Research Article
Evolutionary Multilabel Feature Selection Using Promising Feature Subset Generation
Table 5
Comparison results in terms of normalized coverage.
| Method | Birds | Enron | Llog | Mediamill | Medical | Proposed | 0.194 ± 0.015 | 0.277 ± 0.015 | 0.202 ± 0.025 | 0.196 ± 0.003 | 0.155 ± 0.029 | GA | 0.223 ± 0.025 | 0.337 ± 0.038 | 0.201 ± 0.021 | 0.205 ± 0.005 | 0.180 ± 0.027 | NSGA | 0.212 ± 0.020 | 0.336 ± 0.038 | 0.199 ± 0.025 | 0.208 ± 0.019 | 0.178 ± 0.029 | MPSOFS | 0.222 ± 0.023 | 0.413 ± 0.014 | 0.201 ± 0.023 | 0.330 ± 0.006 | 0.179 ± 0.027 |
| Method | TMC2007 | Business | Education | Entertainment | Health | Proposed | 0.203 ± 0.002 | 0.132 ± 0.023 | 0.148 ± 0.004 | 0.197 ± 0.003 | 0.157 ± 0.023 | GA | 0.208 ± 0.004 | 0.139 ± 0.024 | 0.159 ± 0.003 | 0.221 ± 0.009 | 0.167 ± 0.026 | NSGA | 0.209 ± 0.004 | 0.141 ± 0.021 | 0.159 ± 0.004 | 0.219 ± 0.009 | 0.167 ± 0.026 | MPSOFS | 0.211 ± 0.002 | 0.168 ± 0.023 | 0.159 ± 0.004 | 0.233 ± 0.003 | 0.166 ± 0.025 |
| Method | Reference | Science | Social | Society | Avg. rank | Proposed | 0.157 ± 0.023 | 0.182 ± 0.004 | 0.127 ± 0.010 | 0.242 ± 0.007 | 1.21 | GA | 0.177 ± 0.022 | 0.215 ± 0.005 | 0.140 ± 0.011 | 0.257 ± 0.006 | 2.86 | NSGA | 0.171 ± 0.021 | 0.213 ± 0.006 | 0.136 ± 0.014 | 0.261 ± 0.008 | 2.43 | MPSOFS | 0.179 ± 0.022 | 0.215 ± 0.006 | 0.145 ± 0.011 | 0.317 ± 0.007 | 3.50 |
|
|