Global Annual Final AC Yield Comparison between HCPV and c-Si PV

<div>Map of global annual AC final yield, <svg height="11.9316pt" id="M37" style="vertical-align:-3.2957pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 32.6806 11.9316" width="32.6806pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M640 650H413L406 622L438 617C475 611 483 605 463 571C422 503 346 400 296 333C264 403 215 529 199 575C189 604 191 614 228 618L262 622L271 650H30L23 622C90 615 97 609 119 553L212 321C222 295 223 285 218 259L193 127C176 39 167 33 82 28L76 0H350L356 28C266 36 257 40 275 127L303 266C308 290 314 302 328 322C396 418 454 493 498 546C551 610 565 616 631 622L640 650Z" id="g113-90"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="652" vert-adv-y="652"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,7.111,3.132)"><path d="M738 650H471V617C551 612 559 606 559 524V368H218V524C218 606 227 612 305 617V650H38V617C123 612 131 606 131 524V126C131 44 124 38 41 33V0H310V33C226 38 218 44 218 126V321H559V126C559 44 551 38 463 33V0H737V33C654 38 646 44 646 126V524C646 606 654 612 738 617V650Z" id="g58-70"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="777" vert-adv-y="777"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,14.1,3.132)"><path d="M618 181C565 77 513 26 413 26C264 26 151 150 151 336C151 486 240 625 407 625C516 625 573 582 600 475L634 483C627 540 622 581 613 638C585 643 518 665 435 665C211 665 46 526 46 315C46 158 157 -15 406 -15C480 -15 564 4 594 12C612 43 638 121 651 168L618 181Z" id="g58-65"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="673" vert-adv-y="673"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,20.224,3.132)"><path d="M46 650V618C122 613 130 611 130 522V128C130 46 123 40 40 32V0H319V32C227 40 217 42 217 128V279L292 260C303 259 322 258 338 261C436 272 534 337 534 467C534 534 508 580 469 609C428 640 371 650 299 650H46ZM217 558C217 585 220 596 228 603C235 610 256 615 284 615C367 615 435 571 435 463C435 339 358 304 291 304C256 304 229 310 217 317V558Z" id="g58-78"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="573" vert-adv-y="573"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,25.438,3.132)"><path d="M698 650H468V617C551 609 555 599 536 543C506 457 432 264 379 129H377C311 297 238 488 212 560C196 604 198 609 271 617V650H21V617C80 612 98 603 127 532C183 396 268 173 335 -9H370C445 196 551 450 578 511C615 602 630 609 698 617V650Z" id="g58-84"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="717" vert-adv-y="717"></glyph.data></g></svg>, measured in kW⋅h/k<svg height="13.6886pt" id="M38" style="vertical-align:-5.300619pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.38798 18.1457 13.6886" width="18.1457pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M956 650H736V622C814 613 818 602 804 542C789 471 733 275 691 141H689C628 314 570 476 514 641H485C434 478 377 312 323 142H321C277 284 238 419 199 554C184 605 186 613 259 622V650H16V622C77 615 92 606 117 524C172 346 228 170 281 -11H312C363 151 419 312 475 488H477C528 343 597 150 652 -11H683C765 269 826 458 848 522C878 605 887 613 956 622V650Z" id="g121-85"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="971" vert-adv-y="971"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,12.623,3.132)"><path d="M173 382V461C125 442 68 425 25 418V390C88 382 92 382 92 317V-127C92 -191 84 -199 18 -204V-235H259V-204C180 -196 173 -192 173 -120V7C188 -1 212 -11 243 -12C375 12 495 109 495 261C495 361 427 451 316 451C303 451 283 446 266 435L173 382ZM173 345C200 365 243 388 274 388C346 388 409 329 409 222C409 111 353 40 266 40C231 40 196 56 173 79V345Z" id="g58-110"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="534" vert-adv-y="534"></glyph.data></g></svg> for a HCPV power plant. A Performance Ratio (<svg height="8.55523pt" id="M39" style="vertical-align:-0.1672497pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.38798 15.6146 8.55523" width="15.6146pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M46 650V622C120 617 128 613 128 525V125C128 42 120 34 40 28V0H311V28C221 34 212 39 212 124V281L286 262C297 261 316 261 331 263C429 275 526 338 526 468C526 533 501 579 462 609C422 638 364 650 293 650H46ZM212 559C212 588 215 600 223 606C230 613 251 618 279 618C361 618 430 572 430 464C430 337 350 302 285 302C252 302 225 309 212 314V559Z" id="g121-78"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="563" vert-adv-y="563"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,7.254,0)"><path d="M631 18C609 24 585 35 559 65C534 91 514 117 478 169C448 214 406 281 389 313C462 346 516 399 516 485C516 545 490 590 449 616C412 641 363 650 290 650H42V622C120 615 128 612 128 527V125C128 40 120 34 38 28V0H300V28C221 34 212 40 212 125V284H244C295 284 312 272 329 244C359 195 395 133 430 84C475 19 516 -3 592 -7C603 -8 615 -8 627 -8L631 18ZM212 316V563C212 591 215 602 223 607C231 613 248 617 277 617C352 617 423 577 423 469C423 415 407 375 368 345C343 324 310 316 260 316H212Z" id="g121-80"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="621" vert-adv-y="621"></glyph.data></g></svg>) of 0.82 was considered for the calculation.</div>

Journal of Solar Energy

Global Annual Final AC Yield Comparison between HCPV and c-Si PV

Figure 3