Journal of Spectroscopy

Journal of Spectroscopy / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Spectroscopy in Materials Chemistry

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 680183 |

Rui Liu, Wein-Duo Yang, Hui-Ju Chueng, Bin-Qiao Ren, "Preparation and Application of Titanate Nanotubes on Dye Degradation from Aqueous Media by UV Irradiation", Journal of Spectroscopy, vol. 2015, Article ID 680183, 9 pages, 2015.

Preparation and Application of Titanate Nanotubes on Dye Degradation from Aqueous Media by UV Irradiation

Academic Editor: Tifeng Jiao
Received30 Jun 2014
Accepted15 Jul 2014
Published03 Aug 2015


Titanate nanotubes were synthesized by a hydrothermal method using commercial TiO2 powder and then used as a photocatalyst. The titanate nanotubes were synthesized by varying the hydrothermal temperature from 110°C to 180°C. The morphological changes and phase transformation of the TiO2 nanotubes were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The particles’ scattering behavior was investigated by Raman studies, and the surface area of the nanotubes was determined by a Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) analysis. Comparative studies show that the surface area of nanotubes increases with increasing temperature up to 130°C. The catalytic behavior of the synthesized nanotubes was also studied. The as-prepared titanate nanotubes were applied to methylene blue (MB, an organic dye) degradation in aqueous media by UV irradiation. Approximately 99% of the dye was removed from the aqueous media using 2 g/L titanate nanotube when the initial dye concentration was 9 mg/L. The total irradiation time was 2 h.

1. Introduction

Nanoparticles and their applications are of great interest in modern science due to their unique properties, which differ from those of the corresponding bulk materials, and their diverse applications [14]. Gold, silver, ruthenium, platinum, and bimetallics or nanoalloys of those elements have been synthesized in various ways and used in biochemistry in particular for biomedical applications [510]. Among these materials, Titania (TiO2) is believed to be the most promising due to its nontoxicity, long-term stability, and low cost. Its applications are strongly dependent on the crystallographic structure, morphology, and size of the particles. Due to its desirable band gap (3.2 eV), TiO2 nanoparticles are also used in solar cells. It is also worth mentioning that Titania nanotubes and nanowires are used as photocatalysts due to their strong oxidizing power, biological and chemical inertness, and long-term stability against light-based and chemical corrosion [11, 12]. Presently, groups of researchers are attempting to use this nanoparticle to remove toxic contaminants from aqueous media and air for the remediation of environmental contamination [1315].

Various synthetic routes have been explored for the synthesis of size-controlled TiO2 nanoparticles. The simple hydrolysis of titanium salts results in TiO2 nanoparticles [1619]. However, this technique produces a mixture of anatase and rutile polymorphs, which inhibits the formation of well-shaped anatase nanocrystals [20, 21], which have the highest photocatalytic activity towards the degradation of most organic contaminants in aqueous media [20]. Several groups have reported the preparation of titanate nanotubes (TNTs) using different hydrothermal reaction temperatures and durations [22, 23]. This method does not require a template, and the obtained nanotubes have a small diameter (~10 nm) with high crystallinity. Many groups have tried to analyze the characteristics of TNTs, which can then be used to evaluate the synthetic mechanism as well as sheet-folding mechanism [24, 25]. TNTs derived from the hydrothermal method possess ion-exchange properties and are characterized by a high surface area and pore volume. They may also offer a special environment for the adsorption of large cations, such as basic dyes. Moreover, the hydrothermal method is also a simple, cost-effective, and ecofriendly technology and can prepare TNTs in high yields. Therefore, examining the potential applications of TNTs synthesized from this method, which is ecofriendly and cost-effective, is important.

Water pollution due to organic dyes is of great concern for human health as well as the environment because colored water is aesthetically unpleasant. The production of different by-products due to the degradation of some organic dyes poses a severe health risk due to their carcinogenicity. The literature contains physical, chemical, and biological methods that have been applied to remove the color from dye-contaminated wastewater [2630], and physical adsorption has been identified as a potentially efficient and economical way to remove dyes from waste streams and control the biochemical oxygen demand [31]. Although activated carbon is believed to be an efficient adsorbent for organic hazardous removal from aqueous media, it is expensive. Hence, a number of groups have tried to remove toxic organic dyes from aqueous media using titanate nanotubes by activating its photocatalytic activity using UV irradiation. TiO2/UV photocatalysis is among the most promising advanced oxidation technologies due to the effectiveness of TiO2 in generating hydroxyl radicals along with its environmentally benign properties and relatively low cost [3234].

In this paper, we have focused on the synthesis of titanate nanotubes using a hydrothermal method with different reaction temperatures and times. The performances of the titanate nanotubes synthesized under different reaction temperatures were analyzed analytically by XRD, Raman, TEM, BET, and FTIR. Finally, the removal of an organic dye, methylene blue (MB), was from an aqueous environment attempted using the synthesized titanate nanotubes and UV irradiation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

All the chemicals used were of analytical grade and were used as received. HNO3, NaOH, TiO2 (P25) powder, and methylene blue (MB) were purchased from Acros Organics (New Jersey, USA). A 100 ppm stock MB solution was prepared in double-distilled water and diluted as required.

2.2. Instrumentation

All the glass apparatus used were soaked in concentrated HNO3 for 12 h and then washed with large volumes of double-distilled water followed by tap water. Next, the apparatus were dried in a hot-air oven for 2 h at 90°C. A high-precision electronic balance was used for weighing, and a high-precision digital electronic pH meter was used to measure the pH of the medium. FTIR spectrometry was conducted using a Bio-Rad Digilab FIS-165 spectrophotometer. A Lambda Dimension-P2 Raman spectrometer was used to measure the Raman shift. Powder XRD patterns were recorded using a PANalytical X’Pert PRO X-ray diffractometer with CuK ( = 1.5406 Å) radiation. A Micromeritics ASAP 2101 instrument was used for BET analysis. TEM measurements were performed using a Philips M-200 transmission electron microscope operating at 200 kV. All absorbance measurements were carried out using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (HITACHI, U-2800) equipped with a 1 cm quartz cell. Gilson micropipette and microtips were used to add samples.

2.3. Preparation of Titanate Nanotubes

Hydrothermally titanate nanotubes were synthesized and the total synthesis process is shown in Figure 1. Set of experiments were conducted by the mixing of commercially available (0.8 g) (P25) TiO2 powder in 50 mL aqueous NaOH (10 M) solution. The mixtures were allowed to continuous stirring for 1 h with a magnetic stirrer. After the aging time finished, the reactions mixtures were hydrothermally treated at different temperatures in a stainless Teflon-lined autoclave. The autoclave was put into an oven and was heated to 110–180°C for a prescribed period of 24 h and cooled to room temperature naturally in air. Next, the final reaction products were washed thoroughly with large volumes of double-distilled water to achieve the neutral pH of the medium and that is ~7. Finally, obtained white cotton-batting-like solid was filtrated and dried at 80°C for 1 h and then characterized and used for photodegradation of organic dye, methylene blue from aqueous media.

2.4. Photocatalytic Degradation of Aqueous Methylene Blue (MB)

To investigate the photocatalytic activity of the synthesized titanate nanotubes, the degradation of a toxic organic dye, methylene blue (C16H18ClN3S) (Figure 2), in aqueous media was attempted using UV irradiation. First, 0.2 g of as-prepared titanate nanotubes was dispersed in 100 mL of synthetic MB solution when the initial dye concentration was 9 mg/L (titanate nanotubes dose, 2 g/L). The mixture of dye and catalyst was then placed in a photocatalytic reactor and subjected to UV irradiation. A 6-W, 254 nm UV lamp was used as the light source. The aqueous system of the suspended catalyst was oxygenated to ensure the presence of sufficient oxygen in the system. The experiment was conducted at room temperature (~°C). The total UV irradiation time was 2 h. Next, the titanate nanotube suspension was centrifuged at 3200 rpm for 10 min to separate the solid and liquid phases. Collecting the supernatant liquid, after centrifugation, the remaining dye concentration in the solution was measured by UV-Vis spectrophotometry at 669 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Formation Mechanism of Titanate Nanotubes

Na+ resides between the edge-shared TiO6 and Na2Ti3O7 octahedral layers, as is well known. The strong static interaction force between the Na+ and TiO6 units holds the layers together tightly and makes it impossible to roll these layers into nanotubes. Under the hydrothermal conditions, Na+ is gradually released with intercalated H2O molecules into the interlayer space of the TiO6 sheets. Because H2O molecules are larger than Na+ ions, the interlayer distance increases during the release of Na+, weakening the static interaction force between neighboring TiO6 and octahedral sheets. As a result, the Na2Ti3O7 layer was gradually exfoliated to form numerous sheet-shaped products [32, 33]. The nanotube formation mechanism is shown in Figure 3 [35].

3.2. Characterization of Titanate Nanotubes

The synthesized titanate nanotubes were characterized by different methods. Figure 4 shows the FTIR spectra of the as-prepared nanotubes (using KBr pellets) synthesized at different hydrothermal temperatures and compares these values to those from a previous work [36]. The broad peaks at 3200~3400 cm−1 are ascribed to the stretching vibration of the hydroxyl groups (O–H) from the residual water in the precursors. The peak of 1630 cm−1 is attributed to the bending vibration of the hydroxyl groups (H–O–H) present in the titanate nanotubes. The other broad bands at 700~1200 cm−1 and 300~900 cm−1 are assigned to the Ti–O and Ti–O–Ti skeletal frequency regions, respectively. As the hydrothermal temperature increased to 180°C, the peaks of the stretching (O–H) and bending (H–O–H) vibrations of the hydroxyl groups disappeared completely. This disappearance is due to the very low content of organic compounds and water at high reaction temperatures.

The X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) of titanate nanotubes synthesized at different hydrothermal temperatures are shown in Figure 5. The intense peak at approximately 9.1° is thought to be due to the layered structure of the NaHTi3O7 nanotube wall, while the smaller broad peaks at approximately 24°, 28°, and 48° suggest the presence of sodium (Na) in the synthesized nanotubes, for example, Ti6O13, Ti6O12, and Ti9O18. However, as the hydrothermal temperature increases to 180°C, curve (d) of Figure 5 suggests the presence of Na2Ti6O13, the hydrothermally synthesized product [3639]. This finding indicates that the titanate nanotube structure is changing from tube to rod. The nanorods are formed by the parallel arrangement of the nanotubes, which is a result of the adsorption of the nanotube surface of the water molecules and the evaporation of the inner layer of moisture to release the high stress inside the nanotube structure.

Figure 6 shows the TEM images of titanate nanotubes hydrothermally synthesized at different temperatures. When the hydrothermal treatment temperature was 110°C, the tubular structure was absent, and sheet-like structures were observed. Titanate nanotube clusters can be clearly seen when the hydrothermal treatment temperature was increased to 130°C. As the hydrothermal temperature increased to 180°C, the titanate nanotubes adopted a rod-like structure. It is inferred that the tubular structure is clearer and tube pore diameter larger at high hydrothermal temperatures. Overall, no damage of the titanate nanotubes was observed during the hydrothermal process with increasing temperature. The nanotubes were 200~300 nm in length and approximately 10 nm in diameter. Some of the long tubes synthesized at high temperature broke into shorter tubes. The tubular structure was retained, but the tubes were deposited onto one another [37, 40].

The surface morphology of the synthesized nanotubes was monitored by SEM (JEOL, TFSEM-6330), and the micrographs are shown in Figure 7. Figure 7 implies that the nanotube formation depends on temperature. The formation of nanotubes is due to the warping or splitting of the surface of Na2Ti3O7 octahedral layers. A number of cumulative steps followed the formation of nanotubes. Figure 8 depicts the H2Ti3O7 nanotube and nanowire formation processes. Initially, lamellar structures were grown on the brim of TiO2 particles. These lamellar structures grow along the direction with the (010) plane as the top/bottom surface (a). Second, the lamellar structures split into nanosheets between the (100) planes. The height of these nanosheet structures (in the direction) is the thickness of the original lamellar structure (b). In the third step, the nanosheets wrapped into nanotubes with diameters dependent on the height of the nanosheets (c). Additionally, thick layers or wires may be formed after prolonged reaction at elevated temperature (d). Afterwards, splitting may occur between the (100) and (010) planes of these thick layers or wires (e). Finally, further splitting leads to the formation of thin nanowires (d) [41].

The nanotubes synthesized at various temperatures for various durations were subjected to BET analysis to determine the surface area of the synthesized titanate particles after degassing with nitrogen. The obtained result is given in Table 1. The specific surface area of the nanotubes increased with temperature, which in turn proves that the nanotubes are relatively small. This result can be interpreted as the titanate nanotubes steadily turning into tubular nanocomposites. At temperatures above 130°C, the surface area slowly decreases, which indicates that the nanotubes became larger (Table 1). The maximum surface area of the nanotubes, 186.8 m2/g, was produced at 130°C after 24 h of synthesis. A time-resolved study of the surface area of the synthesized nanotubes was also conducted by varying the synthesis duration from 0 to 48 h, keeping the temperature constant at 130°C. It is observed that the surface area of the nanotubes increases with reaction time at this constant temperature. The time dependence of the nanotube surface area can be attributed to a continuous conversion of nanosheets into nanotubes during the reaction time. However, the obtained result suggests that the maximum surface area, 186.8 m2/g, is found after 24 h of synthesis (Table 2). In contrast, this value was 60 m2/g for P25 under room-temperature conditions.

Sample at different temperature (m2/g)Pore volume (cm3/g)Size (nm)


Sample at different time (m2/g)Pore volume (cm3/g)Size (nm)

12 h161.00.303.7
24 h186.80.313.3
48 h170.30.283.3

The Raman spectrum of the as-prepared nanotubes is shown in curve (a) in Figure 9. For hydrothermal temperatures below 150°C, the modes at 662 cm−1 and 700 cm−1 are ascribed to the vibrations of Ti–O–Na and Ti–O–H, respectively, given that the 662 cm−1 mode disappears from the as-prepared sample after washing with deionized (DI) water, which proves the exchange of Na+ by H+. The 910 cm−1 mode can be ascribed to the vibrations of Ti–O, which indicates that the structure is NaHTi3O7. At 180°C, the characteristic peaks of NaHTi3O7 disappeared, while the Raman modes at 197 cm−1, 224 cm−1, 278 cm−1, 306 cm−1, 414 cm−1, 475 cm−1, 680 cm−1, and 874 cm−1 were strongly consistent with the previously reported results, which once again supports the presence of titanate nanotubes in the products synthesized by the hydrothermal process [36, 39].

3.3. Photocatalytic Degradation of MB
3.3.1. Calibration Curve

UV-Visible spectra were recorded with various dye concentrations and are shown in Figure 10. The study was first conducted without the addition of the titanate nanotube photocatalyst or UV irradiation. A linear calibration curve of MB ( = 669 nm) was drawn in the concentration range of 0–18 mg/L. The linear equation obtained is Absorbance () = 0.1719 × (mg/L) + 0.191. The specific correlation coefficient was = 0.9999. The obtained linear calibration equation was used through this study to determine the remaining dye concentration in the degraded dye solution after UV irradiation.

3.3.2. Photodegradation of Dye

First, 2 g/L of the titanate nanotubes prepared at different temperatures was mixed with 100 mL of the synthetic MB solution. Next, the mixture was photoirradiated with UV light for 2 h. The reaction mixture was stirred with a magnetic stirrer. The experiment was conducted at room temperature with an initial MB concentration of 9 mg/L. The pH of the medium was ~7. Kinetically, within 20 min of photoirradiation, ~99% of the dye had degraded. Hence, a 20 min photoirradiation time was identified as the equilibrium time for the dye photodegradation. No further acceleration of dye degradation was observed over an additional 100 min of irradiation time. The dye degradation efficiency was almost the same for each as-prepared titanate nanotube sample except that prepared at 180°C (Figure 11). The higher specific surface area (186.8 m2/g) allows more of the organic pollutant to be adsorbed onto the photocatalyst surface, while the high pore volume results in a faster diffusion of various reaction products during the photocatalytic reaction. All these factors contributed to enhancing the photocatalytic activity [42]. However, unlike the conventional adsorption of other aquatic contaminants on the adsorbent, which depends on both the particle size and the surface area of the particle [43], the photodegradation of aquatic organic contaminants (here, dye) may also depend on the photon absorption and electronic transition between the organic dye (in the presence of oxygen) and titanate nanotubes, which in turn may enhance the MB degradation in the aquatic environment in the present study.

3.3.3. Photodegradation Mechanism

It is well known that anatase, titanate, and Degussa P-25 are not excited by visible light but can be used to degrade most colored contaminants because of their photosensitization effect [44]. Titanate nanotubes have a large BET surface area of approximately 186.8 m2/g and therefore show a high adsorption capacity, which is beneficial for collecting organic contaminate molecules such as MB. Under UV irradiation, the MB molecules were adsorbed onto the nanotube surfaces, and the produced electrons were transferred to titanate nanotubes and then injected into the conduction band of the anatase nanoparticles connected with these nanotubes through the nanotube channels [45]. This injective process could also be directly performed by radical MB molecules [46]. The injected electrons were captured by the surface-adsorbed O2 molecules to yield and radical ions, among others. Finally, the MB molecules could be quickly mineralized by the radical ions. Due to the anatase nanoparticles’ high absorption capacity and high concentration of excited electrons, the MB molecules adsorbed onto the surface of anatase will be easily photodegraded; thus, the photocatalytic activity of the nanocomposite is substantially improved. The probable photodegradation mechanism of dye under UV light using titanate nanotubes is shown as follows [47]:

According to the above formulae, radicals and hydroxyl groups play a key role in the degradation process, and a greater amount of radicals or hydroxyl groups corresponds to better photocatalytic activity. In the present case, the catalyst, which obeyed a similar mechanism of dye photodegradation, contained hydroxyl groups, which means that the synthesized samples have good potential for photocatalytic applications. The maximum absorption boundaries of the samples mean that the samples can absorb more photons under UV light or sunlight [36].

4. Conclusions

A hydrothermal method was explored for the synthesis of titanate nanotubes. The nanotubes were characterized by SEM, TEM, and FTIR studies. The particles’ scattering behavior was investigated by Raman studies. The surface area of the nanotubes was determined by BET analysis. It was observed that the surface area of the synthesized nanotubes is governed by the hydrothermal temperature and reaction time. At 130°C and 24 h of reaction time, the surface area of the titanate nanotubes was 186.8 m2/g. The photocatalytic activity of the synthesized nanotubes for dye degradation was investigated using a dye-contaminated aqueous solution. The equilibrium time for dye degradation was 20 min. At equilibrium, ~99% of the MB was degraded from the aqueous media by UV irradiation when the initial dye concentration was 9 mg/L. The maximum absorption boundaries of the dye-contaminated samples mean that the samples can absorb more photons under UV light or sunlight. Hence, the synthesized titanate nanotubes are a suitable photocatalyst for the degradation of MB, an organic dye, from aqueous media.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors would like to express their gratitude to Ph.D. program of Harbin University of Commerce for supporting this research under Grant 14LG13.


  1. B. O'Regan and M. Grätzel, “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films,” Nature, vol. 353, pp. 737–740, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Fujishima, T. N. Rao, and D. A. Tryk, “Titanium dioxide photocatalysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. A. Al-Thabaiti, R. Hahn, N. Liu et al., “NH3 treatment of TiO2 nanotubes: from N-doping to semimetallic conductivity,” Chemical Communications, vol. 50, no. 59, pp. 7960–7963, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. T. Rajh, Z. Saponjic, J. Liu et al., “Charge transfer across the nanocrystalline-DNA interface: probing DNA recognition,” Nano Letters, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1017–1023, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. Tokuhisa and P. T. Hammond, “Solid-state photovoltaic thin films using TiO2, organic dyes, and layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte nanocomposites,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 831–839, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Pal and S. K. Maji, “Arsine-induced formation of silver nanoparticles in micellar medium. Application to spectrophotometric determination of arsenic,” Chemia Analityczna, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1077–1086, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  7. A. Pal and S. K. Maji, “Spectrophotometric determination of arsenic via nanogold formation in micellar medium,” Indian Journal of Chemistry A: Inorganic, Physical, Theoretical and Analytical Chemistry, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1178–1182, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  8. I. Srnová-Šloufová, F. Lednický, A. Gemperle, and J. Gemperlová, “Core-shell (Ag)Au bimetallic nanoparticles: analysis of transmission electron microscopy images,” Langmuir, vol. 16, no. 25, pp. 9928–9935, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. F. Bensebaa, N. Patrito, Y. le Page, P. L'Ecuyer, and D. Wang, “Tunable platinum-ruthenium nanoparticle properties using microwave synthesis,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 14, no. 22, pp. 3378–3384, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Yang, J. Yang Lee, and H.-P. Too, “Phase-transfer identification of core-shell structures in bimetallic nanoparticles,” Plasmonics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67–78, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. A. Fox and M. T. Dulay, “Heterogeneous photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 341–357, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Q. Kang, J. Cao, Y. Zhang, L. Liu, H. Xu, and J. Ye, “Reduced TiO2 nanotube arrays for photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 1, no. 18, pp. 5766–5774, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. N. Obee and R. T. Brown, “TiO2 photocatalysis for indoor air applications: effects of humidity and trace contaminant levels on the oxidation rates of Formaldehyde, Toluene, and 1,3-Butadiene,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 29, pp. 1223–1231, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. Ooka, H. Yoshida, K. Suzuki, and T. Hattori, “Highly hydrophobic TiO2 pillared clay for photocatalytic degradation of organic compounds in water,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 67, no. 2-3, pp. 143–150, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Qamar, M. Saquib, and M. Muneer, “Photocatalytic degradation of two selected dye derivatives, chromotrope 2B and amido black 10B, in aqueous suspensions of titanium dioxide,” Dyes and Pigments, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. W. Wang, B. Gu, L. Liang, W. A. Hamilton, and D. J. Wesolowski, “Synthesis of rutile (α-TiO2) nanocrystals with controlled size and shape by low-temperature hydrolysis: effects of solvent composition,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 39, pp. 14789–14792, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Visca and E. J. Matijević, “Preparation of uniform colloidal dispersions by chemical reactions in aerosols. I. Spherical particles of titanium dioxide,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 308–319, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H. K. Park, Y. T. Moon, D. K. Kim, and C. H. Kim, “Formation of monodisperse spherical TiO2 powders by thermal hydrolysis of Ti(SO4)2,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 79, no. 10, pp. 2727–2732, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  19. E. A. Barringer and H. K. Bowen, “High-purity, monodisperse TiO2 powders by hydrolysis of titanium tetraethoxide. 1. Synthesis and physical properties,” Langmuir, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 414–420, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Q.-H. Zhang, L. Gao, and J.-K. Guo, “Preparation and characterization of nanosized TiO2 powders from aqueous TiCl4 solution,” Nanostructured Materials, vol. 11, pp. 1293–1300, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. F. Cavani, E. Foresti, F. Parrinello, and F. Trifirò, “Role of the chemistry of solutions of titanium ions in determining the structure of V/Ti/O catalysts,” Applied Catalysis, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 311–325, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T. Kasuga, M. Hiramatsu, A. Hoson, T. Sekino, and K. Niihara, “Formation of titanium oxide nanotube,” Langmuir, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 3160–3163, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Kasuga, M. Hiramatsu, A. Hoson, T. Sekino, and K. Niihara, “Titania nanotubes prepared by chemical processing,” Advanced Materials, vol. 11, no. 15, pp. 1307–1311, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Y. Q. Wang, G. Q. Hu, X. F. Duan, H. L. Sun, and Q. K. Xue, “Microstructure and formation mechanism of titanium dioxide nanotubes,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 365, no. 5-6, pp. 427–431, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. X. Sun and Y. Li, “Synthesis and characterization of ion-exchangeable titanate nanotubes,” Chemistry—A European Journal, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 2229–2238, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. N. D. Lourenço, J. M. Novais, and H. M. Pinheiro, “Effect of some operational parameters on textile dye biodegradation in a sequential batch reactor,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 89, no. 2-3, pp. 163–174, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Z. Sun, Y. Chen, Q. Ke, Y. Yang, and J. Yuan, “Photocatalytic degradation of a cationic azo dye by TiO2/bentonite nanocomposite,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 149, pp. 169–174, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C.-C. Wang, L.-C. Juang, T.-C. Hsu, C.-K. Lee, J.-F. Lee, and F.-C. Huang, “Adsorption of basic dyes onto montmorillonite,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 273, no. 1, pp. 80–86, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Andrzejewska, A. Krysztafkiewicz, and T. Jesionowski, “Treatment of textile dye wastewater using modified silica,” Dyes and Pigments, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 116–124, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Andrzejewska, A. Krysztafkiewicz, and T. Jesionowski, “Adsorption of organic dyes on the aminosilane modified TiO2 surface,” Dyes and Pigments, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 121–130, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. G. Crini, “Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: a review,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 1061–1085, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Yu, H. Yu, B. Cheng, X. Zhao, and Q. Zhang, “Preparation and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous anatase TiO2 nanofibers by a hydrothermal method,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 121–127, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Xiao, L. Dang, L. An, S. Bai, and Z. Lei, “Photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B and phenol by TiO2 loaded on mesoporous graphitic carbon,” Chinese Journal of Catalysis, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  34. H. Choia, E. Stathatosb, and D. D. Dionysioua, “Photocatalytic TiO2 films and membranes for the development of efficient wastewater treatment and reuse systems,” Desalination, vol. 202, no. 1–3, pp. 199–206, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Wei, Y. Konishi, H. Zhou, H. Sugihara, and H. Arakawa, “Formation of nanotubes TiO2 from layered titanate particles by a soft chemical process,” Solid State Communications, vol. 133, no. 8, pp. 493–497, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. G.-S. Guo, C.-N. He, Z.-H. Wang, F.-B. Gu, and D.-M. Han, “Synthesis of titania and titanate nanomaterials and their application in environmental analytical chemistry,” Talanta, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1687–1692, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L.-H. Huang, C. Sun, and Y.-L. Liu, “Pt/N-codoped TiO2 nanotubes and its photocatalytic activity under visible light,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 253, no. 17, pp. 7029–7035, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. V. P. Godbole, Y.-S. Kim, M. A. Dar, G.-S. Kim, and H.-S. Shin, “Synthesis of titanate nanotubes and its processing by different methods,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1781–1787, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. K. R. Zhu, Y. Yuan, M. S. Zhang, J. M. Hong, Y. Deng, and Z. Yin, “Structural transformation from NaHTi3O7 nanotube to Na2Ti6O13 nanorod,” Solid State Communications, vol. 144, no. 10-11, pp. 450–453, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. H. Tokudome and M. Miyauchi, “N-doped TiO2 nanotube with visible light activity,” Chemistry Letters, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1108–1109, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. D. Wu, J. Liu, X. Zhao, A. Li, Y. Chen, and N. Ming, “Sequence of events for the formation of titanate nanotubes, nanofibers, nanowires, and nanobelts,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 547–553, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. Yu, H. Yu, B. Cheng, and C. Trapalis, “Effects of calcination temperature on the microstructures and photocatalytic activity of titanate nanotubes,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 249, no. 1-2, pp. 135–142, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. K. Maji, A. Pal, and T. Pal, “Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption on laterite soil,” Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmenta, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 453–462, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. D. Chatterjee and S. Dasgupta, “Visible light induced photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, vol. 6, pp. 186–205, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. Tachikawa, S. Tojo, M. Fujitsuka, T. Sekino, and T. Majima, “Photoinduced charge separation in titania nanotubes,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 29, pp. 14055–14059, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. K. Vinodgopal, D. E. Wynkoop, and P. V. Kamat, “Environmental photochemistry on semiconductor surfaces: photosensitized degradation of a textile azo dye, Acid Orange 7, on TiO2 particles using visible light,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1660–1666, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. Li, W. Ma, C. Chen, J. Zhao, H. Zhu, and X. Gao, “Photodegradation of dye pollutants on one-dimensional TiO2 nanoparticles under UV and visible irradiation,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 261, no. 1, pp. 131–138, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Rui Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.