Research Article

Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Deep Thyroid Nodule: Is There a Correlation between the Nodule’s Depth and Nondiagnostic Results?

Table 1

Demographic and ultrasound clinical characteristics of the study groups.

VariablesAll nodules (n = 283)Bethesda 1 (n = 40)Bethesda 2–6 (n = 243)-value

Gender, female (n, %)234, 82.734, 85.0200, 82.30.676
Age, years (mean ± SD)57.5 ± 14.857.3 ± 14.957.5 ± 14.90.817

Ethnicity (n, %)
Jewish193, 68.227, 67.5166, 68.30.919
Arab90, 31.813, 32.577, 31.7

Side (n, %)
Right156, 55.226, 65.0130, 53.50.176
Left113, 39.911, 27.5102, 42.0
Isthmus14, 14.93, 7.511, 4.5
Diameter A (horizontal), mm (mean ± SD)16.8 ± 8.014.5 ± 5.317.2 ± 8.30.038
Diameter B, (anterior-posterior) mm (mean ± SD)16.0 ± 7.713.5 ± 6.716.4 ± 7.80.005

Cystic content (n, %)
Solid166, 58.726, 65.0140, 57.60.175
<50%89, 31.48, 20.081, 33.3
≥50%28, 9.96, 15.022, 9.1

Calcification (n, %)
Non260, 91.936, 90.0224, 92.20.998
Macrocalcification19, 6.73, 7.516, 6.6
Microcalcification4, 1.41, 2.53, 1.2

Echogenicity (n, %)
Hyperechoic50, 17.76, 15.044, 18.10.669
Isoechoic151, 53.422, 55.0129, 53.1
Hypoechoic23, 8.15, 12.518, 7.4
Heteroechoic59, 20.87, 17.552, 21.4
Nodule depth, mm (mean ± SD)10.0 ± 6.612.1 ± 4.79.7 ± 6.8<0.001
Time of surveillance, m (mean ± SD)9.2 ± 4.710.4 ± 5.69.0 ± 4.50.090