Review Article

The Role of mTOR Inhibitors in Liver Transplantation: Reviewing the Evidence

Table 1

(a) Sirolimus trials (de novo and maintenance dosing) retrieved from PubMed/congress search, (b) sirolimus conversion trials retrieved from PubMed/congress search, (c) everolimus trials (de novo dosing) retrieved from PubMed/congress search, (d) everolimus conversion trials retrieved from PubMed/congress search.
(a)

ParticipantsStudy designaDuration of studySirolimus dosingStrength of study design based on defined criteriab

De novo dosing
Chinnakotla et al. Liver Transpl. 2009; 15: 1834–42 [55] recipients
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (TAC)
R/P5 years2 mg orally, once daily. Levels maintained at 5–8 ng/mL for the first 3 months and at 5 ng/mL thereafterHigh
Asthana et al. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011; 25: 28–34 [56] recipients
(i) (de novo SRL)
(ii) (CNI)
R12 monthsMaintained at 8–12 ng/mLMedium
McKenna et al. Am J Transpl. 2011; 11: 2379–87 [57] recipients (HCV-positive)
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (SRL-free)
R/P2 years2 mg daily without a loading dose beginning on the first postoperative dayMedium
Wagner et al. Int Immunopharmacol. 2010; 10: 990–3 [58] recipients (HCV-positive)
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (CNI)
P, C12 monthsTrough levels were maintained between 3 and 8 ng/mLMedium
Zhou et al. Transplant Proc. 2008; 40: 3548–553 [59] recipients (HCC exceeding Milan criteria)
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (TAC)
R2 yearsGiven 1 month after transplant: initial dose of 3 mg/m2 adjusted over time to achieve steady-state trough levels of 5–8 ng/mL Medium
Asthana et al. Presented at AASLD 2011 (Abstract 184) [60] recipients (recurrent HCV)
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (TAC)
(iii) (cyclosporine)
(iv) lost to followup
P, CMedian of 77.6 monthsNot statedLow
Campsen et al. J Transplant. 2011; 2011: 913094 [54] recipients
(i) (CNI + MPS at time of discharge)
(ii) (CNI + MPS at time of discharge; SRL added within the first 6 months and continued through the first year)
(iii) (CNI + MPS at time of discharge; SRL was added within the first 6 months and discontinued before the first year)
(iv) (SRL as primary immunosuppression) 
(v) (SRL as primary immunosuppression and discontinued before the first year)
R1 yearNot statedLow
Dunkelberg et al. Liver Transpl. 2003; 9: 463–8 [61] recipients
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (historic controls)
R12 months6 mg on day 0, and 2 mg/day thereafter no target level was specified Low
Jiménez-Romero et al. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011; 58: 115–21 [62] recipients who developed de novo tumors
 All switched from CNI/MMF to SRL monotherapy
P, SMean of 15.7 monthsLoading dose: 4 mg, followed by 2 mg/day until 8–12 days, thereafter dose adjusted to achieve target blood level of 5–10 ng/mLLow
Kneteman et al. Liver Transpl. 2004; 10: 1301–11 [63] recipients (HCC)
 All given SRL
P, S4 yearsAdjusted to achieve target levels of 12–20 ng/mLLow
Maramattom and WijdicksNeurology. 2004; 63: 1958–9 [64] recipients
 All received SRL
R18 monthsLoading dose: 6 mg, thereafter: 1–10 mg/day with target blood level of 8–15 ng/mLLow
Molinari et al. Transpl Intl. 2010; 23: 155–68 [53] recipients
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (CNI)
R5 yearsOral dose adjusted to keep the blood levels in the range of 10–15 ng/mL during the first 3–6 months and then in the range of 5–10 ng/mL afterwardsLow
Toso et al. Hepatology. 2010; 51: 1237–43 [65] recipients (HCC)
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (SRL-free)
R5 yearsNot statedLow
Wiesner et al. Am J Transplant. 2002; 2 (s3): 464 (Abstract 1294) [44] recipients
(i) (SRL + CsA)
(ii) (concentration-controlled TAC (trough levels 5–15 ng/mL) + corticosteroids)
P, Ra6 monthsFixed-dose of 5 mg/dayLow
Zimmerman et al. Liver Transpl. 2008; 14: 633–8 [15] recipients (cirrhosis + concomitant HCC)
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (standard regimen including CNIs, MMF, and corticosteroids)
R5 yearsBolus dose of 6 mg on day 0 and given on 2 mg/day thereafterLow

Combination of de novo and maintenance dosing
Kazimi et al. Transplantation. 2010; 90 (2S): 697 (Abstract 1950) [66] recipients
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (CNI)
R daysNot statedLow

(b)

ParticipantsStudy designaDuration of studySirolimus dosingStrength of study design based on criteriab

Early conversion (≤3 months after transplantation)
Rogers et al. Clin Transplant. 2009; 23: 887–96 [48] recipients
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (CNI)
R12 monthsTarget SRL levels for the first three months after conversion were 8–10 ng/dL, 6–8 ng/dL for months 3–6, and 5–6 ng/dL after month 12High
Harper et al. Transplantation. 2011; 91: 128–32 [67] recipients
 All converted to SRL
RMedian of 1006 daysConversion from CNI to SRL performed with an overlap. SRL given at 2 mg/day and CNI withdrawn when SRL reached 5–8 ng/mLMedium
McKenna et al. ILTS. 2011 (Abstract O-17) [68] recipients
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (SRL-free)
R10 yearsNot statedMedium
Schleicher et al. Transplant Proc. 2010; 42: 2572–5 [49] recipients
(i) (early conversion, impaired perioperative renal function; SRL = 7, EVL = 4)
(ii) (early conversion, normal perioperative renal function; SRL = 6, EVL = 1)
(iii) (late conversion, impaired perioperative renal function, SRL = 15, EVL = 8)
(iv) (late conversion, normal perioperative renal function; SRL = 12, EVL = 4)
R12 monthsInitial dose of 10 mg/day. Doses were adjusted successively to maintain trough levels of 5–10 ng/mL Medium
Sanchez et al. Transplant Proc. 2005; 37: 4416–23 [69] recipients
(i) (denovo SRL)
(ii) (conversion SRL)
P, C2 yearsIn recipients with HCC or autoimmune disorders, SRL doses used were typically either a 5 mg or 3 mg loading dose followed by 2 mg each day
After conversion, SRL levels were maintained at 10–15 ng/mL when used within 3 months of transplantation and at 5–10 ng/mL after 3 months after transplantation
Medium
Forgacs et al. Transplant Proc. 2005; 37: 1912–4 [70] recipients
 All converted to SRL
RUp to 425 daysNot statedLow

Late conversion (>3 months after transplantation)
Campbell et al. Clin Transplant. 2007; 21: 377–84 [71] recipients
(i) (SRL conversion)
(ii) (CNI controls)
RMedian of 359 days2 mg daily, dose adjusted until target levels of 5–8 ng/mL achievedHigh
DuBay et al. Liver Transpl. 2008; 14: 651–9 [72] recipients (with renal insufficiency)
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (low-dose CNIs)
R12 monthsRecipients on CNI monotherapy were started on SRL 1 mg/day and the CNI dose was halved. At 1 week, the CNI was stopped, and the SRL dose was adjusted on the basis of the serum levels. For recipients on combination therapy, the CNI was stopped, and SRL was started on the same day at 2 mg/day while the antimetabolite or steroid doses were maintained at their current levels. In both groups the SRL dose was adjusted to maintain trough levels of 5–15  g/dayHigh
Herlenius et al. Transplant Proc. 2010; 42: 4441–8 [73] recipients (with chronic kidney disease)
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (MMF)
P, Ra12 monthsA single bolus dose of 10 mg SRL followed by three consecutive daily doses of 8 mg. Target trough concentration of 10 ng/mLMedium
Lam et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2004; 49: 1029–35 [74] recipients (with renal insufficiency after transplantation)
 All converted to SRL
P, SMean of daysSRL initiated at 2 mg/day. Doses adjusted to achieve target level of 4–10 ng/mLMedium
Morard et al. Liver Transpl. 2007; 13: 658–64 [75] recipients
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (SRL + MMF)
(iii) (SRL + prednisone)
(iv) (SRL + CNI)
(v) (SRL + MMF + prednisone)
RMedian of monthsLoading dose: 6 mg (day 1) followed by 2 mg/day (day 2–7). SRL dose adjusted to maintain trough levels of 5–10 ng/mLMedium
Shenoy et al.Transplantation. 2007; 83: 1389–92 [76] recipients (with renal dysfunction)
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (CNI)
P, Ra12 months5 mg loading dose, followed by 3 mg SRL once daily. Levels maintained 6–10 ng/mLMedium
Uhlmann et al. Exp Clin Transplant. 2012; 10: 30–8 [77] recipients
 All converted to SRL
P, S75.6 monthsSRL started at 1 mg/day, dose adjusted to maintain trough levels at 69 ng/mLMedium
Watson et al. Liver Transpl. 2007; 13: 1694–702 [78] recipients
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (CNI)
P, Ra12 monthsCNI was discontinued the evening before conversion, and recipients were started on 2 mg/day SRL on the following day. Target range of 5–15 ng/mLMedium
Stein et al. Presented at the American Transplant Congress 2011 (Abstract 817) [79] recipients (received transplant for HCV)
(i) (SRL conversion)
(ii) (TAC)
R5 yearsNot statedLow
Vivarelli et al.Transplant Proc. 2010; 42: 2579–84 [80] recipients
(i) (SRL)
(ii) (SRL + CNI)
R days5 mg/m2 for 1st day, then 2 mg/daily, adjusted to trough blood level <10 ng/mLLow
Di Benedetto et al.Transplant Proc. 2009; 41: 1297–9 [81] recipients
 All converted to SRL
RMean of 27.5 months (range: 2–71.2 months)SRL at a loading dose of 0.1 mg/kg on day 1 of the switch, then 0.05 mg/kg for the next few days. Dose adjusted to maintain trough levels of 8–10 ng/mLLow
Abdelmalek et al. Am J Transplant. 2012; 12: 694–705 [45] recipients
(i) (SRL conversion)
(ii) (CNI continuation)
P, RaUp to 6 yearsLoading dose of SRL: 10–15 mg. First dose given ≥4 h after the last CNI dose; second doses given 12 h later. On study days 2–6, SRL doses of 3–5 mg/day were given. Thereafter, SRL doses maintained to achieve blood levels of 6–16 ng/mL (chromatographic) and subsequently to 8–16 ng/mL (chromatographic) or 10–20 ng/mL (immunoassay)Low
Bäckman et al. Clin Transplant. 2006; 20: 336–9 [82] recipients
 All converted to SRL
P, S6 monthsLoading dose of 15 mg SRL on days 1 and 2, then 8 mg/day and adjusted to achieve trough levels of 13–22 and 10–22 ng/mLLow
Fairbanks et al. Liver Transpl. 2003; 9: 1079–85 [83] recipients (developed renal dysfunction while on CNI therapy)
 All converted to SRL
P, SMean of weeksInitially 1-2 mg/day and increased weekly by 1 mg to achieve therapeutic levels (9–12 ng/mL)Low
Nair et al. Liver Transpl. 2003; 9: 126–9 [84] recipients
 All converted to SRL
R6 monthsLoading dose of 5 mg on day 1, followed by 2 mg/day. A trough level of 5–10 ng/mL was maintainedLow
Neff et al. Transplant Proc. 2003; 35: 3029–31 [85] recipients
 All converted to SRL
R90 daysMean starting dose of SRL (10 mg/day) adjusted to maintain trough levels of 8–12 ng/mL during first month and subsequently 3–5 ng/mL for recipients on maintenance combination therapy with SRLLow
Wadei et al. Transplantation. 2012; 93: 1006–12 [86] recipients
 All converted to SRL
RMedian of 3.1 yearsCNI dose reduced by 50% until target SRL level of 8–12 ng/mL achieved Low

Search terms were ‘‘sirolimus liver transplantation’’ OR ‘‘sirolimus liver transplant.’’
CNI: calcineurin inhibitor; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV: hepatitis C virus; ILTS: 2011 Joint International Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; SRL: sirolimus; TAC: tacrolimus.
Study design: C: cohort; P: prospective; R: retrospective; Ra: randomized; S: single-arm.
See Section 2 for description of how criteria are defined.
(c)

ParticipantsStudy designaStudy durationEverolimus dosingStrength of study design based on criteriab

De Simone et al. Am J Transplant. 2012; 12: 3008–20 [87] recipients
(i) = 245 (EVR + TAC-RD) 
(ii) = 231 (EVR + TAC-WD)
(iii) (TAC-SD)
P, Ra12 monthsFor EVR + TAC-WD, EVR initiated at a dose of 1.0 mg b.i.d. within 24 h of randomization with the dose adjusted from day 5 onward, to maintain C0 3–8 ng/mL until month 4 after transplantation, after which the target range increased to 6–10 ng/mL
In the EVR + TAC-RD arm, EVR initiated and monitored as for EVR + TAC-WD, but the initial target range of 3–8 ng/mL maintained throughout the study
High
Grazi et al. Presented at ILTS; 2011 (Abstract P-256) [88] recipients (HCV-related cirrhosis)
(i) (EVR + Bmab + steroids)
(ii) (TAC + Bmab + steroids)
P, Ra1 yearNot statedLow
Levy et al. Liver Transpl. 2006; 12: 1640–8 [52] recipients
(i) (EVR 1.0 mg) + CNI
(ii) (EVR 2.0 mg) + CNI
(iii) (EVR 4.0 mg) + CNI
(iv) (placebo) + CNI
P, Ra36 months1, 2 or 4 mg/dayLow

Search terms were ‘‘everolimus liver transplantation’’ OR ‘‘everolimus liver transplant.’’
Maintenance therapy refers to immunotherapy for the lifetime of the graft. Conversion therapy is where liver transplant recipients were withdrawn from CNIs and switched to everolimus.
Bmab: basiliximab; CNI: calcineurin inhibitor; EVR: everolimus; HCV: hepatitis C virus; SRL: sirolimus; TAC: tacrolimus.
Study design: P: prospective; R: retrospective; Ra: randomized.
See Section 2 for description of how criteria are defined.
(d)

ParticipantsStudy designaStudy durationEverolimus dosingStrength of study design based on criteriab

Early conversion (≤3 months after transplantation)
De Simone et al. Am J Transplant. 2012; 12: 3008–20 [87] recipients
(i) 245 (EVR + TAC-RD)
(ii) 231 (EVR + TAC-WD) 
(iii) 243 (TAC-SD)
P, Ra12 monthsFor EVR + TAC-WD, EVR initiated at a dose of 1.0 mg b.i.d. within 24 h of randomization with the dose adjusted from day 5 onward, to maintain C0 3–8 ng/mL until month 4 after transplantation, after which the target range increased to 6–10 ng/mL.
In the EVR + TAC-RD arm, EVR initiated and monitored as for EVR + TAC-WD, but the initial target range of 3–8 ng/mL maintained throughout the study
High
Fischer et al.  Am J Transplant. 2012; 12: 1855–65 [50] recipients on CNI with/out corticosteroids
(i) (EVR)
(ii) (CNI continuation)
P, Ra12 months EVR started at 1.5 mg b.i.d. and adjusted to achieve a target trough level of 5–12 ng/mL (8–12 ng/mL in patients on treatment with CsA), when CNI was tapered by 70% of the initial CNI doseHigh
Masetti et al. Am J Transplant. 2010; 10: 2252–62 [89] recipients
(i) (EVR)
(ii) (CsA)
P, Ra12 monthsInitial dose: 2.0 mg/day, trough level of 6–10 ng/mL. When CsA discontinued, trough level: 8–12 ng/mL until end of month 6 and 6–10 ng/mL thereafterHigh
Saliba et al. AASLD 2012 [90] recipients from De Simone et al. Am J Transplant. 2012 [40]
(i) (EVR + TAC-RD)
(ii) (EVR + TAC-WD)
(iii) (TAC-SD)
P, Ra24 monthsSame as De Simone et al. Am J Transplant. 2012 [40]High
Schlitt et al. AASLD 2012 [91] recipients from Fischer et al. Am J Transplant. 2012
(i) (EVR with/out corticosteroids)
(ii) (CNI with/out corticosteroids)
P, Ra35 monthsSame as Fischer et al. Am J Transplant. 2012 [43]High

Late conversion (>3 months after transplantation)
Bilbao et al.  Transplant Proc. 2009; 41: 2172–6 [92] recipients
 All converted to EVR
RMean of monthsIn refractory rejection: initial dose 0.5 mg/12 h. Trough levels 5 ng/mL. For CNI-related adverse events, EVR started at 0.5 mg once or twice a day. For malignancy, EVR introduced at 0.5 mg/day, adjusting trough levels to <3 ng/mLMedium
Casanovas et al. Transplant Proc. 2011; 43: 2216–9 [93] recipients
 All converted to EVR
P, SMean of 134 months Initial dose 0.25 mg/12 h for the first 4 days. Target trough 3–5 ng/mLMedium
Castroagudín et al. Liver Transpl. 2009; 15: 1792–7 [94] recipients (chronic renal dysfunction)
 All converted to EVR
P, SMedian of 19.8 months0.75 mg b.i.d., with target trough levels of 3–8 ng/mLMedium
De Simone et al.  Transpl Int. 2009; 22: 279–86 [95] recipientsP, S12 monthsEVR 1.5 mg/day. Trough level of 3–8 ng/mLMedium
De Simone et al.  Liver Transpl. 2009; 15: 1262–9 [96] recipients
(i) (EVR therapy with CNI reduction or discontinuation)
(ii) (CNI continuation)
P, Ra12 monthsInitial: 3 mg/day ×2 on day 1. After week 2: EVR trough level maintained at 3–8 ng/mL during concomitant CNI administration and 6–12 ng/mL if CNI eliminatedMedium
Bilbao et al. Presented at ILTS; 2011 (Abstract P-68) [97] recipients
 All received EVR
RMedian of 12 monthsEVR trough level at ~3 ng/mLLow
Saliba et al. Liver Transpl. 2011; 17: 905–13 [98] maintenance recipients
 All received EVR
R12 monthsIntroduced at mean 2.4 mg/day. The mean trough level = 7.3 ng/mL at month 1 and 8.1 ng/mL at month 12 across total population, with higher values in monotherapy cohort (8.8 ng/mL at month 12)Low
Vallin et al. Clin Transplant. 2011; 25: 660–9 [99] recipients
 All received EVR
RMean of monthsInitial dose 0.75–1.5 mg b.i.d. Trough adjusted to 3–8 ng/mLLow

values are included where available.
Search terms were ‘‘everolimus liver transplantation’’ OR ‘‘everolimus liver transplant.’’
AASLD: Annual Meetings of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; b.i.d.: twice daily; CNI: calcineurin inhibitor; CsA: cyclosporin A; EVR: everolimus; ILTS: 2011 Joint International Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society; TAC: tacrolimus; TAC-RD: reduced-dose tacrolimus; TAC-SD: standard-dose tacrolimus; TAC-WD: tacrolimus withdrawn.
Study design: P: prospective; R: retrospective; Ra: randomized; S: single-arm.
See Section 2 for description of how criteria are defined.