Research Article

Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Animal-Source Salmonella Heidelberg Isolates

Table 2

Summary statistics of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) values for S. Heidelberg isolates by source, time frame of recovery, and species of origin.

ABTCMIC by source MIC by time frameMIC by species
(µg/mL) (µg/mL) (µg/mL)
CLINENV<20062006–20112012-2013BOCHTUEQ

AMC
 Mode1/0.51/0.51/0.51/0.51/0.51/0.51/0.51/0.51/0.5
 Range1/0.5–32/161/0.51/0.51/0.5–32/161/0.5–32/161/0.5–32/161/0.5–2/11/0.5–32/161/0.5
AMP
 Mode111111111
 Range1–321-21-21–321–321–321-21–321
AZI
 Mode444444448
 Range2–162–84–82–82–162–82–84–164–8
FOX
 Mode2 222132224
 Range0.5–321-21–40.5–321–320.25–321-22–322–4
TIO
 Mode10.510.50.580.511
 Range0.25–80.5–10.5–10.5–80.5–80.25–80.5–11–80.5–1
AXO
 Mode0.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.25
 Range0.25–640.250.250.25–640.25–320.25–640.250.25–320.25
CHL
 Mode448454488
 Range4–324–84–84–324–164–324–84–164–8
CIP
 Mode0.0150.0150.0150.0150.0150.0150.0150.0150.03
 Range0.015–0.030.0150.015–0.030.0150.015–0.030.0150.0150.015–0.030.015–0.03
GEN
 Mode0.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.51
 Range0.5–160.25–80.5–160.5–160.25–80.5–160.25–160.50.5–1
KAN
 Mode888888888
 Range8–6488–328–648–328–648–3288
NAL
 Mode444244444
 Range2–42–42–42–42–42–42–42–42–4
STR
 Mode323232323232323232
 Range32–64323232–643232–64323232
SUL
 Mode11111111128
 Range1–2561–1281–2561–2561–2561–2561–25611–128
TET
 Mode44444324432
 Range4–3244–324–324–324–324–3244–32
SXT
 Mode0.120.120.120.120.120.120.120.120.12
 Range0.12–40.12–20.120.12–40.12–20.12–40.12–20.120.12

ABTC = antimicrobial tested; CLIN = clinical, ENV = environmental; CH = chicken; BO = bovine; EQ = equine; TU = turkey; AMC = amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, AMP = ampicillin, AZI = azithromycin, FOX = cefoxitin, TIO = ceftiofur, AXO = ceftriaxone, CHL = chloramphenicol, CIP = ciprofloxacin, GEN = gentamicin, KAN = kanamycin, NAL = nalidixic acid, STR = streptomycin, SUL = sulfisoxazole, TET = tetracycline, and SXT = trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; Mode MIC was listed to the greater of the two values; MIC values are significantly () different between sources; MIC values are significantly () different between time frames; MIC values are significantly () different between species.