm × 22.5 mm) were placed on the test users, the first located under the clavicle on the right shoulder, the second under the collarbone on the left shoulder, and the third on the abdomen on the lower left side. These electrodes were connected to the front-end module via cables.(ii)Front-end module: it is the acquisition element of the monitored signal. It consists of an ECG signal capture system based on an instrumentation amplifier (INA), a feedback circuit through the third electrode, three filter stages, and an amplification step, all implemented through operational amplifiers.(iii)Processing module: it is responsible for the processing of the ECG signal and the frequency analysis for the spectral estimation of the HRV. An OLIMEX PIC32-PINGÜINO-OTG module has been used for data processing, which can be sent wirelessly in real time. The OLIMEX module makes use of a PIC32MX440F256H microcontroller, with 256 KB of program memory, 32 KB of data memory, and a maximum speed of 80 MHz.(iv)Communication module: it is responsible for the bidirectional wireless communications of the smart device: the transmission of the result of the signal processing to an external unit (a computer in this first prototype) in one sense, and the reception of configuration commands for the personalization of the processing algorithms in the other. In this case, an RN42-I/RM module from microchip has been used to implement communications based on the Bluetooth standard.

3.2. Design of the Front-End Module

The front-end input stage consists of an INA composed by three operational amplifiers with an approximate gain of 33 dB. The input differential impedance is bootstrapped to increase the input resistance and increase the quality of the signal-to-noise ratio [29, 30]. Through a voltage follower, the INA common mode is obtained, which is inverted and amplified so that it is subsequently feedbacked through the right leg to obtain an increase of the common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR), reducing the impact of interferences in the output signal [31].

A high-pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 0.5 Hz is then implemented. This filtering is performed from a low-pass filter, with the same cutoff frequency, which feedbacks the continuous level of the INA output signal as its reference voltage. This configuration allows a higher gain in the amplifier avoiding the saturation in the subsequent stages due to a high DC level.

Next, two-unit gain filtering steps are included. The interference of the electrical installation is attenuated by a notch filter adjusted to the frequency of 50 Hz. Then, a low-pass filter is configured with a cutoff frequency of 150 Hz to minimize the effects of other possible sources of noise, usually at a high frequency.

Finally, an inverter amplifier with an approximate gain of 30 dB is used as the last gain stage to provide a measurable signal to the analog-to-digital converter (ADC) of the processing module.

The ADC was implemented taking advantage of one of the available peripherals of the PIC32MX440F256H microcontroller, which is the core of the OLIMEX PIC32-PINGÜINO-OTG module. This device allows up to 16-channel 10-bit ADC, with a maximum sampling rate of 1000 ksps. Although it was shown that a sampling rate as low as 50 Hz could be used to measure the ECG signal without compromising the accuracy of the calculated time domain HRV parameters [32], other studies recommend the frequency of 200 Hz to avoid possible distortions in the frequency spectrum of the signal [33], the basis of the analysis shown in the present work. For this reason, a sampling frequency of 200 Hz was selected as the working frequency of the device, to minimize computational load and energy consumption, while ensuring a quality in the results after processing.

For the front-end design, surface mount resistors and capacitors of standard size 0603 and surface mount operational amplifiers of the Texas Instruments OPA211 series have been used. The OPA211 was chosen because it has a main characteristic, a very low input noise (80nVpp), and is ideal for medical applications.

3.3. Processing Module

The estimation of HRV in the frequency domain from the ECG signal is obtained by a five-step algorithm: (i)In a first step, the signal S0 corresponding to the output signal of the ECG front-end is elevated to the third power. In this way, the signal is obtained, allowing a better definition of the QRS complex.(ii)In the second stage, from the second derivative of , a new signal is generated corresponding to the following expressions: where represents the current sample. This processing allows the easy detection of the R wave.(iii)In the third stage, the signal S3 is obtained as the estimation of the RR intervals, expressed in seconds. A register of the last maximum values of the R-wave in the signal S2 is saved, eliminating the older values to dynamically adapt to changes in the amplitude of the signal.From this register, the detection threshold Thd is defined as 30% of the maximum value of all of them. This threshold allows limiting the search interval of the R-wave. The instant at which the wave is maximum in the search interval is set as the R-instant. A new value is then defined in the RR interval vector as the difference between the current R-instant and the previous one.(iv)In the fourth stage, the spectral estimation of S3 using AR models is obtained by the Burg method of order N, where N is a configurable parameter [34]. As the signal acquisition time is small, the use of the Burg method is an appropriate option, since it has the advantage of a higher resolution and stability for a small amount of data [35]. The algorithm was implemented by following the recommendations described in [36] to improve the frequency estimation.(v)Finally, in the fifth stage, , , and parameters were calculated according to the equations and procedures described in the Materials and Methods section.

4. Validation Results

As a sample of the signals with which the processing module operates, Figure 3 shows the result of the first three stages of the algorithm described in the previous section for a sitting experiment. Figure 3(a) shows a 20-second segment of S0 output signal from the ECG front-end. Figure 3(b) shows the signal as a result of raising the S0 signal to the third power to increase the definition of the QRS complex of the ECG signal. Figure 3(c) shows the signal S2, which allows the easy detection of the R wave. Finally, Figure 3(d) shows the complete signal S3 as the result of the estimation of the RR intervals of the S2 signal. This last signal represents a time signal distributed along the horizontal axis, also of a temporal nature, which will be the basis of the subsequent analysis in the frequency domain.

Given the interest represented by the calculation of the power spectral density for the analysis of the HRV signal, the Burg parameter N in the fourth stage of the algorithm was optimized. To select the order of the filter, different values were tested from to , which is the recommended range for this type of applications [34], increasing their value in steps of two.

Figure 4 shows the results obtained for some of the analyzed values of the parameter N. The value that allowed a correct spectral estimation was considered as optimum. The smaller the N the smoother the signal, making it difficult to detect the spectral components, while the higher the N the higher the number of peaks generated in the frequency spectrum, thus making it difficult to analyze and requiring in this case a longer computational time. After this analysis, was established as the optimal value of the parameter, since it was the minor order that offered an adequate definition of the spectral components.

The implementation of the smart device prototype is shown in Figure 5.

The spectral analysis of the first set of experiments (sitting experiment and stimuli experiment) was applied in a first validation of the device and its processing algorithm. This evaluation was done in this case in a qualitative way, analyzing the spectrum of the signals by inspection. Figure 6 shows a comparison of the spectral estimation of two of the experiments performed, in which the spectral components LF and HF are identified.

In the sitting experiment, in which the user was relaxed, it can be seen that the HF component is dominant over the LF component. This outcome is in agreement with the expected result, since in this case, there should be a greater activity of the parasympathetic system above the sympathetic, as it corresponds to a state of rest and relaxed. In the stimuli experiment, the volunteer was subject to different disturbances. In this case, the LF component was dominant, which also agrees with the expected results.

The results obtained encouraged a more detailed study using the standardized protocol described in Materials and Methods section and the second set of experiments (rest experiments and tilt experiments). As an example, Figures 7 and 8 show the HRV spectral estimation of a female volunteer and a male volunteer, respectively. Each of the figures also represents the PSD of the two experiments performed by each volunteer: rest and tilt experiments. In both graphs, an increase in the LF component and a decrease in the HF component are observed when going from the supine position to the standing position. In the case shown in Figure 7, there is even an inversion in the position of the maximum of the spectral components, located in HF during the rest experiment and in LF during the tilt experiment.

To define more precisely the relation between the spectral components when comparing the two cases (rest and tilt), a quantitative analysis was also performed using normalized parameters of the HRV spectral characteristics described above: , , and .

The use of standardized parameters and a standard protocol favors the comparison with other results in the literature. Table 2 shows the results obtained in this study and a sample of equivalent data obtained by other authors for healthy subjects.

This work[27][28][37][38][23][39]




Data of Table 2 show results comparable to those found in other studies, both in absolute and relative values. In addition, the same trend and the same relationships between the parameters are observed. is higher in tilt experiments than in the rest experiments. The reverse is true for HFnu. The LF/HF ratio has a value close to unity in the rest experiments, but is much higher for tilt experiments.

It can also be seen from Table 2 that the maximum and minimum values of the different parameters do not overlap. In this sense, a threshold can then be set for each of the parameters that could be employed in a hypothetical recognition and classification of the experiments. For , the average value between the maximum value of the parameter in the rest experiments and the minimum value of the parameter in the tilt experiments is set as the classification threshold. The same procedure is used to calculate the threshold of the LF/HF parameter. In contrast, the threshold of the parameter HFnu is calculated as the average value between the minimum value in the rest experiments and the maximum value in the tilt experiments. Table 3 shows the classification rules according to the previous thresholds.

<58.94%Rest experiment
≥58.94%Tilt experiment

<39.93%Tilt experiment
≥39.93%Rest experiment

<1.49Rest experiment
≥1.49Tilt experiment

Figure 9 graphically displays the distribution of the parameters around the classification thresholds, marked with a solid line. The graphs also show the confidence interval of 68.27% (±standard deviation) obtained for each parameter in each of the experiments. These intervals are marked with dash lines and serve to highlight the statistical distribution of the results.

Regarding the device performance, Table 4 summarizes some features of the device and compared to a few recent works. The main advantage of the device compared to other commercial and literature proposals is its capacity for the real-time detection of alterations in heart rate variability (HRV) through frequency analysis. To the knowledge of the authors, this capacity is not implemented in portable devices, being the offline analysis from the data stored in memory the most common method [45].

This work[40][41][42][43][44]

Bandwidth (Hz)1508000100100100
Supply voltage (V)
Power consumption mW/channel5.40.4360.0870.60.008
Sampling frequency (Hz)20010001000
ADC bits10121616
Embedded HRV analysisYesNoNoNoNoNo

In the first set of experiments, corresponding to the functional evaluation of the front-end, the ECG data captured by the device were wirelessly sent in real time to a computer, acting as the processing module, where they were analyzed with Matlab software (version 2016a). Each sample was sent sequentially by the Bluetooth communication module, used as a serial port, with a transmission rate of 200 samples per second (two bytes per sample).

After these positive results, in the second set of experiments, the algorithm was embedded in the physical processing module of the prototype. Table 5 shows some details of the implementation of the algorithm in the sensor prototype. The second set of experiments was conducted using the device in stand-alone mode according to which the device carried out the following tasks: (i)Sequential wireless transmission of ECG samples for its registration and subsequent evaluation.(ii)On-line S3 calculation as the estimation of the RR intervals. This process, executed within the device, requires a time of 193 μs to run, enough to be executed in real time whenever a new sample is received at 200 Hz, without interfering with the next sample.(iii)Every five minutes, estimation of HRV in the frequency domain from the RR intervals. This process, also executed within the device, requires a time of 409.2 ms to run, enough for a real-time application.(iv)Calculation of , , and from the PSD of the HRV signal and wireless transmission of the result.

Program memory21.57 KB (8.4% of prototype program memory)
Data memory22.56 KB (70.5% of prototype data memory)
Time for on-line S3 calculation193 μs
Time for HRV estimation409.2 ms

The algorithm was also executed simultaneously on a computer with the ECG samples sent by the device. The coincidence in the results obtained by the device with respect to the computer demonstrates the viability of the prototype for the execution of the proposed algorithm in real time.

5. Conclusions

In the present work, a first approximation to a smart device and a processing algorithm for the spectral analysis of HRV in real time has been shown. To the best of our knowledge, this capability is not available in any portable ECG measurement device. Under the requirements of low-cost, customizable, and low power consumption, the hardware and software required for ECG signal capture and its subsequent processing have been designed and implemented.

A qualitative validation was performed in two different experiments, repeated twice each. In a first experiment, in which the volunteer was relaxed, the observed spectral components indicated a greater activity of the parasympathetic system above the sympathetic one. In a second experiment, in which the volunteer was subjected to external stimuli, the spectral components showed a greater activity of the sympathetic system above the parasympathetic one. The results obtained in this first approximation show the viability of the device and the algorithms proposed for a real-time qualitative analysis of the ANS and the influence of different perturbations.

For a more exhaustive evaluation, a second set of experiments was performed. Standard parameters were used in the spectral analysis of the HRV as well as a standardized measurement protocol (rest and tilt experiments). A comparative analysis with respect to the results obtained in other studies has shown the validity of both the device and the proposed algorithms for the quantitative evaluation of the HRV spectral components. In addition, a method has been established for the classification of rest and tilt activities from an ECG signal.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests with any company or organization regarding the material discussed in this paper.


This work was supported in part by the Fundación Progreso y Salud, Government of Andalucía, under Grants PI-0010-2013 and PI-0041-2014, in part by the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, under Grants PI15/00306 and DTS15/00195, and in part by CIBER-BBN under grants by INT-2-CARE, NeuroIBC, and ALBUMARK.


  1. World Health Organization (WHO), “Media centre (fact sheets): cardiovascular diseases (CVDs),” November 2017, View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Grenier, P. Brassard, O. F. Bertrand et al., “Rosiglitazone influences adipose tissue distribution without deleterious impact on heart rate variability in coronary heart disease patients with type 2 diabetes,” Clinical Autonomic Research, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 407–414, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Hillebrand, K. B. Gast, R. de Mutsert et al., “Heart rate variability and first cardiovascular event in populations without known cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis and dose–response meta-regression,” EP Europace, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 742–749, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Y. Chou, R. Zhang, Y. Feng, M. Lu, Z. Lu, and B. Xu, “A real-time analysis method for pulse rate variability based on improved basic scale entropy,” Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 7406896, 10 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. S. Prakash, “‘Sympathovagal balance from heart rate variability: an obituary’, but what is sympathovagal balance?” Experimental Physiology, vol. 97, no. 10, pp. 1140–1140, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. B. Estañol, R. C. Callejas-Rojas, S. Cortés, R. Martínez-Memije, O. Infante-Vázquez, and G. Delgado-García, “Asymptomatic severe vagal and sympathetic cardiac denervation in Holmes-Adie’s syndrome,” Case Reports in Neurological Medicine, vol. 2017, Article ID 4919758, 6 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. Lucena, A. Kardec, and N. Ohnish, “The performance of short-term heart rate variability in the detection of congestive heart failure,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 1675785, 11 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. K. Stein, P. P. Domitrovich, H. V. Huikuri, R. E. Kleiger, and Cast Investigators, “Traditional and nonlinear heart rate variability are each independently associated with mortality after myocardial infarction,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. X. Chen, Y.-Y. Huang, F. Yun, T.-J. Chen, and J. Li, “Effect of changes in sympathovagal balance on the accuracy of heart rate variability obtained from photoplethysmography,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 2311–2318, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Malik, “Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use,” Circulation, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 1043–1065, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. R. Leite, E. M. Ramos, C. A. Kalva-Filho et al., “Correlation between heart rate variability indexes and aerobic physiological variables in patients with COPD,” Respirology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 273–278, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. L. Roque, V. E. Valenti, T. Massetti et al., “Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart rate variability: a literature update,” International Archives of Medicine, vol. 7, p. 43, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  13. C. L. Goulart, J. C. Simon, P. B. Schneiders et al., “Respiratory muscle strength effect on linear and nonlinear heart rate variability parameters in COPD patients,” International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1671–1677, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. E. Arroyo-Carmona, A. L. López-Serrano, A. Albarado-Ibañez et al., “Heart rate variability as early biomarker for the evaluation of diabetes mellitus progress,” Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2016, Article ID 8483537, 8 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. M. Hallman, S. E. Mathiassen, and E. Lyskov, “Long-term monitoring of physical behavior reveals different cardiac responses to physical activity among subjects with and without chronic neck pain,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 907482, 11 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. H. Kemp and D. S. Quintana, “The relationship between mental and physical health: insights from the study of heart rate variability,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 288–296, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Trinder, J. Waloszek, M. J. Woods, and A. S. Jordan, “Sleep and cardiovascular regulation,” Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, vol. 463, no. 1, pp. 161–168, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. N. Jarczok, M. Jarczok, D. Mauss et al., “Autonomic nervous system activity and workplace stressors—a systematic review,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1810–1823, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. K. Kudrynski and P. Strumillo, “Real-time estimation of the spectral parameters of heart rate variability,” Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 304–316, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. Kudrynski and P. Strumillo, “Real-time estimation of heart rate variability parameters from passband filtered interbeat interval series,” in 2011 Computing in Cardiology, pp. 297–300, Hangzhou, China, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  21. Texas Instruments, “Measuring power consumption with CC2430 and Z-Stack,” Tech. Rep., Tech. Rep. AN053, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA, 2006, November 2017, View at: Google Scholar
  22. M. Hadase, A. Azuma, K. Zen et al., “Very low frequency power of heart rate variability is a powerful predictor of clinical prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure,” Circulation Journal, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 343–347, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. Bunsawat, S. Goulopoulou, S. R. Collier, A. Figueroa, K. H. Pitetti, and T. Baynard, “Normal HR with tilt, yet autonomic dysfunction in persons with down syndrome,” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 250–256, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. Montano, T. G. Ruscone, A. Porta, F. Lombardi, M. Pagani, and A. Malliani, “Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability to assess the changes in sympathovagal balance during graded orthostatic tilt,” Circulation, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1826–1831, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Altuve, S. Wong, G. Passariello, G. Carrault, and A. Hernández, “LF/(LF+HF) index in ventricular repolarization variability correlated and uncorrelated with heart rate variability,” in 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 1363–1366, New York, NY, USA, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Porta, E. Tobaldini, S. Guzzetti, R. Furlan, N. Montano, and T. Gnecchi-Ruscone, “Assessment of cardiac autonomic modulation during graded head-up tilt by symbolic analysis of heart rate variability,” American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 293, no. 1, pp. H702–H708, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. F. S. Martinelli, M. P. T. Chacon-Mikahil, L. E. B. Martins et al., “Heart rate variability in athletes and nonathletes at rest and during head-up tilt,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 639–647, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. P. Tulppo, R. L. Hughson, T. H. Mäkikallio, K. E. J. Airaksinen, T. Seppänen, and H. V. Huikuri, “Effects of exercise and passive head-up tilt on fractal and complexity properties of heart rate dynamics,” American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 280, no. 3, pp. H1081–H1087, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  29. D. Dobrev and T. Dobreva, “Bootstrapped instrumentation biosignal amplifier,” Annual Journal of Electronics, vol. 5, pp. 76–79, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  30. A. Hurskyi, O. Matviykiv, and M. Lobur, “Research of electrocardiography sensors for healthcare monitoring,” in 2017 XIIIth International Conference on Perspective Technologies and Methods in MEMS Design (MEMSTECH), pp. 164–166, Lviv, Ukraine, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Texas Instruments Healthcare, “Medical applications guide,” November 2017, View at: Google Scholar
  32. S. Mahdiani, V. Jeyhani, M. Peltokangas, and A. Vehkaoja, “Is 50 Hz high enough ECG sampling frequency for accurate HRV analysis?” in 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 5948–5951, Milan, Italy, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. T. Ziemssen, J. Gasch, and H. Ruediger, “Influence of ECG sampling frequency on spectral analysis of RR intervals and baroreflex sensitivity using the EUROBAVAR data set,” Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 159–168, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Boardman, F. S. Schlindwein, A. P. Rocha, and A. Leite, “A study on the optimum order of autoregressive models for heart rate variability,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 325–336, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Gutierrez and S. Alois, Comparison of Autoregressive Methods for the Detection of Artifacts in EEG Signals, Workshop Internacional Programa RAICES, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2015.
  36. K. Kazlauskas, “The burg algorithm with extrapolation for improving the frequency estimation,” Informatica, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 177–188, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  37. M. R. Mellingsæter, T. B. Wyller, A. H. Ranhoff, N. Bogdanovic, and V. B. Wyller, “Reduced sympathetic response to head-up tilt in subjects with mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer’s dementia,” Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 107–115, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. Huang, C. F. Xu, X. Y. Deng et al., “Deceleration capacity—a novel measure for autonomic nervous system in patients with vasovagal syncope on tilt-table testing,” Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology - Medical Science, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 326–331, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  39. G. D. Rodrigues, T. R. Gonçalves, and P. P. Soares, “Physical training and aging effects on autonomic control of the heart during supine and active standing in young sedentary and master rowers,” Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical, vol. 192, p. 112, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. Zhu, J. Song, B. Chellappa et al., “A smart ECG sensor with in-situ adaptive motion-artifact compensation for dry-contact wearable healthcare devices,” in 2016 17th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), pp. 450–455, Santa Clara, CA, USA, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. Mitra, J. Xu, A. Matsumoto, K. A. A. Makinwa, C. Van Hoof, and R. F. Yazicioglu, “A 700μW 8-channel EEG/contact-impedance acquisition system for dry-electrodes,” in 2012 Symposium on VLSI Circuits (VLSIC), pp. 68-69, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Guermandi, R. Cardu, E. Franchi, and R. Guerrieri, “Active electrode IC combining EEG, electrical impedance tomography, continuous contact impedance measurement and power supply on a single wire,” in 2011 Proceedings of the ESSCIRC (ESSCIRC), pp. 335–338, Helsinki, Finland, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. Y. M. Chi and G. Cauwenberghs, “Micropower non-contact EEG electrode with active common-mode noise suppression and input capacitance cancellation,” in 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 4218–4221, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. Krachunov, C. Beach, A. J. Casson et al., “Energy efficient heart rate sensing using a painted electrode ECG wearable,” in 2017 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS), pp. 1–6, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. H. Al-Libawy, A. Al-Ataby, W. Al-Nuaimy, and M. A. Al-Taee, “HRV-based operator fatigue analysis and classification using wearable sensors,” in 2016 13th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD), pp. 268–273, Leipzig, Germany, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 David Naranjo-Hernández et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.