- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Molecular Biology International
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 373241, 4 pages
Tissue-Specific Expression of the Chicken Calpain2 Gene
1Institute of Poultry Sciences, Sichuan Animal Science Academy, Chengdu, Sichuan 610066, China
2Breeding Center, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan 625014, China
3Sichuan Dahen Poultry Breeding Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610066, China
Received 18 January 2010; Revised 21 June 2010; Accepted 30 June 2010
Academic Editor: Emanuel E. Strehler
Copyright © 2010 Zeng-Rong Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We quantified chicken calpain 2 (CAPN2) expression in two Chinese chicken breeds (mountainous black-bone chicken breed [MB] and a commercial meat type chicken breed [S01]) to discern the tissue and ontogenic expression pattern and its effect on muscle metabolism. Real-time quantitative PCR assay was developed for accurate measurement of the CAPN2 mRNA expression in various tissues from chickens of different ages (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks). Results showed that the breast muscle and leg muscle tissues had the highest expression of CAPN2 compared to the other tissues from the same individual (). Overall, the CAPN2 mRNA level exhibited a “rise” developmental change in all tissues. The S01 chicken had a higher expression of the CAPN2 mRNA in all tissues than the MB chicken. Our results suggest that chicken CAPN2 expression may be related to chicken breeds and tissues.
Nowadays a highlighted issue for an increasing number of consumers is the problem of meat tenderness, as the result of its physicochemical and biochemical mechanisms acting mainly on myofibrillar structures postmortem. Calpains play an important role in degradation of muscle protein. Because calpastatin inhibits both calpain1 and calpain2, it remains unclear whether one or both calpains are active in postmortem muscle. Most of the studies that have used appropriate methodology  have found the same effect of postmortem storage on the activity of the components of the calpain system [2–4]. This conclusion seems to be based on the finding that calpain2 is not autolyzed during postmortem storage [5, 6]. But some studies also have now suggested that both unautolyzed calpain1 and calpain2 are proteolytically active [7, 8].
The lack of expression data of the calpain2 gene in chicken makes it difficult to verify the role of calpain2 in control of meat quality and carcass traits. In this study, we aimed to (1) develop a convenient approach to quantify the abundance of the calpain2 transcripts in chicken tissues and (2) determine tissue distribution and ontogenic expression of this gene, particularly in muscle tissues.
2. Materials and Methods
Thirty-six chickens at different ages from two breeds/populations, Mountainous black-bone chicken (MB) and a commercial chicken (S01) from Sichuan province, were used in this study. All populations were raised under the same condition and were randomly selected. Tissue samples (including heart, liver, breast muscle, leg muscle, brain, and abdominal fat) from MB chickens were collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 w, respectively; we slaughtered four chickens at each time point. We also collected tissue samples from six S01 chickens at 10 w and six MB chickens at 12 w. Tissue samples were quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at C for total RNA extraction.
2.2. RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis
Total RNA was isolated from the heart, liver, brain, breast muscle, and leg muscle tissues by using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). The quality of RNA was determined by the absorbance ratio (1.6–1.8) and the integrity of the 18S and 28S rRNA bands on 1% formaldehyde agarose gel. Isolated RNAs were treated with DNase (Fermentas) for 20 minutes at C and stored at C. The cDNA was synthesized using the ImProm-II Reverse Transcription System (TaKARa) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reaction was performed in a volume of containing 5PrimerScript Buffer, 10 mM of each dNTPs, 40 U/L RNase Inhibitor, and 2.5 M oligo-dT Primer. The reverse transcription was maintained at C for 10 minutes, C for 25 minutes, C for 5 minutes, and ended with a C for 5 minutes, then stored at C.
2.3. Real-Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) Assay for the CAPN2 Gene
According to the chicken CAPN2 mRNA sequence in GenBank (accession number NM_205080.1), a pair of primers were designed by using Oligo 6.0 (Table ). The expression levels of chicken CAPN2 gene were detected by using the SYBR Green I assay on an IQ5 real-time PCR thermal cycle instrument (Bio-Rad, German) and were normalized to the expression of the -actin gene (ACTB; GenBank Accession No. AF047874). Relative transcript quantification was performed using standard curves generated for the ACTB and CAPN2 genes based on a 7-fold serial dilution of the pooled cDNA product prepared from a subset of the gastrocnemius samples. The cycling conditions consisted of an initial single cycle of C for 3 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of 15 s at C and 1 minute at C. Reactions were performed in a volume of 25 L and included 2.0 L cDNA template, 1.0 L of each specific primer (Table ), 12.5 L SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (TaKaRa, Japan), 1.0 L calibration liquid (BIO-RAD), 7.5 L PCR-grade water, and 1.0 L cDNA. All real-time quantitative PCR amplifications were performed in triplicate for each sample and were analyzed using the method previously described.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Expression data were described as (least square mean standard error) and were analyzed using the SAS 8.0 for Windows Software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). The expression levels of the CAPN2 gene between the tissue and age-related samples of the same breed and those samples from the two breeds with the same age were analyzed by the one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-test, respectively. value .05 was considered as statistically significant.
3.1. Validation of the RT-qPCR Assays for the CAPN2 Gene
Relative mRNA quantification was performed using standard curves generated for the ACTB and CAPN2 genes based on a serial dilution of cDNA. In the current assay, the amplification efficiency of the ACTB and CAPN2 genes were 91.9% and 92.60%, respectively, which were approximately within the expected theoretical values.
3.2. Tissue Distribution of the CAPN2 mRNA
Quantitative PCR analysis showed that the CAPN2 gene was expressed in all six MB chicken tissues. The CAPN2 gene transcript had the highest expression level in breast muscle and leg muscle whereas it had the lowest expression level in liver tissue. The mRNA levels of the CAPN2 gene in breast muscle and leg muscle were higher than those in other tissues from the same chicken () except at 10 w (Table 2).
3.3. Ontogenic Expression of the CAPN2 mRNA
We analyzed the developmental changes of the CAPN2 mRNA expression for each tissue in MB chickens with different ages. As shown in Figure 1, the CAPN2 mRNA in breast muscle had the highest expression at 6 w and the lowest expression at birth. In leg muscle tissue, the highest expression of the CAPN2 gene was at 12 w and the lowest expression at birth. Overall, the CAPN2 mRNA levels exhibited a rise developmental change in all tissue.
3.4. Comparison of the CAPN2 Gene Expression between the MB and S01 Chickens
To characterize whether the expression of the CAPN2 gene had a breed-specific feature, we analyzed the expression levels of this gene in two chicken breeds. Figure 2 presents the expression pattern of the CAPN2 mRNA in the MB and S01 chickens at 10 w. The meat-type S01 chicken had a higher expression of the CAPN2 gene than that of MB chicken in all tissues.
Although previous studies on calpain protease activity indicate that the 2 calpains, calpain1 and calpain2, have an important role in the postmortem proteolysis that increases meat tenderness, it remains unclear how the calpains function in postmortem muscle.
In birds, and in particular the chicken breast muscle, the role of postmortem proteolysis is poorly documented, and the few studies performed did not take into account the particularities of the calcium-dependent proteases in these species [9–12].
In this study, we quantified the chicken CAPN2 gene tissue distribution and ontogenic expression. The CAPN2 mRNA was expressed in all six different tissues studied in the current study, with a dominant expression in breast muscle and leg muscle tissues. The overall pattern of the CAPN2 expression in breast muscle was different from that of leg muscle. It is well known that the breast muscle of chicken is made of white fast oxidative glycolytic fibers that whereas the leg muscle has slow oxidative red aerobic fibers . We also found the relative expression level of the CAPN2 mRNA in the S01 chicken was higher than that in the MB chicken. Investigation of the role of the calpain 2 and its muscle protein substrates in these two chicken breeds may further explain the observed variation in meat tenderness. These results are necessary for knowing the effects of CAPN2 on the regulation of muscle protein metabolism and for defining the biological significance of degradation of the myofibrillar proteins in chicken, as well as potential applications in marker-assisted selection in chicken breeding. Regarding to experiment error, the CAPN2 mRNA quantification data was reliable.
In conclusion, we have developed a highly sensitive real-time PCR method to detect tissue distribution and ontogenic expression of the CAPN2 mRNA in chicken. We found that the CAPN2 expression may be related with tissue in chicken. Future studies will be essential to determine the biochemical character of the muscles from the two chicken breeds and to discern the factors that contribute to differences in their meat quality, as well as to define the role of the calpain 2.
This study was supported by the eleventh five-year program on animal breeding of Sichuan Province (2006YZGG-19, 25), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-10-0889), and the science fund for young scholars in Sichuan Province (Grant no. ZQ 026-017).
- E. Veiseth and M. Koohmaraie, “Effect of extraction buffer on estimating calpain and calpastatin activity in postmortem ovine muscle,” Meat Science, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 325–329, 2001.
- A. Ducastaing, C. Valin, J. Schollmeyer, and R. Cross, “Effects of electrical stimulation on post-mortem changes in the activities of two Ca2+ -dependent neutral proteinases and their inhibitor in beef muscle,” Meat Science, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 193–202, 1985.
- M. Koohmaraie, S. D. Shackelford, N. E. Muggli-Cockett, and R. T. Stone, “Effect of the beta-adrenergic agonist L644,969 on muscle growth, endogenous proteinase activities, and postmortem proteolysis in wether lambs,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 4823–4835, 1991.
- P. Vidalenc, P. Cottin, N. Merdaci, and A. Ducastaing, “Stability of two Ca2+-dependent neutral proteinases and their specific inhibitor during post-mortem storage of rabbit skeletal muscle,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1241–1250, 1983.
- M. L. Boehm, T. L. Kendall, V. F. Thompson, and D. E. Goll, “Changes in the calpains and calpastatin during postmortem storage of bovine muscle,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 76, no. 9, pp. 2415–2434, 1998.
- E. Veiseth, S. D. Shackelford, T. L. Wheeler, and M. Koohmaraie, “Effect of postmortem storage on μ-calpain and m-calpain in ovine skeletal muscle,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 1502–1508, 2001.
- P. Cottin, V. F. Thompson, S. K. Sathe, A. Szpacenko, and D. E. Goll, “Autolysis of υ- and m-calpain from bovine skeletal muscle,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 382, no. 5, pp. 767–776, 2001.
- D. E. Goll, V. F. Thompson, H. Li, W. Wei, and J. Cong, “The calpain system,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 731–801, 2003.
- S. R. McKee, E. M. Hirschler, and A. R. Sams, “Physical and biochemical effects of broiler breast tenderization by aging after pre-rigor deboning,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 959–962, 1997.
- Nurmahmudi and A. R. Sams, “Tenderizing spent fowl meat with calcium chloride. 3. Biochemical characteristics of tenderized breast meat,” Poultry Science, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 543–547, 1997.
- F. Obanor, J. D. Morton, G. H. Geesink, and R. Bickerstaffe, “Effect of processing on turkey meat quality and proteolysis,” Poultry Science, vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 1123–1128, 2005.
- G. I. Veeramuthu and A. R. Sams, “Postmortem pH, myofibrillar fragmentation, and calpain activity in Pectoralis from electrically stimulated and muscle tensioned broiler carcasses,” Poultry Science, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 272–276, 1999.