Journal of Tropical Medicine

Journal of Tropical Medicine / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 9819723 |

Nercy Virginia Rabelo Furtado, Allan Kardec Ribeiro Galardo, Clicia Denis Galardo, Viviane Caetano Firmino, Thiago Vasconcelos dos Santos, "Phlebotomines (Diptera: Psychodidae) in a Hydroelectric System Affected Area from Northern Amazonian Brazil: Further Insights into the Effects of Environmental Changes on Vector Ecology", Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 2016, Article ID 9819723, 12 pages, 2016.

Phlebotomines (Diptera: Psychodidae) in a Hydroelectric System Affected Area from Northern Amazonian Brazil: Further Insights into the Effects of Environmental Changes on Vector Ecology

Academic Editor: Aditya Prasad Dash
Received03 Aug 2016
Revised06 Oct 2016
Accepted12 Oct 2016
Published29 Nov 2016


During 2012–2015, an entomological survey was conducted as part of a phlebotomine (Diptera: Psychodidae) monitoring program in an area influenced by the Santo Antônio do Jari hydroelectric system (Amapá State, Brazil). The purpose was to study aspects of Amazon/Guianan American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) vectors subjected to stresses by anthropogenic environmental changes. For sampling, CDC light traps were positioned 0.5, 1, and 20 m above ground at five capture locations along the Jari River Basin. Fluctuations in phlebotomine numbers were analyzed to determine any correlation with rainfall, dam waterlogging, and/or ACL cases, from May 2012 to March 2015. We captured 2,800 individuals, and among 45 species identified, Bichromomyia flaviscutellata, Nyssomyia umbratilis, and Psychodopygus squamiventris s.l. were determined to be the main putative vectors, based on current knowledge of the Amazon/Guianan ACL scenario. Rainfall, but not complete flooding, was relatively correlated with phlebotomine fluctuation, mainly observed for Ps. squamiventris s.l., as were ACL cases with Ny. umbratilis. Behavioral changes were observed in the unexpected high frequency of Bi. flaviscutellata among CDC captures and the noncanopy dominance of Ny. umbratilis, possibly attributable to environmental stress in the sampled ecotopes. Continuous entomological surveillance is necessary to monitor the outcomes of these findings.

1. Introduction

Insects of Phlebotominae (Diptera: Psychodidae) species are of great medical interest because of their implications in the transmission of some vector-borne diseases, in particular leishmaniasis [13]. American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) is known to be endemic in Amazonian Brazil and is regarded as a serious risk to public health. The high biodiversity of the region induces a complex mosaic of ecological interactions among reservoirs, vectors, and parasites, and consequently a wide spectrum of ACL clinical manifestations, including disfiguring and potentially life-threatening cases [4]. Moreover, this diversity of transmission cycles becomes even more complex to understand in the context of the influence of anthropic effects on natural ecological systems. The consequences of anthropogenic environmental stress on the expansion of the geographical distribution of ACL are, therefore, difficult to predict with any certainty [5].

Over the past 30 years, one of the main causes of human influence on the environment in the Brazilian Amazon Basin is its exploitation for generating energy from hydropower. Negative effects of some of the resultant environmental changes have been observed; an example is the disturbance caused by the proliferation of Mansonia (Diptera: Culicidae) in the dammed lake associated with the Tucuruí hydroelectric system [6]. Vector monitoring programs, which are essential to being granted a license to operate, are included in environmental and public health planning, in order to predict and minimize the effects of vector-borne diseases in hydroelectric systems [7]. This monitoring includes spatial/temporal studies of phlebotomines and their potential implications for the transmission dynamics of leishmaniasis agents [8].

The geographically closely related Brazilian states of Pará (PA) and Amapá (AP) share a border through the Jari River and cover a region historically associated with the exploitation and processing of cellulose. Early information about leishmaniasis in the region first emerged in the 1970–1980s. In this period, studies conducted in “Monte Dourado” (Almeirim, PA) provided substantial knowledge about ACL ecoepidemiology, with particular reference to the “pian-bois,” a form of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis (formerly referred to as Leishmania braziliensis guyanensis), and its respective identity-obscured vector, Nyssomyia umbratilis [916].

Since those original studies were undertaken, the region also now hosts the Santo Antônio do Jari hydroelectric system. The present study, therefore, aimed to characterize phlebotomine fauna in the area in order to assess the potential impact of the Santo Antônio do Jari hydroelectric system and in particular the spatiotemporal implications of environmental changes on the ecology of ACL vectors in that region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Santo Antonio do Jari hydroelectric system (0°39′02.4′′S 52°30′56.9′′W) is situated between the municipalities of Almeirim (PA) and Laranjal do Jari (AP), a region within the Guianan Ecoregion Complex. The hydroelectric system comprises 373.4 MW of installed potency and a reservoir area of 31.7 km2. Its construction began in 2011, and the system was totally operative from 2014.

The Amazon Region has a “hot-humid” equatorial climate; however, only minor differences are observed in the distinct ecoregions. In this study, four Guianan Ecoregion Complex seasons were characterized as follows: a short rainy (wet) season from mid-November (“novembre humide”) to late January; a short dry season between early February and mid-March; a long rainy season from late March to late July; and a long dry season from late July to mid-November [17].

2.2. Sampled Locations

Five locations, each with the following characteristics, were sampled up- and downstream of the caisson (Figure 1):

The eastern bank of the Jari River (AP), covered by alluvial dense forest:(I)Porto Sabão (S 00°37′02.2′′ W 052°30′42.1′′), a forested area with only a few dwelling. A small harbor operates from the opposite side of the river.(II)Iratapuru Village (S 00°33′50.9′′ W 052°34′48.5′′), a cluster of dwellings, forming a community of approximately 200 inhabitants, which primarily acts as an extractive reserve.(III)Santo Antônio Village (S 00°38′57.4′′ W 052°30′27.9′′), which is the only site downstream of the caisson, comprising 27 agriculturist families inhabiting riverine wooden buildings.The western bank of the Jari River (PA), covered by submontane (lowland) dense forest.(IV)Traíra (S 00°37′50.7′′ W 052°31′48.8′′), a location with no dwellings on the Traíra river.(V)the power Plant (S 00°39′07.7′′ W 052°31′06.4′′), the most affected area, close to the construction site and with very little vegetation.

2.3. Sampling

Phlebotomine captures were undertaken during 2012 to 2015 in fourteen quadrimonthly field expeditions, which aimed to sample periods in the short dry (February/March), rainy to dry (June/July), and dry to rainy (October/November) Amazon/Guianan seasons. Eight expeditions were undertaken before and six after dammed lake levels were replenished (in May 2014). In each of the above described five areas, a randomly selected horizontal transect was established in the direction of the primarily forested area, comprising a phlebotomine monitoring station (MS), sited approximately 200 m distance from the forest edge, where human settlements were present. Each MS incorporated three CDC miniature light traps (Sudia and Chamberlain model), installed between 18:00 and 06:00 for two consecutive nights. Each was placed according to the following different vertical strata: 0.5 m from ground level, 1 m from ground level, and at 20 m, in the tree canopy; they were placed 10 m apart from each other. Trees used for canopy placement of CDC traps were selected based on a minimum height of 20 m, regardless of species. The ground level surface was composed of humid, decomposed organic material, originating from the trees. Phlebotomines were triaged in a stereomicroscope, cleaned with neutral detergent [1% (Extran®)], washed with NaCl 0.9%, and then stored in 70% ethanol. In the laboratory, specimens were processed according to the methodology of Ryan [18], mounted in Berlese fluid (GBI Laboratories, Manchester, England), and identified according to Galati [19].

2.4. Data Analysis

Sampling effort was calculated based on number of expeditions, versus the number of installed CDC traps, versus hours of exposition. Phlebotomine frequency was analyzed for correlation with climatic data (monthly average rainfall, temperature, and air relative humidity) sourced from the Jari Meteorological Station (“Jari Energia” database) and with epidemiology (ACL monthly prevalence) obtained after interrogating the database of the “Coordenação de Vigilância em Saúde” (Coordination of Surveillance in Health) of the “Secretaria de Estado da Saúde do Amapá-SESA” (Amapá State Health Secretary). Data were tested by a single linear regression with Pearson’s coefficient (r), using BioEstat 5.0, where the r-value represents a strong correlation if above 0.7, a moderate correlation if between 0.3 and 0.7, a weak correlation if between 0.1 and 0.3, and an insignificant correlation if below 0.1. The index of species abundance (ISA) and the standard index of species abundance (SISA) were calculated using Microsoft Excel for the five ecotopes surveyed, as described by Roberts and Hsi [20]. Species diversity (Shannon’s diversity index, H′) and the coefficient of variation (S′) between monthly records (climatic and epidemiological) were calculated using Past software [21]. All comparisons were performed using a t-test to determine significance level ( value ≤ 0.05).

3. Results

A total of 2,800 individuals were captured (1,894 females and 906 males), belonging to 45 species, in approximately 2,520 h of sampling effort. Females of Trichophoromyia (exceptionally Th. ubiquitalis) and Pressatia (not identifiable at species level), and some unidentified Evandromyia, Nyssomyia, and Psychodopygus species were allocated at generic level (Table 1).

SpeciesPorto SabãoTraíra River Iratapuru Santo Power PlantISA
Total %

1Sciopemyia sordellii149661310154421613,60,872nd31611,29
2Psychodopygus davisi46379556151038176,40,743rd31411,21
Trichophoromyia spp.1773440172689,57
3Bichromomyia flaviscutellata76322414221152311220,951st2659,46
4Evandromyia infraspinosa441025183230189,20,66th1505,36
5Nyssomyia umbratilis261231301961398,60,635th1465,21
6Trichophoromyia castanheirai1046141111,20,519th1354,82
Pressatia spp.4319781314,68
Evandromyia spp.521043911121284,57
7Viannamyia furcata44411511130510,40,557th1113,96
8Psychodopygus squamiventris sensu lato3614155109110,528th893,18
9Trichopygomyia trichopyga111698921127,20,74th863,07
10Trichophoromyia ubiquitalis21658148139211,40,510th863,07
11Evandromyia saulensis40954412112,80,4311th752,68
12Psychodopygus hirsutus hirsutus1320414413,60,412th551,96
13Trichophoromyia brachypyga36122215,20,3214th521,86
14Pressatia choti17352514,20,3713th501,79
15Nyssomyia anduzei652410170,2316th451,61
16Lutzomyia gomezi271119,40,1222th381,36
Nyssomyia spp.111125381,36
17Nyssomyia antunesi2952114,20,3713th190,68
18Sciopemyia fluviatilis21391180,1918th160,57
19Micropygomyia rorotaensis482117,80,217th150,54
20Psychodopygus paraensis635117,60,217th150,54
21Psychodopygus claustrei7123115,40,3115th140,50
Psychodopygus spp.4262140,50
22Trichophoromyia eurypyga83118,20,1819th120,43
23Psathyromyia aragaoi52418,80,1520th110,39
24Evandromyia brachyphalla43211190,1421th110,39
25Psychodopygus carrerai carrerai11720,20,0826th90,32
26Evandromyia begonae22419,60,1123th80,29
27Nyssomyia whitmani8200,0925th80,29
28Psathyromyia scaffi32219,80,124th70,25
29Pressatia trispinosa720,40,0727th70,25
30Micropygomyia trinidadensis720,80,0529th70,25
31Viannamyia tuberculata6210,0430th60,21
32Pintomyia damascenoi5200,0925th50,18
33Evandromyia evandroi4120,40,0727th50,18
34Psathyromyia lutziana521,20,0331th50,18
35Brumptomia travassosi3119,60,1123th40,14
36Evandromyia bacula1320,20,0826th40,14
37Evandromyia monstruosa420,60,0628th40,14
38Psychodopygus amazonensis22210,0430th40,14
39Psychodopygus corossoniensis220,60,0628th20,07
40Pressatia equatorialis2210,0430th20,07
41Psathyromyia inflata2210,0430th20,07
42Micropygomyia micropyga1121,40,0232th20,07
43Psychodopygus geniculatus221,8033th20,07
44Lutzomyia carvalhoi120,80,0529th10,04
45Psathyromyia punctigeniculata121,60,0132th10,04

Each location comprised a monitoring station (MS) sampled with 0.5, 1, and 20 m CDC traps, providing approximately 504 h/MS.
♀: female; ♂: male; ISA: index of species abundance; SISA: standard index of species abundance.
“the bold italic font” Proven and/or putative ACL vectors in the Amazon Region, based in Young and Duncan [1], Rangel and Lainson [4], Ready [2], and Lainson and Shaw [16].

New AP records included Th. castanheirai, Th. eurypyga, Evandromyia begonae, Ev. bacula, Pressatia equatorialis, and Psathyromyia punctigeniculata.

The five most frequent species captured were Sciopemyia sordellii (; SISA = 0.87), Ps. davisi (; SISA = 0.74), Bichromomyia flaviscutellata (; SISA = 0.95), Ev. infraspinosa (; SISA = 0.6), and Ny. umbratilis (; SISA = 0.63). Less frequently captured but nonetheless epidemiologically relevant species included Ps. squamiventris s.l. (; SISA = 0.52), Th. ubiquitalis (; SISA=0.5), Ps. hirsutus hirsutus (; SISA = 0.4), Ny. anduzei (; SISA = 0.23), Lutzomyia gomezi (; SISA = 0.12), Ny. antunesi (; SISA = 0.37), Ps. paraensis (; SISA = 0.2), and Ny. whitmani (; SISA = 0.09).

Sampling effort for each area comprised approximately 504 h of CDC trapping (14 expeditions, 3 CDC traps, and 12-hour CDC exposition). Porto Sabão was the site of the most captured specimens (1,267), followed by Santo Antônio Village (601). The highest diversity was observed in captures from Iratapuru Village (). All value comparisons between the different environments were significant (), except when comparing Traíra River and the Power Plant () (Figure 2).

Regarding vertical distribution, sampling of the same captures described above accounted for approximately 840 h of CDC trapping by stratum (14 expeditions, 5 ecotopes, and 12-hour CDC exposition). CDC traps placed 0.5 m above ground level accounted for a greater number of individuals (1,225) than those placed 1 m above ground level (1,021) and 20 m above ground level in the canopy (554) (Table 2). While Ps. davisi was most likely to be found at canopy level (75 individuals at 0.5 m, 83 at 1 m, and 156 at 20 m) and Bi. flaviscutellata closer to ground level (130 at 0.5 m, 120 at 1 m, and 15 at 20 m), there was little difference in numbers of Ny. umbratilis individuals captured at the different levels of strata (58 at 0.5 m, 39 at 1 m, and 49 at 20 m).

Species0.5 m ground1 m ground20 m canopyTotal

1Sciopemyia sordellii117719123113316
2Psychodopygus davisi4827443910254314
Trichophoromyia spp.11712724268
3Bichromomyia flaviscutellata85457941114265
4Evandromyia infraspinosa38184827163150
5Nyssomyia umbratilis352326132821146
6Trichophoromyia castanheirai505926135
Pressatia spp.663926131
Evandromyia spp.551241911128
7Vianamyia furcata42846681111
8Psychodopygus squamiventris s.l.271120123789
9Trichopygomyia trichopyga1820105221186
10Trichophoromyia ubiquitalis281516139586
Other species (11–45)137112129697157575

Total (♀ + ♂)12251021554

Each stratum was sampled with approximately 840 h of CDC trap.
♀: female; ♂: male.

The monthly average rainfall was the only climatic data with a representative coefficient of variance () when tested against ACL occurrence and phlebotomine frequency (), in contrast to temperature (), and relative air humidity (). The available data enabled correlations to be determined between the periods of May 2012 to April 2015, a period within which nine of the fourteen capture efforts were undertaken. Rainfall presented a moderate correlation with overall phlebotomine frequency (; ), as also individually compared with Ps. squamiventris s.l. (; ), and a similarly moderate, but lower correlation with Bi. flaviscutellata (; ) and Ny. umbratilis (; ). A decrease in the overall phlebotomine population was observed after March until November 2014, coinciding with the transition between the rainy and dry periods and with flooding (Figure 3).

The number of ACL cases presented a moderate correlation with overall phlebotomine frequency (; ) and also with Ps. squamiventris (; ) and an insignificant negative correlation with Bi. flaviscutellata (; ). A similarly moderate, but higher correlation was however found with Ny. umbratilis (; ) (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

It is important to consider current investigations of phlebotomine fauna in the Jari River Basin in the context of the historical findings from the 1970s and 1980s. These earlier studies represent comprehensive research conducted in Monte Dourado (northern PA), a region close to the area investigated in the present study and on which the present epidemiological background to ACL transmission in the associated region is based. In brief, the previous research includes a description of Ny. umbratilis (formerly “obscured” as Ny. anduzei) [13] and its incrimination as the main vector of L. (V.) guyanensis [911], confirmed by strong ecological associations [15]. Just as important, a parasite, more recently described as L. (V.) naiffi, was isolated from the armadillo, Dasypus novemcinctus, for which transmission was locally driven and attributed to Ps. squamiventris s.l., and other Psychodopygus species [22]; this comprised a primarily enzootic ACL, occasionally infecting humans [23]. Finally, the isolation of L. (L.) amazonensis from rodents in an area affected by occurrence of the main vector Bi. flaviscutellata [11] comprised the third known Jari ACL transmission cycle. These facts described above suggest that Ny. umbratilis, Ps. squamiventris s.l., and Bi. flaviscutellata are implicated in the transmission scenario of the area covered by the present study and thus merit particular attention.

The present study incorporated a representative composition of the known AP fauna. Considering the substantial sampling effort (2,520 h), the determined diversity showed agreement with the findings of other inventories from the Brazilian Amazon basin [1, 24]. Moreover, all new records for AP have already been recorded for PA [25].

Apart from Ny. umbratilis, Ps. squamiventris s.l., and Bi. flaviscutellata, other species captured were noted as being epidemiologically relevant to ACL in the Brazilian Amazon Region: Ps. paraensis, Ps. davisi, and Ps. hirsutus hirsutus, which are putative vectors of L. (V.) naiffi [26, 27]; Th. ubiquitalis, a proven vector of L. (V.) lainsoni [28]; Ny. anduzei, a secondary vector of L. (V.) guyanensis [4]; Ny. whitmani and Lu. gomezi, proven and putative vectors of L. (V.) shawi, respectively [4, 26]; and lastly, Ny. antunesi, a suspected vector of L. (V.) lindenbergi [4].

Among the above species, Ps. davisi is notable as the third highest ranking according to SISA (0.74) and as having the highest presence in all vertical strata, in particular, at the canopy level. This species is generally anthropophilic, is widely distributed in the Amazon Basin [1, 24], and is related to Leishmania (Viannia) infections in the States of Rondônia (RO) [29] and PA [27, 30]. Interestingly, this species remains frequent in recently surveyed areas affected by hydroelectric schemes in RO [8] and PA (TVS, unpublished). These observations add weight to the need for further investigation into the putative epidemiological role of Ps. davisi in Jari.

The species most frequently captured, Sc. sordellii, would appear not to be of epidemiological concern. Firstly, the apparent abundance of a given phlebotomine species is not sufficient of itself to incriminate it as a vector [31], particularly when it does not demonstrate high levels of anthropophilic behavior. Secondly, flagellate infections isolated from this species (formerly referred to as Lutzomyia nordestina) are historically recognized as distinct from Leishmania [22] or remain undetermined, [32] and are more likely to be other trypanosomatids [22]. Furthermore, despite recent reports of molecular Leishmania ascribed to this fly [33, 34], currently, polymerase chain reaction-based techniques do not allow “true infection” to be distinguished from a “simple and occasionally ingested” DNA fragment [3]. Thus, there remains insufficient evidence for a potential vector role of S. sordellii in Leishmania transmission.

High frequencies of light-trapped Bi. flaviscutellata have been documented [8, 35], despite rodent-baited trapping being better recognized as a method for attracting the species. Additionally, the first SISA Rank (0.95) was indicative of this high presence in all five surveyed ecotopes; this has been observed in the Belém metropolitan area (PA), where Bi. flaviscutellata was the only omnipresent species in seven urban and ecologically isolated forest fragments surveyed [36]. Furthermore, this species has been reported as being able to adapt to plantations of introduced tree species and in other nonclimax forests in Jari [14], suggesting it is capable of responding positively to environmental change, such as the vegetal suppression and flooding caused by hydroelectric operations. Nonetheless, ecological niche model projections predict no change in spatial distribution for Bi. flaviscutellata in the Jari area, which is an environment that remains suitable for the species [37].

In an area in Regina, French Guiana, ecologically disturbed due to agricultural practices, flagellates infecting a Bi. flaviscutellata specimen have been determined to be L. (V.) guyanensis [38], in similar circumstances to the observed low presence of Ny. umbratilis. Although this possibly changing pattern in ACL transmission should be interpreted with caution, it raises an intriguing possibility about the permissiveness of Bi. flaviscutellata to L. (V.) guyanensis in the Amazon/Guianan ACL scenario.

In the present study, a higher number of Bi. flaviscutellata individuals was captured compared to Ny. umbratilis (265 versus 146, resp.). A lack of available evidence for natural infection in this unnatural vector/parasite system, however, precludes speculation about the possible involvement of Bi. flaviscutellata, even in the context of occasional transmission of parasites distinct from L. (L.) amazonensis. Nevertheless, the current high occurrence of Bi. flaviscutellata in the Amazon/Guianan ACL scenario may be of future concern; unnatural parasite/vector/reservoir systems, when closely related in an ecological context, can, on a century-level scale, undergo stress adaptation (evolutionary fitness) and form new ecological systems driven by coevolution [39].

There is no doubt that Ny. umbratilis is the main vector of ACL in the Jari River Basin [15]. Surprisingly, the well-documented tree-dwelling behavior of this species [15, 40] was not observed in CDC canopy captures in the present study; very little difference was found between the number of individuals captured in the three sampled strata (58 at 0.5 m, 39 at 1 m, and 49 at 20 m). Although Ny. umbratilis is known to climb into the canopy at night to feed on edentates (mainly sloths) [12, 41], it is possible that an alternative terrestrial source of blood, such as rodents, may be attracting females toward ground level. Sloths are very slow moving and are therefore commonly rescued for relocation during environmental monitoring operations; their resulting rareness means Ny. umbratilis has had to find other food sources. Conversely, blood meal analysis conducted during studies in a forest fragment of the Western Amazon has shown rodent blood to be the predominant feeding source for Ny. umbratilis [42]. Wild and synanthropic rodents have been shown to survive environmental disturbance in Jari and to proliferate in areas of introduced tree species [14]; this indicated a plausible reason not only for the putative adaptation of Ny. umbratilis, but also for the increasing population levels of the rodent blood-feeder Bi. flaviscutellata, as already discussed.

Given the clear importance of Psychodopygus of the Chagasi series (formerly referred to as the Squamiventris series) in the context of ACL transmission [22], taxonomic studies on identifying the cryptic females have been undertaken previously [43] and more recently, with interesting results (Rodrigo E. Godoy, unpublished). These techniques, however, could not be employed in the field at the time. Early consideration of the assumed geographic distribution of the complex Ps. squamiventris s.l. [1, 44] shows that individuals from AP are likely to be predominantly Ps. s. maripaensis. Determining males of the species present could clarify these taxonomic uncertainties in the area covered by the present study; however, doubts about identification of some male specimens meant they were grouped as Ps. squamiventris s.l.

Ryan et al. [22] did not find Ps. squamiventris s.l. to be naturally infected in the Jari area but proposed a link to L. (V.) naiffi along the same northern bank of the Amazon River through studies in Cachoeira Porteira (PA); Fouque et al. [38] came to the same conclusions in French Guiana. Interestingly, this fly species complex was found alongside L. (V.) braziliensis DNA in Suriname [45], an area where the known Amazonian vectors of this parasite, Ps. complexus and Ps. wellcomei, are unlikely to occur. As previously discussed in the context of Bi. flaviscutellata, the changing transmission patterns of unnatural vector/parasite systems must be carefully interpreted and only after strong ecological associations have been determined. Thus, the putative vector importance of Ps. squamiventris s.l. in Jari can only be assumed in respect of L. (V.) naiffi.

The five surveyed areas presented, in general, different diversity indexes, showing variations in the phlebotomine composition along the affected area. This finding can be attributed not only to the distance between capture sites, but also to forest composition, fragmentation, geographic barriers, and migration of mammal fauna between sites; this latter can occur naturally or be induced by rescue operations involved in hydroelectric planning, whereby animals are moved to suitable “dry land” environments safe from potential flooding.

A decrease in the phlebotomine population in 2014, in the period after filling the reservoir, could not be attributed exclusively either to flooding or to the transition from the rainy to the dry season. Both eventualities, although opposite in effect, are likely to lead to unsuitable conditions for phlebotomine reproduction. However, they did coincide in May 2014, when rainfall decreased and the lake was formed.

Conversely, rainfall was a valid determinant of overall phlebotomine fluctuation; Ps. squamiventris s.l. was the main putative vector directly correlated with this. Other variables, such as forest composition and altitudinal variation, are known to influence seasonal dynamics of species from the complex Ps. squamiventris s.l. For example, the dry period from October to November in Serra dos Carajás (southern PA) can be unsuitable for Ps. wellcomei, which is adapted to high altitudes, in contrast to Ps. complexus, which flourishes in lowland areas during the same months [46].

An insignificant negative to a moderate positive correlation was observed between cases of ACL and phlebotomine fluctuations. In the case of Ny. umbratilis, however, the apparently higher correlation when compared with other species is in agreement with its known vector importance in Amazon/Guianan ACL. A strong spatiotemporal association between a given vector and ACL cases is considered essential to maintenance of the Leishmania life cycle [2, 14].

In summary, the present study filled a temporal gap on phlebotomine data relating to the Jari area. It provides a meaningful update on species composition and further insights into seasonal dynamics of species under pressures caused by environmental change. The presence of ACL vectors, in particular Ny. umbratilis, Bi. flaviscutellata, and Ps. squamiventris s.l., is noteworthy, due to their direct association with Amazon/Guianan-ACL transmission. For Ny. umbratilis, the lower frequency associated with the unpredicted lack of tree-dwelling behavior may be attributable to a reduction in numbers of canopy-dwelling mammals, due to the environmental disturbance and relocation efforts; this could consequently have led to seeking for alternative terrestrial blood sources at ground level. The possible association of Ps. davisi with Leishmania transmission cycles in other Amazon ecoregions draws attention to its high rank position in Jari. Rainfall can be partly associated with local seasonal fluctuations in fly numbers, mainly with respect to Ps. squamiventris s.l. Cases of ACL were also more highly correlated with Ny. umbratilis dynamics. Further attention was also given to results for Bi. flaviscutellata, which has been apparently tolerant of anthropic activity: continued phlebotomine monitoring is proposed in order to evaluate the implication for social welfare and health in the future.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


The authors wish to thank the “Instituto de Pesquisas Científicas e Tecnológicas do Estado do Amapá, IEPA” entomology team for the technical assistance given to the field work, in particular to Aderbal Amanajás Santana, Rosalvo Dias de Castro, Noel Fernandes Santos Neto, Ósita Cleyriane Lobato do Nascimento, José Luiz dos Santos Chaves, and João do Socorro Gomes Campos. Logistical facilities were financially supported by the “Jari Energia.”


  1. D. G. Young and M. A. Duncan, “Guide to the identification and geographic distribution of Lutzomyia sand flies in Mexico, the West Indies, Central and South America (Diptera: Psychodidae),” in Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, pp. 1–881, Associated Publishers American Entomological Institute, Gainesville, Fla, USA, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  2. P. D. Ready, “Biology of phlebotomine sand flies as vectors of disease agents,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 58, pp. 227–250, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. P. Brazil, A. A. Fuzzari, and J. D. Andrade Filho, “Sand fly vectors of Leishmania in the Americas—a mini review,” Entomology, Ornithology & Herpetology, vol. 4, no. 2, Article ID 1000144, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  4. E. F. Rangel and R. Lainson, “Proven and putative vectors of American cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil: aspects of their biology and vectorial competence,” Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 104, no. 7, pp. 937–954, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. F. Rangel, S. M. Costa, and B. M. Carvalho, “Environmental changes and the geographic spreading of American cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil,” in Leishmaniasis-Trends in Epidemiology, D. Claborn, Ed., Diagnosis and Treatment, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  6. W. P. Taddei, “O gênero Mansonia (Diptera: Culicidae) e a proliferação de mosquitos na usina hidrelétrica de Tucuruí,” in Energia na Amazônia, S. B. Magalhães, R. C. Brito, and E. R. Castro, Eds., vol. 1, pp. 311–318, MPEG/FPA/UNAMAZ, Belém, Brazil, 1996 (Portuguese). View at: Google Scholar
  7. A. I. A. Oliveira, Observações Sobre a Resolução CONAMA no. 237/97, que Dispõe Sobre o Licenciamento Ambiental, Mimeo, Conselho Empresarial Brasileiro Para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1997 (Portuguese).
  8. A. K. R. Galardo, C. D. Galardo, G. A. Silveira et al., “Phlebotominae sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae): potential vectors of American cutaneous leishmaniasis agents in the area associated with the Santo Antônio hydroelectric system in Western Amazonian, Brazil,” Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 265–271, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. Lainson, R. D. Ward, and J. J. Shaw, “Cutaneous leishmaniasis in North Brazil: Lutzomyia anduzei as a major vector,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 171–172, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Lainson, J. J. Shaw, R. D. Ward, P. D. Ready, and R. D. Naiff, “Leishmaniasis in Brazil: XIII. Isolation of Leishmania from armadillos (Dasypus novemcinctus), and observations on the epidemiology of cutaneous leishmaniasis in north Pará State,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 239–242, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. Lainson, J. J. Shaw, P. D. Ready, M. A. Miles, and M. Póvoa, “Leishmaniasis in Brazil: XVI. Isolation and identification of Leishmania species from sandflies, wild mammals and man in north Pará State, with particular reference to L. braziliensis guyanensis causative agent of “pian-bois”,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 530–536, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. Lainson, J. J. Shaw, and M. Póvoa, “The importance of edentates (sloths and anteaters) as primary reservoirs of Leishmania braziliensis guyanensis, causative agent of ‘pian bois’ in north Brazil,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 611–612, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. D. Ward and H. Fraiha, “Lutzomyia umbratilis, a new species of sand fly from Brazil (Diptera: Psychodidae),” Journal of Medical Entomology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 313–317, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. D. Ready, R. Lainson, and J. J. Shaw, “Leishmaniasis in Brazil: XX. Prevalence of ‘enzootic rodent leishmaniasis’ (Leishmania mexicana amazonensis), and apparent absence of ‘pian bois’ (Le. braziliensis guyanensis), in plantations of introduced tree species and in other non-climax forests in eastern Amazônia,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 775–785, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  15. P. D. Ready, R. Lainson, J. J. Shaw, and R. D. Ward, “The ecology of Lutzomyia umbratilis Ward & Fraiha (Diptera: Psychodidae), the major vector to man of Leishmania braziliensis guyanensis in north-eastern Amazonian Brazil,” Bulletin of Entomological Research, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 21–40, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. Lainson and J. J. Shaw, “Leishmania (Viannia) naiffi sp. n., a parasite of the armadillo, Dasypus novemcinctus (L.) in Amazonian Brazil,” Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Roger, M. Nacher, M. Hanf et al., “Climate and leishmaniasis in French guiana,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 564–569, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. Ryan, “Flebótomos do estado do Pará, Brasil (Diptera: Psychodidae),” Thecnical Document 1, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Belém, Brazil, 1986 (Portuguese). View at: Google Scholar
  19. E. A. B. Galati, “Morfologia e Taxonomia: Morfologia, terminologia de adultos e identificação dos táxons da América,” in Flebotomíneos do Brasil, E. F. Rangel and R. Lainson, Eds., pp. 53–75, Editora Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2003 (Portuguese). View at: Google Scholar
  20. D. R. Roberts and B. P. Hsi, “An index of species abundance for use with mosquito surveillance data,” Environmental Entomology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1007–1013, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Ø. Hammer, D. A. T. Harper, and P. D. Ryan, “Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis,” Palaeontologia Electronica, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  22. L. Ryan, R. Lainson, J. J. Shaw, R. R. Braga, and E. A. Ishikawa, “Leishmaniasis in Brazil. XXV. Sandfly vectors of Leishmania in Pará State, Brazil,” Medical and Veterinary Entomology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 383–395, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. Lainson, J. J. Shaw, F. T. Silveira, R. R. Braga, and E. A. Ishikawa, “Cutaneous leishmaniasis of man due to Leishmania (Viannia) naiffi,” Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee, vol. 65, no. 5-6, pp. 282–284, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  24. E. G. C. Bermudez, Lutzomyia Sand Flies in the Brazilian Amazon Basin (Diptera: Psychodidae), INPA, Manaus, Brazil, 2009.
  25. G. M. Aguiar and W. M. Medeiros, “Distribuição regional e hábitats das espécies de flebotomíneos do Brasil,” in Flebotomíneos do Brasil, E. F. Rangel and R. Lainson, Eds., pp. 207–256, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2003 (Portuguese). View at: Google Scholar
  26. J. R. Arias, M. A. Miles, R. D. Naiff et al., “Flagellate infections of Brazilian sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae): isolation in vitro and biochemical identification of Endotrypanum and Leishmania,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1098–1108, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  27. A. A. Souza, T. V. Santos, Y. L. Jennings et al., “Natural Leishmania(Viannia) spp. infections in phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) from the Brazilian Amazon region reveal new putative transmission cycles of American cutaneous leishmaniasis,” Parasite, vol. 23, article 22, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  28. F. T. Silveira, A. A. Souza, R. Lainson, J. J. Shaw, R. R. Braga, and E. A. Ishikawa, “Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Amazon Region: natural infection of the sand fly Lutzomyia ubiquitalis (Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) by Leishmania (Viannia) lainsoni in Pará state, Brazil,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 127–130, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  29. L. H. S. Gil, S. A. Basano, A. A. Souza et al., “Recent observations on the sand fly (Diptera: Psychodidae) fauna of the state of Rondônia, Western Amazonia, Brazil: the importance of Psychdopygus davisi as a vector of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 751–755, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. A. A. Souza, F. T. Silveira, R. Lainson et al., “The Phlebotominae fauna of Serra dos Carajás, Pará, Brazil, and its possible implication in the transmission of American tegumentary leishmaniasis,” Revista Pan-Amazônica de Saúde, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  31. R. Killick-Kendrick, “Phlebotomine vectors of the leishmaniases: a review,” Medical and Veterinary Entomology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. E. C. Dorval, G. Cristaldo, H. C. da Rocha et al., “Phlebotomine fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae) of an American cutaneous leishmaniasis endemic area in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 695–702, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. V. C. F. V. Guimarães, P. L. Costa, F. J. da Silva et al., “Molecular detection of Leishmania in phlebotomine sand flies in a cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis endemic area in northeastern Brazil,” Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 357–360, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. S. Lana, É. M. Michalsky, C. L. Fortes-Dias et al., “Phlebotomine sand fly fauna and Leishmania infection in the vicinity of the Serra do Cipó National Park, a natural Brazilian heritage site,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 385493, 9 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. V. R. Alves, R. A. de Freitas, F. L. Santos, A. F. J. de Oliveira, T. V. Barrett, and P. H. F. Shimabukuro, “Sand flies (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotominae) from central amazonia and four new records for the Amazonas State, Brazil,” Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 220–227, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. V. S. Ferreira, T. V. Santos, E. M. Santos, and I. S. Gorayeb, “Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in forest fragments of Belém metropolitan area, Pará State, Brazil, with considerations on vectors of American cutaneous leishmaniasis agents,” Revista Pan-Amazônica de Saúde, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 29–35, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. B. M. Carvalho, E. F. Rangel, P. D. Ready, and M. M. Vale, “Ecological niche modelling predicts southward expansion of Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) flaviscutellata (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae), vector of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis in South America, under climate change,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 11, Article ID e0143282, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. Fouque, P. Gaborit, J. Issaly et al., “Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) associated with changing patterns in the transmission of the human cutaneous leishmaniasis in French Guiana,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Killick-Kendrick, “Some epidemiological consequences of the evolutionary fit between Leishmaniae and their phlebotomine vectors,” Bulletin de la Societe de Pathologie Exotique et de ses Filiales, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 747–755, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  40. F. X. Pajot, F. Le Pont, B. Gentile, and R. Besnard, “Epidemiology of leishmaniasis in French Guiana,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 112–113, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. A. Christensen, J. R. Arias, A. M. De Vasquez, and R. A. De Freitas, “Hosts of sandfly vectors of Leishmania braziliensis guyanensis in the central Amazon of Brazil,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 239–242, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  42. L. C. R. Nery, E. S. Lorosa, and A. M. R. Franco, “Feeding preference of the sand flies Lutzomyia umbratilis and L. spathotrichia (Diptera: Psychodidae, Phlebotominae) in an urban forest patch in the City of Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 571–574, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  43. P. D. Ready, R. Lainson, J. J. Shaw, and A. A. Souza, “DNA probes for distinguishing Psychodopygus wellcomei from Psychodopygus complexus (Diptera: Psychodidae),” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 41–49, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. P. D. Ready, H. Fraiha, R. P. Lane, J. R. Arias, and F. X. Pajot, “On distinguishing the female of Psychodopygus wellcomei, a vector of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, from other squamiventris series females. I. Characterization of Ps. squamiventris squamiventris and Ps. s. maripaensis stat. nov. (Diptera: Psychodidae),” Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 201–214, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. D. Kent, T. V. dos Santos, A. Gangadin, A. Samjhawan, D. R. A. Mans, and H. D. F. H. Schallig, “Studies on the sand fly fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae) in high-transmission areas of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Republic of Suriname,” Parasites and Vectors, vol. 6, no. 1, article 318, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. P. D. Ready, R. Lainson, and J. J. Shaw, “Habitat and seasonality of Psychodopygus wellcomei help incriminate it as a vector of Leishmania braziliensis in Amazônia and Northeast Brazil,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 543–544, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Nercy Virginia Rabelo Furtado et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.