Review Article

A Systematic Review of Carcinogenic Outcomes and Potential Mechanisms from Exposure to 2,4-D and MCPA in the Environment

Table 2

Case-control studies of chlorophenoxy compounds and NHL.

NHL ORCasesControlsReferenceHerbicideNotes

4.8 (2.9–8.1)4124Hardell et al. [72]2,4,5-T; 2,4-D; MCPAChlorophenols, solvents, and other pesticides. Exposure defined as greater than one day; entirely self-reported. One documented MCPA exposure across cases; results for NHL and HD combined. Forestry.

4.9 (1.3–18)66Persson et al. [68]PhenoxysChlorophenols, solvents, and other pesticides. Variety of occupations and exposure described by occupation. Exposure to wood preservatives/creosote predicted much higher ORs; exposure to pets comparable. Only logistic model statistically significant.

13 (1.2–360)31Hardell et al. [56]2,4-D only Chlorophenols. Potential for recall bias in questionnaires used for exposure. No dose response relationship observed. Forestry.

5.5 (2.7–11)2524Hardell et al. [56]Phenoxys (including 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and MCPA)2,4,5-T known to contain dioxin. No dose response relationship observed.

2.7 (1.0–7.0)1211Hardell and Eriksson [60]Primarily MCPAGreater than 30 year latency to achieve statistical significance.
1.3 (0.7–2.3)4362Hardell and Eriksson [60]2,4-D/2,4,5-T

2.81 (1.27–6.22)219Eriksson et al. [71]MCPA only overall  Questionnaire on work history; questions on exposure to pesticides, organic solvents, and other chemicals.
 Numbers of years, days per year, and approximate length of exposure per day. No job-exposure matrix could be developed. One full day of exposure constituted exposure.
3.76 (1.35–10.5)155Eriksson et al. [71]MCPA < 32 days of use
1.66 (0.46–5.96)64Eriksson et al. [71]MCPA > 32 days of use
2.04 (1.24–3.36)4726Eriksson et al. [71]Phenoxys overall
2.83 (1.47–5.47)3213Eriksson et al. [71]Phenoxys < 45 days of use
1.27 (0.59–2.70)1513Eriksson et al. [71]Phenoxys > 45 days of use

1.3 (0.8–2.1)5192Pearce et al. [73]Primarily 2,4,5-T; MCPA not mentionedFencing work; employment in meat works statistically significant. “Farming” assumed to represent chlorophenoxy exposures.

2.2 (1.2–4.1)2478Hoar et al. [57]2,4-D (overall, not stratified)No dose response (see below).

2.7 (0.9–8.1)617Hoar et al. [57]Use of 2,4-D 1-2 d/y (frequency)Only overall analysis statistically significant; no dose response relationship. Many other exposures; use of hierarchical modeling by class (herbicides only, insecticides only, etc.). Detailed questionnaire; but elicited dates and frequency of use of any herbicide on each farm instead of dates and frequency for each specific herbicide.
1.6 (0.4–5.7)416Hoar et al. [57]Use of 2,4-D 3–5 d/y (frequency)
1.9 (0.5–6.7)416Hoar et al. [57]Use of 2,4-D 6–10 d/y (frequency)

3.0 (0.7–11.8)49Hoar et al. [57]Use of 2,4-D 11–20 d/y (frequency)
7.6 (1.8–32.3)56Hoar et al. [57]Use of 2,4-D > 21 d/yOnly overall analysis statistically significant; no dose response relationship. Many other exposures; use of hierarchical modeling by class (herbicides only, insecticides only, etc.). Detailed questionnaire; but elicited dates and frequency of use of any herbicide on each farm instead of dates and frequency for each specific herbicide.
1.3 (0.3–5.1)316Hoar et al. [57]Use of 2,4-D 1–5 yrs (duration)
2.5 (0.9–6.8)722Hoar et al. [57]Use of 2,4-D 6–15 yrs (duration)
3.9 (1.4–10.9)815Hoar et al. [57]Use of 2,4-D 16–25 yrs (duration)
2.3 (0.7–6.8)617Hoar et al. [57]Use of 2,4-D > 26 yr (duration)

1.5 (0.9–2.5)4398Zahm et al. [61]2,4-DLawn care professionals.

1.07 (0.8–1.4)NRNRWoods et al. [66]Phenoxys; other compoundsIncreased risks found for DDT (1.82 (1.04-3.2)) and organic solvents (1.35 (1.06-1.7)). Exposure based on job description. No dose response observed for phenoxys.

0.68 (0.3–1.4)181196Woods [65]2,4-DSmall but significant excess risk observed for farmers (all chemicals). Exposure poorly defined.
0.71 (0.3–1.5)181196Woods [65]Any phenoxy

1.2 (0.9–1.6)118231Cantor et al. [64]Largely 2,4-DStatistically significant OR > 1.5 for personal handling, mixing, or application of carbaryl, chlordane, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, diazinon, dichlorvos, lindane, maialinoli, nicotine, and toxaphene.

0.5 (0.2–1.2)679Leiss and Savitz [69]Yard treated in last three months of pregnancy Exposure dichotomous never exposed versus ever exposed; actual products and durations not specified.
Lymphomas considered as a category.
0.8 (0.3–1.8)15118Leiss and Savitz [69]Yard treated in the two years between birth and diagnosis

0.6 (0.4–1.0)1098Leiss and Savitz [69]Yard treated in the two years prior to diagnosisExposure dichotomous never exposed versus ever exposed; actual products and durations not specified. Lymphomas considered as a category.

1.25 (0.54–2.90)1985Kogevinas et al. [59]PhenoxysExposure evaluated for phenoxy herbicides and chlorophenols, polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and furans, raw materials, process chemicals, and chemicals used in the production of phenoxy herbicides.
0.88 (0.36–2.18)1576Kogevinas et al. [59]MCPA/MCPPThree industrial hygienists carried out questionnaire-based analysis of exposure to 21 chemicals or mixtures. Nested case-control in IARC cohort [83].

1.11 (0.46–2.65)1256Kogevinas et al. [59]2,4-D/P/BSee previous/above

1.32 (1.01–1.73)111293McDuffie et al. [13]2,4-DSmall validation study of exposure questionnaire.
Considered many covariates and exposures. Final models did not include MCPA or 2,4-D.
Previous cancer and family history strong predictors.
1.10 (0.6–2.0)1746McDuffie et al. [13]MCPA

1.25 (0.96–1.62)110293McDuffie et al. [62]2,4-DCross-Canada study. Mecoprop exposures show strongest relationship; also DEET.
1.09 (0.6–1.98)1746McDuffie et al. [62]MCPA

1.09 (0.76–1.56)64186McDuffie et al. [62]2,4-DFarm study. Mecoprop exposures show strongest relationship; also DEET.
0.98 (0.7–1.37)1533McDuffie et al. [62]MCPA

0.9 (0.6–1.2)123314De Roos et al. [16]2,4-DPooled data from three previous case-control studies.
0.9 (0.4–2.0)816De Roos et al. [16]MCPAStrongest associations for organophosphates, chlordane, and dieldrin.

1.0 (0.5–2.0)18NRMiligi et al. [58]Chlorophenoxys and men
1.3 (0.5–3.7)11NRMiligi et al. [58]Chlorophenoxys and womenCrop exposure matrix for exposure based on face-to-face interview questionnaire together with pesticide usage statistics by area.
0.7 (0.3–1.9)6NRMiligi et al. [58]2,4-D and men
1.5 (0.4–5.7)7NRMiligi et al. [58]2,4-D and women
1.1 (0.4–3.5)8NRMiligi et al. [58]MCPA and women
1.1 (0.6–1.8)3228Miligi et al. [58]Chlorophenoxys overall
2.4 (0.9–7.6)136Miligi et al. [58]Chlorophenoxys without protective equipment
0.9 (0.5–1.8)1718Miligi et al. [87]2,4-D overall

4.4 (1.1–29.1)93Miligi et al. [87]2,4-D without protective equipment
0.9 (0.4–1.8)1819Miligi et al. [87]MCPA overallCrop exposure matrix for exposure based on face-to-face interview questionnaire together with pesticide usage statistics by area.
3.4 (0.8–23.2)73Miligi et al. [87]MCPA without protective equipment

1.1 (0.78–1.55)257161Hartge et al. [15]500 ng/g 2,4-D in carpet dust
0.91 (0.45–1.45)8659Hartge et al. [15]500–999 ng/g 2,4-D in carpet dustNo dose response observed; residential exposures from tracking following yard application. Measured exposures but not concurrent.
0.66 (0.45–0.98)165162Hartge et al. [15]1000–9999 ng/g 2,4-D in carpet dust

0.82 (0.41–1.66)2418Hartge et al. [15]>10000 ng/g 2,4-D in carpet dustSee previous/above.

3.8 (1.85–7.81)60NRMills et al. [12]2,4-DUS farmworkers union.

1.75 (0.42–7.38)35Fritschi et al. [67]Chlorophenoxys

0.9 (0.4–1.9)1125Orsi et al. [70]Phenoxys

0.94 (0.67–1.33)49187Hohenadel et al. [17]2,4-D

1.78 (1.27–2.5)63133Hohenadel et al. [17]2+ phenoxys