Review Article

Utility of the Rose Bengal Test as a Point-of-Care Test for Human Brucellosis in Endemic African Settings: A Systematic Review

Table 2

Reported sensitivity and specificity of RBT in patient groups used in reviewed studies.

Patient groupsTestRBT positive, n/NDSeDSp

Patients with acute brucellosis (diagnosis of brucellosis was based on clinical findings and on either positive blood cultures for Brucella spp. or the presence of serum antibodies (SAT titer => 160)) [23].Titrated RBTNR10097
MATNR92100
BrucellacaptNR100100
IgG ELISANR84100
IgM ELISANR60100
IgA ELISANR9698

Patients with clinical suspicion of brucellosis [28].RBT (acute + subacute)49/5294.2NS
RBT (chronic)6/1154.5NS
RBT (total)45/6371.4NS
SAT ≥ 1 : 200 (acute + subacute)26/5250NS
SAT ≥ 1 : 200 (chronic)6/1154.5NS
SAT ≥ 1 : 200 (total)32/6350.8NS
LFA IgM and/or IgG (acute + subacute)52/52100NS
LFA IgM and/or IgG (chronic)11/11100NS
LFA IgM and/or IgG (total)63/63100NS
LFA IgM (acute + subacute)47/5290.4NS
LFA IgM (chronic)8/1172.7NS
LFA IgM (total)55/6387.3NS
LFA IgG (acute + subacute)39/5275NS
LFA IgG (chronic)11/11100NS
LFA IgG (total)50/6379.4NS

Patients presented with clinical signs of brucellosis; clinical features along with epidemiological evidence were considered for presumptive clinical diagnosis of brucellosis [34].Titrated RBT78/20088.987.7

Patients presented with clinical suspicion of brucellosis [36].RBT20/20100100
Patients with diseases mimicking brucellosis clinically [36].RB screening test0/280NSNS
STAT (≥1/160)b0/280NSNS

Patients with signs of brucellosis at presentation [20].RBT91/91100NS
ELISA IgM59/9164.8NS
ELISA IgG56.1NS

Patients with signs of brucellosis at presentation [31].RBTNSNSNS

Healthy, voluntary blood donors [21].RBTNSNSNS
CoombsNSNSNS
2-MENSNSNS
CFTNSNSNS
Indirect ELISANSNSNS
cELISA0/10NSNS
FPANSNSNS
PCR0/30NSNS
Healthy people from endemic areas [21].RBTNS7NS

Individuals with no history of brucellosis or regular exposure to Brucella spp. (patients with different infectious, autoimmune, or neoplastic processes with a precise aetiological diagnosis, but which involved an initial differential diagnosis with brucellosis) [15].RB screening test288/30793.894.3
Patients with a previous history of brucellosis/asymptomatic individuals infected with Brucella who had received appropriate treatment during the previous 12 months [15].RB screening test49/5196.176.9
Asymptomatic individuals exposed repeatedly to Brucella infection during their work [15].RB screening test311/33991.794.3

Patients with primary infection (no personal history of brucellosis) and showing acute clinical symptoms [19].RB screening testc38/3810099
Tube agglutination test (≥1/160)NS9799
Coombs (≥1/320)NS10098
ELISA IgGNS7883
ELISA IgMNS9498
CFTNS9199

Patients with evidence of previous Brucella infection, with either brucellosis diagnosed previously or epidemiological data compatible with long exposure and an immune response of “secondary type” (IgG predominating on IgM) [19].RB screening test22/249252
Tube agglutination test (≥1/160)NS2098
Coombs (≥1/320)NS10080
ELISA IgGNS10070
ELISA IgMNS5476
CFTNS8878

Patients with acute brucellosis (presented with fever and had nonspecific symptoms such as headache, malaise, arthralgia, and low back pain. Other symptoms included splenomegaly, lymphadenitis, and localization of the disease including genitourinary hematological and osteoarticular involvement) [33].RBT83/8310087.5
Patients with chronic/relapsing brucellosis (defined as patients located 3–13 years following first hospital visit when they presented with acute brucellosis infection). Chronic brucellosis cases did not have signs of acute brucellosis illness on presentation the second time [33].RBT9/72NSNS

Patients categorised as acute (duration up to 12 months)/chronic (more than 12 months)/healthy [37].RBT3/21NSNS
Patients categorised as acute (duration up to 12 months)/chronic (more than 12 months)/healthy [37].RBT3/21NSNS

Patients with a diagnosis of chronic brucellar meningitis or meningoencephalitis [35].RBT118/123NSNS
RBT75/106NSNS
Patients with fever but no other symptoms of brucellosis and tested negative on culture and other tests [35].RB screening test0/107NSNS
SAT (≥1/180)0/107NSNS
Coombs (≥1/160)0/107NSNS
ELISA IgGNSNSNS
ELISA IgMNSNSNS
ELISA IgANSNSNS
ELISA Td4/107NSNS

Contacts with no brucellosis and had professional contact [2].RB screening teste19/20NSNS
RB titration test (>1 : 4)e0/20NSNS
SAT (=160)e3/20NSNS
Brucellacapt (≥320)e8/20NSNS
Coombse16/20NSNS
LFiC-IgMe4/20NSNS
LFiC-IgGe8/20NSNS
Patient with no recent contact and no symptoms of brucellosis sent to the lab for diagnosis of other infections [2].RB screening testf1/1559NSNS

Patients with brucellosis categorised as acute (n=296) [27].RBT98100
Patients with brucellosis categorised as subacute (n=44) [27].RBT84100
Patients with brucellosis categorised as chronic (n=40) [27].RBT61100
Patients with brucellosis categorised as CNS brucellosis (n=317) [27].RBT22100
Patients with other infectious diseases, noninfectious diseases, and normal healthy individuals (n=345) [27].RBT100

RBT positive: Rose Bengal test positive, DSe: diagnostic sensitivity, DSp: diagnostic specificity, PPV: positive predictive value, NPV: negative predictive value, and NS: not specified. RBT: standard RBT, titrated RBT: titrations made by serial dilutions of serum with saline solution, SAT: serum agglutination test, LFA: lateral flow assay, MAT: microagglutination test, Brucellacapt: immunocapture-agglutination test, LFiC: lateral flow immunochromatography assay. bSTAT: only low titres were obtained in 3 patients, one with malaria (1/40), one with lymphoma (1/40), and another with typhoid fever (1/20). cReported test values were combined values for patients with primary infection (no personal history of brucellosis) showing acute clinical symptoms and patients with evidence of previous infection by Brucella.dELISA T: detects total specific antibodies. eSensitivity and specificity not reported, but number of positives in this patient group reported for each test performed. This group comprised 20 people that had had professional contact (veterinarians, slaughterhouse workers, shepherds, etc.) with B. melitensis-infected animals or their products or had accidentally injected themselves with vaccine B. melitensis Rev 1 and that were followed for a period of at least two years [2]. fSensitivity and specificity not reported, but number of positives in this patient subgroup reported for standard RBT (RB screening test).