Journal of Tropical Medicine

Journal of Tropical Medicine / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6650388 |

Tharaka Wijerathna, Nayana Gunathilaka, Kithsiri Gunawardena, Yoshito Fujii, Deepa Gunasekara, "Detection of Leishmania donovani DNA within Field-Caught Phlebotomine Sand Flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Three Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Endemic Foci of Kurunegala District, Sri Lanka", Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 2021, Article ID 6650388, 8 pages, 2021.

Detection of Leishmania donovani DNA within Field-Caught Phlebotomine Sand Flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Three Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Endemic Foci of Kurunegala District, Sri Lanka

Academic Editor: Hassan Vatandoost
Received10 Oct 2020
Revised24 Nov 2020
Accepted24 Mar 2021
Published10 Apr 2021


Leishmaniasis is a parasitic infection transmitted through the bite of female phlebotomine sand flies. Microscopy is the gold standard to detect parasites within the sand flies and for vector incrimination. However, molecular-based detection has become more popular nowadays in the identification of Leishmania parasites since it provides detection and species identification simultaneously with no need of laborious procedures. The entomological surveys were conducted monthly from May to October 2017 using standard entomological techniques. Field-caught sand flies were identified to the species level followed by DNA extraction. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using species-specific primers to detect Leishmania donovani parasites. A total of 1,662 sand flies were encountered from the entomological surveys, and the majority of them were Phlebotomus argentipes (n = 1517; 91.27%), while others were Sergentomyia punjabiensis (n = 140; 8.72%). Leishmania donovani parasite DNA was detected only from P. argentipes (2.3%; n = 2). The detection of Leishmania DNA in P. argentipes suggests the possible role of this species as a vector for leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka.

1. Introduction

Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne disease, which is caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Leishmania of family Trypanosomatidae and transmitted by the bite of infected adult female sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae). It is regarded as one of the neglected tropical diseases in the world, affecting people mostly at low economic stratum in developing countries [1]. It is predicted that, globally, more than 350 million people are at risk of contracting leishmaniasis, and about two million new cases account annually [2].

Leishmaniasis has three main types of clinical presentations, namely, cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL), and visceral leishmaniasis (VL). In Sri Lanka, the first indigenous case of leishmaniais was identified in 1992, which is of cutaneous origin [3].Mucocutaenous (MCL) and visceral (VL) forms have been identified in 2005 and 2007, respectively [4, 5]. At present, Sri Lanka is considered as a one of the endemic countries for cutaneous leishmaniasis in the world. The VL and MCL forms have been reported less frequently than cutaneous type so far. According to the available data, nine indigenous cases of VL and two mucosal leishmaniasis cases by the same parasite strain have been reported [6]. Currently, CL is the predominant clinical representation in the country with more than 3000 cases per year [7]. Sri Lanka has been reported as the newest focus of leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent, where the disease is caused by the most virulent visceralizing species, Leishmania donovani [8, 9]. The strain identified from Sri Lanka has only one nucleotide substitution in the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase gene from L. donovani MON-2, the strain most commonly isolated from VL cases in India [8, 9]. The potential for visceralization in the cutaneous variant of L. donovani in Sri Lanka is not known until recently [9]. However, some recent studies have shown that visceralizing potential is absent in MON-37 strain identified from Sri Lanka [10]. Furthermore, studies on sylvatic and domestic reservoirs in Sri Lanka, though not entirely conclusive, indicate that this strain is more likely to be anthroponotic than zoonotic [11, 12].

Sri Lankan sand fly fauna consist of a total of 22 species from two genera: Phlebotomus and Sergentomyia [13]. The presence of Phlebotomus (Euphlebotomus) argentipes, the species known to be the vector for L. donovani, has been reported from Sri Lanka since the early 1900’s [14]. However, the first confirmed indigenous CL case was reported in 1992 [3]. The confirmation of the exact vector species is a fundamental requirement in the control efforts of vector-borne diseases such as leishmaniasis [2]. The detection of the presence of parasites within the sand flies is one of the criteria to incriminate leishmaniasis vectors [2, 15]. Until recently, published information on the vectorial potential of sand flies were limited. Only two attempts in 2013 [16] and 2015 [17] have been made to confirm the presence of parasites in the field caught sand flies, which is grossly inadequate for confirmation [15].

Currently, there is no proper control program in action for leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka [18]. The detection of Leishmania parasites in freshly caught sand flies through traditional methods such as microscopic detection, culture, and inoculation into another animal to detect parasites within the sand fly midgut requires a high level of expertise and a relatively longer time [19, 20]. Furthermore, some of these methods are highly laborious [20, 21]. Therefore, molecular methods are more reliable and user friendly to detect Leishmania parasites in wild-caught sand flies [22]. Hence, the present study was conducted to detect the Leishmania donovani parasite DNA from wild-caught sand flies using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, which can also be used in field routine surveillance and control programs.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Area

Kurunegala is one of the districts with the highest cutaneous leishmaniasis prevalence in Sri Lanka with a continuously increasing trend throughout the last few years [23]. At present, this district denotes the highest number of patients from the country with a prevalence rate of 0.37% [23]. It is located in the North Western Province of Sri Lanka covering a land area of 4,816 km2 with a human population of 1,610,299 [24]. The district receives an average of 2,095 mm rainfall annually. The average temperature and humidity is 31.7°C and 69.6%, respectively. Three Medical Officer of Health (MOH) areas in Kurunegala district, namely, Polpithigama, Maho, and Galgamuwa (Figure 1), which were considered as high-risk areas for leishmaniasis during the period of 2009–2016, were selected for the sample collections for the present study.

2.2. Entomological Surveillance

Entomological surveys were conducted monthly from May to October 2017 in three Medical Officer of Health (MOH) areas. Three different techniques, namely, Sticky Trap (ST), Cattle Baited Net Trap Collection (CBNT), and Hand Collection (HC) (selected indoor (bedroom, guestroom, and toilet)/outdoor (rodent burrows and wall cracks) sites) were performed to collect sand flies from three selected study locations on a monthly basis. The collections in CBNT and HC were performed using a handheld battery-operated aspirator. All traps were installed at sunset and collected during the night (8.00 pm: 12.00 midnight) and near sunrise (5.00–6.00 am).

2.3. Processing of Samples and Species Identification

Collected sand fly specimens were washed once in 1% detergent followed by twice in sterile distilled water. Each specimen was then dissected in a drop of fresh sterile normal saline by cutting off the head and abdominal terminalia with sterilized forceps and disposable needles. The rest of the body was stored in the sterile 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes and kept at −20°C freezer until use for DNA extraction. Specimens were mounted on glass slides using Hoyer’s medium [25] and identified using the identification keys for species within several subgenera [2527].

2.4. Extraction of Genomic DNA

The DNA was extracted using MightyPrep reagent for DNA (Takara Bio Inc, Japan) according to manufacturer’s guide with some modifications as follows: a volume of 200 μL from MightlyPrep reagent was added into each microcentrifuge tube and the individual sand flies were crushed using a sterile 200 μL pipette tip. New pipette tips were used every time to prevent contamination of samples. The samples were subjected to hard vortex for 10 seconds followed by incubation at 95°C for 20 minutes. The samples were allowed to cool down to room temperature and a hard vortex for 10 seconds. Finally, the samples were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 minutes and stored at −20°C until used for PCR.

2.5. DNA Amplification

Oligonucleotide primers [F: AAATCGGCTCCGAGGCGGGAAAC; R: GGTACACTCTATCAGTAGCAC] targeting kinetoplast minicircle sequence (591 bp) of L. donovani as described by previous studies were used in amplification [28]. This study indicates a detection limit of 1 fg. The amplifications were conducted using 20 μL of the solution containing 1 μL of DNA product as the template, 2 μL of CoralLoad Buffer (QIAGEN) with 15 mM MgCl2 and loading dye, 1.6 μL of dNTP mixture with 0.2 mM from each nucleotide, 0.06 μL of 0.3 μM forward and reverse primers, 0.41 μL of 2.5 U MightyAmp DNA Polymerase (Takara, Japan), and 15.18 μL of PCR water. Amplification was performed in a thermal cycler (SimpliAmpTM, Applied Biosystems) programmed for an initial denaturation step of 94°C for 5 min and 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 50°C for 60 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 24 seconds. Nuclease-free, PCR-grade water was used as negative control and DNA isolated from L. donovani was used as positive controls.

2.6. Agarose Gel Electrophoresis

Agarose powder (Agarose S) was used for the preparation of gels with 1 X TAE. The 2% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/ml) were prepared. A volume of 4 μL of the amplified PCR products was loaded with Promega 100 bp lambda marker, and gel electrophoresis was carried out at 100 V for 25 minutes to get a good separation in the amplified products. Following the gel electrophoresis, the migrated DNA was visualized and photographed under UV illumination.

2.7. DNA Sequencing and Confirmation of Species

The PCR amplicons were purified using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen), and purified products were sent to Macrogen, South Korea (Macrogen Inc., 1001, 254 Beotkkot-ro, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea) for sequencing by the Sanger method. Sequencing results were analyzed by BioEdit sequence alignment editor v7.0.9 software. The database search for homologous sequences was performed submitting kinetoplast minicircle sequences to the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool nucleotide (BLASTn) server of the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, USA).

2.8. Data Analysis

The data were entered into Microsoft Excel sheets. Percentages for entomological surveillance data and molecular analysis data were calculated in Microsoft Excel. The sand fly male-to-female ratio was calculated as follows:

The spatial variation of the disease prevalence was evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in Minitab 17 statistical software package (Minitab Inc, Pennsylvania, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Diversity and Abundance of Sand Flies

A total of 1,662 sand flies were collected from all techniques during the study period in three MOH areas. Maho MOH area recorded the highest collection (51.81%; n = 861) followed by Polpithigama (40.85%; n = 679) and Galgamuwa (7.34%; n = 122). According to the morphological confirmation, two species, namely, Phlebotomus argentipes (n = 1517) and Sergentomyia punjabiensis (n = 140), were recorded. The male-to-female ratio of P. argentipes was 2.88 and 1.55 in S. punjabiensis.

The CBNT technique was contributed to the 91.28% (n = 1,517) of the collection followed ST (8.42%; n = 140) and HC (0.3%; n = 5). All individuals caught from CBNTs consisted only of P. argentipes. All sand flies collected from the STs that were placed inside houses denoted with S. punjabiensis only. The species composition and relative abundance are given in Table 1.

SpeciesAbundanceRelative abundance (%)Number of screened sand fliesNumber of infected sand fliesInfection rate (%)Parasite species

P. argentipes1,52291.588722.3L. donovani
S. punjabiensis1408.4280

3.2. Molecular Detection of Parasitic DNA

The visualization of PCR products on agarose gel under UV light revealed the presence of L. donovani parasites only from P. argentipes indicating a band size at 591 bp (Figure 2).

3.3. Species Level Validation

The sequenced region of the PCR product showed 99% similarity (Figure 3) to the Sri Lankan Leishmania sp. Isolated from (E value = 0) patient samples in Sri Lanka (accession number DQ205334.1), which was later characterized as the Leishmania donovani zymodeme MON 37 [9].

3.4. Presence of Leishmania DNA within Sand Flies and the Leishmaniasis Incidence

According to the one-way ANOVA test, the prevalence of the disease within the last four years did not differ significantly at the 95% confidence level (F = 2.72; ). However, the mean values for the number of cases reported during the period were highest in Polpithigama MOH area (Table 2), where the only sand flies with L. donovani DNA were reported during the current study.

MOH areaMean number of patients reported annually ± standrad deviation

Maho5.50 ± 4.65
Polpithigama15.00 ± 8.49
Galgamuwa7.75 ± 3.86

4. Discussion

Investigations on the epidemiology of leishmaniasis and bioecology of sand flies are important factors for disease management and to plan control programmes [29, 30]. However, the abundance of sand flies in a leishmaniasis endemic region is merely not sufficient to characterize them as vectors responsible for transmitting leishmaniasis. One of the important criteria towards the incrimination of exact Leishmania vectors as per WHO guidelines is the detection of evidence for the presence of Leishmania DNA within sand flies [2, 31]. Dissection of the digestive tract of the sand fly is considered as the gold standard in detecting the natural infective rate. However, it is laborious and difficult in processing a large number of samples [32]. Moreover, the infection needs to be confirmed by in vitro culture of parasites or by inoculation into laboratory animals, since other nonidentified flagellates are also commonly found in the insect midgut [33]. Molecular techniques such as PCR allow for DNA detection of even a single Leishmania parasite [34].

In the present study, we used a PCR assay to detect L. donovani with species-specific primers to detect parasite DNA from field caught sand flies. These primers are designed to amplify minicircle kinetoplast DNA of the parasite. Furthermore, we compared the spatial distribution of sand flies in three MOH areas; namely, Polpithigama, Maho, and Galgamuwa in Kurunegala district. Two species, namely, P. argentipes and S. punjabiensis, were encountered from the field surveys. Of them, P. argentipes, the proven vector for the transmission of L. donovani in other countries and the main suspected vector in Sri Lanka, was predominant [16, 17]. It is interesting to note that P. argentipes was collected only from cattle baited net traps indicating a zoophilic nature of the species. However, the exact role of the sand flies in genus Sergentomyia as vectors of leishmaniasis is still uncertain and the foraging behaviour has been suggested as the main reason [35]. The species in the genus Sergentomyia mainly feed on cold-blooded animals, especially small reptiles such as geckoes [36, 37]. However, recent studies have confirmed that some species feed on various mammals, including humans, domesticated animals, and wild rodents [35]. Therefore, revealing of S. punjabiensis only from the sticky traps placed at house may indicate their endophilic resting behaviour and foraging preference to the small reptiles (geckoes), domestic animals, rodents, or may be humans. The determination of the blood meal of this species would provide the better answer as to why they prefer human habitations.

The detection limit of the primers used for the present assay was as low as 1 fg, which is equivalent of 0.1 parasites as reported by the previous studies [28]. According the published literature, the sensitivity required for the detection of parasite DNA in sand flies has been documented as 0.1–1 [38]. Thus, the primers used in this study are suitable for the detection of L. donovani from field-caught sand flies and results in the current study also advocate on this. The present study detected L. donovani DNA from 2.3% of wild-caught P. argentipes. Interestingly, no parasitic DNA was detected from S. punjabiensis suggesting that this species is unlikely to be a vector for disease transmission as indicated in the previous studies conducted in South East Asian region [3032]. However, more extensive studies are required since the number of flies of this species collected during the current study was very low.

Molecular-based PCR assays target different conserved regions to confirm the species identification. One study conducted in Hambanthota District, Southern Province of Sri Lanka has targeted the ribosomal DNA of the Leishmania parasites and reported with 0.31% of L. donovani DNA among the wild-caught sand flies [17]. A study conducted in Brazil using ITS1 region as the target sequence has indicated 1.1% positivity [39].

The observation of a higher percentage of sand flies with L. donovani DNA among wild-caught sand flies from the present study may indicate a higher circulation rate of the parasite among hosts and vectors in these areas. This shows the importance of taking immediate action to conduct more extensive studies and planning effective control programs. Furthermore, once the macrophages with Leishmania amastigotes are ingested by sand flies along with a blood meal, the changes in the sand fly gut conditions triggers morphological transformation to promastigotes [40, 41]. The phosphoglycans on promastigote surface must bind with receptors in the midgut in order to enter the sand fly body. If the promastigote phosphoglycans are not compatible with the receptors in the sand fly midgut, the promastigotes will pass out with the fly excretions. On such occasions, the sand flies do not transmit the disease [41]. Therefore, this study does not necessarily confirm that P. argentipes involved in the transmission of Leishmania parasites. This only provides evidence for the fulfillment of a single vector incrimination criterion by P. argentipes, which is the circulation of L. donovani parasites within the sand fly population [2, 15, 42]. Although the knowledge on potential vectors was limited few years ago [18], more recent studies report that P. argentipes is attracted to and bites humans and potential reservoir hosts [43]. Further, this species is also known to show strong ecological associations with the leishmaniasis incidence in this area [44, 45]. Therefore, all the existing data suggest that P. argentipes is potentially competent vector for the transmission of L. donovani. The next steps should be the confirmation of luxuriant growth of the parasite within the sand fly stomdeal valve in the midgut and experimental transmission by vectors under laboratory conditions [42, 46]. The use of retrospective data to generate mathematical modeling-based proof of this species being essential for the maintenance of the parasitic transmission cycle with or without the involvement of other vectors is also a necessity. Additionally, the machine learning approaches using the results of planned control programs could be used to endorse that disease incidence significantly decreases with the biting density of the sand fly species [15].

Based on the evidence on the zoophilic nature of the main suspected vector, zooprophylaxis could be considered as a potentially effective method to reduce the infection in the human population [4749], Furthermore, considering the zoophilic nature of P. argentipes as indicated by previous studies [17, 50] and the present study, it could be assumed that the disease is likely to be transmitted through an opportunistic feeding.

As described above, identification of sand flies with naturally infected Leishmania in more than one occasion is one of the main vector incrimination criteria [2, 15]. In this study, only 21% (95/448) of the field-caught females were randomly selected for molecular detection of the parasite. It is evidenced that 2.1% of the representative sample was positive for Leishmania parasite, though the sample size was low. The presence of the parasite in such a small set of sand flies could be indicative of a high rate of parasite circulation between hosts and vectors in these areas. Usually the field collections of sand flies from the surveillance activities cannot screen all collection for the presence of parasites. In terms of feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and applicability, it is good to evaluate a representative sample. Therefore, we intended to evaluate the practicality and success of such an attempt at the field setup with a representative sample to provide a user-friendly application for field surveys with evidence that could be useful for control programs.

5. Conclusion

The sand fly species P. argentipes is the most common species of sand flies found in the area, and it is the only species found to harbor Leishmania parasites. Therefore, it can be presumed that this species plays an important role in the transmission of leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka. Furthermore, the PCR optimized during the current study could be used as an effective method for the detection of Leishmania parasites residing sand fly midgut due to its user-friendliness.


ANOVA:Analysis of variance
CBNT:Cattle baited net trap
CL:Cutaneous leishmaniasis
HC:Hand collection
ITS1:Internal transcribed spacer 1
kDNA:Kinetoplast DNA
MCL:Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis
PCR:Polymerase chain reaction
ST:Sticky trap
VL:Visceral leishmaniasis.

Data Availability

All the data generated during the study will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was obtained for this study from the Ethics Review Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya (P/204/12/2016).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

TW conducted field collection of sand flies. TW, YF, and NG conducted laboratory investigations. TW and NG compiled the manuscript. NG, DG, and KG reviewed and made critical revisions. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.


The National Research Council, Sri Lanka (NRC 16-142) is acknowledged for the financial assistance provided for field surveys and laboratory studies. This study was funded by the National Research Council, Sri Lanka (Grant No. NRC 16-142).


  1. J. Alvar, I. D. Vélez, C. Bern et al., “Team: leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 5, p. e35671, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. WHO, Control of the Leishmaniasis. Report of a meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on the Control of Leishmaniases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
  3. D. N. Athukorale, J. K. Seneviratne, R. L. Ihalamulla, and U. N. Premaratne, “Locally acquired cutaneous leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka,” The Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 432-433, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  4. P. H. Abeygunasekara, Y. J. Costa, N. Seneviratne, N. Ratnatunga, and M. S. Wijesundera, “Locally acquired visceral leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka,” The Ceylon Medical Journal, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 30-31, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. Rathnayake, R. R. Ranawake, G. Sirimanna, Y. Siriwardhane, N. Karunaweera, and R. De Silva, “Co-infection of mucosal leishmaniasis and extra pulmonary tuberculosis in a patient with inherent immune deficiency,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 549–551, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Siriwardana, P. Karunanayake, L. Goonerathne, and N. D. Karunaweera, “Emergence of visceral leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka: a newly established health threat,” Pathogens and Global Health, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 317–326, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. Siriwardana, P. Chandrawansa, G. Sirimanna, and N. Karunaweera, “Leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka: a decade old story,” Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 2–12, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Z. Alam, C. Haralambous, K. Kuhls et al., “The paraphyletic composition of Leishmania donovani zymodeme Mon-37 revealed by multilocus microsatellite typing,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 11, no. 6-7, pp. 707–715, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. D. Karunaweera, F. Pratlong, H. Siriwardane, R. L. Ihalamulla, and J. P. Dedet, “Sri Lankan cutaneous leishmaniasis is caused by Leishmania donovani zymodeme Mon-37,” Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 380-381, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  10. K. Kariyawasam, A. Selvapandiyan, H. Siriwardana et al., “Dermotropic Leishmania donovani in Sri Lanka: visceralizing potential in clinical and preclinical studies,” Parasitology, vol. 145, no. 4, pp. 443–452, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. S. K. Nawaratna, D. J. Weilgama, and K. Rajapaksha, “Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka: a study of possible animal reservoirs,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 513–517, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. C. Rosypal, S. Tripp, C. Kinlaw et al., “Surveillance for antibodies to leishmania spp. in dogs from Sri Lanka,” Journal of Parasitology, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 230-231, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Wijerathna and N. Gunathilaka, “Phlebotomine sand flies (psychodidae: diptera) of Sri Lanka: a review on diversity, biology and bionomics,” Journal of Insect Biodiversity, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 41–58, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. N. Annandale, “Sand-flies {Phlebotomus) from peradeniya,” Spolia Zeylan, vol. 7, pp. 57–62, 1910. View at: Google Scholar
  15. P. D. Ready, “Biology of phlebotomine sand flies as vectors of disease agents,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 227–250, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. Gajapathy, L. Peiris, S. L. Goodacre, A. Silva, P. J. Jude, and S. N. Surendran, “Molecular identification of potential leishmaniasis vector species within the phlebotomus (Euphlebotomus) argentipes species complex in Sri Lanka,” Parasites and Vectors, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 302, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. A. Senanayake, W. Abeyewicreme, E. M. Dotson, and N. D. Karunaweera, “Characteristics of phlebotomine sandflies in selected areas of Sri Lanka,” The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 994–1004, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  18. T. Wijerathna, N. Gunathilaka, K. Gunawardena, and W. Rodrigo, “Potential challenges of controlling leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka at a disease outbreak,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2017, Article ID 6931497, 9 pages, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  19. S. Rafizadeh, M. Saraei, M. R. Abaei et al., “Molecular detection of leishmania major and L. Turanica in phlebotomus papatasi and first natural infection of P. salehi to L. Major in north-east of Iran,” Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 141–147, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  20. J. Convit and F. Kerdel-Vegas, “Disseminated cutaneous leishmaniasis,” Archives of Dermatology, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 439–447, 1965. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Siripattanapipong, S. Leelayoova, U. Ninsaeng, and M. Mungthin, “Detection of DNA of Leishmania siamensis in Sergentomyia (Neophlebotomus) iyengari (Diptera: psychodidae) and molecular identification of blood meals of sand flies in an affected area, Southern Thailand,” Journal of Medical Entomology, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1277–1283, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. M. Aransay, E. Scoulica, and Y. Tselentis, “Detection and identification of Leishmania DNA within naturally infected sand flies by seminested PCR on minicircle kinetoplastic DNA,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1933–1938, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Epidemiology Unit: Weekly Epidemiology Report,
  24. Department of Census & Statistics, District Statistical Hand Book, National Library and Documentation Services Board, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2019.
  25. N. L. Kalra and Y. H. Bang, Manual on Entomology in Visceral Leishmaniasis, World Health Organization, New Delhi, India, 1988.
  26. A. Absavaran, Y. Rassi, P. Parvizi et al., “Identification of sand flies of the subgenus larroussius based on molecular and morphological characters in North western Iran. Iran,” ournal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 22–35, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  27. D. J. Lewis, “The phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: psychodidae) of the oriental region,” Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Entomology, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 217–343, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  28. P. Salotra, G. Sreenivas, G. P. Pogue et al., “Development of a species-specific PCR assay for detection of Leishmania donovani in clinical samples from patients with kala-azar and post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 849–854, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Vahabi, Y. Rassi, M. A. Oshaghi, M. Sayyadi, and S. Rafizadeh, “Detection of Leishmania major DNA within wild caught Phlebotomus papatasi and species composition of sand flies in endemic focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis, in western Iran,” Journal of Parasitic Diseases, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 69–74, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. Rassi, A. Sofizadeh, M. R. Abai et al., “Molecular detection of Leishmania major in the vectors and reservoir hosts of cutaneous leishmaniasis in kalaleh district, golestan Province, Iran,” J. Arthropod-Borne Dis., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 21–27, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  31. R. Killick-Kendrick and R. D. Ward, “Ecology of Leishmania,” Parasitology, vol. 82, pp. 143–152, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  32. J. Enrique Perez, N. Veland, D. Espinosa et al., “Isolation and molecular identification of Leishmania ( Viannia ) peruviana from naturally infected Lutzomyia peruensis (Diptera: psychodidae) in the Peruvian Andes,” Memórias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 655–658, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. Ryan and R. P. Brazil, “Leishmania infections in lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: psychodidae) on the island of sao luis, maranhao state, Brazil,” Memórias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 383-384, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. D. Pita-Pereira, C. R. Alves, M. B. Souza et al., “Identification of naturally infected Lutzomyia intermedia and Lutzomyia migonei with Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) revealed by a PCR multiplex non-isotopic hybridisation assay,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 99, no. 12, pp. 905–913, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. Tiwananthagorn, A. M. Bhutto, J. H. Baloch et al., “Zoophilic feeding behaviour of phlebotomine sand flies in the endemic areas of cutaneous leishmaniasis of Sindh Province, Pakistan,” Parasitology Research, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 125–133, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. D. J. Lewis and A. L. Dyce, “The subgenusaustralophlebotomustheodor of Phlebotomus rondani and berté (Diptera: psychodidae),” Australian Journal of Entomology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 37–54, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. Lewis and A. Dyce, “Taxonomy of the australasian phlebotominae (Diptera: psychodidae) with revision of genus sergentomyia from the region,” Invertebrate Systematics, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 755–804, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. H. Kato, T. Mimori, J. D. Marco et al., “Detection and identification of Leishmania species within naturally infected sand flies in the andean areas of ecuador by a polymerase chain reaction,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 87–93, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. F. D. Rêgo, J. Rugani, P. Shimabukuro, G. B. Tonelli, P. F. Quaresma, and C. Gontijo, “Molecular detection of Leishmania in phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: psychodidae) from a cutaneous leishmaniasis focus at xakriabá indigenous reserve, Brazil,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 4, Article ID e0122038, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. K. R. Wallbanks, G. A. Ingram, and D. H. Molyneux, “The agglutination of erythrocytes and Leishmania parasites by sandfly gut extracts: evidence for lectin activity,” Tropical Medicine and Parasitology: Official Organ of Deutsche Tropenmedizinische Gesellschaft and of Deutsche Gesellschaft Fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 409–413, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  41. A. Dostálová and P. Volf, “Leishmania development in sand flies: parasite-vector interactions overview,” Parasites and Vectors, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. R. Killick-Kendrick, “Phlebotomine vectors of the leishmaniases: a review,” Medical and Veterinary Entomology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. T. Wijerathna, N. Gunathilaka, K. Gunawardena, Y. Fujii, and D. Gunasekara, “Molecular detection of blood meal sources of wild caught, engorged sand flies (psychodidae: diptera) in Sri Lanka,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Sri Lanka Japan Collaborative Research, p. 4, Kandy, Sri Lanka, July 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  44. T. Wijerathna and N. Gunathilaka, “Population dynamics of phlebotomine sand flies (diptera: psychodidae) in cutaneous leishmaniasis endemic areas of Kurunegala district, Sri Lanka,” 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  45. T. Wijerathna and N. Gunathilaka, “Diurnal adult resting sites and breeding habitats of phlebotomine sand flies in cutaneous leishmaniasis endemic areas of Kurunegala District, Sri Lanka,” Parasites and Vectors, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 284, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. T. Wijerathna, N. Gunathilaka, and K. Gunawardena, “Establishment of a colony of Phlebotomus argentipes under laboratory conditions and morphometric variation between wild-caught and laboratory-reared populations,” Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 2020, Article ID 7317648, 10 pages, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  47. I. Tirados, G. Gibson, S. Young, and S. J. Torr, “Are herders protected by their herds? An experimental analysis of zooprophylaxis against the malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis,” Malaria Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 68, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. N. Gunathilaka, T. Denipitiya, M. Hapugoda, W. Abeyewickreme, and R. Wickremasinghe, “Determination of the foraging behaviour and blood meal source of malaria vector mosquitoes in Trincomalee District of Sri Lanka using a multiplex real time polymerase chain reaction assay,” Malaria Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 242, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. P. Gunathilaka, M. Fernando, M. D. Hapugoda, P. Wijeyerathne, A. R. Wickremasinghe, and W. Abeyewickreme, “Resting behavior of malaria vectors in Mannar District of Sri Lanka with reference to zooprophylaxis,” in Proceedings of the Annual Research Symposium, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya, pp. 132-133, University of Kelaniya, Colombo, Sri Lanka, March 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  50. P. Tiwary, D. Kumar, R. P. Singh, M. Rai, and S. Sundar, “Prevalence of sand flies and Leishmania donovani infection in a natural population of female Phlebotomus argentipes in Bihar state, India,” Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 467–472, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Tharaka Wijerathna et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.