Journal of Sensors

Journal of Sensors / 2017 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 9290478 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9290478

Electric Cell-Substrate Impedance Sensing of Cellular Effects under Hypoxic Conditions and Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibition

Academic Editor: Hana Vaisocherova
Received07 Jul 2017
Revised23 Oct 2017
Accepted16 Nov 2017
Published27 Dec 2017

Abstract

Tumor hypoxia provides a dynamic environment for the cancer cells to thrive and metastasize. Evaluation of cell growth, cell-cell, and cell surface interactions in hypoxic conditions is therefore highly needed in the establishment of treatment options. Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) has been traditionally used in the evaluation of cellular platforms as a real-time, label-free impedance-based method to study the activities of cells grown in tissue cultures, but its application for hypoxic environments is seldom reported. We present real-time evaluation of hypoxia-induced bioeffects with a focus on hypoxic pH regulation of tumor environment. To this end, multiparametric real-time bioanalytical platform using electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and human colon cancer HT-29 cells is advanced. A time series of EIS data enables monitoring with high temporal resolution the alterations occurring within the cell layer, especially at the cell-substrate level. We reveal the dynamic changes of cellular processes during hypoxic conditions and in response to application of acetazolamide (AZA), a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. Optical evaluation and pH assessment complemented the electrical analysis towards establishing a pattern of cellular changes. The proposed bioanalytical platform indicates wide applicability towards evaluation of bioeffects of hypoxia at cellular level.

1. Introduction

Hypoxic environments are characteristic for fast growing, solid tumors [1]. The carefully orchestrated tumor cell response to hypoxia provides cancerous cells both a metabolic advantage and the capability to metastasize [2], hypoxia being associated with aggressive tumor proliferation, resistance to therapy, and a poor prognosis [3].

The reprogramming of metabolism towards anaerobic glycolysis, the typical attribute of hypoxic tumor cells, is responsible for the acidic milieu within the tumor microenvironment [4] that impacts on cancer development and treatment outcome. Nevertheless, metabolic profiles of glycolysis-impaired tumors (demonstrating that local glucose and oxygen availabilities independently affect tumor acidity [5]) have revealed that CO2 in addition to lactic acid was a significant source of acidity in tumors, indicating carbonic anhydrases (CAs) as important contributors in the pharmacological management of tumor development [5]. Whereas there are 16 types of CA isozymes (among them—CAI, II, III, VII, and XIII being cytoplasmic, CAIV, IX, XII, XIV, and XV—membrane-bound, CAVa—mitochondrial and Vb and CAVI, secreted), only the hypoxia-inducible CA isozymes, CAIX and CAXII, are known to promote tumor growth through regulating the pH in the tumor microenvironment [6] and to be tumor associated. Accordingly, there is a tremendous interest in designing and testing of targeted, potent CA inhibitors. As such, the list of the potential CA inhibitors is continuously expanded, with particular focus for the CAIX isoform due to its important role in regulating both extra- and intercellular pH towards tumor survival and growth [7], its highly active extracellular enzyme domain, and its hypoxia-induced expression that correlates with poor prognosis.

Acetazolamide (AZA), a heterocyclic primary sulfonamide, is a well-known inhibitor of the catalytic activity of CAs [6]. AZA is used to treat glaucoma, edema, heart failure, and mountain sickness, is reported to significantly reduce cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in hypoxic human cancer cells, and is therefore an important model inhibitor in the design of novel compounds. Often, the efficiency of CA inhibition is predicted based on cell-free assessment of enzymatic activity and endpoint biochemical cell analyses, information that is not suitable for guiding the tailored design of new inhibitors.

In contrast to the endpoint analyses, the use of label-free bioanalytical platforms allows dynamic evaluation of discrete, nonlethal effects of external stimuli at cellular level [8] and enables a more nuanced, multiparametric assessment of potential bioeffects [9]. These include changes in cell growth and morphology [10], cell locomotion, cell-cell communication [11], and other behaviors directed by the cell’s cytoskeleton [12] under specific (including hypoxic) conditions. As such, they are invaluable tools for the development and preclinical testing of novel therapeutic compounds.

Bioelectrical impedance cell culture platforms have shown a broad utility in biomedical applications and were recently shown to provide momentum to cancer research [13]. At the core of these platforms is electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), a sensitive method that provides noninvasive and real-time detection of electrical and morphological parameters of cellular monolayers in response to extracellular stressors. EIS uses an alternating current (AC) of low amplitude, within a wide frequency range, to measure the impedance of the cells grown on electrodes. Depending on the morphology [14] (changes in cell shape and volume), degree of attachment (changes in cell-substrate adherence), and electrical properties, the cells that are on or between the electrodes influence the flow of the current, shaping the characteristics of the measured signal corresponding to selected frequencies [15]. As such, EIS enables the study of cell properties like attachment [16] and spreading [17], growth and proliferation [18, 19], micromotion [20], apoptosis [21], metastatic potential, and endothelial barrier functions and cell-cell interactions [22], being a powerful complement to multielectrode array (MEA) recording technologies [23]. Chemical, biological, or physical stimuli change the current pathways through and around the cell modifying the impedance of the system making EIS a sensitive enough method to be used to evaluate cellular responses to external stimuli [2427] and cell behavior changes in response to external/environmental conditions, such as pH, temperature, light, and chemical/biological substances. It is amenable for multiplexing, and it can be combined with optical analyses and microfluidics and controlled environmental conditions. Nevertheless, EIS cell analysis under hypoxic conditions is seldom reported [2830].

Aiming to characterize the dynamics of cellular changes under hypoxic conditions, this study advances real-time evaluation of hypoxia-induced bioeffects with a focus on hypoxic pH regulation of tumor environment. We chose AZA to probe the capability of impedance sensing as a real-time assay of the inhibitory effect without influence from potential variations given by specific mechanisms of action, CA type, or localization, in view of broader biosensing relevance. The proposed bioanalytical platform combines HT-29 cell cultures on gold film electrode arrays with multifrequency impedance measurements and hypoxic conditions. Together with optical microscopy and pH assay, the platform enables assessment of bioeffects of hypoxia providing insight into dynamic changes of cellular processes as cancer cells are exposed to low oxygen environments and CA inhibition as a clinically relevant target for novel cancer therapeutics specific for hypoxic tumors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Cultures

Colorectal carcinoma cells HT-29 cells (ATCC HTB38) were cultured in Dulbecco-modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin-streptomycin (100 IU/mL-0.1 mg/mL). Cells were seeded at a concentration of 4.5 × 105 cells/mL on IBIDI ECIS (electric cell-substrate impedance sensing) culture ware (8 W10E PET) and cultured for up to 2 days in standard growth conditions. Upon reaching confluence, the cells were subjected within a (MCO-20AIC Sanyo, Japan) 5% CO2 incubator to specific growth conditions with either normal (21% O2) or low oxygen (1% O2) concentrations. For reoxygenation, following hypoxic conditions, the medium was replaced with fresh medium and the cells were kept in normoxic conditions. The pH of the culture medium was measured at the beginning of the experiment and immediately at the end of each experimental procedure.

2.2. Hypoxic Conditions

Hypoxic conditions were acquired using a modular incubator chamber (MIC-101, Billups-Rothenberg Inc.) inserted within the MCO-20AIC main incubator and equipped with a dedicated measurement electrode array mount for the IBIDI ECIS culture ware. The atmosphere in the chamber consisted of 94% N2, 1% O2, and 5% CO2.

2.3. CA Inhibition

Acetazolamide (≥99%, powder, Sigma-Aldrich, 222.2 Da), a pancarbonic anhydrase inhibitor, was dissolved in 20% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS to prepare a 10 mM stock solution that was further diluted in DMEM to a final concentration of 100 μM, prior to experiment. 0.2% DMSO was used as carrier control.

2.4. Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Measurements

Electrical impedance spectroscopy enables real-time monitoring of the interaction between cells and substrate together with the study of cellular processes [31]. A 4294A Precision Impedance Analyzer (Agilent, Japan) interfaced with a multiplexing module (8 channels), developed in-house, was used for recording (AC applied potential of 100 mV amplitude with zero DC bias) a time series of impedance data (—polar form depending on modulus and phase , with ω—the angular frequency) corresponding to 100 Hz–100 kHz frequency range (100 frequency points with logarithmic distribution). Data were collected and processed using a custom-developed LabView interface and represented as the time series of either single frequency impedances or equivalent circuit parameters. Single frequency data (the equivalent resistance corresponding to the real part of the complex impedance at 10 kHz) were normalized using the formula using the software package OriginPro 8.5 (OriginLab). The whole spectra of the complex impedance were analysed and complex fitted with a simplified equivalent circuit (ZView, Solartron Analytical, UK) to derive time evolutions of specific circuit parameters as function of hypoxic environment and CA inhibition effect.

All values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for a minimum of 3 experiments.

2.5. Optical Microscopy Experiments

Bright field transmitted and reflected light microscopy have been used to evaluate label-free, live cells subjected to normoxic and hypoxic conditions. The microscopy set-up contains an AxioObzerver Z1 (Zeiss, Germany) platform, a 20x 0.4 NA objective (Zeiss, Germany), an ANDOR DU885 EMCCD camera, and an environmental control enclosure (CO2 and temperature, OKOLab, Italy). For advanced analyses, cells were seeded at a concentration of 5 × 104 cells/mL on Petri dishes with glass bottom (World Precision Instruments Inc.) and assessed with a 40x 0.95 NA objective during experiments the next day.

Actin cytoskeleton morphology was imaged via fluorescence imaging using cells fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100—2% bovine serum albumin solution (prepared in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature. Filamentous actin (F-actin) was labelled with 20 μg/mL phalloidin conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC; Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclei were stained with 2 μg/mL 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Invitrogen, USA) for 10 min at room temperature.

2.6. Cell Proliferation Assay

Cell proliferation was assessed using the In Vitro Toxicology Assay Kit Sulforhodamine B (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were fixed by adding 50% trichloroacetic acid to the growth media in a 1/4 ratio (v/v), incubated for 1 h at 4°C, and stained for 20 min with 0.4% sulforhodamine B. Afterwards, the cells were rinsed quickly with 1% acetic acid and the incorporated dye was solubilized with a 10 mM Tris solution. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA), and the results were represented as percentage relative to control (normoxic cells).

3. Results

EIS measurements in a wide frequency range (100 Hz–100 kHz) were performed to monitor cell growth and to evaluate in real-time and noninvasively the cell monolayer response to hypoxic conditions and application of AZA.

Single frequency analysis of the impedance data led to the identification of the frequency at which interfacial effects and membrane processes have the highest influence on the measured impedance values. The selected frequency was 10 kHz, a frequency suitable for monitoring the adhesion process of cells on the electrodes [21] that showed characteristic changes at cell surface level for both cell growth and hypoxic pH regulation (Figure 1). We chose in the representation of the cell dynamics under various conditions the real part of the measured complex impedance at the given frequency (as given by ) to comprise in our analysis both the possible modulus and phase changes occurring as function of cell evolution.

When cells attach and spread on the electrodes, the electrical impedance increases as the dielectric cell bodies impede current flow between the electrodes (Figure 1(a)). Accordingly, the evolution of the real part of impedance at 10 kHz enables evaluation of cell monolayer establishment. After confluence was achieved and impedance values reached a plateau (Figure 1(a)), after ~48 h, cells were exposed to hypoxic conditions.

Cell adaptation via specific responses evolved to protect the cell from permanent damage or death is ubiquitous [32]. Likewise, the hypoxic conditions trigger specific cell adaptation to low oxygen availability with a vast literature concerning HT-29 ability to withstand and adapt to hypoxic conditions [3335]. The complexity of the signaling networks involved in cell response to hypoxia is overarching, the stabilization and activation of the transcription factor HIF-1 (usually degraded in normoxic conditions) and its downstream targets being a hallmark of cell response to hypoxic conditions. CAs (particularly CAIX) represent one of the HIF-1 targets related to glycolysis and pH regulation that also include monocarboxylate transporter, glucose transporter-1, lactate dehydrogenase, and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase [36].

As shown in Figure 1(b), consistent with cell adaptation to hypoxic conditions, during the first two hours of hypoxia, the impedance values reveal a small transient drop corresponding to cell rearrangement, including detachment of some cells from the surface.

As cells start to adapt to the hypoxic environment, a biphasic behavior is evident: after an initial increase of ~5% of the normalized impedance values, after 6 h of hypoxia, the impedance values start to decrease (Figure 1(b), red line). To check if the recorded impedance changes are associated with cell surface changes or cell death, we monitored the subsequent 12 h of reoxygenation as well as an additional step of hypoxia. While prolongation of hypoxic conditions (hypoxia II) with an additional 12 h reveals massive electrode uncoverage, the hypoxic cells detaching from the surface, when the cells subjected to hypoxia were reexposed to normoxic oxygen conditions (reoxygenation), the impedance values (error bars should be taken into account) confirm that most of the cells were viable and managed to adapt to the hypoxic stress with subsequent structural and morphological changes. Aware of the stabilization and activation of HIF-1 as function of cell density [37], cell confluency at the beginning of the experiment was controlled to be below 100%.

From a molecular perspective, corresponding to the onset of hypoxic conditions, upregulation of CAs (and in particular of CAIX as result of transcriptional activation of the CA9 gene by HIF-1) [38] is commonly reported. Whereas CAIX is expressed (yet not catalytically active) in HT-29 cells even under normoxia, CAIX activation and overexpression are characteristic for hypoxic conditions [39]. Using the exact cell line and a fluorescent, specific CAIX inhibitor, we have recently [40] demonstrated that hypoxia triggered CAIX expression in HT-29 live cell experiments. After 8 h of hypoxia, we showed the specific fluorescent signal corresponding to active CAIX. Importantly, upon hypoxic conditions (as early as 30 min of hypoxia), the existing CAIX becomes catalytically active and was able to bind inhibitors (AZA included) [39].

Notably, CAIX is a functional mediator of both tumor growth and metastasis under hypoxic conditions [41]. As such, whereas impedance values are not specific to certain molecular processes, to test this adaptation, we used a known CA inhibitor, AZA, at 100 μM concentration. The concentration was chosen below the therapeutic concentration shown to inhibit 60–70% of CA function [42]. In contrast to most of the available literature data that provide only endpoint analyses, our study is able to highlight the dynamics of cell layer adaptation under hypoxic conditions and upon mild CA inhibition.

These dynamic changes are exquisitely revealed using impedance: Figure 1(c) highlights the distinct evolutions for normoxic, normoxic plus CA inhibition, hypoxic, and hypoxic plus CA inhibition conditions. A monotonous 10% increase of impedance values is associated with monolayer tightening in normoxic conditions, whereas the biphasic dynamics revealed in hypoxic conditions are further altered due to AZA bioeffects. In comparison to hypoxia alone, the application of AZA reveals a further decrease of the impedance values indicating morphological changes of cells on the electrode surface, as cells’ adaptation to hypoxic environment is impeded (Figure 1(c)) due to CA inhibition.

Complementary cell growth assay, sulforhodamine test (Figure 1(d)), shows moderate reduction of cell proliferation under hypoxic conditions (up to 20% change for hypoxic conditions and AZA exposure), in agreement with literature reports [34] where an 8 h exposure of human adenocarcinoma HT-29 cells to hypoxia resulted in 14% loss of viability, as assayed with trypan blue.

With appropriate frequency selection, single frequency analysis is able to reveal characteristic cell dynamics with sensing potential. Nevertheless, it is an over simplification of the complexity of the bioanalytical platform. To evaluate in real-time and noninvasively the cell monolayer response to hypoxic conditions and application of AZA, the experimental data obtained from the whole measured frequency domain were fitted with an equivalent electrical circuit whose elements, constant phase element (CPE), resistors, and capacitors are attributed to components in the biological probe such as paracellular space, cellular monolayer, or cell surface contacts. The circuit considered adequate to fit the measured impedance spectra is described by a constant phase element (CPE) which represents the cell monolayer-electrode interface, a resistor (Rp) that defines the paracellular route in parallel with a capacitor (Cc) which describes the cellular monolayer and a resistor for the bulk solution (Rsol) (Figure 2(a)). The impedance of CPE is characterized by two independent parameters, the amplitude, CPE_T, and the distribution parameter, the exponent CPE_P, according to the formula . When the value of CPE_P equals 1, the CPE behaves as an ideal capacitor, whereas when 0, the CPE behaves as a pure resistor. CPE is used in the model, associated with the double-layer capacitance, to compensate for nonhomogeneity in the system in conjunction with the rough/porous surface of the electrodes and inhomogeneous cell attachment. Indeed, a constant phase element with a CPE_P value between 0.9 and 1 has been derived from the fitting.

Although the equivalent circuit is not unique, it was selected to enable long time assessment of impedance changes via complex fitting under different experimental conditions. A comparison between the experiment and fit for characteristic modulus and phase spectra is shown in Figure 2(b).

The normalized values of the elements of the electrical circuit obtained after fitting were compared () for normoxic cells, hypoxic cells, and hypoxic cells incubated with AZA to obtain complementary information regarding the bioeffects induced by these conditions on cells.

The most relevant changes were revealed in Rp and Cc values (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)) with modest changes of the CPE and Rsol parameters (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)).

An increase of Rp for hypoxic cells corresponds to an increase in the monolayer tightness (cell-cell contacts) which occurs when cells begin to adapt to the low oxygenated environment and flatten on the surface. For the hypoxic cells incubated with AZA, the Rp decreases in accordance with a decrease of the cell surface adherence and cell-cell interaction (Figure 3(a)). The evolution of normalized Cc values (inverted for better comparison: ) for hypoxic cells is similar with the one in normoxic conditions, indicating a good coverage of the electrodes both upon adaptation to new low oxygen and for normal cell growth conditions, respectively. On the other hand, for hypoxic cells treated with AZA, Cc changes, although modest (10%), highlight a looser cell attachment and coverage of the electrodes (Figure 3(b)). These values corroborate with the values of the decreased Rp component pinpointing to morphological, cell-cell, and cell surface changes that are induced under combined hypoxic and AZA exposure.

As demonstrated in complementary biochemical evaluation of cell proliferation (Figure 1(d)), hypoxic conditions are able to induce a decrease in cell number. This reduction and associated changes in cell attachment to the surface can be related to the observed drift in CPE (<2%) values (Figure 3(c)).

The drift in Rsol parameters (<5% Figure 3(d)) has a similar trend for all experimental conditions and can be related to cell metabolism-induced changes in batch cultivation conditions.

To validate the impedance findings and shed light on the cellular changes responsible for these characteristic trends, advanced microscopy (Figure 4) has been deployed on both live and fixed cells. Differential interference contrast (DIC) and bright field reflected light (BFRL) images achieved in label free-conditions, on live cells, highlight the morphology of HT cells as a whole and the quality of the cell surface attachment, respectively. BFRL assay has been chosen for its ability to highlight cell areas not in full contact with the support surface. In the BFRL set-up, there will be a relatively strong reflection, and the background will be bright, for areas devoid of cells, while in the presence of a cell the background intensity will be changed [43]. The different gray levels in the adhesion topology image correlate with the distance between the cell membrane and the glass interface (dark area = close contact area) [44]. A flatter morphology (evident in the DIC contrast) and more stress vacuoles (arrows in the DIC image) are revealed in DIC assay. Intriguingly, larger contacts have been recently reported for highly metastatic cells than for less metastatic ones using BFRL interference assays [45]. Our BFRL assays reveal for hypoxic cells exposed to AZA a more diffuse cytoskeleton (visible as wider reflecting areas—the white zones—in the centre of the cells) and possible cell integrity effects (arrows in BFRL images revealing areas of cell detachment or disorganization of cortical ring-shaped actin).

The fluorescence data, with cell nucleus labeled with DAPI and the F-actin within the cytoskeleton labelled with phalloidin-FITC, were assayed on fixed cells and reveal a more spread and diffuse cytoskeleton, highlighted as a wider green area surrounding cell nuclei, for hypoxia and mixed exposure (hypoxia + AZA) in comparison with control images. Moreover, areas where the cell integrity is affected, that is, areas where the cortical ring-shaped actin on cell borders disappears (arrows) are visible under mixed exposure (hypoxia + AZA) conditions, further confirming DIC and BFRL data.

Inability to control intracellular pH has adverse consequences for different cellular processes including proliferation and survival [46]. In response to hypoxia, cells adapt and reset their metabolism towards anaerobic glycolysis, responsible for the acidic milieu within the tumor microenvironment and express CAs (in particular CAIX which plays an important role in regulating both extra- and intercellular pH) towards tumor survival and growth [47]. The hypoxia-induced CAs maintain the intracellular pH favorable for tumor cells while contributing to the acidification of the tumor environment and promoting tumor metastasis. To do so, CAs regulate pH and ion balance by catalysing the interconversion of carbon dioxide (CO2) to bicarbonate anion (HCO3) and protons (H+) [7]. To check the effect of hypoxic conditions and inhibitor exposure, samples of the growth medium at the beginning of the experimental assay and after 12 h of cell cultivation were assayed using standard pH meter. pH evaluation indicated that indeed, hypoxic conditions led to a relative acidification of the extracellular cell culture medium (Figure 5). Following incubation with 100 μM of AZA in hypoxic conditions, the decrease of the extracellular pH is reduced in accordance with inhibitory effect of AZA on the active CAs [7]. Moreover, the effect of AZA on the normoxic extracellular pH was negligible.

4. Discussions

Hypoxic environments are characteristic for fast growing, solid tumors, being associated with aggressive tumor proliferation, resistance to therapy, and a poor prognosis.

Impedance studies with cells in hypoxic conditions are seldom reported [29, 48], with a focus on barrier function assays. In contrast to the endpoint analyses, the use of this label-free bioanalytical platform allows dynamic evaluation of discrete, nonlethal effects of external stimuli at cellular level and enables a quantitative, multiparametric assessment of potential bioeffects. Our study demonstrates dynamic evaluation of cellular effects induced by hypoxic conditions and upon chemical inhibition of CAs and indicates a powerful biosensing approach for hypoxic cultures. The HT-29 cells were used as model cell lines for bioanalysis due to their good adherence, stable growth conditions, and ability to adapt to hypoxic conditions via overexpression of CAs (in particular CAIX considered an endogenous marker of hypoxia), coordinating the carefully orchestrated tumor cell response to hypoxia that provides cancerous cells both a metabolic advantage and the capability to metastasize [6]. This role in tumor progression and high incidence of metastasis is due to the transmembrane CA isoform capacity to maintain tumor intracellular pH homeostasis while acidifying the extracellular environment [7]. Another important aspect of CA functionality, the potential to decrease cell-cell adhesion by destabilization of E-cadherin links to cytoskeleton, may contribute to the acquisition of increased tumor aggressiveness [49]. Targeting CAs in general, the current study exploits the demonstrated EIS success as a label-free, real-time, and noninvasive method in applications concerning cell differentiation, cell spreading, cell motility, toxicology, cytotoxicity, and cell cycle progression [15, 31] towards a quantitative analysis approach for evaluation of hypoxic conditions and a potential inhibitor efficacy as anticancer compound. We chose AZA to probe the capability of impedance sensing as a real-time assay of the inhibitory effect without influence from potential variations given by specific mechanisms of action, CA type, or localization, in view of broader biosensing relevance. As recently demonstrated by our group in a complementary study [40], targeted specificity and in depth understanding of the interaction between CAIX and its inhibitors can be also achieved.

Corroborated with literature data demonstrating that the early (<1 h) response of HT-29 cell under hypoxic conditions is governed by activation of the existing CAIX followed by the CAIX overexpression [39], our single frequency analysis of the impedance data (real part at 10 kHz) provides qualitative discrimination between different cultivation conditions and is able to reveal dynamically the effect of CA activity (including overexpression) under hypoxic conditions [7] and inhibition (using 100 μM concentration of AZA) on cell monolayers. Cell adhesion and cytoskeletal activity serve as valuable indicators [21] for understanding cancer cell behavior, such as proliferation, migration, and invasion [13], and offers cell response profiles related to changes in cellular dynamics as a result of the interaction of extracellular compounds with cells [50]. To further quantify these effects, complex nonlinear fitting of the impedance data in a wide frequency range demonstrated via the derived equivalent circuit parameter characteristic changes of the monolayer tightness (Rp) and cell morphology (Cc) for hypoxic and perturbed pH homeostasy under CA inhibition.

By evaluating cell morphology (DIC), cell surface contacts (BFRL), and the actin cytoskeleton (fluorescence), as well as the extracellular medium acidification (pH measurements), we were able to confirm the cellular effects induced by hypoxic conditions and upon AZA inhibition of CA highlighted noninvasively and label free using impedance bioassay.

In conclusion, the study provides an efficient sensing platform for the evaluation of hypoxic conditions and CA inhibition as a developmental cell-based sensor of novel anticancer compounds targeting tumor hypoxia as a dynamic environment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Authors’ Contributions

Luciana Stanica and Mihnea Rosu-Hamzescu have equally contributed.

Acknowledgments

The financial support by grants of the Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding (UEFISCDI), Romanian Ministry of National Education and Scientific Research, Project nos. PNII-ID- PCCE-2011–2-0075, PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2016-1137, is gratefully acknowledged. The technical support of Mrs. Florica Moranescu is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. P. Vaupel, “The role of hypoxia-induced factors in tumor progression,” The Oncologist, vol. 9, Supplement 5, pp. 10–17, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. R. Wilson and M. P. Hay, “Targeting hypoxia in cancer therapy,” Nature Reviews. Cancer, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 393–410, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Wouters, B. Pauwels, F. Lardon, and J. B. Vermorken, “Review: implications of in vitro research on the effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy under hypoxic conditions,” The Oncologist, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 690–712, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. Neri and C. T. Supuran, “Interfering with pH regulation in tumours as a therapeutic strategy,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 767–777, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. Helmlinger, A. Sckell, M. Dellian, N. S. Forbes, and R. K. Jain, “Acid production in glycolysis-impaired tumors provides new insights into tumor metabolism,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1284–1291, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  6. C. T. Supuran, “Structure and function of carbonic anhydrases,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 473, no. 14, pp. 2023–2032, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. Švastová, A. Hulı́ková, M. Rafajová et al., “Hypoxia activates the capacity of tumor-associated carbonic anhydrase IX to acidify extracellular pH,” FEBS Letters, vol. 577, no. 3, pp. 439–445, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Gheorghiu, A. M. Enciu, B. O. Popescu, and E. Gheorghiu, “Functional and molecular characterization of the effect of amyloid-β42 on an in vitro epithelial barrier model,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 787–798. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Gheorghiu, S. David, C. Polonschii et al., “Label free sensing platform for amyloid fibrils effect on living cells,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 52, pp. 89–97, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. Gheorghiu, “Characterizing cellular systems by means of dielectric spectroscopy,” Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 475–482, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Q. Liu, C. Wu, H. Cai, N. Hu, J. Zhou, and P. Wang, “Cell-based biosensors and their application in biomedicine,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 114, no. 12, pp. 6423–6461, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Ramasamy, D. Bennet, and S. Kim, “Drug and bioactive molecule screening based on a bioelectrical impedance cell culture platform,” International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 9, pp. 5789–5809, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Hong, K. Kandasamy, M. Marimuthu, C. S. Choi, and S. Kim, “Electrical cell-substrate impedance sensing as a non-invasive tool for cancer cell study,” Analyst, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 237–245, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. E. Gheorghiu, “On the limits of ellipsoidal models when analyzing dielectric behavior of living cells. Emphasis on red blood cells,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 873, no. 1 ELECTRICAL BI, pp. 262–268, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Wang, C. Wu, N. Hu, J. Zhou, L. Du, and P. Wang, “Microfabricated electrochemical cell-based biosensors for analysis of living cells in vitro,” Biosensors, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 127–170, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. Asphahani, M. Thein, O. Veiseh et al., “Influence of cell adhesion and spreading on impedance characteristics of cell-based sensors,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1307–1313, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Wegener, C. R. Keese, and I. Giaever, “Electric cell–substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) as a noninvasive means to monitor the kinetics of cell spreading to artificial surfaces,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 259, no. 1, pp. 158–166, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. Wang, L. Wang, H. Yin et al., “Real-time, label-free monitoring of the cell cycle with a cellular impedance sensing chip,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 990–995, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. Park, C. K. Choi, A. E. English, and T. E. Sparer, “Electrical impedance measurements predict cellular transformation,” Cell Biology International, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 429–433, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. I. Giaever and C. R. Keese, “A morphological biosensor for mammalian cells,” Nature, vol. 366, no. 6455, pp. 591-592, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Arndt, J. Seebach, K. Psathaki, H. J. Galla, and J. Wegener, “Bioelectrical impedance assay to monitor changes in cell shape during apoptosis,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 583–594, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. Gheorghiu, C. Balut, and M. Gheorghiu, “Dielectric behaviour of gap junction connected cells: a microscopic approach,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 341–348, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. E. Spira and A. Hai, “Multi-electrode array technologies for neuroscience and cardiology,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 83–94, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. X. Zhang, F. Li, A. N. Nordin, J. Tarbell, and I. Voiculescu, “Toxicity studies using mammalian cells and impedance spectroscopy method,” Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, vol. 3, pp. 112–121, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. T. M. Curtis, J. Tabb, L. Romeo, S. J. Schwager, M. W. Widder, and W. H. van der Schalie, “Improved cell sensitivity and longevity in a rapid impedance-based toxicity sensor,” Journal of Applied Toxicology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 374–380, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. H. Yeon and J.-K. Park, “Cytotoxicity test based on electrochemical impedance measurement of HepG2 cultured in microfabricated cell chip,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 341, no. 2, pp. 308–315, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. B. Male, B. Lachance, S. Hrapovic, G. Sunahara, and J. H. T. Luong, “Assessment of cytotoxicity of quantum dots and gold nanoparticles using cell-based impedance spectroscopy,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 80, no. 14, pp. 5487–5493, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. K. Sharma, J. L. Lucitti, C. Nordman, J. P. Tinney, K. Tobita, and B. B. Keller, “Impact of hypoxia on early chick embryo growth and cardiovascular function,” Pediatric Research, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 116–120, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Chanakira, D. Kir, R. A. Barke, S. M. Santilli, S. Ramakrishnan, and S. Roy, “Hypoxia differentially regulates arterial and venous smooth muscle cell migration,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 9, article e0138587, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. T. B. Tran, C. Baek, and J. Min, “Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) with microelectrode arrays for investigation of cancer cell – fibroblasts interaction,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 4, article e0153813, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. W. Gu and Y. Zhao, “Cellular electrical impedance spectroscopy: an emerging technology of microscale biosensors,” Expert Review of Medical Devices, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 767–779, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. J. Fornace Jr., D. W. Nebert, M. C. Hollander et al., “Mammalian genes coordinately regulated by growth arrest signals and DNA-damaging agents,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 4196–4203, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. Carlin, N. Khan, T. Ku, V. A. Longo, S. M. Larson, and P. M. Smith-Jones, “Molecular targeting of carbonic anhydrase IX in mice with hypoxic HT29 colorectal tumor xenografts,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 5, article e10857, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. K. S. Yao, M. Clayton, and P. J. O'Dwyer, “Apoptosis in human adenocarcinoma HT29 cells induced by exposure to hypoxia,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 117–122, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. K. S. Yao, S. Xanthoudakis, T. Curran, and P. J. O'Dwyer, “Activation of AP-1 and of a nuclear redox factor, Ref-1, in the response of HT29 colon cancer cells to hypoxia,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 5997–6003, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. G. L. Semenza, “HIF-1 mediates metabolic responses to intratumoral hypoxia and oncogenic mutations,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 9, pp. 3664–3671, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. F. Dayan, R. L. Bilton, J. Laferrière et al., “Activation of HIF-1α in exponentially growing cells via hypoxic stimulation is independent of the Akt/mTOR pathway,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 167–174, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. C. Wykoff, N. J. Beasley, P. H. Watson et al., “Hypoxia-inducible expression of tumor-associated carbonic anhydrases,” Cancer Research, vol. 60, no. 24, pp. 7075–7083, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  39. L. Dubois, K. Douma, C. T. Supuran et al., “Imaging the hypoxia surrogate marker CA IX requires expression and catalytic activity for binding fluorescent sulfonamide inhibitors,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 367–373, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. L. Stanica, M. Gheorghiu, M. Stan et al., “Quantitative assessment of specific carbonic anhydrase inhibitors effect on hypoxic cells using electrical impedance assays,” Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1079–1090, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. C. McDonald and S. Dedhar, “Carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) as a mediator of hypoxia-induced stress response in cancer cells,” Sub-Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 75, pp. 255–269, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. B. Bao, K. Groves, J. Zhang et al., “In vivo imaging and quantification of carbonic anhydrase IX expression as an endogenous biomarker of tumor hypoxia,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 11, article e50860, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. H. Verschueren, “Interference reflection microscopy in cell biology: methodology and applications,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 75, pp. 279–301, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  44. K. Klein, T. Maier, V. C. Hirschfeld-Warneken, and J. P. Spatz, “Marker-free phenotyping of tumor cells by fractal analysis of reflection interference contrast microscopy images,” Nano Letters, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 5474–5479, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. Matsuzaki, K. Ito, K. Masuda et al., “Quantitative evaluation of cancer cell adhesion to self-assembled monolayer-patterned substrates by reflection interference contrast microscopy,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 120, no. 7, pp. 1221–1227, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. K. Parks, J. Chiche, and J. Pouyssegur, “pH control mechanisms of tumor survival and growth,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 226, no. 2, pp. 299–308, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. P. C. McDonald, S. C. Chafe, and S. Dedhar, “Overcoming hypoxia-mediated tumor progression: combinatorial approaches targeting pH regulation, angiogenesis and immune dysfunction,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 4, p. 27, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. K. Kangwantas, E. Pinteaux, and J. Penny, “The extracellular matrix protein laminin-10 promotes blood-brain barrier repair after hypoxia and inflammation in vitro,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 25, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. O. Sedlakova, E. Svastova, M. Takacova, J. Kopacek, J. Pastorek, and S. Pastorekova, “Carbonic anhydrase IX, a hypoxia-induced catalytic component of the pH regulating machinery in tumors,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 4, p. 400, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Y. A. Abassi, B. Xi, W. Zhang et al., “Kinetic cell-based morphological screening: prediction of mechanism of compound action and off-target effects,” Chemistry & Biology, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 712–723, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Luciana Stanica et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

903 Views | 264 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.