About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Signal Transduction
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 792639, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/792639
Review Article

Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases and Reactive Oxygen Species: How Can ROS Activate MAPK Pathways?

1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan 570-749, Republic of Korea
2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan 570-711, Republic of Korea
3Department of Biological Science, University of Ulsan, Ulsan 680-749, Republic of Korea
4Professional Graduate School of Oriental Medicine and Hanbang Body-Fluid Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan 570-749, Republic of Korea
5Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, 344-2 Shinyong-dong, Iksan, Chonbuk 570-749, Republic of Korea

Received 16 August 2010; Revised 25 December 2010; Accepted 11 January 2011

Academic Editor: Zhilin Qu

Copyright © 2011 Yong Son et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are serine-threonine protein kinases that play the major role in signal transduction from the cell surface to the nucleus. MAPKs, which consist of growth factor-regulated extracellular signal-related kinases (ERKs), and the stress-activated MAPKs, c-jun NH2-terminal kinases (JNKs) and p38 MAPKs, are part of a three-kinase signaling module composed of the MAPK, an MAPK kinase (MAP2K) and an MAPK kinase (MAP3K). MAP3Ks phosphorylate MAP2Ks, which in turn activate MAPKs. MAPK phosphatases (MKPs), which recognize the TXY amino acid motif present in MAPKs, dephosphorylate and deactivate MAPKs. MAPK pathways are known to be influenced not only by receptor ligand interactions, but also by different stressors placed on the cell. One type of stress that induces potential activation of MAPK pathways is the oxidative stress caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS). Generally, increased ROS production in a cell leads to the activation of ERKs, JNKs, or p38 MAPKs, but the mechanisms by which ROS can activate these kinases are unclear. Oxidative modifications of MAPK signaling proteins and inactivation and/or degradation of MKPs may provide the plausible mechanisms for activation of MAPK pathways by ROS, which will be reviewed in this paper.

1. Introduction

Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) compose a family of protein kinases that play an essential role in relaying extracellular signals from the cell membrane to the nucleus via a cascade of phosphorylation events and are negatively regulated by MAPK phosphatases (MKPs) [1]. Diverse cellular functions, ranging from cell survival to cell death, are regulated by MAPK signaling [2]. A number of extracellular and intracellular stimuli have been shown to activate MAPK pathways at cellular levels [3], implying that there may be tight and specific regulation of MAPK activation by a certain stimulus. Interestingly, reactive oxygen species (ROS) can activate MAPK pathways [4], but the mechanism(s) for this effect is unclear.

Besides MAPKs, other signaling molecules (e.g., protein tyrosine phosphatases, protein tyrosine kinases, and transcriptional factors) can also be activated by ROS [5], suggesting that ROS may have meaningful roles as regulators of cell function or as signaling molecules. Indeed, mounting evidence supports a physiological role for ROS as a “second messenger” in intracellular signaling cascades that control cell growth, proliferation, migration, and apoptosis [5].

Because the MAPK pathways mediate both mitogen- and stress-activated signals, there has been significant interest in the regulation of these pathways by ROS. This paper will focus on the putative mechanisms by which ROS can activate MAPK pathways in a cell.

2. ROS

ROS include superoxide anion radical (·O2), hydroxyl radicals (·OH), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). H2O2 is not a free radical and a weaker oxidizing agent than the free radical ·O2. However, in the presence of transition metals such as iron or copper, H2O2 can be oxidized into the extremely reactive and toxic ·OH via well-known Fenton reaction. In the cellular systems, ROS are normally counteracted by ubiquitously expressed antioxidant proteins, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, glutathione (GSH) peroxidase, thioredoxin, glutaredoxin, and GSH. For example, SOD can convert ·O2 into H2O2, whereas catalase and GSH peroxidase can reduce H2O2.

ROS are constantly produced by a number of normal cellular events, with a major source being aerobic respiration, but ROS produced during these events are generally counteracted by several antioxidant proteins [6, 7]. A large amount of ROS can also be produced by inflammatory processes, ionizing radiation, and many chemotherapeutic drugs, and this, if the production of ROS exceeds the capacity of the antioxidant proteins, may cause the so-called “oxidative stress”; in a biological sense, the oxidative stress may be broadly defined as an imbalance between oxidant production and the antioxidant capacity of the cell to prevent oxidative injury [5, 7].

Oxidative stress is known to be implicated in many human diseases, including atherosclerosis, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and aging [7]. However, there is still a debate whether oxidative stress is a cause or a result of these diseases, largely due to a lack of our understanding of the mechanisms by which ROS function in both normal physiological and disease states.

ROS are not only injurious to cell survival but also essential to cell signaling and regulation, and this may be dependent on the levels of produced ROS. At high levels, ROS can lead to impaired physiological function through cellular damage of DNA, proteins, phospholipids, and other macromolecules, which can lead to certain human pathologies [8]. At low levels, ROS can alter intracellular redox state, leading to activation of redox-sensitive proteins, and also modify redox-sensitive parts of proteins, potentially inhibiting or increasing their enzymatic activity [9, 10]. H2O2, with a relatively long half-life, good membrane permeability, and higher intracellular concentration, has been proposed to function as a second messenger [9, 10]. In this regard, it is most likely that H2O2 may mimic many actions of ROS in a cellular system.

3. MAPKs

The MAPKs comprise a family of ubiquitous proline-directed, protein-serine/threonine kinases, which play an essential role in sequential transduction of biological signals from the cell membrane to the nucleus [11]. In mammalian cells, there are three well-defined subgroups of MAPKs: the extracellular signal regulated kinases (ERKs, including ERK-1 and ERK-2 isoforms), the c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs, including JNK-1, JNK-2, and JNK-3 isoforms), and the p38 MAPKs (including p38-α, p38-β, p38-γ, and p38-δ isoforms). Each subgroup of MAPKs is activated through a cascade of sequential phosphorylation events, beginning with the activation of MAPK kinase kinases (MAP3Ks). The MAP3Ks phosphorylate and activate a downstream dual-specificity MAPK kinases (MAP2Ks), which in turn stimulate MAPK activity through dual phosphorylation on threonine and tyrosine residues within a conserved tripeptide motif [1, 11]. The well-defined regulation of MAPK signaling pathways is summarized in Figure 1. It should be noted that the three subgroups of MAPKs (i.e., ERKs, JNKs, and p38 MAPKs) are involved in both cell growth and cell death, and the tight regulation of these pathways is paramount in determining cell fate [12]. The deleterious consequences of sustained activation of MAPK pathways may include excessive production of MAPK-regulated genes, uncontrolled proliferation, and unscheduled cell death.

792639.fig.001
Figure 1: MAPK cascades. MAPK signaling pathways mediate intracellular signaling initiated by extracellular or intracellular stimuli. MAP3Ks phosphorylate MAP2Ks, which in turn phosphorylate MAPKs. Activated MAPKs phosphorylate various substrate proteins (e.g., transcription factors), resulting in regulation of various cellular activities (e.g., proliferation, differentiation, inflammatory responses, and apoptosis). Activation by MAPK signaling cascades is achieved either through a series of binary interactions among the kinase components or through formation of a multiple kinase complex.
3.1. ERKs

ERK pathway is activated by MAP/ERK Kinase (MEK), which is activated by Raf. Raf, an MAP3K, is activated by the Ras-GTPase, whose activation is induced by receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) such as the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor [13]. Growth factor receptors are most commonly activated by ligand-induced dimerization or oligomerization that phosphorylates RTKs [14]. Ligand-independent clustering and activation of growth factor receptors in response to ROS have also been well demonstrated [15]. Meves et al. [16] demonstrated that oxidative stress induces EGF receptor activation through RTK phosphorylation and proposed that H2O2 is a critical mediator required for ligand-independent phosphorylation of growth factor receptors in response to oxidative stress.

3.2. p38 MAPKs

The p38 MAPKs are usually activated in response to inflammatory cytokines, as well as by many other stimuli, including hormones, ligands for G protein-coupled receptors, and stresses such as heat shock and osmotic shock [17]. Two MEK family members, MEK3 (or MKK3) and MEK6 (or MKK6), are highly specific for p38 MAPKs [17]. MKK6 can phosphorylate the four p38 MAPK family members, while MKK3 phosphorylates p38α, p38γ, and p38δ, but not p38β. Both will also phosphorylate JNK isoforms [17]. Several MAP3Ks have been shown to trigger p38 MAPK activation, and they include ASK1 (apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1), DLK1 (dual-leucine-zipper-bearing kinase 1), TAK1 (transforming growth factor β-activated kinase 1), TAO (thousand-and-one amino acid) 1 and 2, TPL2 (tumor progression loci 2), MLK3 (mixed-lineage kinase 3), MEKK3 (MEK kinase 3) and MEKK4, and ZAK1 (leucine zipper and sterile-α motif kinase 1) [17]. The diversity of MAP3Ks and their regulatory mechanisms may provide the ability to respond to a wide range of stimuli and to integrate p38 MAPK activation with other signaling pathways. It should be noted that some MAP3Ks that trigger p38 MAPK activation can also activate the JNK pathway.

3.3. JNKs

The JNK pathway is known to be activated by cytokines, ligation of a variety of receptors, agents that interfere with DNA and protein synthesis, many other stresses, and to some extent by serum, growth factors, and transforming agents [18]. Two MEK family members, MEK4 (or MKK4) and MEK7 (or MKK7), have been implicated in phosphorylation of JNKs [18]. A number of different MAP3Ks can activate MKK4 and MKK7, suggesting that a wide range of stimuli can activate this MAPK pathway. These include MEKK1, 2, 3, and 4, MLK, and ASK1. In addition to its activation of MKK4 and MKK7, MEKK4 can also activate MKK3 or MKK6 to activate p38 MAPK pathway, which depends on the receptor activated and availability of other signaling molecules [18]. Research into the molecular mechanisms of oxidative stress-mediated activation of JNK and p38 pathways has focused on redox-sensitive proteins such as thioredoxin and glutaredoxin [19]. It is well known that ROS oxidizes thioredoxin to dissociate from ASK-1 for its activation, resulting in the activation of JNK and p38 pathways [20].

4. MAPK Phosphates

As above mentioned, MAPK pathways are activated through phosphorylation. Thus, the dephosphorylation of MAPKs by phosphatases is likely the most efficient mode of negative regulation. A number of protein phosphatases that are known to deactivate MAPKs include tyrosine, serine/threonine, and dual specificity phosphatases [21, 22]. A group of dual specificity protein phosphatases that are responsible primarily for dephosphorylation/deactivation of MAP kinases are often referred to as MAPK phosphatases (MKPs) [21, 22]. Since MKPs dephosphorylate MAPKs on their regulatory residues, aberrant regulation of MAPK activity may arise through defective regulation of the MKPs. The factors that activate MAPK pathways, such as environmental stresses and growth factor stimulation, can also activate MKP pathways [21, 22], supporting the notion that there is tight and specific control of MAPK activation and function by MKP activation. In mammalian cells, at least 11 MKP family members have been identified so far: MKP-1, MKP-2, MKP-3, MKP-4, MKP-5, MKP-7, MKP-X, PAC1, hVH3, hVH5, and MK-STYX. According to their subcellular localization, MKPs can be grouped: (1) MKP-1, MKP-2, hVH3, and PAC1 are found in the nucleus; (2) MKP-3, MKP-4, and MKP-X are found in the cytoplasm; (3) MKP-5, MKP-7, and hVH5 are found in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm [21, 22]. These MKPs exhibit distinct biochemical properties with regard to their substrate specificity [21, 22]. MKP-1 and MKP-2 show selectivity for p38s and JNKs over ERKs. MKP-3, MKP-X, and hVH3 primarily inactivate ERKs. MKP-5, MKP-7, and hVH5 show selectivity for JNKs and p38s, while MKP-4 and PAC1 inactivate ERKs and p38s.

MKP-1, the archetype, was initially discovered as a stress-responsive protein phosphatase [23]. Since MKP-1 deactivates MAPKs and is robustly induced by stress stimuli that also activate MAPKs, MKP-1 is regarded as an important feedback control mechanism that regulates the MAPKs. Compared with other MKPs, MKP-1 has been most closely examined. The activity of MKP-1 may be regulated at multiple levels, including transcriptional induction, protein stabilization, catalytic activation, and acetylation [24]. It has been reported that JNK and p38 pathways are highly activated in MKP-1-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts [25], supporting that MKP-1 functions as a critical negative regulator during MAPK activation. However, it should be noted that all MPKs may act cooperatively to modulate the MAPK pathways and to orchestrate appropriate cellular responses.

5. Activation of MAPK Pathways by ROS

Studies have demonstrated that ROS can induce or mediate the activation of the MAPK pathways [26]. A number of cellular stimuli that induce ROS production also in parallel can activate MAPK pathways in multiple cell types [4, 26]. The prevention of ROS accumulation by antioxidants blocks MAPK activation after cell stimulation with cellular stimuli [4, 26], indicating the involvement of ROS in activation of MAPK pathways. Moreover, direct exposure of cells to exogenous H2O2, to mimic oxidative stress, leads to activation of MAPK pathways [27, 28]. The mechanism(s) by which ROS can activate the MAPK pathways, however, is not well defined. Because ROS can alter protein structure and function by modifying critical amino acid residues of proteins [5], the oxidative modification of signaling proteins by ROS may be one of the plausible mechanisms for the activation of MAPK pathways. However, the precise molecular target(s) of ROS is unknown.

Many growth factor and cytokine receptors have cysteine-rich motifs, the oxidation of which may activate MAPK pathways, and they, if not all, may be targets of oxidative stress. Meng et al. [29] determined the contribution of EGF receptor to activation of ERK pathway by insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in vascular smooth muscle cells. They showed that IGF-I induced phosphorylation of EGF receptor and ERK. AG1478, an EGF receptor inhibitor, inhibited IGF-I-induced phosphorylation of EGF receptor and ERK, suggesting that activation of ERK pathway results from EGF receptor activation. IGF-I stimulated ROS production and antioxidants inhibited IGF-I-induced ROS generation and activation of EGF receptor and ERK pathway, indicating that IGF-I activates ERK pathway through ROS-mediated activation of EGF receptor. Moreover, Guyton et al. [30] investigated the factors controlling MAPK activation by the oxidant H2O2. They found that H2O2 activates MAPK pathways via activation of growth factor receptors in several cell types.

ROS may also activate MAPK pathways through the oxidative modification of intracellular kinases (e.g., MAP3Ks) that are involved in MAPK signaling cascade. ASK-1, a member of the MAP3K superfamily for JNK and p38, binds to reduced thioredoxin in nonstressed cells. Upon an oxidative stress, thioredoxin becomes oxidized and disassociates from ASK-1, leading to activation of JNK and p38 pathways through oligomerization of ASK-1 [31]. A study has been shown that ASK-1-knockout mice exhibited lower levels of JNK and p38 activation in comparison to wild type after oxidant treatment [32]. Besides ASK-1, there may be other redox-sensitive MAP3Ks or MAP2Ks that can also activate MAPK pathways.

Another potential mechanism for MAPK activation by ROS may include the inactivation and degradation of the MKPs that maintain the pathway in an inactive state. Kamata et al. [33] demonstrated that intracellular H2O2 accumulation inactivates MKPs by oxidation of their catalytic cysteine, which leads to sustained activation of JNK pathway. Hou et al. [34] further confirmed that ROS-induced MKP inactivation causes sustained activation of JNK pathway. Choi et al. [35] showed that glutamate-induced oxidative stress induces sustained activation of ERK pathway through a mechanism that involves degradation of MKP-1. It is worth pointing out that ROS can upregulate MKP-1 expression. Zhou et al. [36] found that upregulation of MKP-1 expression by H2O2 correlates with inactivation of JNK and p38 activity. Kuwano and Gorospe [37] revealed that the oxidant-triggered induction of MKP-1 is potently influenced by two posttranscriptional processes, mRNA stabilization and increased translation. Lornejad-Schäfer et al. [38] investigated the regulation of MKP-1 expression and JNK activation by the induction of light damage that has shown to enhance ROS production in ARPE-19 cells. In their study, low light doses upregulated MKP-1 expression in ARPE-19 cells, this being accompanied by inactivation of JNK pathway. High light doses, however, led to a decrease in the expression of MKP-1, resulting in sustained activation of JNK pathway. Hence, the paradox in the roles of ROS as “inducers” in the regulation of MKP-1 expression and as “inhibitors” may be, at least in part, related to differences in the concentrations of ROS.

6. Conclusion

The evidence supporting that ROS can activate MAPK pathways at cellular levels is based largely on the following findings: (1) cellular stimuli that are capable of producing ROS can also activate MAPK pathways in a number of different cell types, (2) antioxidants and inhibitors of ROS-producing enzymatic systems block MAPK activation, and (3) exogenous addition of H2O2, one of ROS, activates MAPK pathways. The putative mechanisms by which ROS, on the basis of their oxidation potentials, can activate MAPK pathways may include (1) oxidative modifications of MAPK signaling proteins (e.g., RTKs and MAP3Ks) and (2) inactivation of MKPs, as illustrated in Figure 2. Finally, the site of ROS production and the concentration and kinetics of ROS production as well as cellular antioxidant pools and redox state are most likely to be important factors in determining the effects of ROS on activation of MAPK pathways.

792639.fig.002
Figure 2: Putative mechanisms for ROS-mediated activation of MAPK pathways. ROS are activated by growth factors, cytokines, and various stresses and rapidly removed by intracellular antioxidant proteins. ROS, once ROS production exceeds the capacity of the antioxidant proteins, may induce oxidative modification of MAPK signaling proteins (e.g., RTKs and MAP3Ks), thereby leading to MAPK activation. ROS may activate MAPK pathways via inhibition and/or degradation of MKPs.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Daiichi Sankyo Korea Co., Ltd. (N. H. Kim) and Astellas Pharma Korea, Inc. (Y. K. Cheong).

References

  1. T. Boutros, E. Chevet, and P. Metrakos, “Mitogen-Activated Protein (MAP) kinase/MAP kinase phosphatase regulation: roles in cell growth, death, and cancer,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 261–310, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. K. Haagenson and G. S. Wu, “The role of MAP kinases and MAP kinase phosphatase-1 in resistance to breast cancer treatment,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 143–149, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. K. Kim and E. J. Choi, “Pathological roles of MAPK signaling pathways in human diseases,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1802, no. 4, pp. 396–405, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Torres and H. J. Forman, “Redox signaling and the MAP kinase pathways,” BioFactors, vol. 17, no. 1–4, pp. 287–296, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. J. Thannickal and B. L. Fanburg, “Reactive oxygen species in cell signaling,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 279, no. 6, pp. L1005–L1028, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y.-C. Chang and L.-M. Chuang, “The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes: from molecular mechanism to clinical implication,” American Journal of Translational Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 316–331, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Valko, D. Leibfritz, J. Moncol, M. T. D. Cronin, M. Mazur, and J. Telser, “Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 44–84, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. D. Stoner, L. S. Wang, and B. C. Casto, “Laboratory and clinical studies of cancer chemoprevention by antioxidants in berries,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1665–1674, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Reth, “Hydrogen peroxide as second messenger in lymphocyte activation,” Nature Immunology, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1129–1134, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. J. Forman, “Use and abuse of exogenous H2O2 in studies of signal transduction,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 926–932, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. D. Brown and D. B. Sacks, “Protein scaffolds in MAP kinase signalling,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 462–469, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. M. Winter-Vann and G. L. Johnson, “Integrated activation of MAP3Ks balances cell fate in response to stress,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 848–858, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. W. Ramos, “The regulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) in mammalian cells,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2707–2719, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Aslan and T. Özben, “Oxidants in receptor tyrosine kinase signal transduction pathways,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 781–788, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. I. Nakashima, K. Takeda, Y. Kawamoto, Y. Okuno, M. Kato, and H. Suzuki, “Redox control of catalytic activities of membrane-associated protein tyrosine kinases,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 434, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Meves, S. N. Stock, A. Beyerle, M. R. Pittelkow, and D. Peus, “H2O2 mediates oxidative stress-induced epidermal growth factor receptor phosphorylation,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 205–214, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Cuadrado and A. R. Nebreda, “Mechanisms and functions of p38 MAPK signalling,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 429, no. 3, pp. 403–417, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. M. A. Bogoyevitch, K. R. W. Ngoei, T. T. Zhao, Y. Y. C. Yeap, and D. C. H. Ng, “c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling: recent advances and challenges,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1804, no. 3, pp. 463–475, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Ichijo, “From receptors to stress-activated MAP kinases,” Oncogene, vol. 18, no. 45, pp. 6087–6093, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Matsuzawa and H. Ichijo, “Redox control of cell fate by MAP kinase: physiological roles of ASK1-MAP kinase pathway in stress signaling,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1780, no. 11, pp. 1325–1336, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. I. Patterson, T. Brummer, P. M. O'Brien, and R. J. Daly, “Dual-specificity phosphatases: critical regulators with diverse cellular targets,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 418, no. 3, pp. 475–489, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. Kondoh and E. Nishida, “Regulation of MAP kinases by MAP kinase phosphatases,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1773, no. 8, pp. 1227–1237, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. R. Clark, “MAP kinase phosphatase 1: a novel mediator of biological effects of glucocorticoids?” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 5–12, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Li, M. Gorospe, D. Hutter, J. Barnes, S. M. Keyse, and Y. Liu, “Transcriptional induction of MKP-1 in response to stress is associated with histone H3 phosphorylation-acetylation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 8213–8224, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. J. Wu and A. M. Bennett, “Essential role for mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase phosphatase-1 in stress-responsive MAP kinase and cell survival signaling,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 16, pp. 16461–16466, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. A. McCubrey, M. M. Lahair, and R. A. Franklin, “Reactive oxygen species-induced activation of the MAP kinase signaling pathways,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 8, no. 9-10, pp. 1775–1789, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Ruffels, M. Griffin, and J. M. Dickenson, “Activation of ERK1/2, JNK and PKB by hydrogen peroxide in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells: role of ERK1/2 in H2O2-induced cell death,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 483, no. 2-3, pp. 163–173, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Dabrowski, C. Boguslowicz, M. Dabrowska, I. Tribillo, and A. Gabryelewicz, “Reactive oxygen species activate mitogen-activated protein kinases in pancreatic acinar cells,” Pancreas, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 376–384, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. Meng, X. Shi, B. H. Jiang, and J. Fang, “Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) induces epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation and cell proliferation through reactive oxygen species,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1651–1660, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. Z. Guyton, Y. Liu, M. Gorospe, Q. Xu, and N. J. Holbrook, “Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by H2O2: role in cell survival following oxidant injury,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 8, pp. 4138–4142, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. Nagai, T. Noguchi, K. Takeda, and H. Ichijo, “Pathophysiological roles of ASK1-MAP kinase signaling pathways,” Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. K. Tobiume, A. Matsuzawa, T. Takahashi et al., “ASK1 is required for sustained activations of JNK/p38 MAP kinases and apoptosis,” EMBO Reports, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 222–228, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. H. Kamata, S. I. Honda, S. Maeda, L. Chang, H. Hirata, and M. Karin, “Reactive oxygen species promote TNFα-induced death and sustained JNK activation by inhibiting MAP kinase phosphatases,” Cell, vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 649–661, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. N. Hou, S. Torii, N. Saito, M. Hosaka, and T. Takeuchi, “Reactive oxygen species-mediated pancreatic β-cell death is regulated by interactions between stress-activated protein kinases, p38 and c-jun N-terminal kinase, and mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatases,” Endocrinology, vol. 149, no. 4, pp. 1654–1665, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. B. H. Choi, E. M. Hur, J. H. Lee, D. J. Jun, and K. T. Kim, “Protein kinase Cδ-mediated proteasomal degradation of MAP kinase phosphatase-1 contributes to glutamate-induced neuronal cell death,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 119, no. 7, pp. 1329–1340, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. Y. Zhou, Y. Liu, and S. W. Gen, “The role of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 in oxidative damage-induced cell death,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 4888–4894, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Y. Kuwano and M. Gorospe, “Protecting the stress response, guarding the MKP-1 mRNA,” Cell Cycle, vol. 7, no. 17, pp. 2640–2642, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. R. Lornejad-Schäfer, C. Schäfer, H. Schöffl, and J. Frank, “Cytoprotective role of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 in light-damaged human retinal pigment epithelial cells,” Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 834–842, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus