Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Sensors
Volume 2018, Article ID 5096540, 16 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5096540
Research Article

Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors for Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring

1Department of Air Conditioning, Heating, Gas Engineering and Air Protection, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-373 Wrocław, Poland
2INSYSPOM, 54-427 Wrocław, Poland
3Department of Climatology and Atmosphere Protection, Institute of Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Earth Science and Environmental Management, University of Wrocław, 51-621 Wrocław, Poland

Correspondence should be addressed to Marek Badura; lp.ude.rwp@arudab.keram

Received 28 February 2018; Revised 3 June 2018; Accepted 30 July 2018; Published 31 October 2018

Academic Editor: Michele Penza

Copyright © 2018 Marek Badura et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. European Environment Agency, “Air quality in Europe – 2017 report,” Tech. Rep., Publications Office of the European Union. EEA Report no. 13/2017, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. O. Anderson, J. G. Thundiyil, and A. Stolbach, “Clearing the air: a review of the effects of particulate matter air pollution on human health,” Journal of Medical Toxicology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 166–175, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. H. Kim, E. Kabir, and S. Kabir, “A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter,” Environment International, vol. 74, pp. 136–143, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Guarnieri and J. R. Balmes, “Outdoor air pollution and asthma,” Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9928, pp. 1581–1592, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. R. Cassee, M.-E. Héroux, M. E. Gerlofs-Nijland, and F. J. Kelly, “Particulate matter beyond mass: recent health evidence on the role of fractions, chemical constituents and sources of emission,” Inhalation Toxicology, vol. 25, no. 14, pp. 802–812, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. International Agency for Research on Cancer, “Outdoor air pollution a leading environmental cause of cancer deaths,” Press Release No. 221, IARC Communications Group, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  7. European Environment Agency, “European Air Quality Index,” May 2018 http://airindex.eea.europa.eu/.
  8. P. Kumar, L. Morawska, C. Martani et al., “The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities,” Environment International, vol. 75, pp. 199–205, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. G. Snyder, T. H. Watkins, P. A. Solomon et al., “The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 47, no. 20, pp. 11369–11377, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Castell, F. R. Dauge, P. Schneider et al., “Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates?” Environment International, vol. 99, pp. 293–302, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Budde, M. Köpke, and M. Beigl, “Design of a light-scattering particle sensor for citizen science air quality monitoring with smartphones: tradeoffs and experiences,” in Pro Science 3: Conference Proceedings: 2nd International Conference on Atmospheric Dust - DUST 2016, pp. 13–20, Castellaneta Marina, Italy, 2016.
  12. M. Budde, L. Zhang, and M. Beigl, “Distributed, low-cost particulate matter sensing: scenarios, challenges, approaches,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Atmospheric Dust, pp. 230–236, Castellaneta Marina, Italy, June 2014.
  13. M. Gao, J. Cao, and E. Seto, “A distributed network of low-cost continuous reading sensors to measure spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 in Xi'an, China,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 199, pp. 56–65, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. Zikova, M. Masiol, D. Chalupa, D. Rich, A. Ferro, and P. Hopke, “Estimating hourly concentrations of PM2.5 across a metropolitan area using low-cost particle monitors,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 8, p. 1922, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Patel, J. Li, A. Pandey, S. Pervez, R. K. Chakrabarty, and P. Biswas, “Spatio-temporal measurement of indoor particulate matter concentrations using a wireless network of low-cost sensors in households using solid fuels,” Environmental Research, vol. 152, pp. 59–65, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Schmidt-Ott and Z. D. Ristovski, “Measurement of airborne particles,” in Indoor Environment: Airborne Particles and Settled Dust, pp. 56–81, Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. C. Rai, P. Kumar, F. Pilla et al., “End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 607-608, pp. 691–705, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. Williams, T. Watkins, and R. Long, “Low cost sensor calibration options,” in EM: Air and Waste Management Association's Magazine for Environmental Managers, pp. 10–15, Air & Waste Management Association, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  19. EN 12341:2014, Ambient Air - Standard Gravimetric Measurement Method for the Determination of the PM10 or PM2,5 Mass Concentration of Suspended Particulate Matter, European Committee for Standardization, 2014.
  20. EN 16450:2017, Ambient Air - Automated Measuring Systems for the Measurement of the Concentration of Particulate Matter (PM10; PM2,5), European Committee for Standardization, 2017.
  21. World Meteorological Organization, “Low-cost sensors for the measurement of atmospheric composition: overview of topic and future applications,” in WMO-No. 1215, A. C. Lewis, E. Schneidemesser, and R. E. Peltier, Eds., World Meteorological Organization, 2018. View at Google Scholar
  22. R. McDonald, S. Hu, D. Martuzevicius, S. A. Grinshpun, G. LeMasters, and P. Biswas, “Intensive short term measurements of the ambient aerosol in the greater Cincinnati airshed,” Aerosol Science and Technology, vol. 38, Supplement 2, pp. 70–79, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H. Patashnick and E. G. Rupprecht, “Continuous PM-10 measurements using the tapered element oscillating microbalance,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1079–1083, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), List of Designated Reference and Equivalent Methods, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2017.
  25. K. Zhu, J. (. J.). Zhang, and P. J. Lioy, “Evaluation and comparison of continuous fine particulate matter monitors for measurement of ambient aerosols,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 1499–1506, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. K. Johnson, M. H. Bergin, A. G. Russell, and G. S. W. Hagler, “Using low cost sensors to measure ambient particulate matter concentrations and on-road emissions factors,” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, pp. 1–22, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. K. K. Johnson, M. H. Bergin, A. G. Russell, and G. S. W. Hagler, “Field test of several low-cost particulate matter sensors in high and low concentration urban environments,” Aerosol and Air Quality Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 565–578, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. Williams, A. Kaufman, T. Hanley, J. Rice, and S. Garvey, Evaluation of Field-Deployed Low Cost PM Sensors, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 2014, EPA/600/R-14/464 (NTIS PB 2015–102104).
  29. K. E. Kelly, J. Whitaker, A. Petty et al., “Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter sensor,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 221, pp. 491–500, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), “Field evaluation laser egg PM sensor,” May 2018 http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/aq-spec/field-evaluations/laser-egg---field-evaluation.pdf.
  31. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), “Field evaluation of SainSmart,” May 2018 http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/aq-spec/field-evaluations/sainsmart---field-evaluation.pdf.
  32. T. Zheng, M. H. Bergin, K. K. Johnson et al., “Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments,” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 4823–4846, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. R. Jayaratne, X. Liu, P. Thai, M. Dunbabin, and L. Morawska, “The influence of humidity on the performance of a low-cost air particle mass sensor and the effect of atmospheric fog,” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 4883–4890, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. K. N. Genikomsakis, N.-F. Galatoulas, P. I. Dallas, L. C. Ibarra, D. Margaritis, and C. S. Ioakimidis, “Development and on-field testing of low-cost portable system for monitoring PM2.5 concentrations,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 1056, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Sousan, K. Koehler, L. Hallett, and T. M. Peters, “Evaluation of the Alphasense optical particle counter (OPC-N2) and the Grimm portable aerosol spectrometer (PAS-1.108),” Aerosol Science and Technology, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1352–1365, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. R. Crilley, M. Shaw, R. Pound et al., “Evaluation of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring,” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 709–720, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), “Field evaluation AlphaSense OPC-N2 sensor,” May 2018 http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/aq-spec/field-evaluations/alphasense-opc-n2---field-evaluation.pdf.
  38. M. Badura, P. Batog, A. Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, and P. Modzel, “Optical particulate matter sensors in PM2.5 measurements in atmospheric air,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 44, article 00006, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. S. Sousan, K. Koehler, G. Thomas et al., “Inter-comparison of low-cost sensors for measuring the mass concentration of occupational aerosols,” Aerosol Science and Technology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 462–473, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. Sousan, K. Koehler, L. Hallett, and T. M. Peters, “Evaluation of consumer monitors to measure particulate matter,” Journal of Aerosol Science, vol. 107, pp. 123–133, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. D. Wanjura, B. W. Shaw, C. B. Parnell Jr, R. E. Lacey, and S. C. Capareda, “Comparison of continuous monitor (TEOM) and gravimetric sampler particulate matter concentrations,” Transactions of the ASABE, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 251–257, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. G. Allen, C. Sioutas, P. Koutrakis, R. Reiss, F. W. Lurmann, and P. T. Roberts, “Evaluation of the TEOM® method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 682–689, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. L.-A. Tortajada-Genaro and E. Borrás, “Temperature effect of tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) system measuring semi-volatile organic particulate matter,” Journal of Environmental Monitoring, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1017–1026, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus