Journal of Thyroid Research

Journal of Thyroid Research / 2011 / Article
Special Issue

Thyroid Oncology

View this Special Issue

Editorial | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 467570 |

Maria João M. Bugalho, Nelson Wohllk, Ana O. Hoff, Maria E. Cabanillas, "Thyroid Oncology", Journal of Thyroid Research, vol. 2011, Article ID 467570, 3 pages, 2011.

Thyroid Oncology

Received20 Jul 2011
Accepted20 Jul 2011
Published09 Oct 2011

We are pleased to bring you the Special Issue of the Journal Thyroid Research dedicated to Thyroid Oncology.

The incidence of thyroid cancer has been increasing in recent decades mainly due to an increase in papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs). Among these, tumors ≤1 cm increased the most. Whether this represents a higher sensitivity to detect smaller tumors or depends on other factors such as environmental factors remains unclear [13].

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), papillary thyroid carcinomas measuring 1 cm or less are designated as papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMCs).

Incidentally diagnosed PTMCs are generally indolent tumors. However, PTMCs detected due to clinically suspected and histological confirmed lymph node metastases or associated with extra thyroidal extension may have a more aggressive behavior [4, 5]. Thus, it is inaccurate and misleading to regard all PTMCs patients as having the same level of risk. Most studies based their conclusions on clinicopathological factors. Recently, Kim et al. [6] showed that the gene expression profiles of PTMCs were not different from those of larger PTCs and suggested that PTMCs may represent an earlier stage of the same disease.

Differences in the form of presentation between papillary microcarcinomas and papillary carcinomas of larger size are discussed in this issue by C. Zafon et al., who concluded that patients with a low aggressive profile were significantly older than the remaining patients. This interesting finding awaits confirmation by other studies and larger series.

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of thyroid nodules is highly sensitive in the diagnosis of papillary, medullary, and anaplastic carcinomas. Distinction between benign lesions, such as follicular adenoma or nodular adenomatous goiter, and follicular carcinoma or follicular variant of papillary carcinoma remains a problem. The final diagnosis depends on histological evaluation.

The study by M. Bonzanini et al. addresses practical issues related to the existence of different FNAC classifications [7, 8] and was designed to retrospectively analyze the benefits of subclassifying the “undetermined” cytologic reports into two categories: “follicular lesion” (FL) and “atypia of undetermined significance” (AUS). Data obtained on this basis indicate that AUS is associated with higher malignancy rate than FL. Moreover, the authors provide data in favor of an integrated analysis of clinical, cytological, biochemical, and ecographic findings to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Young patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) represent a particular group. Childhood DTC is more frequently multicentric and is associated with a more locally aggressive and more frequent distant disease than its adult counterpart. Nonetheless, recent series [9], with long followup, have shown that fewer than 2% of children die from DTC contrasting to a much higher number of patients dying from nonthyroid malignancy. Further more, seventy-three percent of those who died from nonthyroid malignancy had received adjuvant radioactive iodine ( ) therapy.

In children, the lungs are almost the sole distant metastatic site, and pulmonary metastases are nearly always functional [10].

A risk-stratified approach is probably the best choice to optimize treatment and reduce risks associated with therapy [11]. To choose among the classical risk stratification systems, the most adequate one for young patients is still a matter of debate. F. Vaisman et al. discuss these and other points.

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a neuroendocrine tumor derived from parafollicular cells of the thyroid that occurs in both sporadic and hereditary forms. MTC spreads early to lymph nodes and is both chemo- and radioresistant. Early surgery is the only therapeutic approach potentially curative thus explaining the importance of an early detection.

Activating mutations of the rearranged during transfection (RET) proto-oncogene were first described in patients with familial forms in 1993 [12, 13]. Additionally, somatic RET mutations were identified in up to 65% of patients with sporadic MTC [14, 15]. The RET gene is located in chromosome 10q11.2 and codes for a tyrosine kinase (TK) receptor. These molecular advances made possible to define genotype-phenotype correlations; the International RET Mutation Consortium and the American Thyroid Association provided guidelines for the timing of prophylactic surgery based on genetic analysis [16, 17]. Moreover, promising targeted therapies have been developed for progressive and advanced MTC.

Genetic screening became a routine, worldwide, in the management of MTC patients at a preclinical stage. Results presented by M. Hedayati et al. in the current issue, in addition to those previously presented by Alvandi et al. [18], are illustrative of the mutational profile observed among Iranian patients with MTC.

Based on the understanding of the altered molecular pathways underlying MTC, a number of “targeted” therapies have been developed. K. Gómez et al. present a comprehensive review of the most promising TK inhibitors for the treatment of MTC and draw attention to possible adverse effects and drug resistance.

Standard treatment of DTC includes surgery, and thyroid hormone suppressive therapy. 131I, selectively targeting thyroid cells, was probably the first targeted therapy for cancer. For those cases refractory to131I and for patients with local aggressive or metastatic disease, until recently, there were no effective treatments.

During the last decades, a large body of information has been generated on the molecular alterations, particularly on the role of oncogenic kinases involved in thyroid carcinomas. Based on this information, thyroid became, once more, a model for the use of new targeted therapies specially the kinase inhibitors. Interest in this field grew, and future holds promise. The role for combinatory treatments is still not defined.

Papers by H. Prazeres et al. and S. B. Bales et al. review genomic changes in thyroid cancer (DTC and MTC) and discuss how this information might be used to improve targeted therapies.

Epigenetic mechanisms are likely to play an important role in thyroid cancers particularly by modulating tumor progression. Whereas mutations generally alter intracellular signaling pathways, the epigenetic mechanisms may interfere with tumor environment as recently shown [19]. In this issue, O. P. Eze et al. present a thorough revision of this theme and discuss implications for future therapies designed to attain different pathways.

Clinical trials of TK inhibitors in patients with advanced thyroid cancer have shown promising preliminary results, justifying enthusiasm among physicians and expectation among patients. The Food and Drug Administration recently approved Vandetanib for local advanced or metastatic MTC.

Despite the promising results, TK inhibitors have a broad spectrum of adverse effects. Considering that this class of therapeutic agents is to be used as chronic treatment, clinicians responsible for their use need to be familiar with adverse effects associated with TK inhibitors and prepared to manage them. M. E. Cabanillas et al. provide us with a comprehensive revision and practical tips to optimize treatment and minimize toxicity.

We are grateful to all contributors, reviewers, and the editorial staff.

Maria João M. Bugalho
Nelson Wohllk
Ana O. Hoff
Maria E. Cabanillas


  1. L. Davies and H. G. Welch, “Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973–2002,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 295, no. 18, pp. 2164–2167, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. D. Cramer, P. Fu, K. C. Harth, S. Margevicius, and S. M. Wilhelm, “Analysis of the rising incidence of thyroid cancer using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results national cancer data registry,” Surgery, vol. 148, no. 6, pp. 1147–1152, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. P. Yu, J. C. L. Li, D. Branovan, S. McCormick, and S. P. Schantz, “Thyroid cancer incidence and survival in the national cancer institute surveillance, epidemiology, and end results race/ethnicity groups,” Thyroid, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 465–473, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Durante, M. Attard, M. Torlontano et al., “Identification and optimal postsurgical follow-up of patients with very low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinomas,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 4882–4888, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Agarwal, A. Agarwal, and G. Chand, “Incidental papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid-further evidence of a very low malignant potential: a retrospective clinicopathologic study with up to 30 years of follow-up,” Annals of Surgical Oncology. In press. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Y. Kim, W.-Y. Park, K. E. Lee et al., “Comparative analysis of gene expression profiles of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma and papillary thyroid carcinoma,” Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 452–457, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. G. Gheri, E. Romoli, V. Vezzosi et al., “Follicular nodules (THY3) of the thyroid: we recommend surgery,” Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. In press. View at: Google Scholar
  8. R. Paschke, L. Hegedüs, E. Alexander, R. Valcavi, E. Papini, and H. Gharib, “Thyroid nodule guidelines: agreement, disagreement and need for future research,” Nature Reviews Endocrinology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 354–361, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. I. D. Hay, T. Gonzalez-Losada, M. S. Reinalda, J. A. Honetschlager, M. L. Richards, and G. B. Thompson, “Long-term outcome in 215 children and adolescents with papillary thyroid cancer treated during 1940 through 2008,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1192–1202, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. B. Jarząb, D. Handkiewicz-Junak, and J. Włoch, “Juvenile differentiated thyroid carcinoma and the role of radioiodine in its treatment: a qualitative review,” Endocrine-Related Cancer, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 773–803, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Francis and S. G. Waguespack, “An individualized approach to the child with thyroid cancer,” Expert Review of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. Donis-Keller, S. Dou, D. Chi et al., “Mutations in the RET proto-oncogene are associated with MEN 2A and FMTC,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 851–856, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  13. L. M. Mulligan, J. B. J. Kwok, C. S. Healey et al., “Germ-line mutations of the RET proto-oncogene in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A,” Nature, vol. 363, no. 6428, pp. 458–460, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. N. Wohllk, G. J. Cote, M. M. J. Bugalho et al., “Relevance of RET proto-oncogene mutations in sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 3740–3745, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. M. Moura, B. M. Cavaco, A. E. Pinto et al., “Correlation of RET somatic mutations with clinicopathological features in sporadic medullary thyroid carcinomas,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 100, no. 11, pp. 1777–1783, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. L. Brandi, R. F. Gagel, A. Angeli et al., “Consensus: Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type 2,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 5658–5671, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force, R. T. Kloos, C. Eng et al., “Medullary thyroid cancer: management guidelines of the American Thyroid Association,” Thyroid, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 565–612, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  18. E. Alvandi, S. M. Akrami, M. Chiani et al., “Molecular analysis of the RET proto-oncogene key exons in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma: a comprehensive study of the iranian population,” Thyroid, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 373–382, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. Prazeres, J. Torres, F. Rodrigues et al., “Chromosomal, epigenetic and microRNA-mediated inactivation of LRP1B, a modulator of the extracellular environment of thyroid cancer cells,” Oncogene, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1302–1317, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Maria João M. Bugalho et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.