Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Spectroscopy: An International Journal
Volume 27 (2012), Issue 5-6, Pages 337-342

A New Method for D 2 O / H 2 O Exchange in Infrared Spectroscopy of Proteins

1Laboratorio di Biochimica e Biofisica, Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
2Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze Fisiche della Materia, c/o Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
3LASIR, UMR CNRS 8516, Bat C5, Université Lille 1, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France
4Service de Bioénergétique Biologie Structurale et Mécanismes, URA CNRS 2096, IBITeC-S, Bat 532, CEA-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France

Copyright © 2012 Marco Malferrari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


In this paper, we describe a new method to obtain D2O/H2O exchange in photosynthetic reaction centres from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The method is characterized by: (i) a very high efficiency of the isotopic replacement; (ii) an extremely low amount of D2O needed; (iii) the short time required for dehydration and D2O rehydration; (iv) the possibility of controlling concomitantly the hydration state of the sample. The proposed method can be applied to other proteins.

1. Introduction

Reaction-induced Fourier transform infrared difference spectroscopy (FTIR-DS) in the mid-IR region (4000–800 cm−1) is an important tool for biochemical and biophysical studies of protein processes [1]. The potentiality of FTIR-DS is fully exploited when the structure of the protein is known and at least some of the bands in the difference spectrum have been assigned to a vibration of a given chemical moiety of a specific amino acid or cofactor inside the protein. A series of strategies exists for correct assignment [1]. Among them, the comparison of FTIR difference spectra recorded in H2O, D2O is often the first step. In fact, H2O replacement by D2O entails exchange of accessible N–, O–, S– bound protons leading to band shifts in the spectrum. The main drawback arises from the incomplete exchange (even for water-accessible residues), leading to “mixed” D2O/H2O spectra.

The photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter (Rb.) sphaeroides represents a model system in bioenergetics, especially suited to investigate electron transfer (ET), proton transfer, and quinone redox chemistry in proteins [2]. It is also an excellent system to study matrix effects on the dynamics of membrane proteins and ET processes [3]. The structure of the Rb. sphaeroides RC is known at atomic resolution and its photochemistry has been characterized in detail [4, 5].

FTIR-DS studies on Rb. sphaeroides RC have been carried out during more than 20 years (see [6] for a recent review), leading to the marker bands for cofactors, amino acid side chains and internal water molecules [6, 7]. The RC has also been studied by time-resolved FTIR-DS ([812] and references therein) and used as a “case study” to develop and test new data analysis techniques ([12, 13] and references therein). Despite this large amount of data, several issues are still debated (see e.g., [10, 11, 14]).

In a recent work [15] it has been shown that the hydration state of the RC controls the protein dynamics associated to ET reactions. The hydration state has been controlled accurately by using an isopiestic method, which consists in equilibrating a dehydrated RC film in the presence of saturated salt solutions providing definite values of the relative humidity, r [15]. In the present work we show that the isopiestic method mentioned above can be used to obtain a very high efficiency of H2O/D2O exchange for Rb. sphaeroides RCs. The method can be extended to other proteins.

2. Materials and Methods

RCs were extracted from Rb. sphaeroides strain 2.4.1 using lauryldimethylamine N-oxide (LDAO) as detergent and purified following the procedure described in [16]. FTIR spectra were recorded on a Bruker IFS 88 spectrometer. A Globar source and a DTGS detector were used. The intactness of the RC was checked in the sample compartment by recording a FT-UV-Vis spectrum in the 15000–10000 cm−1 range using as a detector a silicon photodiode. Temperature was set to 281 K by a N2 cryostat (Oxford Instrument).

RC films were prepared on CaF2 window using 40–60 μL drops of a 60 μM RC solution (10 mM TRIS HCl, pH 8.0, 0.025% LDAO, and 10 mM o-phenanthroline). A small compartment (volume ~1 mL) was obtained by inserting the CaF2 window carrying the film and a second one, separated by an O-ring, in a clipping sample holder. The relative humidity 𝑟 within the compartment containing the RC film was controlled by a few μL drops of saturated NaCl or LiCl solutions to achieve at 281 K values of 𝑟 equal to 76% and 11%, respectively [15].

3. Results and Discussion

Spectra recorded at two hydration levels ( 𝑟 = 1 1 % and 76%) are shown in Figure 1(a). The amide A (at ~3295 cm−1), the amide I (at ~1655 cm−1), and the amide II (at ~1550 cm−1) bands are easily identified, in agreement with spectra obtained in air-dried RCs reconstituted in phospholipid vesicles [17]. The peaks around 2900 cm−1 are attributed to the various CH2 stretching modes [17]. The amide A band overlaps largely with the OH stretching band of water. As a consequence the large band at ~3300 cm−1 is strongly reduced when the sample is dehydrated by equilibration at 𝑟 = 1 1 % as compared to 𝑟 = 7 6 %. The dehydration of the sample can be better evaluated from the ( 𝜈 2 + 𝜈 3 ) combination band of water, centred at 5150 cm−1, which is shown enlarged in Figure 1(b). The area below this band has been shown to be proportional to the water content, independently of the H bonding organization [15, 18]. The peak at 4850 cm−1, on the lower wavenumber side of the water combination band, is attributed to a combination of the NH stretching frequency at 3280 cm−1 and the peptide frequency at 1550 cm−1 [15] and is clearly resolved at 𝑟 = 1 1 %. When the water combination band is corrected for this contribution by subtracting a background [15], it can be estimated that at 𝑟 = 1 1 % less than 20% of the water content of the sample detected at 𝑟 = 7 6 % is retained. The association band of water visible at ~2100 cm−1 in the spectrum at 𝑟 = 7 6 % is also strongly reduced at 𝑟 = 1 1 % (Figure 1(a)).

Figure 1: (a) FTIR spectra recorded in a RC film equilibrated at 𝑟 = 7 6 % (blue), dehydrated at 𝑟 = 1 1 % (black), and rehydrated at 𝑟 = 7 6 % in the presence of D2O (red). (b) Enlargement of the 5500–4700 cm−1 spectral region, showing the ( 𝜈 2 + 𝜈 3 ) combination band of water at 5150 cm−1.

When the dehydrated sample ( 𝑟 = 1 1 %) is rehydrated in the presence of NaCl in D2O ( 𝑟 = 7 6 %) the spectrum exhibits strong alterations, diagnostic of an efficient deuteration. In Figure 1(a), all the spectra have been normalized to the amplitude of the amide I band, which is less affected by D2O replacement as compared to the amide II band. Although the region of the amide I includes some contribution from the water bending mode, normalization to the amplitude of the amide I band allows a better comparison between the spectra recorded in the presence of H2O and D2O at 𝑟 = 7 6 %.

Figure 1(a) shows that upon rehydration with D2O the band centred at 3300 cm−1 is almost halved in amplitude, as compared to the one recorded in H2O at 𝑟 = 7 6 %, consistently with a reduction of the water OH stretching contribution and the partial deuteration of the NH group of the amide A band. As expected, upon rehydration with D2O, the OH stretching band of water is blue-shifted by about 800 cm−1 [19], resulting in a strong absorption band centred at 2500 cm−1. In the hydrated samples at 𝑟 = 7 6 %, both in H2O and in D2O, the amide A band exhibits a shoulder on the high wavenumber side. This shoulder, which essentially disappears in the dehydrated sample at 𝑟 = 1 1 %, is attributed to the water OH stretching mode and to OH and NH groups of the protein. We propose that the disappearance of the shoulder in the dehydrated sample reflects not only water depletion but possibly also a shift to lower wavenumbers of the protein OH and NH groups, presumably due to a strengthening of the H-bonds. This interpretation would explain why the shoulder becomes again detectable upon rehydration with D2O, although much reduced in amplitude and width. Since in D2O the extent of deuteration is very high and H2O is essentially absent (see below), the contribution of protein OH and NH groups is likely to be responsible for the band shoulder in the deuterated sample.

It is known that N-deuteration converts the amide II mode to largely a CN stretching vibration at 1490–1460 cm−1, named amide II’ band [1]. In line with this change, we observe a weakening of the band at 1550 cm−1 (amide II) and a large increase of the absorbance between 1420 and 1500 cm−1, giving rise to a peak at 1460 cm−1, which can be attributed to the appearance of the amide II’ band. Interestingly a peak at 1550 cm−1 also appears, which corresponds to the wavenumber expected for the water association band upon D2O replacement [19].

The extent of D2O replacement can be evaluated from Figure 1(b). Following rehydration with D2O, the spectrum between 5500 and 4700 cm−1 still exhibits the NH band at 4850 cm−1, while the ( 𝜈 2 + 𝜈 3 ) combination band of water essentially disappears. We infer that the efficiency of D2O replacement achieved upon rehydration in the presence of D2O is larger than 95%. Since rehydration with D2O occurs in samples which still retain some residual H2O (see the spectrum at 𝑟 = 1 1 % in Figure 1(b)), it appears that equilibration with D2O vapour not only leads to rehydration with deuterated water, but also results in the exchange of the residual H2O with D2O.

The isopiestic method for isotopic replacement discussed above offers significant assets: (i) the efficiency of the isotopic replacement is very high; (ii) the amount of D2O needed is extremely low; (iii) dehydration and D2O rehydration require a relatively short time (less than 6 hours as compared to, for example, more than 12 for dialysis); (iv) the hydration state of the sample can be concomitantly controlled through the ( 𝜈 2 + 𝜈 3 ) combination band of water [15].


The authors thank Dr. W. Leibl (CEA-Saclay) for help in the FTIR measurements. Financial support from MIUR of Italy (Grant PRIN 2008ZWHZJT) is gratefully acknowledged by M. Malferrari and G. Venturoli


  1. A. Barth, “Infrared spectroscopy of proteins,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1767, no. 9, pp. 1073–1101, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Y. Okamura, M. L. Paddock, M. S. Graige, and G. Feher, “Proton and electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1458, no. 1, pp. 148–163, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. Cordone, G. Cottone, S. Giuffrida, G. Palazzo, G. Venturoli, and C. Viappiani, “Internal dynamics and protein-matrix coupling in trehalose-coated proteins,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1749, no. 2, pp. 252–281, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Feher, J. P. Allen, M. Y. Okamura, and D. C. Rees, “Structure and function of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centres,” Nature, vol. 339, no. 6220, pp. 111–116, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Koepke, E. M. Krammer, A. R. Klingen, P. Sebban, G. M. Ullmann, and G. Fritzsch, “pH Modulates the quinone position in the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides in the neutral and charge separated states,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 371, no. 2, pp. 396–409, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Nabedryk and J. Breton, “Coupling of electron transfer to proton uptake at the QB site of the bacterial reaction center: a perspective from FTIR difference spectroscopy,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1777, no. 10, pp. 1229–1248, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Iwata, M. L. Paddock, M. Y. Okamura, and H. Kandori, “Identification of FTIR bands due to internal water molecules around the quinone binding sites in the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides,” Biochemistry, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1220–1229, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Mezzetti and W. Leibl, “Investigation of ubiquinol formation in isolated photosynthetic reaction centers by rapid-scan Fourier transform IR spectroscopy,” European Biophysics Journal, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 921–936, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Mezzetti, E. Nabedryk, J. Breton et al., “Rapid-scan Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy shows coupling of GLu-L212 protonation and electron transfer to QB in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1553, no. 3, pp. 320–330, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Remy and K. Gerwert, “Coupling of light-induced electron transfer to proton uptake in photosynthesis,” Nature Structural Biology, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 637–644, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Onidas, J. M. Stachnik, S. Brucker, S. Krätzig, and K. Gerwert, “Histidine is involved in coupling proton uptake to electron transfer in photosynthetic proteins,” European Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 89, no. 12, pp. 983–989, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Mezzetti, L. Blanchet, A. de Juan, W. Leibl, and C. Ruckebusch, “Ubiquinol formation in isolated photosynthetic reaction centres monitored by time-resolved differential FTIR in combination with 2D correlation spectroscopy and multivariate curve resolution,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 399, no. 6, pp. 1999–2014, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Blanchet, C. Ruckebusch, A. Mezzetti, J. P. Huvenne, and A. De Juan, “Monitoring and interpretation of photoinduced biochemical processes by rapid-scan FTIR difference spectroscopy and hybrid hard and soft modeling,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 113, no. 17, pp. 6031–6040, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Breton, “Steady-state FTIR spectra of the photoreduction of QA and Q B in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers provide evidence against the presence of a proposed transient electron acceptor X between the two quinones,” Biochemistry, vol. 46, no. 15, pp. 4459–4465, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Malferrari, F. Francia, and G. Venturoli, “Coupling between electron transfer and protein-solvent dynamics: FTIR and Laser-Flash spectroscopy studies in photosynthetic reaction center films at different hydration levels,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 115, no. 49, pp. 14732–14750, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  16. L. Baciou and H. Michel, “Interruption of the water chain in the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides reduces the rates of the proton uptake and of the second electron transfer to QB,” Biochemistry, vol. 34, no. 25, pp. 7967–7972, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Nabedryk, D. M. Tiede, P. L. Dutton, and J. Breton, “Conformation and orientation of the protein in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 682, no. 2, pp. 273–280, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. Fornés and J. Chaussidon, “An interpretation of the evolution with temperature of the v2+v3 combination band in water,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 4667–4671, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. J. Max and C. Chapados, “Isotope effects in liquid water by infrared spectroscopy,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 116, no. 11, pp. 4626–4642, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus