Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Macrophage-Mediated Inflammatory Disorders

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 391984 |

Yuki Murakami, Masato Hoshi, Yukio Imamura, Yuko Arioka, Yasuko Yamamoto, Kuniaki Saito, "Remarkable Role of Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase and Tryptophan Metabolites in Infectious Diseases: Potential Role in Macrophage-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases", Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2013, Article ID 391984, 9 pages, 2013.

Remarkable Role of Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase and Tryptophan Metabolites in Infectious Diseases: Potential Role in Macrophage-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases

Academic Editor: Chiou-Feng Lin
Received12 Oct 2012
Revised28 Dec 2012
Accepted03 Jan 2013
Published18 Feb 2013


Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), the L-tryptophan-degrading enzyme, plays a key role in the immunomodulatory effects on several types of immune cells. Originally known for its regulatory function during pregnancy and chronic inflammation in tumorigenesis, the activity of IDO1 seems to modify the inflammatory state of infectious diseases. The pathophysiologic activity of L-tryptophan metabolites, kynurenines, is well recognized. Therefore, an understanding of the regulation of IDO1 and the subsequent biochemical reactions is essential for the design of therapeutic strategies in certain immune diseases. In this paper, current knowledge about the role of IDO1 and its metabolites during various infectious diseases is presented. Particularly, the regulation of type I interferons (IFNs) production via IDO1 in virus infection is discussed. This paper offers insights into new therapeutic strategies in the modulation of viral infection and several immune-related disorders.

1. Introduction

Inflammation is the physiological response of the body to harmful stimuli, such as injury, pathogens, damaged cells, or irritants. Inflammatory response can be either acute or chronic, which leads to pathology. The major function of innate immune cells is identification and recognition of the injurious and/or foreign substances causing the defense response. Macrophages are actively involved in all phases of inflammation, and their role as effector and regulatory cells is now widely recognized. Another interesting and important role of macrophages is their high level of specialization and tissue specificity. While all tissue-bound macrophages differentiate from circulating monocytes, they acquire distinct characteristics and functions locally due to their response profiles. One of the major factors for this diversity is the complexity of microbial load as well as tissue architecture. Thus, it is not a surprise that some of the most sophisticated interactions between the host and parasites also dictate the most evolved phenotypic characteristics of the macrophage.

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) has been identified as an enzyme endowed with powerful immunomodulatory effects, resulting from its enzymatic activity that leads to catabolism of the essential amino acid L-tryptophan (L-TRP) [1, 2]. This enzyme is expressed in epithelial cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs) induced by proinflammatory cytokines [35]. The initial observation suggesting the immunoregulatory role of IDO1 dates back to the finding that its inhibition by 1-methyl-DL-tryptophan (1-MT) during pregnancy would cause rejection of semiallogeneic, but not syngeneic, fetuses in mice [6]. A second observation expanding upon that initial finding was that IDO1 mediates a bidirectional flow of information between cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-associated-antigen-4- (CTLA-4-) expressing T cells and accessory cells of the immune system; IDO1 activation in antigen-presenting cells (APCs) by CTLA-4 ligation of CD80/CD86 “counterreceptors” on those cells represents an important effector pathway for regulatory T (Treg) cells, to induce and maintain peripheral tolerance [7, 8]. Third, it was later found that, in T cells, the general control nonderepressing-2 (GCN2) protein kinase, with a putative binding site for free acyl-transfer RNAs (tRNAs), acts as a molecular sensor for intracellular TRP, participating in the integrated stress response (ISR) pathway, which controls cell growth and differentiation [9]. Finally, IDO1 was found to possess signaling activity in DCs, which are stably turned into regulatory DCs by its activation. Thus, IDO1 may contribute to long-term immune homeostasis and immune-related functions not only in pregnancy, but also in infectious, allergic, autoimmune, and chronic inflammatory diseases, as well as in transplantation and immune-escaping tumoral mechanisms [7, 1012]. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current knowledge about the physiological role of IDO1 following certain immune-related disorders. Further, new therapeutic targets via regulation of IDO1 are discussed against macrophage-related inflammatory diseases.

2. Tryptophan and Its Degradation Pathways

TRP is an essential starting point of two biochemical pathways: (1) the enzyme tryptophan 5-hydroxylase converts TRP into 5-hydroxytryptophan, which is subsequently decarboxylated to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin), an essential neurotransmitter, and (2) two atoms of oxygen are inserted into TRP to form N-formylkynurenine, the first and rate-limiting step in the kynurenine (KYN) pathway (Figure 1). It is estimated that only 1% of dietary TRP can be converted into 5-HT [13]. The remaining 99% of TRP is metabolized via the KYN pathway. TRP is catalyzed by three different enzymes: tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO), IDO1, and IDO2. While the expression and function of IDO2 have been well explored in the mouse model, there is a lack of knowledge about its expression and functional significance in human tissue. Human IDO1 and IDO2 seem to have different kinetic parameters and inhibition profiles. The Km for L-TRP of human IDO2 protein is approximately 500–1000-fold higher than that of mammalian IDO1 enzymes [14], and IDO2 is especially inhibited by 1-methyl-D-tryptophan (1-D-MT) [15, 16]. In contrast to both IDOs, TDO is a highly substrate-specific dioxygenase and deoxygenates only L-TRP and some TRP derivatives. The expression of TDO is normally restricted to mammalian liver cells where it is believed to regulate systemic TRP concentrations [17]. Although TDO has been identified in the brain and epididymis of some species recently [18], it has been found that TDO is expressed in human malignant glioma cells of the brain [19]. On the other hand, IDO1 is expressed in a broad variety of mammalian cells related to immune function, such as activated macrophages and DCs. IDO1 is induced by proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis-α (TNF-α) and IFN-γ [20]. The enzymatic activity of IDO1 is restricted to specific tissues, including lungs, cecum, colon, and epididymis [21]. In addition, Takikawa et al. found that immune activation, such as an endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection, could induce IDO1 enzyme activity only in specific tissue; however, this local induction of TRP metabolism resulted in a threefold increase in KYN concentrations in serum [22]. Thus, these findings have suggested that TRP metabolism can be initiated in local tissues, whereas KYN may diffuse into the bloodstream. Therefore, increased KYN concentration in the serum can indicate increased TRP metabolism taking place in a specific tissue. While TDO and IDO1 alter local and systemic TRP concentrations and initiate the production of neuroactive and immunoregulatory TRP metabolites; the known immunologic function of TRP degradation is largely dependent on IDO1. In addition, the biological function of IDO2 is still unclear and needs clarification. Therefore, in this paper, we describe IDO1 and immune regulation, unless specifically noted.

IDO1 is induced by IFN-γ-mediated effects of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1α (STAT1α) and interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1). The IDO1 gene has two interferon-stimulated response elements (ISREs) and IFN-γ-activated site (GAS) element sequences in the 5′-flanking region [2325]. IDO1 induction is also mediated by an IFN-γ-independent mechanism under certain circumstances [2628]. Fujigaki et al. demonstrated that IDO1 induction by LPS is not mediated by STAT1α or IRF-1 binding activities that induce IDO1 transcriptional activity by IFN-γ in many cells [28]. LPS stimulation of human monocytes and macrophages activates several intracellular signaling pathways, including the IkappaB kinase-nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways. These pathways, in turn, activate a variety of transcription factors that include NF-κB and activator protein-1 (AP-1). A part of the induction of IDO1 by LPS is mediated by a signal from NF-κB or p38-MAPK pathways. A homology search of the 5′-flanking region of the IDO1 gene shows consensus sequences for transcriptional factors such as AP-1, NF-κB, and NF-IL-6, which are activated by LPS and other proinflammatory cytokines: TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β. Therefore, the IDO1 gene could be upregulated by LPS or these cytokines in a synergistic manner.

Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of proteins perform crucial roles in the biological regulation of cells. PTMs provide a dynamic mechanism for regulating protein function and potentially change physical or chemical properties, activity, localization, or stability of proteins [29, 30]. Our group demonstrated for the first time that IDO1 activity is regulated by PTMs [31]. Peroxynitrite, a nitric-oxide- (NO-) derived reactive species, inhibits IDO1 activity via the nitration of tyrosine residues in IDO1 protein. This inhibition occurs at the posttranslational level because peroxynitrite inhibits IDO1 enzyme activity without affecting the expression level of the IDO1 protein. Activated macrophages can simultaneously generate large fluxes of NO and superoxide anions [32, 33], which rapidly combine to produce the far more reactive peroxynitrite anions. Peroxynitrite is considered to be produced by inflammatory cells to defend against infectious pathogens, such as parasites, viruses, and bacteria [3436]. Thus, an understanding of protein nitration and PTMs on IDO1 will provide insight into the pathogenic mechanisms of inflammatory diseases related to macrophages and into novel therapeutic strategies for limiting tissue inflammatory injury.

4. Immune Regulation by IDO1

IDO1 was first isolated from rabbit intestine in 1967 [37], and it became rapidly clear that its induction serves the mechanism of antimicrobial resistance. Infection by bacteria, parasites, or viruses induces a strong IFN-γ-dependent inflammatory response. IFN-γ-induced IDO1 degrades TRP, and the depletion of TRP results in the regulation of intracellular pathogens [3842]. On the other hand, Munn et al. provided evidence for a much broader immunoregulatory significance of TRP degradation by IDO1. They demonstrated that tolerance to allogeneic fetuses is regulated by IDO1-expressing cells in the mice placenta [1]. They and others also showed that a marked increase in IDO1 suppresses immune responses by locally depleting TRP and hence preventing T-lymphocyte proliferation using the IDO1 inhibitor, 1-MT [4345]. These previous studies clearly showed that TRP degradation by IDO1 substantially contributes to immunoregulation, and therefore IDO1 has been considered as a strong immunoregulatory factor.

As shown in Figure 2, IDO1 is predominantly expressed in APCs of the immune system—the DCs, the monocytes, and the macrophages (Figure 2(a)) [46, 47]. IDO1 can be introduced by soluble cytokines such as IFN-γ, type I IFNs, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), TNF-α, or Toll-like receptors (TLRs) ligands such as LPS [27]. In addition, KYN and 3-hydroxykynurenine (3-HK) could be also involved in exacerbation of TRP starvation in T cells. Kaper et al. have proposed the existence of a positive feedback between IDO1-mediated TRP metabolism in DCs and KYN-induced TRP depletion in CD98-expressing T cells [48]. CD98 is expressed on astrocytes and activated T cells. T cells are sensitive to low levels of TRP and TRP metabolites in vitro. TRP deficiency specifically activates the GCN2 kinase in murine and human T cells, which leads to a halt in the G2 phase of T-cell division and T-cell suppression (Figure 2(b)) [49]. Moreover, a specific combination of TRP metabolites can inhibit anti-CD3 antibody-induced T-cell proliferation and induce T-cell apoptosis in vitro [50, 51]. The combination of low TRP concentrations and specific TRP metabolites leads to the generation of Tregs from naïve T cells in vitro [52, 53]. Tregs inhibit the activation, differentiation, and survival of effector T cells through the induction of IDO1 in APCs by ligation of inhibitory ligands and cytokines from Tregs [54].

It is possibly the selective pressure by Tregs that drove the evolution of the IDO1 mechanism from one operating in innate and inflammatory responses to pathogens [55, 56] to an effector mechanism of Treg function [57, 58]. Functional plasticity in DCs allows these cells to present antigens in an immunogenic or tolerogenic fashion, largely contingent on environmental factors [59]. Costimulatory and coinhibitory interactions between DCs and T cells are pivotal in tipping the balance between immunity and tolerance in favor of either outcome. When CD80/CD86 molecules on DCs were engaged to T cells, CTLA-4 (widely expressed by Tregs) was later shown to behave as an activating ligand for CD80/CD86 receptors, resulting in intracellular signaling events. Through an unidentified signal cascade, DCs release type I and type II IFNs that act in an autocrine and paracrine fashion to induce strong IDO1 expression and function [60]. KYN-dependent T-cell differentiation would contribute to expand the pool of Tregs [8]. However, in the long-term control of immune homeostasis and tolerance to self, IDO1 relies on different regulatory stimuli and cytokines, providing a basal function amenable to regulation by abrupt environmental changes (Figure 3) [61].

In a TGF-β-dominated environment and in the absence of IL-6, IDO1 activates a variety of downstream signaling effectors that sustain TGF-β production, production of type I IFNs, and a bias of plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) toward a regulatory phenotype [62, 63]. IDO1 enhances its own expression and stably tips the balance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory NF-κB activation.

5. Pathophysiologic Significance of Kynurenine Pathway Metabolites

IDO1-expressed DCs are able to lower TRP concentration, increase KYN concentration, and suppress the allogeneic T-cell response [50]. The TRP metabolites KYN, 3-HK, and 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid (3-HAA) inhibit T-cell proliferation by a time-dependent cytotoxic action, an effect which concerns mainly not only the activated T cells, but also B and natural killer (NK) cells. It has also been reported that KYN was able to reduce proliferation of human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) in vitro [64]. The cytotoxic action of 3-HK can be attributed to the production of hydrogen peroxides which results in the damaging action of free hydroxyl radical [65]. As with KYN, when 3-HK was administrated exogenously, it effectively reduced symptoms in allergic inflammation [66]. The toxic action of 3-HAA is more complex. Although the final effect of 3-HAA results in the cell death of T cells, thymocytes [51] and monocyte-derived macrophages [67], the mechanisms involved in the cell death, might depend on the cell type. The formation of cytotoxic-free hydroxyl radical may be involved in 3-HAA-induced cell death in monocyte-derived macrophages [67]. L-KYN is considered to be the end product of KYN pathway metabolism in most extrahepatic cells, whereas macrophages produce the largest amount of quinolinic acid (QUIN) in accordance with the highest activities of kynurenine 3-monooxygenase (KMO) and kynureninase [4, 68]. In fact, Heyes et al. showed that macrophages stimulated with IFN-γ may be an important source of accelerated TRP conversion into KYN metabolites in inflammatory diseases [69]. Further, they showed that increased activities of KYN pathway enzymes, including IDO1 and KMO following systemic immune stimulation and HIV infection, in conjunction with macrophage infiltration, resulted in acceleration of the local formation of KYN metabolites, especially QUIN [21, 70]. Therefore, KMO is considered as a secondary regulatory enzyme for the KYN pathway, and macrophages, including monocytes, play a key role in the production of KYN metabolites.

6. Type I IFNs Production and IDO1

IDO1 activities in various tissues are induced by several cytokines after viral infection. However, the role of IDO1 in vivo after parasitic or viral infection is not fully understood. Recently, our group demonstrated that inhibition of increased IDO1 activity attenuates Toxoplasma gondii replication in the lung, and the inflammatory damage is significantly decreased by the administration of the IDO1 inhibitor after infection [71]. Some in vitro studies indicated that IFN-γ-induced antitoxoplasma activities are involved in IDO1-dependent mechanisms. These in vitro studies showed that IFN-γ-induced IDO1 degraded TRP in the culture medium, and the depletion of TRP resulted in the suppression of the growth of the parasites [39]. However, our experiments and the most recent study demonstrated that IDO1 ablation reduced local inflammation and parasite burdens, as did pharmacological inhibition of IDO1 in vivo [72]. Although IDO1 is certainly not the only regulator that plays a role as an antimicrobial, these studies show that the lack of the IDO1 gene or the inhibition of increased IDO1 activity suppressed the parasites’ replication in vivo and that TRP degradation and KYNs production are not the only mechanisms of host resistance to early infection with these parasites. On the other hand, Hoshi et al. investigated the role of IDO1 in chronic viral infection diseases in mice infected with LP-BM5 murine leukemia virus (MuLV), including both replication-competent and replication-defective viruses, which resulted in the development of a fatal immunodeficiency syndrome in mice, known as murine AIDS [73]. Murine AIDS is characterized by activation and proliferation of T and B cells, impaired T- and B-cell function, an aberrant regulation of cytokine production, hypergammaglobulinemia, decreased NK cell function, the development of B-cell lymphoma, and the susceptibility to opportunistic infections [74]. Hoshi et al. used IDO1 gene-deficient (IDO1 K.O.) mice and IDO inhibitor to examine whether IDO1 is an important factor for immune regulation against LP-BM5 infection and especially whether the presence of IDO1 is necessary for the induction of cytokines and IDO1-related molecules, which are important for viral clearance. Remarkably, they demonstrated that absence of IDO1 upregulated type I IFNs and downregulated virus replication in IDO1 K.O. mice with LP-BM5 infection [73]. Their finding is the first piece of evidence that the absence of IDO1 is involved in the clearance of murine retroviral infection via upregulated type I IFNs (Figure 4). Further, they also recently examined the roles of IDO1 in immune regulation in encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) infection by using IDO1 K.O. mice or the IDO inhibitor, 1-MT. EMCV, a member of the Picornaviridae family which includes the Enterovirus genus, can cause acute myocarditis in various animals. EMCV infection in mice is an established model for viral myocarditis, dilated cardiomyopathy, and congestive heart failure [75]. They demonstrated that type I IFNs are upregulated, resulting in suppressed EMCV replication by IDO1 knockdown or inhibition [76]. They also found that treatment of IDO1 K.O. mice with KYN metabolites eliminated the effects of IDO1 knockdown on the improved survival rates. These results suggested that KYN metabolites regulate the production of type I IFNs by decreasing the number of macrophages. Viruses initially activate the innate immune system, which recognizes viral components through pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs). Currently, three classes of PRRs have been shown to be involved in the recognition of virus-specific components in innate immune cells, which are TLRs, retinoic-acid-inducible-gene-I- (RIG-I-) like receptors (RLRs), and nucleotide-oligomerization-domain- (NOD-) like receptors (NLRs). Of these, TLRs and RLRs are especially important for the production of type I IFNs and various cytokines [77]. Therefore, these reports suggest that the enhancement of TRP breakdown by IDO1 regulates several signal pathways, which is related to IFNs production. TRP metabolites might contribute to the function of IFNs producing cells, like macrophages and DCs. The role of IDO1 may be complex; it may depend on the difference of disease stages (acute/chronic disease) and/or the stimulus pathogens. Kumagai et al. showed that lung infection with Newcastle disease virus (NDV) led to type I IFN, IFN-α production in alveolar macrophages, and conventional DCs (cDCs), but not in pDCs [78]. Specific depletion of macrophages caused a marked defect in initial viral elimination in the lung, and pDCs produced type I IFNs in the absence of macrophage-mediated viral recognition. These results suggest that pDCs work as immune regulators when the first defense line by macrophages is broken. Macrophages are important for the initial response to viral infection in the lung. Besides, a subpopulation of CD19+ pDCs produces high levels of the TRP-catabolizing enzyme IDO1 [44]. Production of IDO1 by pDC has been linked directly to activation of naturally occurring Foxp3+ Treg through modulation of the GCN2 pathway, which leads to inhibition of protein synthesis and Treg activation [63]. IDO1 plays a dual regulatory role by preventing conversion of these Tregs into proinflammatory Th17 cells through autocrine inhibition of IL-6 production via upregulation of GCN2 in pDC [79] and inhibited production of type I IFN and IFN-α, which may limit their ability for activating innate and adaptive antitumor immunity [80]. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is also reported in regulating type I IFNs production by pDCs [81]. Additionally, TRP breakdown by IDO1 may regulate mTOR inhibition pathway [82]. Therefore, the degradation of local TRP and increased TRP metabolites by activated IDO1 may stimulate several signal pathways and induce cell death, resulting in the inhibition of IFNs production.

7. Conclusions

IDO1 is not only pivotal in limiting potentially exaggerated inflammatory reactions in response to danger signals and in assisting the effector functions of Treg cells, but also an important component of the regulatory system that presides over long-term control of immune homeostasis. On the other hand, TRP metabolism via KYN pathway is a good example of how metabolism of small molecules can impact the immune system. Therefore, induction of the KYN pathway and/or controlling the systemic TRP concentrations by stimulation of immune cells or by diet might be an effective strategy for treatment of virus infection and immune diseases. In addition, understanding the subsequent steps on the KYN pathway and the physiological mechanisms responsible for regulation of KYN and concentration of its metabolites in biological fluids may be important for development of drugs in the future. We believe that further findings on the mechanism of immune regulation by IDO1 and TRP metabolites might contribute to the implementation of a novel therapy protocol, which would target several immune disorders.


  1. D. H. Munn, E. Shafizadeh, J. T. Attwood, I. Bondarev, A. Pashine, and A. L. Mellor, “Inhibition of T cell proliferation by macrophage tryptophan catabolism,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 189, no. 9, pp. 1363–1372, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. L. Mellor and D. H. Munn, “Tryptophan catabolism and T-cell tolerance: immunosuppression by starvation?” Immunology Today, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 469–473, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. A. Ibana, R. J. Belland, A. H. Zea et al., “Inhibition of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity by levo-1-methyl tryptophan blocks gamma interferon-induced Chlamydia trachomatis persistence in human epithelial cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 4425–4437, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  4. M. P. Heyes, C. Y. Chen, E. O. Major, and K. Saito, “Different kynurenine pathway enzymes limit quinolinic acid formation by various human cell types,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 326, part 2, pp. 351–356, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  5. G. I. Byrne, L. K. Lehmann, and G. J. Landry, “Induction of tryptophan catabolism is the mechanism for gamma-interferon-mediated inhibition of intracellular Chlamydia psittaci replication in T24 cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 347–351, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  6. D. H. Munn, M. Zhou, J. T. Attwood et al., “Prevention of allogeneic fetal rejection by tryptophan catabolism,” Science, vol. 281, no. 5380, pp. 1191–1193, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  7. A. L. Mellor and D. H. Munn, “IDO expression by dendritic cells: tolerance and tryptophan catabolism,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 762–774, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. Puccetti and U. Grohmann, “IDO and regulatory T cells: a role for reverse signalling and non-canonical NF-κB activation,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 817–823, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. P. Cobbold, E. Adams, C. A. Farquhar et al., “Infectious tolerance via the consumption of essential amino acids and mTOR signaling,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 29, pp. 12055–12060, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Lotfi, J. Eisenbacher, G. Solgi et al., “Human mesenchymal stem cells respond to native but not oxidized damage associated molecular pattern molecules from necrotic (tumor) material,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 2021–2028, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. U. Grohmann, F. Fallarino, and P. Puccetti, “Tolerance, DCs and tryptophan: much ado about IDO,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 242–248, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. B. Katz, A. J. Muller, and G. C. Prendergast, “Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in T-cell tolerance and tumoral immune escape,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 222, no. 1, pp. 206–221, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Russo, I. P. Kema, M. R. Fokkema et al., “Tryptophan as a link between psychopathology and somatic states,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 665–671, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  14. H. J. Yuasa, M. Takubo, A. Takahashi, T. Hasegawa, H. Noma, and T. Suzuki, “Evolution of vertebrate indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenases,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 705–714, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. Meininger, L. Zalameda, Y. Liu et al., “Purification and kinetic characterization of human indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenases 1 and 2 (IDO1 and IDO2) and discovery of selective IDO1 inhibitors,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1814, no. 12, pp. 1947–1954, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  16. H. J. Ball, H. J. Yuasa, C. J. D. Austin, S. Weiser, and N. H. Hunt, “Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-2; a new enzyme in the kynurenine pathway,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 467–471, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Löb, A. Königsrainer, H. G. Rammensee, G. Opelz, and P. Terness, “Inhibitors of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase for cancer therapy: can we see the wood for the trees?” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 445–452, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  18. R. Haber, D. Bessette, B. Hulihan-Giblin, M. J. Durcan, and D. Goldman, “Identification of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase RNA in rodent brain,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1159–1162, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  19. C. A. Opitz, U. M. Litzenburger, F. Sahm et al., “An endogenous tumour-promoting ligand of the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor,” Nature, vol. 478, no. 7368, pp. 197–203, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  20. C. M. Robinson, P. T. Hale, and J. M. Carlin, “The role of IFN-γ and TNF-α-responsive regulatory elements in the synergistic induction of indoleamine dioxygenase,” Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 20–30, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  21. K. Saito, J. S. Crowley, S. P. Markey, and M. P. Heyes, “A mechanism for increased quinolinic acid formation following acute systemic immune stimulation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, no. 21, pp. 15496–15503, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  22. O. Takikawa, R. Yoshida, R. Kido, and O. Hayaishi, “Tryptophan degradation in mice initiated by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 261, no. 8, pp. 3648–3653, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  23. H. H. Hassanain, S. Y. Chon, and S. L. Gupta, “Differential regulation of human indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase gene expression by interferons-γ and -α. analysis of the regulatory region of the gene and identification of an interferon-γ-inducible DNA-binding factor,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, no. 7, pp. 5077–5084, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  24. S. Y. Chon, H. H. Hassanain, R. Pine, and S. L. Gupta, “Involvement of two regulatory elements in interferon-γ-regulated expression of human indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase gene,” Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 517–526, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  25. K. V. Konan and M. W. Taylor, “Importance of the two interferon-stimulated response element (ISRE) sequences in the regulation of the human indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase gene,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 32, pp. 19140–19145, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. D. Hissong and J. M. Carlin, “Potentiation of interferon-induced indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase mRNA in human mononuclear phagocytes by lipopolysaccharide and interleukin-1,” Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 387–393, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  27. S. Fujigaki, K. Saito, K. Sekikawa et al., “Lipopolysaccharide induction of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase is mediated dominantly by an IFN-gamma-independent mechanism,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 2313–2318, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  28. H. Fujigaki, K. Saito, S. Fujigaki et al., “The signal transducer and activator of transcription 1α and interferon regulatory factor 1 are not essential for the induction of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase by lipopolysaccharide: involvement of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor-κB pathways, and synergistic effect of several proinflammatory cytokines,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 655–662, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. H. Johnson and C. E. Eyers, “Analysis of post-translational modifications by LC-MS/MS,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 658, pp. 93–108, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  30. N. L. Young, M. D. Plazas-Mayorca, and B. A. Garcia, “Systems-wide proteomic characterization of combinatorial post-translational modification patterns,” Expert Review of Proteomics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 79–92, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. H. Fujigaki, K. Saito, F. Lin et al., “Nitration and inactivation of IDO by peroxynitrite,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 372–379, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  32. J. S. Beckman and W. H. Koppenol, “Nitric oxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite: the good, the bad, and the ugly,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 271, no. 5, part 1, pp. C1424–C1437, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  33. A. P. Gobert, S. Semballa, S. Daulouede et al., “Murine macrophages use oxygen- and nitric oxide-dependent mechanisms to synthesize S-nitroso-albumin and to kill extracellular trypanosomes,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 4068–4072, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  34. H. Ischiropoulos, L. Zhu, and J. S. Beckman, “Peroxynitrite formation from macrophage-derived nitric oxide,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 298, no. 2, pp. 446–451, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Denicola, H. Rubbo, D. Rodriguez, and R. Radi, “Peroxynitrite-mediated cytotoxicity to Trypanosoma cruzi,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 304, no. 1, pp. 279–286, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. Brito, M. Naviliat, A. C. Tiscornia et al., “Peroxynitrite inhibits T lymphocyte activation and proliferation by promoting impairment of tyrosine phosphorylation and peroxynitrite-driven apoptotic death,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 162, no. 6, pp. 3356–3366, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  37. S. Yamamoto and O. Hayaishi, “Tryptophan pyrrolase of rabbit intestine. D- and L-tryptophan-cleaving enzyme or enzymes,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 242, no. 22, pp. 5260–5266, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
  38. R. Yoshida, Y. Urade, M. Tokuda, and O. Hayaishi, “Induction of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in mouse lung during virus infection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 4084–4086, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  39. H. W. Murray, A. Szuro-Sudol, D. Wellner et al., “Role of tryptophan degradation in respiratory burst-independent antimicrobial activity of gamma interferon-stimulated human macrophages,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 845–849, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  40. W. Daubener, K. Pilz, S. Seghrouchni Zennati, T. Bilzer, H. G. Fischer, and U. Hadding, “Induction of toxoplasmostasis in a human glioblastoma by interferon γ,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 43, no. 1-2, pp. 31–38, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  41. C. N. Nagineni, K. Pardhasaradhi, M. C. Martins, B. Detrick, and J. J. Hooks, “Mechanisms of interferon-induced inhibition of Toxoplasma gondii replication in human retinal pigment epithelial cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 4188–4196, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  42. E. R. Pfefferkorn and P. M. Guyre, “Inhibition of growth of Toxoplasma gondii in cultured fibroblasts by human recombinant gamma interferon,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 211–216, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  43. K. Heseler, K. Spekker, S. K. Schmidt, C. R. MacKenzie, and W. Däubener, “Antimicrobial and immunoregulatory effects mediated by human lung cells: role of IFN-γ-induced tryptophan degradation,” FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 273–281, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. D. H. Munn, M. D. Sharma, D. Hou et al., “Expression of indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase by plasmacytoid dendritic cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 280–290, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  45. S. K. Schmidt, A. Müller, K. Heseler et al., “Antimicrobial and immunoregulatory properties of human tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 2755–2764, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. Heitger, “Regulation of expression and function of IDO in human dendritic cells,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 15, pp. 2222–2233, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  47. A. Blaschitz, M. Gauster, D. Fuchs et al., “Vascular endothelial expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 forms a positive gradient towards the feto-maternal interface,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 7, Article ID e21774, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. T. Kaper, L. L. Looger, H. Takanaga, M. Platten, L. Steinman, and W. B. Frommer, “Nanosensor detection of an immunoregulatory tryptophan influx/kynurenine efflux cycle,” PLoS Biology, vol. 5, no. 10, p. e257, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. D. H. Munn, M. D. Sharma, B. Baban et al., “GCN2 kinase in T cells mediates proliferative arrest and anergy induction in response to indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase,” Immunity, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 633–642, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. P. Terness, T. M. Bauer, L. Röse et al., “Inhibition of allogeneic T cell proliferation by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-expressing dendritic cells: mediation of suppression by tryptophan metabolites,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 196, no. 4, pp. 447–457, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. F. Fallarino, U. Grohmann, C. Vacca et al., “T cell apoptosis by tryptophan catabolism,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1069–1077, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. L. Belladonna, P. Puccetti, C. Orabona et al., “Immunosuppression via tryptophan catabolism: the role of kynurenine pathway enzymes,” Transplantation, vol. 84, no. 1, supplement, pp. S17–S20, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. F. Fallarino, U. Grohmann, S. You et al., “Tryptophan catabolism generates autoimmune-preventive regulatory T cells,” Transplant Immunology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 58–60, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. F. Fallarino, C. Asselin-Paturel, C. Vacca et al., “Murine plasmacytoid dendritic cells initiate the immunosuppressive pathway of tryptophan catabolism in response to CD200 receptor engagement,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 6, pp. 3748–3754, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  55. S. Bozza, F. Fallarino, L. Pitzurra et al., “A crucial role for tryptophan catabolism at the host/Candida albicans interface,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 5, pp. 2910–2918, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  56. F. Fallarino and P. Puccetti, “Toll-like receptor 9-mediated induction of the immunosuppressive pathway of tryptophan catabolism,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 8–11, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. U. Grohmann and P. Puccetti, “CTLA-4, T helper lymphocytes and dendritic cells: an internal perspective of T-cell homeostasis,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 133–135, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. F. Fallarino, U. Grohmann, K. W. Hwang et al., “Modulation of tryptophan catabolism by regulatory T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1206–1212, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. U. Grohmann, R. Bianchi, C. Orabona et al., “Functional plasticity of dendritic cell subsets as mediated by CD40 versus B7 activation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 171, no. 5, pp. 2581–2587, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  60. U. Grohmann, F. Fallarino, R. Bianchi et al., “A defect in tryptophan catabolism impairs tolerance in nonobese diabetic mice,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 198, no. 1, pp. 153–160, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. M. L. Belladonna, C. Volpi, R. Bianchi et al., “Cutting edge: autocrine TGF-β sustains default tolerogenesis by IDO-competent dendritic cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 8, pp. 5194–5198, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  62. R. Lande and M. Gilliet, “Plasmacytoid dendritic cells: key players in the initiation and regulation of immune responses,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1183, pp. 89–103, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. B. M. Matta, A. Castellaneta, and A. W. Thomson, “Tolerogenic plasmacytoid DC,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2667–2676, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. G. Frumento, R. Rotondo, M. Tonetti, G. Damonte, U. Benatti, and G. B. Ferrara, “Tryptophan-derived catabolites are responsible for inhibition of T and natural killer cell proliferation induced by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 196, no. 4, pp. 459–468, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. S. Okuda, N. Nishiyama, H. Saito, and H. Katsuki, “3-Hydroxykynurenine, an endogenous oxidative stress generator, causes neuronal cell death with apoptotic features and region selectivity,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 299–307, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  66. Y. A. Taher, B. J. A. Piavaux, R. Gras et al., “Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-dependent tryptophan metabolites contribute to tolerance induction during allergen immunotherapy in a mouse model,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 983–991, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. T. Morita, K. Saito, M. Takemura et al., “3-Hydroxyanthranilic acid, an L-tryptophan metabolite, induces apoptosis in monocyte-derived cells stimulated by interferon-γ,” Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 38, part 3, pp. 242–251, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. W. Taylor and G. S. Feng, “Relationship between interferon-γ, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, and tryptophan catabolism,” FASEB Journal, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 2516–2522, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  69. M. P. Heyes, K. Saito, and S. P. Markey, “Human macrophages convert L-tryptophan into the neurotoxin quinolinic acid,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 283, part 3, pp. 633–635, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  70. M. P. Heyes, K. Saito, A. Lackner, C. A. Wiley, C. L. Achim, and S. P. Markey, “Sources of the neurotoxin quinolinic acid in the brain of HIV-1-infected patients and retrovirus-infected macaques,” FASEB Journal, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 881–896, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  71. Y. Murakami, M. Hoshi, A. Hara et al., “Inhibition of increased indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase activity attenuates Toxoplasma gondii replication in the lung during acute infection,” Cytokine, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 245–251, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  72. L. H. C. Makala, B. Baban, H. Lemos et al., “Leishmania major attenuates host immunity by stimulating local indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 203, no. 5, pp. 715–725, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. M. Hoshi, K. Saito, A. Hara et al., “The absence of IDO upregulates type I IFN production, resulting in suppression of viral replication in the retrovirus-infected mouse,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 6, pp. 3305–3312, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. D. E. Mosier, R. A. Yetter, and H. C. Morse III, “Retroviral induction of acute lymphoproliferative disease and profound immunosuppression in adult C57BL/6 mice,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 161, no. 4, pp. 766–784, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  75. A. Matsumori and C. Kawai, “An experimental model for congestive heart failure after encephalomyocarditis virus myocarditis in mice,” Circulation, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1230–1235, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  76. M. Hoshi, K. Matsumoto, H. Ito et al., “L-tryptophan-kynurenine pathway metabolites regulate type I IFNs of acute viral myocarditis in mice,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 188, no. 8, pp. 3980–3987, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  77. O. Takeuchi and S. Akira, “Innate immunity to virus infection,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 227, no. 1, pp. 75–86, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. Y. Kumagai, O. Takeuchi, H. Kato et al., “Alveolar macrophages are the primary interferon-alpha producer in pulmonary infection with RNA viruses,” Immunity, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 240–252, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. M. D. Sharma, D. Y. Hou, Y. Liu et al., “Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase controls conversion of Foxp3+ Tregs to TH17-like cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 24, pp. 6102–6111, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. A. K. Manlapat, D. J. Kahler, P. R. Chandler, D. H. Munn, and A. L. Mellor, “Cell-autonomous control of interferon type I expression by indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase in regulatory CD19 + dendritic cells,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1064–1071, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. W. Cao, S. Manicassamy, H. Tang et al., “Toll-like receptor-mediated induction of type I interferon in plasmacytoid dendritic cells requires the rapamycin-sensitive PI(3)K-mTOR-p70S6K pathway,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1157–1164, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. P. Bonifazi, C. D'Angelo, S. Zagarella et al., “Intranasally delivered siRNA targeting PI3K/Akt/mTOR inflammatory pathways protects from aspergillosis,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 193–205, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. D. Alberati-Giani and A. M. Cesura, “Expression of the kynurenine enzymes in macrophages and microglial cells: regulation by immune modulators,” Amino Acids, vol. 14, no. 1–3, pp. 251–255, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. M. D. Sharma, B. Baban, P. Chandler et al., “Plasmacytoid dendritic cells from mouse tumor-draining lymph nodes directly activate mature Tregs via indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 117, no. 9, pp. 2570–2582, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. F. Fallarino, U. Grohmann, and P. Puccetti, “Indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase: from catalyst to signaling function,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1932–1937, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  86. S. Y. Hwang, P. J. Hertzog, K. A. Holland et al., “A null mutation in the gene encoding a type I interferon receptor component eliminates antiproliferative and antiviral responses to interferons α and β and alters macrophage responses,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 24, pp. 11284–11288, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Yuki Murakami et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.