Prevalence of<i> Haemonchus contortus</i> Infections in Sheep and Goats in Nyagatare District, Rwanda

Mushonga, Borden; Habumugisha, Dismas; Kandiwa, Erick; Madzingira, Oscar; Samkange, Alaster; Segwagwe, Basiamisi Ernest; Jaja, Ishmael Festus

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3602081

Journal of Veterinary Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 3602081 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3602081

Prevalence of Haemonchus contortus Infections in Sheep and Goats in Nyagatare District, Rwanda

Borden Mushonga,¹Dismas Habumugisha,²Erick Kandiwa,¹Oscar Madzingira,¹Alaster Samkange,¹Basiamisi Ernest Segwagwe,³and Ishmael Festus Jaja⁴

Academic Editor: William Alberto Cañón-Franco

Received07 Jun 2018

Accepted27 Aug 2018

Published06 Sept 2018

Abstract

This study investigated the overall prevalence of Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep and goats from five purposively selected subdivisions (sectors) of Nyagatare district from January to December 2014, after a high prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites and generalized poor productivity was reported in small ruminants in some districts of Rwanda. Faecal egg counts (FEC) were performed using the Modified Wisconsin Sugar Floatation method and the Fluorescent-labeled peanut-lectin agglutination test while enumerations, as log (FEC), were done using the modified McMaster method. The overall prevalence of H. contortus infection in sheep and goats was 75.7% (n=949). The overall prevalence of H. contortus infection in sheep (83.4%, n=314) was higher than in goats (71.8%, n=635) (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.98, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.40-2.79, and p≤0.001). The prevalence of H. contortus infection in female goats (74.2%) was higher than in male goats (64.3%) (OR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.09-2.36, and p=0.01). The prevalence of H. contortus infection in goats from Nyagatare was higher than in goats from Matimba (OR 3.25, 95% CI: 1.76-5.99, and p≤0.001) and from Katabagemu (OR 3.67, 95% CI: 2.04-6.59, and p≤0.001). The prevalence of H. contortus infection in goats from Karangazi was higher than in goats from Matimba (OR 4.72, 95% CI: 2.40-9.28, and p≤0.001). The overall mean monthly log (FEC) for H. contortus in sheep and goats were highest in April (18.9±0.2 and 14.05±0.1, respectively) and October (19.25± 0.2 and 13.75±0.1, respectively). Though, overall, sheep in Nyagatare district were at greater risk of H. contortus infection and goats from Nyagatare and Karangazi sectors were paradoxically at greater risk of H. contortus infection. It was also apparent that young female goats were at greater risk of H. contortus infection than young male goats. H. contortus infection is endemic in small ruminants in Nyagatare district and possibly other districts in Rwanda. Targeted selective treatment (TST) using FAMACHA with emphasis on low-lying swampy pastures and appropriate anthelmintic drugs may be the most economically viable solution in the short term. In the long term breeding of H. contortus resistant small ruminants and strategic grazing using the concept of refugia may bring about considerable relief from H. contortus infection in Nyagatare district, in particular, and Rwanda at large.

1. Introduction

Due to their hardiness and fecundity, small ruminants play a crucial role in the cultural and socioeconomic lives of rural people in Africa, providing meat, milk, income, and wealth [1–4].

Helminth infections are one of the most important diseases limiting livestock production in many parts of the world including Rwanda [5–8]. Gastrointestinal helminthes cause significant economic losses of small ruminant enterprises through increased susceptibility of animals to other infections, morbidities, and mortalities, especially in heavily parasitized animals and in young animals. Furthermore, they lead to forced culling, carcass, and organ condemnations [9], increased cost of veterinary treatments, decreased weight gain, reduced milk production and reproductive capacity, decreased work capacity, diminished food intake, reduced animal growth rates, and lower weight gains and treatment and management costs [8–12]. Among these gastrointestinal helminths, nematodes are the leading cause of ill-health and production losses in sheep and goats worldwide [7, 10, 13]. It would appear that a number of reports point to Trichostrongylid nematodes, especially Haemonchus. contortus (H. contortus) (also known as the barber’s pole worm) as the most prevalent parasite identified in small ruminants [8, 10, 11]. According to some reports, Haemonchus contortus is the most important gastrointestinal parasite in sheep [5, 14]. However, in a survey in South Eastern Ethiopia Haemonchus spp. was not found [15].

H. contortus is a helminth parasite of the abomasum of ruminants and, in particular, sheep and goats. It is the most economically important and pathogenic helminth parasite of small ruminants in the warm tropical and subtropical regions of the world [5, 8, 13, 16, 17]. Acutely infected sheep and goats exhibit pale mucous membranes, dark colored faeces, weakness, and edema (bottle jaw) and may die suddenly. Chronic disease may manifest as decreased appetite, weight loss, and anemia [18]. Young animals usually carry heavier burdens than adult sheep and goats. Occurrence and severity of H. contortus infection also depend on the rainfall patterns and temperatures of an area [13]. High rainfall and temperatures promote rapid hatching of eggs on pasture and hence increased contamination.

The prevalence of H. contortus infections in a flock provides a good indication of the parasite burdens and the magnitude of production losses. Ambient temperature, environmental humidity, grazing behavior of the host, and quantity and quality of pasture are some factors responsible for the prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths. Outbreaks are most common and severe in warm, humid climates [19]. Other risk factors which include host species, sex, age, body condition, breed [16], and intensity of worm infections affect the development of gastrointestinal parasites [20].

Overall prevalence of H. contortus infection in small ruminants has been reported variably by different studies from as low as 52.7 to over 83% [13, 15, 16, 21, 22]. One Ethiopian study reported a prevalence of 67.2% and 56.6% in sheep and goats, respectively [16], indicating greater susceptibility of sheep. For instance, a study in Ethiopia reported prevalence of 90.1-96.5% in sheep and 81.8-100% in goats [13]. In South Africa, the prevalence of H. contortus infection in sheep has been reported at 68% using the FAMACHA score and 100% with the Hawkesley microhematocrit reader [23]. The same study reported that H. contortus was the most prevalent nematode parasite just as had been reported in an earlier study in that country [1]. Reports from other studies indicate that the prevalence of H. contortus infection is always higher in sheep than in goats in the same geographical area. In a study conducted in Rwanda, Haemonchus spp. were found to be the predominant parasite species in small ruminants with very high infection rates [3].

There are limited reports on the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in Rwanda [3, 21]. The prevalence has been reported to be around 58% in Bugesera district in the Southern Province of Rwanda [21] and 88.9% in kids and 73.3% in lambs in Musanze in the Northern Province of Rwanda [3].

Until today, there are very few reports on the prevalence of nematode parasites in Rwanda and, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have been undertaken to assess the burden Haemonchus spp. and its implications on small ruminant production on in Nyagatare. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of H. contortus egg shedding and the prevalence of Haemonchus spp. infections using coprocultures in sheep and goats from five selected sectors of the Nyagatare district where sheep and goats play an important part in human livelihood and sustenance. Furthermore, the study aimed to determine the significance of parasite infections and recommend strategic preventive and control measures with aim of improving the productivity of this sector.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area was in Nyagatare district (1° 18′0′′S, 30° 20′ 0′′E). Of the 14 sectors in Nyagatare, five sectors were chosen for this study: Karangazi in the East, Tabagwe in the West, Matimba in the North, Katabagemu in the South, and Nyagatare in the centre (Figure 1). There are two wet seasons in Nyagatare district; the first is from February to May and the second from September to November. Average precipitation ranges between 1000 mm and 1200 mm annually. Average temperatures vary between 17.8°C and 21°C.

2.2. Study Design

A cross-sectional study was used where five sectors were purposively selected out of the 14 sectors of Nyagatare district based on location (i.e., North, South, East, West, and Centre). Selection of sheep and goats from each sector was done biased towards goats whose population is roughly double that of the sheep in Nyagatare district. A random digits table was then used for simple random sampling of animals within each sector. Male and female sheep (local, cross, and South African Meat Merino breeds) and the small East African goat and its crosses with the Alpine, Anglo-Nubian, and Angora goat breeds raised extensively on communal land in the five sectors were sampled [24].

2.3. Faecal Sample Collection

Faecal samples were collected per rectum monthly from January to December 2014 from young and adult sheep and goats of all sexes raised on natural pastures in the five sectors. A total of 949 faecal samples were collected from both sheep (n=314) and goats (n=635). Faeces were scooped from the rectum of small ruminants using a gloved index finger in animals restrained in a standing position. Each sample was placed in a separate plastic container with a screw cap, labeled, placed on ice, and transported to the laboratory at the College of Agriculture, Environment, and Veterinary Medicine, University of Rwanda for analysis. Samples that were not tested on the same day were stored at +4°C.

2.4. Parasite Identification and Enumeration of H. contortus Eggs

Parasite eggs in faecal samples (3 grams) from each animal were isolated using the Modified Wisconsin Sugar Floatation method [25]. Following centrifugation, the supernatant was incubated with Fluorescent-labeled peanut-lectin (Arachis hypogaea) agglutinin (Sigma L7381) to identify and enumerate H. contortus eggs [26]. Faecal egg counts (FEC) per gram of faeces were performed following the modified McMaster method as described [27] at a sensitivity of 50 eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive and inferential statistics performed in SPSS version 25. Cross-tabulations were performed to test differences in occurrence of H. contortus infections between sectors and within species, age, and sex categories of animals. P values ≤0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

Overall, 75.7% of the small ruminants under study in Nyagatare district (n = 949) had H. contortus eggs in faeces. The prevalence of H. contortus infection in sheep (83.4%, n = 314) was significantly higher than that in goats of (71.8%, n = 635) (p<0.05).

As shown in Table 1, the overall prevalence of H. contortus infection in male and female sheep was 83.5% and 83.4%, respectively, and that in male and female goats was 64.3% and 74.2%, respectively.

As shown in Table 2, significant differences existed in the prevalence of H. contortus infection between sheep and goats (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.98, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.40-2.79, and p≤0.001). There was no difference in the prevalence of H. contortus infection when age or sex was considered in sheep. Female goats had a higher prevalence of H. contortus infection than male goats (OR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.09-2.36, and p=0.01) and similarly young female goats had a higher prevalence of H. contortus infection than young male goats (OR 1.73, 95% CI: 1.01-2.96, and p=0.03).

As shown in Table 3, the prevalence of H. contortus infection in sheep from Nyagatare and Karangazi sectors was 88% and 90%, respectively, and that in goats was 85.4% and 89.5%, respectively. The prevalence of H. contortus infection in sheep from Tabagwe, Matimba, and Katabagemu sectors was 70.7%, 73.8%, and 72.6%, respectively and that in goats was 55.1%, 64.3%, and 61.5%, respectively.

As shown in Table 4, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of H contortus infections in sheep between the five sectors (p>0.05).

As shown in Table 5, the prevalence of H. contortus infection in goats from Nyagatare sector was greater than in goats from Matimba (OR 3.25, 95% CI: 1.76-5.99, and p≤0.001) and Katabagemu sectors (OR 3.67, 95% CI: 2.04-6.59, and p≤0.001). The prevalence of H. contortus infection in goats from Karangazi (89.5%) was also greater than in goats from Matimba (OR 4.72, 95% CI: 2.40-9.28, and p≤0.001).

As shown in Figure 2, two distinct periods of higher level of H. contortus infection were observed in the first half (February-May) and last half of the year (September-November). A decrease in level of H. contortus infection in both sheep and goat was apparent from June to August.

As shown in Figure 3, a higher level of H contortus infection in goats was recorded in all sectors from February to May and from September to November, with a decrease in level of infection from June to August and in December.

As shown in Figure 4, a higher level of H contortus infection in sheep was recorded in all sectors from February to May and from September to November, with a decrease in level of infection from June to August and in December.

4. Discussion

Table 1 shows that about 76% of small ruminants in this study shed Haemonchus eggs in their faeces. These results indicate a very high level of infection. This high level of infection may partly explain the low productivity of small ruminants in Rwanda as reported in another study [21]. This phenomenon of high nematode prevalence is not new in tropical countries. Similarly high levels of nematode infection like 83.08%, 88.9%, and even 100% have been reported in India, Rwanda, and Pakistan, respectively [3, 22, 28]. In the present study, sheep and goats were raised under an extensive management system, in mostly low-lying pastures where stocking densities were high, nutrition was limited, and veterinary care was almost nonexistent. One study demonstrated a positive correlation between nematode infection and land elevation [28]. These factors promote the exposure of livestock to infective larvae from pastures and the establishment of infections in animals [16].

A significantly higher proportion of sheep (83.4%) than goats (71.8%) had H. contortus eggs in their faeces indicating that sheep are more susceptible to H. contortus infections than goats. This observation is consistent with the findings of earlier work in Ethiopia [13, 16] that showed higher H. contortus infection in sheep than in goats. However, in another study in a different part of Ethiopia, a higher Haemonchus spp. infection in goats (71.3%) than sheep (67.57%) was reported [29]. Studies in neighbouring Uganda have reported the prevalence of goats shedding nematode eggs at 53.7% [10] which is lower than that reported in this study. This may be explained by the differences in management practices such as stocking density and ecoclimatic factors. Hot humid areas that receive high rainfall are ideal for reproduction of nematode parasites, contamination of pastures, and survival of infective larvae. Higher stocking densities promote pasture contamination and within-flock transmission of nematode infections. The results of this study contradicted the findings of another study undertaken in Bangladesh which reported a higher occurrence of H. contortus infection in goats (35.56%) than in sheep (20%); in that same study, the overall prevalence of gastrointestinal parasitic infection was also found to be higher in goats (45% than in sheep (40%) [30].

The higher prevalence value in sheep than goats arises from the fact that sheep predominantly graze closer to the ground where infective nematode larvae are prevalent, while goats are predominantly browsers and feed on shrubs above the ground where infective larvae are fewer [16]. However, there are a variety of factors which can convolute this expectation. These factors include host age, sex and breeding status, grazing habits, the level of education and economic capacity of farmers, the standard of management, and anthelmintic used [30].

There were no statistically significant differences in the shedding of nematode eggs between male and female sheep (Table 2). These results are in agreement with the findings of a study from Ethiopia [31] and Bangladesh [32]. In contrast, a significantly higher number of female than male goats had nematode eggs in their faeces. Previous studies have shown that female animals are at risk of heavy nematode burdens due to the immunosuppression associated with pregnancy and periparturient periods [7, 15, 16, 22]. In our study, this phenomenon was apparent in goats but not in sheep.

Young animals are generally considered to be more susceptible to nematode infection than adults [6, 32] due to immature active immunity and lack of adaptation in the young [6]. On the other end, immunity also wanes with age. In our study, the differences in nematode infections between adult and young sheep and goats were not statistically significant (Table 2). Older animals would not influence the result much because most families sell the biggest (usually the oldest) animals in order to raise the most money in Rwanda [21]. The finding of having no difference in young than old animals is in agreement with reports from Ethiopia, which indicated that helminth infections affect both young and adult animals equally [31].

The prevalence of sheep and goats that shed nematode eggs in faeces differed by sector of origin. Nyagatare and Karangazi sectors had a significantly higher prevalence of sheep and goats that shed nematode eggs in faeces than sheep and goats from Tabagwe and Matimba and Katabagemu sectors (Figure 4). No significant differences were apparent in the proportions of small ruminants with nematode eggs in faeces between Nyagatare and Karangazi sectors (p<0.05). These findings are explained by the variations local elevation, precipitation, hydrology, and pedology between the sectors. Figure 1shows that Karangazi and Nyagatare both have very extensive hydrological systems and hence flooding and swamp formation is likely. This explains the high infection rates in these 2 sectors. Besides Karangazi is adjacent to a game reserve increasing the likelihood of sharing of parasites with game. On the other hand, Tabagwe, Matimba, and Katabagemu are generally somewhat mountainous and do not promote H. contortus infection due to high elevation which favour the growth of browse but not grassland.

Figure 3 shows that faecal egg shedding varied with time of the year in both sheep and goats. Higher faecal egg counts were reported from February to May with a peak in April and from September to November with a peak in October coinciding with the two rainy seasons that are typical of the Nyagatare district. Therefore, rainfall was an important determinant of nematode infection and burden in the study area. Moisture plays a supporting role in the development and survival of the infective stages of nematodes on pasture [33]. Faecal egg counts were significantly higher in the five sectors in February, March, April, and May than in September, October, and November. The lowest FEC were recorded in June, July, August, and December, coinciding with the period of low rainfall.

Haemonchus contortus eggs were recovered from 83.4% of sheep and 71.8% goats. Our study focused on H. contortus parasite because it has been reported in many studies as the predominant and most pathogenic of sheep and goat parasite [13, 16, 17] that causes considerable economic losses to the small ruminant industry. Results from coprocultures correlated positively with the faecal egg counts. Our findings are within the range of prevalence of 69.6% and 90.1% reported in sheep and prevalence of 57.1% and 81.8% reported in goats [13]. The overall prevalence of H. contortus infection in small ruminants of 75.7% reported in this study is comparable to overall prevalence of 71.03% and 77.38% documented by other studies [13]. This study showed that small ruminants harbored H. contortus infections throughout the year with the highest prevalence occurring during the rainy seasons.

The use of chemicals (mainly anthelminthic drugs) has been standard practice for the control of H. contortus in ruminants for decades [34]. However the efficacy of this method has been seriously curtailed by the development of anthelminthic drug resistance the world over. This has necessitated the development of alternative techniques such as rotation of anthelminthic class of drugs [35], breeding for anthelminthic resistance [4], vaccination [34], FAMACHA for the implementation of targeted selective treatments (TST), copper oxide wire particles (COWP), nematode trapping fungi, strategic grazing that avoids parasite-laden pastures, phytotherapy [36, 37], and strategic grazing applying the concept of refugia [38].

5. Conclusion

Given the high pathogenicity of H. contortus compared with other nematode species, it can be concluded that sheep and goat farmers in the Nyagatare district are at a relatively higher risk of economic loss resulting from reduced productivity, morbidity, and possibly mortality in their flocks. It is well known that H. contortus is a problem in hot humid conditions such as occurs in summer in Nyagatare.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

F. R. Bakunzi, L. K. Nkomo, L. E. Motsei, R. V. Ndou, and M. Nyirenda, “A survey on anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of communally grazed sheep and goats in a rural area of North West Province, Republic of South Africa,” Life Science Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 391–393, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Gebresilassie and B. Afera Tadele, “Prevalence of ovine Haemonchosis in Wukro, ethiopia,” Journal of Parasitology Research, vol. 2015, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Juvénal, N. Carine, S. J. dArc, and M. Edward, “An analysis of the dynamics of gastro-intestinal nematode infection in small ruminants in the northern region of Rwanda,” International Journal of Animal and Veterinary, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 128–134, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
P. I. Zvinorova, T. E. Halimani, F. C. Muchadeyi, O. Matika, V. Riggio, and K. Dzama, “Prevalence and risk factors of gastrointestinal parasitic infections in goats in low-input low-output farming systems in Zimbabwe,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 143, pp. 75–83, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sharma and S. Ganguly, “Gastrointestinal Nematodiasis in Small Ruminants and Anthelmintic Resistance: A Review,” Journal of Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 100–104, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sohail, M. Nauman-ul-Islam, S. S. A. Shah, I. A. Shah, A. Raziq, and M. I. Khan, “Incidence of gastrointestinal parasites in beetal goats at District Peshawar, Pakistan,” Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 205–207, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
H. M. Rizwan, M. S. Sajid, Z. Iqbal, and M. Saqib, “Point prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of domestic sheep (Ovis aries) in district Sialkot, Punjab, Pakistan,” Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 803–808, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. El-Ashram, I. Al Nasr, R. Mehmood, M. Hu, L. He, and X. Suo, “Haemonchus Contortus and Ovine Host: a Retrospective Review,” International Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 972–999, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
I. F. Jaja, B. Mushonga, E. Green, and V. Muchenje, “A quantitative assessment of causes of bovine liver condemnation and its implication for food security in the eastern cape province South Africa,” Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 5, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Nsereko, P. Emudong, H. Mulindwa, and J. Okwee-Acai, “Prevalence of common gastro-intestinal nematode infections in commercial goat farms in Central Uganda,” Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 99–106, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. S. Elshahawy, A. M. Metwally, and D. A. Ibrahim, “An abattoir-based study on helminthes of slaughtered goats (Capra hircus L., 1758) in upper Egypt, Egypt,” Helminthologia (Poland), vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 67–72, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. F. Jaja, B. Mushonga, E. Green, and V. Muchenje, “Seasonal prevalence, body condition score and risk factors of bovine fasciolosis in South Africa,” Veterinary and Animal Science, vol. 4, pp. 1–7, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Abdo, W. Tesfaye, and T. Shibbiru, “Prevalence of Haemonchosis and Associated Risk Factors in Small Ruminants Slaughtered at Bishoftu ELFORA Export Abattoir,” Journal of Natural Sciences Research, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 48–52, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. A. Fleming, T. Craig, R. M. Kaplan, J. E. Miller, C. Navarre, and M. Rings, “Anthelmintic resistance of gastrointestinal parasites in small ruminants,” Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 435–444, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. K. Elemo and M. A. Geresu, “Prevalence and Risk Factors of Gastro Intestinal Parasitesof Small Ruminants in Sinana and Dinsho Districts of Bale Zone,” European Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 01–08, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Badaso and M. Addis, “Small Ruminants Haemonchosis: Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors in Arsi Negelle Municipal Abattoir, Ethiopia,” Global Veterinaria, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 315–320, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Blackie, “A Review of the Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Nematode Infections in Sheep and Goats in Ghana,” Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 109–118, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Roeber, A. R. Jex, and R. B. Gasser, “Impact of gastrointestinal parasitic nematodes of sheep, and the role of advanced molecular tools for exploring epidemiology and drug resistance—an Australian perspective,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 6, no. 1, article 153, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Gadahi, M. J. Arshed, Q. Ali, S. B. Javaid, and S. I. Shah, “Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of sheep and goat in and around Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan,” Veterinary World, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 51–53, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Tariq, M. Chishti, and F. Ahmad, “Gastro-intestinal nematode infections in goats relative to season, host sex and age from the Kashmir valley, India,” Journal of Helminthology, vol. 84, no. 01, pp. 93–97, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Manzi, J. Mutabazi, C. D. Hirwa, and D. R. Kugonza, “Socio-economic assessment of indigenous goat production system in rural areas of Bugesera District in Rwanda,” Livestock Research for Rural Development, vol. 25, no. 11, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Singh, P. Kaur, L. D. Singla, and M. S. Bal, “Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasitism in small ruminants in western zone of Punjab, India,” Veterinary World, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Rampedi, W. Smit, P. Soma, B. Dube, W. Luus-Powell, and A. Halajian, “Prevalence of helminth parasites from sheep in the Mohlonong village, Limpopo Province: Preliminary survey,” in Proceedings of the South African Society for Animal Science, 49th Congress, Limpopo, South African, July 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
Borden Mushonga, Sylvine Twiyizeyimna, Gervais Habarugira et al., “Study of Incidence of Gross Urogenital Lesions and Abnormalities on Does Slaughtered at Nyagatare Slaughterhouse, Eastern Province, Rwanda,” Journal of Veterinary Medicine, vol. 2017, Article ID 7564019, 7 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Haji, Q. D. Bickle, M. Ramsan et al., “A comparison of methods for detecting the eggs of Ascaris, Trichuris, and hookworm in infant stool, and the epidemiology of infection in Zanzibari infants,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 725–731, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Jurasek, J. K. Bishop-Stewart, B. E. Storey, R. M. Kaplan, and M. L. Kent, “Modification and further evaluation of a fluorescein-labeled peanut agglutinin test for identification of Haemonchus contortus eggs,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 169, no. 1-2, pp. 209–213, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Glennon, Modified McMaster’s Fecal Egg Counting Technique, NC State Extension Publications, 2015, http://www.content.ces.ncsu.edu.
V. Kantzoura, M. K. Kouam, H. Theodoropoulou, H. Feidas, and G. Theodoropoulos, “Prevalence and Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal Parasitic Infections in Small Ruminants in the Greek Temperate Mediterranean Environment,” Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine, vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 25–33, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Mengist, N. Abebe, G. Gugsa, and N. Kumar, “Assessment of Small Ruminant Haemonchosis and Its Associated Risk Factors in and Around Finoteselam, Ethiopia,” Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Science, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 36–41, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hossain, M. J. Bhuiyan, M. S. Alam et al., “Cross sectional epidemiological investigation on the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of small ruminants in sullah upazilla of sunamgonj district, Bangladesh,” Journal of Advances in Parasitology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 100–104, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Getachew, R. Tesfaye, and E. Sisay, “Prevalence and Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal Nematodes Infections in Small Ruminants in Tullo District, Western Harerghe, Ethiopia,” Journal of Veterinary Science & Technology, vol. 08, no. 02, pp. 8–11, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Poddar, N. Begum, M. A. Alim, A. R. Dey, M. S. Hossain, and S. S. Labony, “Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths of sheep in Sherpur, Bangladesh,” Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 274–280, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Zeryehun, “Helminthosis of sheep and goats in and around Haramaya, Southeastern Ethiopia,” Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 48–55, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
A. F. I. M. D. Matos, C. O. R. Nobre, J. P. Monteiro, C. M. L. Bevilaqua, D. W. Smith, and M. Teixeira, “Attempt to control Haemonchus contortus in dairy goats with Barbervax®, a vaccine derived from the nematode gut membrane glycoproteins,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 151, pp. 1–4, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Leathwick, “Managing anthelmintic resistance-Parasite fitness, drug use strategy and the potential for reversion towards susceptibility,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 198, no. 1-2, pp. 145–153, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. G. M. Houdijk, I. Kyriazakis, A. Kidane, and S. Athanasiadou, “Manipulating small ruminant parasite epidemiology through the combination of nutritional strategies,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 186, no. 1-2, pp. 38–50, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. H. Terrill, J. E. Miller, J. M. Burke, J. A. Mosjidis, and R. M. Kaplan, “Experiences with integrated concepts for the control of Haemonchus contortus in sheep and goats in the United States,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 186, no. 1-2, pp. 28–37, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Muchiut, A. S. Fernández, P. E. Steffan, E. Riva, and C. A. Fiel, “Anthelmintic resistance: Management of parasite refugia for Haemonchus contortus through the replacement of resistant with susceptible populations,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 254, pp. 43–48, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Borden Mushonga et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

5526

Downloads

765

Citations