Research Article

Radial Basis Function Artificial Neural Network for the Investigation of Thyroid Cytological Lesions

Table 8

Performance indices for the patient classification subsystems (numeric and percentage classifiers) for the training and test sets and for both sets combined.

Reference numberYear of publicationAI methodNumber of unitsClassification domainPerformance

[81]1993A backpropagation ANN and a learning vector quantizer392 casesDiagnosis of thyroid functionOverall accuracy on test data subsets was in the range of 96.4–99.7%, when extreme values used for training the overall accuracy were in the range of 92.7–98.8%

[27]1996Backpropagation algorithm (three layers)51 patientsCell nuclei and patientsOverall accuracy was 90.6% for nuclei classification and 98% on individual patients

[61]1999LVQ classifier198 patientsBenign from malignant thyroid lesions.Overall accuracy: 97.8%

[31]2006Four methods: (1) a linear classifier, (2) a two-layer feedforward ANN, (3) a combined two-layer feedforward ANN generated by the AdaBoost method, and (4) the k nearest neighbor classifier (a method with many similarities with LVQ)157 patientsBenign from malignant thyroid lesions.(1) 65.17%, (2) 73.20%, (3) 73.20%, and (4) 74.69%

[82]2007Backpropagation algorithm (three layers)197 smearsFollicular carcinomas vs. follicular adenomasSensitivity: 97%

[83]2004Multilayer perceptron 15 nodes in the input, 1 hidden layer of 15 units, and an output layer453 patientsHigh vs. low risk for cancerSensitivity: 90.6%, specificity: 62.2%

[84]2006Two-layer ANN having inputs as cytological images30 images from 10 patients for training and 45 patients with follicular adenoma and 39 patients with follicular carcinoma for testingFollicular carcinomas vs. follicular adenomasOverall accuracy: 96%

[86]2008Multiclassifier system115 casesBenign vs. malignant nodulesOverall accuracy: 95.7%

[58]2011LVQ ANN335 casesIn follicular neoplasms suspicious for malignancy and in Hürthle cell tumorsOverall accuracy: 94%

[87]2014Optimal transport-based linear embedding for segmented nuclei94 patientsDistinguishing between follicular lesionsOA LOT-100% except FVPC vs. FC 87%

[89]2013Supervised learning-based template matching for segmenting cell nucleiMicroscopy images to segment nucleiTexture and shape variations of the nuclear structuresNot applicable, used for nuclei segmentation

[90]2018ANN model to differentiate FA versus FC on the FNAC materialMicroscopy images of FA–FC (26 and 32 cases respectively)Follicular carcinomas vs. follicular adenomasOverall accuracy of 93% on image analysis and an overall accuracy of 96% in automatic image classification to differentiate FA and FC

[91]2018Convolutional neural network174 microscopy imagesPapillary vs. nonpapillarySensitivity: 90.8%, specificity: 83.3%

[92]2020Deep learning algorithm for whole slide images (WSIs)908 whole slide imagesMalignancy predictionSensitivity: 92%, specificity: 90.5%