Evaluation of Serum Posaconazole Concentrations in Patients with Hematological Malignancies Receiving Posaconazole Suspension Compared to the Delayed-Release Tablet Formulation

Belling, Morgan; Kanate, Abraham S.; Shillingburg, Alexandra; Lu, Xiaoxiao; Wen, Sijin; Shah, Nilay; Craig, Michael; Cumpston, Aaron

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3460892

Leukemia Research and Treatment

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Ethical Approval Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 | Article ID 3460892 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3460892

Evaluation of Serum Posaconazole Concentrations in Patients with Hematological Malignancies Receiving Posaconazole Suspension Compared to the Delayed-Release Tablet Formulation

Morgan Belling,¹Abraham S. Kanate,²Alexandra Shillingburg,^1,2Xiaoxiao Lu,³Sijin Wen,³Nilay Shah,²Michael Craig,²and Aaron Cumpston^1,2

Academic Editor: Daniela Cilloni

Received14 Mar 2017

Accepted17 May 2017

Published11 Jun 2017

Abstract

Posaconazole (PCZ) is frequently used for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections (IFI) in patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Posaconazole is commercially available as an oral suspension (PCZ-susp) and as a delayed-release tablet (PCZ-tab). Differences in absorption and bioavailability between these formulations may result in variability in serum posaconazole concentrations. The primary objective of this retrospective analysis was to compare attainment of goal serum posaconazole steady state concentrations () ≥ 700 ng/ml in patients with AML/MDS undergoing induction chemotherapy receiving PCZ-susp 600–800 mg per day versus PCZ-Tablet 300 mg twice daily for one day, followed by 300 mg daily . Sixty-two patients (97%) in the PCZ-tab group compared to 20 patients (17%) in the PCZ-susp group achieved goal . Median posaconazole serum was 1,665 ng/ml (522–3,830 mg/ml) in the PCZ-tab group versus 390 ng/ml (51–1,870 ng/ml) in the PCZ-susp group . There was no difference in hepatotoxicity, QTc prolongation, or breakthrough IFI. Patients receiving PCZ-tab were significantly more likely to achieve goal and demonstrated higher versus patients receiving PCZ-susp. Prospective studies are needed to assess the potential correlation of serum concentrations with efficacy and toxicity.

1. Introduction

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing induction chemotherapy are severely immunocompromised and therefore at risk of developing invasive fungal infections (IFI). Posaconazole (PCZ) has the widest spectrum of antifungal activity among the triazole drug class and has demonstrated superiority versus fluconazole in the prevention of IFI in patients with AML or high-grade MDS undergoing induction chemotherapy and in patients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) receiving immunosuppression [1, 2]. Posaconazole is commercially available as an oral suspension and as a delayed-release tablet [3]. Substantial differences in absorption and bioavailability between these two formulations may result in variability in serum posaconazole concentrations. As demonstrated in several studies, bioavailability and gastrointestinal absorption of PCZ-susp are variable and affected by factors such as concomitant acid suppression therapy and enteral intake [4–9]. In contrast, PCZ-tab has demonstrated improved oral bioavailability. This formulation does not require food intake or a fatty meal to improve absorption and does not seem to be affected by use of acid suppressing agents [10–13]. These factors are especially important, considering the patient population being treated. Most patients receiving intensive chemotherapy and/or having GVHD are likely to have poor oral intake and be receiving stress ulcer prophylaxis.

Serum concentrations of posaconazole follow dose-dependent pharmacokinetics at steady state. Saturation of absorption of the PCZ-susp occurs at doses of 800 mg [14]. Serum concentrations of posaconazole correlate with clinical efficacy and inadequate concentrations are associated with breakthrough fungal infections [15–19]. Thus, differences in bioavailability between the two formulations may correspond to differences in serum concentrations and, subsequently, clinical effectiveness in preventing IFIs. Currently, guidelines recommend goal serum posaconazole concentrations ≥ 700 ng/ml for purposes of fungal prophylaxis [20]. Limited data is available comparing achievement of serum concentrations between the two formulations [21–24].

We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare attainment of goal serum posaconazole concentrations ≥ 700 ng/ml in patients with AML or high-grade MDL undergoing induction chemotherapy receiving the oral suspension versus the delayed-release tablets. We also assessed incidence and severity of toxicities, as well as rates of breakthrough IFIs. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at West Virginia University.

2. Patients and Methods

Patients with AML or high-grade MDS admitted to the inpatient hematologic malignancy service at West Virginia University Hospital between February 2008 and December 2015 were eligible. Posaconazole prophylaxis is standard of care at our institution for adult patients receiving systemic chemotherapy and expected to have prolonged neutropenia, defined as an expected nadir absolute neutrophil count of <500/μl and duration of ≥7 to 10 days. Patients who were receiving concomitant medications interacting with posaconazole were excluded from the study. From February 2008 to December 2013, patients received PCZ-susp 600 to 800 mg per day. From January 2014 to December 2015, patients received PCZ-Tablet300 mg twice daily on day 1, followed by 300 mg daily. Posaconazole concentrations were drawn after ≥7 days of therapy to permit adequate time to achieve steady state concentration (). These concentrations were drawn approximately 4 hours after the posaconazole dose was administered in the morning. Only patients with a serum concentration obtained within these parameters were included for this analysis. Starting June 2014, for patients whose posaconazole concentration was ≥2,000 ng/ml, the dose was decreased from 300 mg daily to 200 mg daily to avoid toxicity without compromising adequate concentrations to be effective for prophylaxis. In August 2015, we began obtaining a second serum concentration after ≥7 days of reduced maintenance dose in order to assess the impact of dose reduction on serum concentrations.

Toxicities were analyzed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 [25]. Grade 2 and higher toxicities were deemed clinically relevant. Specifically, incidence and severity of hepatotoxicity and prolongation were monitored, as these are relevant adverse effects of posaconazole therapy. Hepatotoxicity was assessed by obtaining liver function tests (LFTs) at least twice per week while patients were on posaconazole. prolongation was assessed at baseline and at physician discretion during therapy. Starting July 2015, an electrocardiogram (ECG) was consistently repeated while patients were receiving posaconazole prophylaxis at the time of serum concentration monitoring. Breakthrough fungal infections were classified as proven, probable, or possible according to commonly accepted criteria [26]. Clinical suspicion for fungal infections prompted assessment and work-up, including a chest CT scan and serum galactomannan and 1,3-β-D glucan assays. When possible, a bronchoalveolar lavage was performed and galactomannan was assessed on that sample.

Also assessed in this study were patient-specific factors that may impact serum posaconazole concentrations, including age, obesity, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis, and concomitant acid suppression therapy [27]. Nutritional status was assessed by a registered dietician, who classified patients into three categories based on food intake. Category 1 included patients who consumed >75% of meals or >2 nutritional supplements per day. Category 2 included patients who consumed 50%–75% of meals or 1-2 nutritional supplements per day. Category 3 featured patients consuming <50% of meals or no nutritional supplements per day. All of these factors were assessed at the time the serum posaconazole concentration was drawn.

Descriptive statistics were utilized to assess patient characteristics. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess independence between categorical variables, while the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess differences between continuous variables.

3. Results

One-hundred and eighteen patients were included in the PCZ-susp group, while 64 patients were included in the PCZ-tab arm of the study. Most of the baseline patient characteristics were similar between the two groups (Table 1), except that more patients in the PCZ-susp group received high-dose cytarabine therapy compared to PCZ-tab group (13% versus 0%), whereas more patients in the PCZ-tab were noted to have better nutritional status.

In the PCZ-tab group 97% achieved goal serum concentrations ≥ 700 ng/ml, while only 17% reached goal concentrations in the PCZ-susp . The median in the PCZ-tab group was 1,665 (522–3,830) ng/ml versus 390 (51–1,870) ng/ml in the PCZ-susp cohort . Linear regression models (Table 2) revealed that age ≥ 60 years improved posaconazole concentrations, whereas mucositis and poor nutritional status (category 3) negatively impacted posaconazole concentrations. We also examined the influence of specific factors within each formulation (suspension or delayed-release tablet). In patients receiving PCZ-tab, those with mucositis had significantly decreased serum posaconazole concentrations compared to patients who did not have mucositis (; Figure 1). This effect was not seen in the PCZ-susp patients. Acid suppression therapy did not affect the posaconazole serum concentrations in either formulation group.

Grade ≥ 2 hepatotoxicity attributable to posaconazole was seen in 1 patient in each group. The serum posaconazole concentrations in these patients who developed hepatic dysfunction were 390 ng/ml (PCZ-susp) and 3,350 ng/ml (PCZ-tab). ECGs obtained while receiving posaconazole therapy were available for 32 and 38 patients in the PCZ-susp and PCZ-tab groups, respectively. Grade ≥ 2 prolongation occurred in 9% receiving PCZ-susp compared to 21% patients taking PCZ-tab . Dose reduction of the maintenance posaconazole from 300 mg to 200 mg daily occurred in 14 patients. An additional posaconazole concentration obtained after ≥7 days of therapy with the adjusted dose in 4 of these patients noted a median concentration of 1,820 ng/ml (range, 954–2,790).

The incidence of breakthrough fungal infections was not statistically different between the two groups, with 8 cases (3 proven, 1 probable, and 4 possible) in the PCZ-susp arm and 4 cases (1 proven, 0 probable, and 3 possible) in the PCZ-tab group . In the PCZ-susp arm, among the 3 proven cases of fungal infections, 2 were attributable to Candida glabrata (serum posaconazole concentrations 440 ng/ml and 700 ng/ml) and 1 to Alternia species (serum posaconazole concentration 341 ng/ml). In the PCZ-tab group, the proven infection was due to Scedosporium species (serum posaconazole concentration was 1,990 ng/ml).

4. Discussion

This is one of the largest studies comparing serum posaconazole concentrations with the suspension versus delayed-release tablet formulation. The rate of attainment of goal ng/ml and a higher median were both significantly greater with PCZ-tab versus PCZ-susp, with no difference in the toxicity profile. Interestingly, the presence of mucositis was associated with a statistically significant decrease in posaconazole serum concentrations in the patients receiving PCZ-tab. However, all these patients attained the goal ng/ml, thus likely negating any significant differences in clinical outcomes. No differences were noted in the incidence of hepatotoxicity or breakthrough fungal infections between groups.

The increased exposure of posaconazole tablets is thought to be a result of the tablet formulation’s improved bioavailability and absorption. The PCZ-tab is formulated with a pH-dependent polymer that prevents the dissolution of the tablet in the acidic environment of the stomach. The subsequent increase in pH in the small intestine promotes dissolution of the PCZ-tab, resulting in improved bioavailability and absorption versus the PCZ-susp. Although a higher number of patients with better nutritional intake were seen in the PCZ-tab group, this should not have a substantial effect on the tablet absorption due to its delayed-release formulation. While no significant difference in rates of prolongation was noted between the two groups, the 21% incidence of prolongation seen in PCZ-tab may have clinical ramifications in a larger cohort. Of the 8 patients with documented prolongation in the PCZ-tab group, all had ng/ml, and 50% of these patients had ng/ml. Furthermore, all 8 of these concentrations (median 2,040 ng/ml) in the PCZ-tab group were higher than any of the 3 concentrations (median 426 ng/ml) associated with clinically significant prolongation in the PCZ-susp group. In the PCZ-susp group, the QTc prolongation noted in 8% of the patients may not be related to posaconazole since the ECGs were only ordered at physician discretion as part of the work-up for cardiac symptoms, whereas more PCZ-tab patients received routine ECG monitoring. A recently published phase III study assessing pharmacokinetics and safety of PCZ-tab in high-risk patients demonstrated no increase in the rate of adverse events with higher posaconazole exposure, but the QTc assessments in this cohort remain unclear [28]. Larger, prospective studies and postmarketing reporting are necessary to assess the association of prolongation with the higher posaconazole exposure with PCZ-tab and its clinical relevance.

We did not observe any differences in the rates of breakthrough fungal infections between the two groups, although the smaller sample size may have been inadequate to detect it. Previous, larger trials have documented that posaconazole exposure above goal concentrations correlates to a reduction in breakthrough IFIs. The potential protective effects of dose reducing the PCZ-tab patients to 200 mg in patients with higher serum concentrations are undetermined. Dose reductions may have improved the tolerability and toxicity profile of the PCZ-tab group. It is reassuring to note that dose reductions in PCZ-tab group did not affect serum concentrations adversely. Considering the smaller sample size and retrospective nature of our study, this needs to be further explored in a prospective manner.

Optimal timing of serum concentration monitoring is unclear and has varied in previous studies. The most commonly used time point is serum trough concentrations. For purposes of our analysis, we chose to evaluate 4-hour concentrations in our tablet patients, to remain consistent with our previous reports of the suspension formulation [9, 15] and allow direct comparison between the two groups. Considering the long half-life of posaconazole, we do not expect to see significant variations between these time points, but there is limited data to describe this variability.

In conclusion, our study showed more consistent attainment of goal posaconazole serum concentrations and superior median with PCZ-tab compared to PCZ-susp, thus supporting the routine use of the delayed-release tablet formulation as antifungal prophylaxis for patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for AML or high-risk MDS. The tolerability, safety, and effects of dose reduction of PCZ-tab seem acceptable but should be studied in prospective trials.

Ethical Approval

This article was approved by the Investigational Review Board for West Virginia University (Protocol no. 1409428537R001).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

Sijin Wen acknowledges the support from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Grant U54GM104942.

References

O. A. Cornely, J. Maertens, D. J. Winston et al., “Posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 4, pp. 348–359, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Ullmann, J. H. Lipton, D. H. Vesole et al., “Posaconazole or fluconazole for prophylaxis in severe graft-versus-host disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 4, pp. 335–347, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Noxafil (posaconazole) [package insert], Merck and Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA, 2015.
G. Krishna, M. AbuTarif, F. Xuan, M. Martinho, D. Angulo, and O. A. Cornely, “Pharmacokinetics of oral posaconazole in neutropenic patients receiving chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome,” Pharmacotherapy, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1223–1232, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Lebeaux, F. Lanternier, C. Elie et al., “Therapeutic drug monitoring of posaconazole: a monocentric study with 54 adults,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 5224–5229, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Abutarif, G. Krishna, and P. Statkevich, “Population pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in neutropenic patients receiving chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome,” Current Medical Research and Opinion, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 397–405, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Kohl, C. Müller, O. A. Cornely et al., “Factors influencing pharmacokinetics of prophylactic posaconazole in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 207–212, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Courtney, D. Wexler, E. Radwanski, J. Lim, and M. Laughlin, “Effect of food on the relative bioavailability of two oral formulations of posaconazole in healthy adults,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 218–222, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Ross, D. Slain, A. Cumpston, A. M. Bryant, M. Hamadani, and M. Craig, “Evaluation of an alternative posaconazole prophylaxis regimen in haematological malignancy patients receiving concomitant stress ulcer prophylaxis,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 557–561, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. K. Kraft, P. S. Chang, M. L. P. S. Van Iersel, H. Waskin, G. Krishna, W. M. Kersemaekers et al., “Posaconazole tablet pharmacokinetics: lack of effect of concomitant medications altering gastric pH and gastric motility in healthy subjects,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 4020–4025, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Krishna, L. Ma, M. Martinho, and E. O'Mara, “Single-dose phase I study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in new tablet and capsule formulations relative to oral suspension,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 4196–4201, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Krishna, L. Ma, M. Martinho, R. A. Preston, and E. O'mara, “A new solid oral tablet formulation of posaconazole: a randomized clinical trial to investigate rising single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety in healthy volunteers,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 2723–2730, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
R. F. Duarte, J. López-Jiménez, O. A. Cornely et al., “Phase 1b study of new posaconazole tablet for prevention of invasive fungal infections in high-risk patients with neutropenia,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 5758–5765, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Courtney, S. Pai, M. Laughlin, J. Lim, and V. Batra, “Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of oral posaconazole administered in single and multiple doses in healthy adults,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 49, pp. 804–808, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
A. M. Bryant, D. Slain, A. Cumpston, and M. Craig, “A post-marketing evaluation of posaconazole plasma concentrations in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancy receiving posaconazole prophylaxis,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 266–269, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Eiden, J. C. Meniane, H. Peyrière et al., “Therapeutic drug monitoring of posaconazole in hematology adults under posaconazole prophylaxis: influence of food intake,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 161–167, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hoenigl, R. B. Raggam, H. J. F. Salzer et al., “Posaconazole plasma concentrations and invasive mould infections in patients with haematological malignancies,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 510–513, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Cattaneo, A. Panzali, A. Passi et al., “Serum posaconazole levels during acute myeloid leukaemia induction therapy: correlations with breakthrough invasive fungal infections,” Mycoses, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 362–367, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Dolton, J. E. Ray, S. C. Chen, K. Ng, L. Pont, and A. J. McLachlan, “Multicenter study of posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring: exposure-response relationship and factors affecting concentration,” Antimicrobial Agents Chemotherapy, vol. 50, pp. 1993–1999, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
H. R. Ashbee, R. A. Barnes, E. M. Johnson, M. D. Richardson, R. Gorton, and W. W. Hope, “Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal agents: guidelines from the british society for medical mycology,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 1162–1176, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Cumpston, R. Caddell, A. Shillingburg et al., “Superior serum concentrations with posaconazole delayed-release tablets compared to suspension formulation in hematological malignancies,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 4424–4428, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Jung, F. P. Tverdek, and D. P. Kontoyiannis, “Switching from posaconazole suspension to tablets increases serum drug levels in leukemia patients without clinically relevant hepatotoxicity,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 6993–6995, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. N. Pham, J. S. Bubalo, and J. S. Lewis, “Comparison of posaconazole serum concentrations from haematological cancer patients on posaconazole tablet and oral suspension for treatment and prevention of invasive fungal infections,” Mycoses, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 226–233, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Durani, P. K. Tosh, J. N. Barreto, L. L. Estes, P. J. Jannetto, and A. J. Tande, “Retrospective comparison of posaconazole levels in patients taking the delayed-release tablet versus the oral suspension,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 4914–4918, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
National Cancer Institute, Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), version 4.03, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, MD, USA, 2010.
B. De Pauw, T. J. Walsh, J. P. Donnelly, D. A. Stevens, J. E. Edwards, T. Calandra et al., “Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 46, pp. 1813–1821, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
M. H. Miceli, A. J. Perissinotti, C. A. Kauffman, and D. R. Couriel, “Serum posaconazole levels among haematological cancer patients taking extended release tablets is affected by body weight and diarrhoea: Single centre retrospective analysis,” Mycoses, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 432–436, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. A. Cornely, R. F. Duarte, S. Haider et al., “Phase 3 pharmacokinetics and safety study of a posaconazole tablet formulation in patients at risk for invasive fungal disease,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 718–726, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2017 Morgan Belling et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1719

Downloads

254

Citations