Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Transplantation
Volume 2010, Article ID 467976, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/467976
Research Article

The Effect of Race, Sex, and Insurance Status on Time-to-Listing Decisions for Liver Transplantation

1Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
2Section of Decision Sciences and Clinical Systems Modeling, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
3Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
4Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
5The Clinical Research Investigation and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Laboratory, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA

Received 7 May 2010; Revised 13 August 2010; Accepted 23 September 2010

Academic Editor: Paul C. Kuo

Copyright © 2010 Cindy L. Bryce et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. A. Majeske, “Transforming objectivity to promote equity in transplant candidate selection,” Theoretical Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 45–59, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. L. Milford, “Organ transplantationn—barriers, outcomes, and evolving policies,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 280, no. 13, pp. 1184–1185, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. D. Navaneethan and S. Singh, “A systematic review of barriers in access to renal transplantation among African Americans in the United States,” Clinical Transplantation, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 769–775, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. A. Ubel and G. Loewenstein, “Public perceptions of the importance of prognosis in allocating transplantable livers to children,” Medical Decision Making, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 234–241, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. A. Ubel and A. L. Caplan, “Geographic favoritism in liver transplantation—unfortunate or unfair?” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 18, pp. 1322–1325, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, “Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS. Final rule,” Federal Register, vol. 64, no. 202, pp. 56650–56661, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), “Annual Report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1988-1997,” Tech. Rep., UNOS, Richmond, Va, USA, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  8. Committee on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Policy, Institute of Medicine, Organ Procurement and Transplantation: Assessing Current Policies and the Potential Impact of the DHHS Final Rule. Advance Copy Edition, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
  9. United Network for Organ Sharing, “OPTN/UNOS board revises kidney policy to boost minority transplants,” November 2002, http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/news/newsDetail.asp?id=228.
  10. R. Wiesner, E. Edwards, R. Freeman et al., “Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers,” Gastroenterology, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 91–96, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Malinchoc, P. S. Kamath, F. D. Gordon, C. J. Peine, J. Rank, and P. C. J. Ter Borg, “A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts,” Hepatology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 864–871, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. C. Alexander and A. R. Sehgal, “Barriers to cadaveric renal transplantation among blacks, women, and the poor,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 280, no. 13, pp. 1148–1152, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. P. Garg, S. L. Furth, B. A. Fivush, and N. R. Powe, “Impact of gender on access to the renal transplant waiting list for pediatric and adult patients,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 958–964, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Macrae, A. L. Friedman, E. A. Friedman, and P. Eggers, “Live and deceased donor kidney transplantation in patients aged 75 years and older in the United States,” International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 641–648, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. L. Bryce, D. C. Angus, R. M. Arnold et al., “Sociodemographic differences in early access to liver transplantation services,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 2092–2101, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. J. Fine, L. J. Hough, A. R. Medsger et al., “The hospital admission decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the pneumonia patient outcomes research team cohort study,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. M. Shechter, C. L. Bryce, O. Alagoz et al., “A clinically based discrete-event simulation of end-stage liver disease and the organ allocation process,” Medical Decision Making, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 199–209, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. MediQual Severity Score, MediQual Systems, Inc., Marlborough, Mass, USA.
  19. J. D. Kalbfleisch and R. L. Prentice, The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
  20. J. P. Fine and R. J. Gray, “A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 94, no. 446, pp. 496–509, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus