Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Spectroscopy
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 425753, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/425753
Review Article

Remote Sensing of CO2 Absorption by Saline-Alkali Soils: Potentials and Constraints

1State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
3College of Computer and Information Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Received 6 March 2014; Accepted 29 March 2014; Published 17 April 2014

Academic Editor: Qingrui Zhang

Copyright © 2014 Wenfeng Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils was recently demonstrated in the measurements of soil respiration fluxes in arid and semiarid ecosystems and hypothetically contributed to the long-thought “missing carbon sink.” This paper is aimed to develop the preliminary theory and methodology for the quantitative analysis of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils on regional and global scales. Both the technological progress of multispectral remote sensing over the past decades and the conjectures of mechanisms and controls of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils are advantageous for remote sensing of such absorption. At the end of this paper, the scheme for remote sensing is presented and some unresolved issues related to the scheme are also proposed for further investigations.

1. Introduction

Energy shortage and environment security are hot issues on economy and social development in the world today [13]. Global trends of soil desertification and degradation pose a direct threat to the food safety and human survival and become the hottest part of the issues. Soil salinization is one of the main types of soil desertification and degradation. It is caused by soil water and salt movement, usually occurring in arid and semiarid areas of strong evaporation and high-table groundwater with dissolvable salt [4]. Because of the alternating affection of rainfall, irrigation, and evaporation, soil salt further accumulates in unsaturated zone and leads to the secondary salinization, which induces a great loss of the resources of arable land and the agricultural production and meanwhile poses a serious threat to biosphere and ecological environment [5]. In order to manage saline-alkali soils and prevent further soil degradation, people must be timely informed about the nature and geographic distribution of saline-alkali soils and the degrees of salinity/alkalinity. Therefore, accurately acquiring the information on saline-alkali soils is significant to protect soil quality and agricultural yield. Remote sensing data allows us to dynamically monitor saline-alkali soils on large scales [6]. Such information reflects the soil nature, geographical distribution, and its dynamic changes in the degrees of salinity/alkalinity, which is essentially significant for the reasonable planning of agricultural production and the steady development of social economy in arid and semiarid regions [46].

Exactly, such information not only can be used to monitor soil salinization, but also can be used to quantify the effects of other environmental processes, especially the geochemical processes related to the long-thought “missing carbon sink” [7]. It has been demonstrated that saline-alkali soils are absorbing CO2 and may significantly contribute to the “missing carbon sink” [810]. A global quantification of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils is important to readdress the “missing carbon sink” [79]. However, there is still no theory and methodology was developed for quantifying the CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils on large scales. Some empirical models are presented to approximately quantify the absorption on site scales, but the model was parameterized using the collected data from the Gubantonggut desert and the environmental controls on model parameters were poorly understood [1114]. It is emergent to take further readings in other arid and semiarid regions and develop theory and methodology for remote sensing of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils on regional and global scales [13].

This paper is aimed to develop some preliminary theory and methodology for remote sensing of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils on large scales. As a first attempt, the theory potentials of and constraints on applying the methodology are also discussed. Strategies against the constraints are presented. Theoretical feasibility for remote sensing of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils on large scales is discussed. At the end of this paper, the strategies against the constraints and some unresolved issues about the theory and methodology are proposed.

2. Theory and Methodology

Although there are a series of studies speculated the mechanisms of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils, none of those speculations has been widely accepted. Conjectured mechanisms in the previous publications [7, 9, 10, 13] include the soil storage of CO2; (2) the molecular dissolution of CO2 in soil water films; (3) the surface adhesion of CO2 onto soil minerals; (4) pH-mediated CO2 dissolution; and (4) migration and sequestration of CO2 into groundwater. The molecular solubility of CO2 (MSC) and the pH-mediated CO2 dissolution are two determining physiochemical parameters [10].

Spectral data from laboratory and field observations suggested that spectral reflectance of saline-alkali soil was affected by soil salt, organic matter content, structure, and soil color [16]. In addition, the solar altitude and soil salt composition also affect the spectral response mode of saline-alkali soils. Spectral reflectance increases/decreases when soil salt content increases for the difference in soil salt composition [6]. Although spectral reflectance of saline-alkali soils is the integrated effect of a series of environmental factors, soil salts and soil minerals content, soil surface morphology and soil water content are more determining factors. These are right the materials that contribute to CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils (Figure 1).

425753.fig.001
Figure 1: Conjectured mechanisms for CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils. Note: MSC (the molecular solubility of CO2); SSC (the soil storage of CO2).

Soil water not only directly affects the spectral characteristics of soils, but also controls the vertical movement of soil salt [16]. Saline-alkali soil usually contains Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cl-, , , and so forth. Special salts (aqueous sodium chloride, sodium sulfate, potassium sulfate, calcium sulfate, and magnesium sulfate) absorb solar radiation and present additional spectral information [1720]. These chemical materials, driven by soil water movements, are accumulated in the soil surface as salt crystals. Saline-alkali soils containing the heavier mass of sodium also have higher spectral reflectance than common saline-alkali soils [6]. Soil salinization and alkalization were caused by the increases of soluble salts (sodium carbonate, sodium sulfate, and sodium chloride) in soils. The higher sodium content in the soils implies more CO2 can be dissolved [10]. The spectral characteristics also reflect the different stages of soil salinization and alkalization [21, 22], while the alkalinity degree is a determining factor of CO2 absorption intensity [13].

Both the technological progress of multispectral remote sensing over the past decades and the conjectures of mechanisms and controls of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils are advantageous for remote sensing of such absorption on large scales. As a preliminary attempt, we need only to know well about how much soil dew can be accumulated in these soils and how much CO2 can be dissolved in the dew. These will help us to finally calculate the rate of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils. Estimation of the soil CO2 flux (i.e., soil respiration flux: ) along a field gradient of air temperature 10 cm above the soil surface () with (, ) and the contribution analysis of soil dew in the unexplained part of by the model (denoted by ) with (dew > 1 mm; , ) present further evidence (Figure 3). It recommends that remote sensing of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils should be based on the following equation. Let be the initial amounts of CO2 in soil dew at and the rate of CO2 increases in dew is . Ignoring the restricting effect of history CO2 absorption, it is straight that where represents the CO2 dissolution dynamics on time scales.

It is easy to see that the analytic solution of (1) is . Noting that and determine the dynamic changes of soil CO2 dissolution and the absorption rate, remote sensing of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils is equivalent to the retrieval of these two parameters. These two parameters are largely determined by soil pH (determines the amounts of soil CO2 dissolution), soil water content (reflects the dynamic changes of dew amounts in the soil), and air temperature (controls the dew deposition/evaporation). Exactly, it was found that CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils correlates well with these three determining factors and an alternative form of (1) has been employed in large-scale applications [13].

It is worthy to be noted that soil content largely determines soil alkalinity degree, which in turn determines the intensity of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils. Soil strongly absorbs infrared radiation and may present additional helpful spectral information [23]. When soils are sufficiently dry, salt crystal is accumulated onto the soil surface and hence the surface CO2 adhesion onto soil minerals is increasingly important since it makes chances for this CO2 on the soil surface to be further dissolved in soil water when soil dew amounts increase at lower temperatures (Figure 2). The significance of soil content on CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils is mainly determined by its close relation with soil pH, soil water content, and air temperature.

425753.fig.002
Figure 2: Variations of soil CO2 fluxes (soil respiration fluxes) with dew accumulation along a laboratory gradient of colder air temperatures (from [12]).
425753.fig.003
Figure 3: Estimation of soil CO2 fluxes (soil respiration fluxes: ) along a field gradient of the air temperature 10 cm above the soil surface () with (a: , RMSE = 0.23) and analysis of the contributions of dew amounts in with + 0.18 (b: , ) and   − 6.38 (c: , RMSE = 0.75), where is defined as the unexplained part of by the model (from [12]).

3. Potential and Constraints

The spectral characteristics of saline-alkali soils are vulnerable to the effects of the external environmental factors. If such an issue is not properly addressed, then it is easy to generate cumulative errors, which increased the uncertainties in model parameters and in quantifying CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils. These external environmental factors are also the main determinants of the model parameters. So it is an inevitable challenge to the traditional multispectral remote sensing. Fortunately, the development of modern spectroscopic techniques, especially the development of hyperspectral technology, allows researchers to detect specific substances in the soil using spectral diagnosis characteristics and further reduces uncertainties in remote sensing of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils.

Vegetation coverage can change spectral reflectance mode of saline-alkali soils and result in external interference [6, 24, 25]. Remote sensing of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils deserves the remote sensing images of high spatial resolution. Currently, the CO2 absorption phenomenon is mainly observed at saline-alkali sites of arid and semiarid regions. Remote sensing of the absorption on large scales should be naturally focused on arid and semiarid ecosystems. Some natural phenomena occurred at soil surface, such as the dry river-bed, the erosion of soil surface, the muddy crust, and their dynamic changes may generate the spectral characteristics similar to saline-alkali soils and cause confusions of the spectrum. These bring technological difficulties in remote sensing of the dynamic changes of the soil salt content on time and spatial scales.

The spectral characteristics are also closely related to the surface morphology of saline-alkali soils, including the salt incrustation of different thickness and salt content, the loose soil structure with aggregated and crystalline salt, and the loose formation caused by wind erosion. Soil surface roughness of different surface morphology is different and the spectral reflectance characteristics become different [26]. These external interferences can affect the surface spectral information of soil surface texture and caused bigger errors in the retrieval of model parameters [2729]. Other physical and chemical characteristics also affect the spectral characteristics of saline-alkali soils [3032]. Human farming causes higher surface roughness because the soils are reconstructed and soil surface roughness is significantly increased. However, spatial and spectral resolution of the multispectral remote sensing are relatively low and it is difficult to differentiate the complex spectral characteristics of soil surface and to obtain the precise and quantitative results if we only use the soil spectral characteristics [33]. When the salt content is less than 10~15%, it is almost impossible to distinguish saline-alkali soils from other soils [34].

Hyperspectral images are feasible for the synchronization acquisition of spatial features, radiation information, and spectral characteristics. These images of higher spectral resolution can even reflect the subtle characteristics of landmark spectrum. Quantitative analysis of the distribution of saline-alkali soils and their surface morphology becomes possible, reducing the interference from external environmental factors [3538]. Hyperspectral remote sensing data improve the accuracy of classification of halophyte and the degrees of salinity/alkalinity [39, 40], which further cut down the subjective errors in remote sensing of the model parameters.

4. Schemes for Remote Sensing

Quantitative mapping of the properties of global saline-alkali soils according to hyperspectral data (including soil salinity) is feasible. Exactly, some scientists have proved the feasibility on regional scales [4143]. In addition, hyperspectral remote sensing can be provided for each pixel the information of high-quality (similar to the laboratory accuracy) and can accurately monitor the vegetation information (such as the growth and distribution of different types of vegetation). This allows a pretreatment of the vegetation-covered part in hyperspectral images, overcomes the interference of vegetation, and helps to indirectly infer the salinity and alkalinity of the soil according to the vegetation types [4446], since the vegetation types reflect the ranges of soil salt content and soil pH. These preliminary illustrations present necessary theoretical basis for remote sensing of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soil on large scales.

Now we are going to design remote sensing schemes for CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soil on the global scale. First, collect the representative soil samples for chemical, physical analysis, and the field and laboratory measurements of the soil spectral characteristics. This helps to obtain the spectral information related to physical and chemical characteristics. The model parameters are determined by the sampling measurements of soil CO2 fluxes. Second, conduct the atmospheric correction of high reflectance spectrum image, the retrievial of soil surface reflectance, and the pretreatment of vegetation-covered areas. The retrieval of model parameters is implemented using multiple stepwise regression analyses. Finally, the model with the determined parameters is employed in remote sensing of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soil on region scales and then integrated to the global scale. Sketch of the full scheme for quantitative remote sensing of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils on the global scales is presented in Figure 4.

425753.fig.004
Figure 4: Remote sensing schemes for CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soil on large scales.

Over the last three decades, the sources of remote sensing data became more abundant and the methods for retrieval became more sophisticated. Saline-alkali soils and other soils can be easily distinguished according to the spectral characteristics from the hyperspectral images when combined with the GIS assessment of the degrees of soil salinity and alkalinity. Soil salt content can also be accurately predicted by the standard reflectance spectrum, using the data-mining technologies (such as PLSR and ANN) [47]. Spectral reflectance of saline-alkali soils has been applied in studies on soil science, ecology, environmental science, biophysiology, ecology, and economics [4851]. The scheme for retrieval of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soil on the global scale seems feasible under the strong backgrounds. However, there are still some unresolved issues to be investigated for further reducing uncertainties in the retrieval as follows.(1)Visual interpretation remains as an important means of monitoring and analysis on saline-alkali soil and its dynamics [52]. But in fact, the imaging characteristics of saline-alkali soils can vary depending on the resolution and the image sensor at different times. Interpretation of saline-alkali soils should be done not only in accordance with their image features, but also in accordance with a comprehensive analysis of the geographical and landscape features of the saline-alkali soils [5356].(2)Remote sensing of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils deserves a better understanding of spectral reflectance of the different types of saline-alkali soils and the relationship between them and the degrees of soil salinity and alkalinity. This deserves the hyperspectral images of high spatial resolution, which is essentially significant to enhance the reliability of retrieval of model parameters. But the access of hyperspectral remote sensing data remains too expensive, especially, when the retrieval is considered on the global scale.(3)Salts dissolution in the soil during the rainy seasons and salts migration due to the seasonal changes of land-cover changes will also cause interference in the extraction of information for saline-alkali soils. These will increase the difficulty of detecting dynamic changes in remote sensing data, which is partly because of the integrated effects of vegetation and soil types and other factors on spectral information of the pilot land farming. This can be resolved using the multitemporal image and by the adoption of different tillage.

Study on these issues will not only help us to distinguish different types of saline-alkali soils, but will also imply the comprehensive applications of multitemporal remote sensing data in zoning soil CO2 source or sink over arid and semiarid regions [15, 5759]. In addition, the large-scale effort on measuring soil respiration fluxes in arid and semiarid ecosystems around the world must be organized for a reliable quantitative inversion of soil CO2 absorption. This is a laborious challenge and needs the common attention by the world scientific communities.

5. Conclusions

With the increases of the spectral resolution, the radiation resolution, the time resolution, and the spatial resolution of remote sensing data, retrieval of soil salt content becomes more active and researches on the mechanisms are prized. In particular, research on the applications of the hyperspectral remote sensing data on soil salinization and alkalization has tremendous potential. Utilizing the hyperspectral remote sensing data, it becomes possible to accurately distinguish the special salt content in the soils (Figure 5). Remote sensing of CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soils is theoretical feasible. However, the spectroscopy studies on the saline-alkali soil are mainly restricted to monitor the salinity degree, the spatial scope, and the geographic distribution of saline-alkali soils, mainly using the multispectral remote sensing data (the hyperspectral remote sensing data were less employed because it is expensive). As a first attempt, this paper presented remote sensing scheme for CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soil on large scales. But the qualitative research of spectral reflectance properties of saline-alkali soils was less focused on CO2 absorption by saline-alkali soil, which is partly because of traditional ignoring of such absorption. There are still a series of unresolved issues to be further addressed before the remote sensing scheme is carried out.

425753.fig.005
Figure 5: Reflectance of soils rich in Na2SO4 with different salt content (adapted from [15]).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declared that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the anonymous referees for their careful reading, very detailed comments, and many constructive suggestions which greatly improved the presentation. The research is supported by the CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams (Transects studies on the special ecological process in arid regions) and the NSFC-UNEP International-Cooperative Projects (no. 41361140361).

References

  1. Y. F. Yan, Z. E. Zhang, L. Zhang, and L. Zhang, “Influence of coal properties on the co-combustion characteristics of low-grade coal and city mud,” Global NEST Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 330–339, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  2. H. F. Tuo, “Energy and exergy-based working fluid selection for organic Rankine cycle recovering waste heat from high temperature solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid systems,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1831–1841, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  3. H. F. Tuo and P. S. Hrnjak, “Periodical reverse flow and boiling fluctuations in a microchannel evaporator of an air-conditioning system,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1263–1275, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  4. K. Sreenivas, L. Venkataraman, and P. V. N. Rao, “Dielectric properties of salt-affected soils,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 641–649, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. R. Taylor, A. H. Mah, F. A. Kruse, K. S. Kierein-Young, R. D. Hewson, and B. A. Bennett, “Characterization of saline soils using airborne radar imagery,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 127–142, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. R. M. Rao, “Spectral behaviour of salt-affected soils,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 2125–2136, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Stone, “Ecosystems: have desert researchers discovered a hidden loop in the carbon cycle?” Science, vol. 320, no. 5882, pp. 1409–1410, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. X. Xie, Y. Li, C. X. Zhai, C. H. Li, and Z. D. Lan, “CO2 absorption by alkaline soils and its implication to the global carbon cycle,” Environmental Geology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 953–961, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. L. Yates, A. M. Detweiler, L. T. Iraci et al., “Assessing the role of alkaline soils on the carbon cycle at a playa site,” Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1047–1056, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Ma, Z. Y. Wang, B. A. Stevenson, X. J. Zhang, and Y. Li, “An inorganic CO2 diffusion and dissolution process explains negative CO2 fluxes in saline/alkaline soils,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, article 2025, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. W. F. Wang, X. Chen, G. P. Luo, and L. H. Li, “Modeling the contribution of abiotic exchange to CO2 flux in alkaline soils of arid areas,” Journal of Arid Land, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  12. X. Chen and W. F. Wang, “On the apparent CO2 absorption by alkaline soils,” Biogeosciences Discussions, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2665–2683, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  13. X. Chen, W. F. Wang, G. P. Luo, and H. Ye, “Can soil respiration estimate neglect the contribution of abiotic exchange?” Journal of Arid Land, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 129–135, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  14. X. Chen, W. F. Wang, G. P. Luo, L. H. Li, and Y. Li, “Time lag between carbon dioxide influx to and efflux from bare saline-alkali soil detected by the explicit partitioning and reconciling of soil CO2 flux,” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 737–745, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  15. Z. Pu, Quantitive retrieval of saline soil salt content in arid region using hyperspectral data -take the Sangong river watershed as a case [Ph.D. thesis], Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xinjiang, China, 2010.
  16. G. I. Metternicht and J. A. Zinck, “Remote sensing of soil salinity: potentials and constraints,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. L. Dehaan and G. R. Taylor, “Field-derived spectra of salinized soils and vegetation as indicators of irrigation-induced soil salinization,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 406–417, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. M. Howari, Reflectance spectra of common salts in arid soils (320–2500 nm): application of remote sensing [Ph.D. thesis], University of Texas at Elpaso, El Paso, Tex, USA, 2001.
  19. F. M. Howari, P. C. Goodell, and S. Miyamoto, “Spectral properties of salt crusts formed on saline soils,” Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1453–1461, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. M. Howari, “Chemical and environmental implications of visible and near-infrared spectral features of salt crusts formed from different brines,” Annali di Chimica, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 315–323, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. Csillag, L. Pásztor, and L. L. Biehl, “Spectral band selection for the characterization of salinity status of soils,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 231–242, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. Ben-Dor, “Quantitative remote sensing of soil properties,” Advances in Agronomy, vol. 75, pp. 173–243, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. Metternicht and J. A. Zinck, “Spatial discrimination of salt-and sodium-affected soil surfaces,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2571–2586, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. G. I. Metternicht, “Analysing the relationship between ground-based reflectance and environmental indicators of salinity processes in the Cochabamba valleys (Bolivia),” International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 359–370, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. L. Wiegand, J. D. Rhoades, D. E. Escobar, and J. H. Everitt, “Photographic and videographic observations for determining and mapping the response of cotton to soil salinity,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 212–223, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Farifteh, A. Farshad, and R. J. George, “Assessing salt-affected soils using remote sensing, solute modelling, and geophysics,” Geoderma, vol. 130, no. 3-4, pp. 191–206, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. M. de Jong, “The analysis of spectroscopical data to map soil types and soil crusts of Mediterranean eroded soils,” Soil Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 199–211, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. N. Goldshleger, E. Ben-Dor, Y. Benyamini, M. Agassi, and D. G. Blumberg, “Characterization of soil's structural crust by spectral reflectance in the SWIR region (1.2–2.5.μm),” Terra Nova, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. I. Metternicht and J. A. Zinck, “Modelling salinity-alkalinity classes for mapping salt-affected topsoils in the semiarid valleys of Cochabamba (Bolivia),” ITC Journal, no. 2, pp. 125–135, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. R. Hunt and J. W. Salisbury, “Visible and near infrared spectra of minerals and rocks. II. Carbonates,” Modern Geology, no. 2, pp. 23–30, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  31. E. Ben-Dor, J. R. Irons, and G. F. Epema, “Soil reflectance,” in Remote Sensing for the Earth Sciences: Manual of Remote Sensing, N. Rencz, Ed., pp. 111–188, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  32. J. R. Irons, R. A. Weismiller, and G. W. Petersen, “Soil reflectance,” in Theory and Applications of Optical Remote Sensing, G. Asrar, Ed., Wiley Series of Remote Sensing, pp. 66–106, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  33. R. Dehaan and G. R. Taylor, “Image-derived spectral endmembers as indicators of salinisation,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 775–794, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. B. Mougenot, M. Pouget, and G. F. Epema, “Remote sensing of salt affected soils,” Remote Sensing Reviews, vol. 7, no. 3-4, pp. 241–259, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. F. M. Howari, “Comparison of spectral matching algorithms for identifying natural salt crusts,” Journal of Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 782–787, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. F. M. Howari, “The use of remote sensing data to extract information from agricultural land with emphasis on soil salinity,” Australian Journal of Soil Research, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1243–1253, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. F. M. Howari, “Chemical and environmental implications of visible and near-infrared spectral features of salt crusts formed from different brines,” Annali di Chimica, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 315–323, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. F. Goetz, G. Vane, J. E. Solomon, and B. N. Rock, “Imaging spectrometry for earth remote sensing,” Science, vol. 228, no. 4704, pp. 1147–1153, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. G. R. Taylor, A. H. Mah, F. A. Kruse, K. S. Kierein-Young, R. D. Hewson, and B. A. Bennett, “Characterization of saline soils using airborne radar imagery,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 127–142, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. T. Schmid, M. Koch, J. Gumuzzio, and P. M. Mather, “A spectral library for a semi-arid wetland and its application to studies of wetland degradation using hyperspectral and multispectral data,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 25, no. 13, pp. 2485–2496, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  41. E. Ben-Dor, K. Patkin, A. Banin, and A. Karnieli, “Mapping of several soil properties using DAIS-7915 hyperspectral scanner data—a case study over soils in Israel,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1043–1062, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Y. Weng, P. Gong, and Z. Zhu, “Soil sail content estimation in the yellow river delta with satellite hyperspectral data,” Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 259–270, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. Y. L. Weng, P. Gong, and Z. L. Zhu, “Reflectance spectroscopy for the assessment of soil salt content in soils of the yellow river delta of China,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 29, no. 19, pp. 5511–5531, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. E. N. Bui and B. L. Henderson, “Vegetation indicators of salinity in northern Queensland,” Austral Ecology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 539–552, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. F. Al-Khaier, Soil salinity detection using satellite remote sensingInternational institute for Geo-information science and earth observation [Ph.D. thesis], Enschede, The Netherlands, 2003.
  46. D. Wang, C. Wilson, and M. C. Shannon, “Interpretation of salinity and irrigation effects on soybean canopy reflectance in visible and near-infrared spectrum domain,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 811–824, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. Farifteh, F. van der Meer, C. Atzberger, and E. J. M. Carranza, “Quantitative analysis of salt-affected soil reflectance spectra: a comparison of two adaptive methods (PLSR and ANN),” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 59–78, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. G. R. Cramer, “Differential effects of salinity on leaf elongation kinetics of three grass species,” Plant and Soil, vol. 253, no. 1, pp. 233–244, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. L. K. Smedema and K. Shiati, “Irrigation and salinity: a perspective review of the salinity hazards of irrigation development in the arid zone,” Irrigation and Drainage Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 161–174, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. C. J. Clarke, R. W. Bell, R. J. Hobbs, and R. J. George, “Incorporating geological effects in modeling of revegetation strategies for salt-affected landscapes,” Environmental Management, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 99–109, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. D. Wichelns, “An economic model of waterlogging and salinization in arid regions,” Ecological Economics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 475–491, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. T. G. Sommerfeldt, M. D. Thompson, and N. A. Prout, “Delineation and mapping of soil salinity in southern Alberta from Landsat data,” Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 104–110, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. C. Sharma and G. P. Bhargava, “Landsat imagery for mapping saline soils and wet lands in north-west India,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. R. S. Dwivedi and B. R. M. Rao, “The selection of the best possible Landsat TM band combination for delineating salt-affected soils,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2051–2058, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. N. K. Kalra and D. C. Joshi, “Potentiality of Landsat, SPOT and IRS satellite imagery, for recognition of salt affected soils in Indian Arid Zone,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 17, no. 15, pp. 3001–3014, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. B. R. M. Rao, “Mapping the magnitude of sodicity in part of the Indo-Gangetic plains of Uttar Pradesh, northern India using Landsat-TM data,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 419–425, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. B. R. M. Rao, R. S. Dwivedi, K. Sreenivas et al., “An inventory of salt-affected soils and waterlogged areas in the Nagarjunsagar Canal Command Area of southern India, using space-borne multispectral data,” Land Degradation & Development, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 357–367, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  58. R. S. Dwivedi, K. Sreenivas, and K. V. Ramana, “Inventory of salt-affected soils and waterlogged areas: a remote sensing approach,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1589–1599, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. I. McGowen and S. Mallyon, “Detection of dryland salinity using single and multitemporal landsat imagery,” in Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Remote Sensing Conference, pp. 26–34, Canberra, Australia, 1996.