Clinical Study

Subclinical Cardiovascular System Changes in Obese Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Table 4

Traditional cardiovascular risk factors, selected inflammatory markers, and ultrasonographic evaluation of cardiovascular system in clinically active and inactive juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients.

JIA patients clinically active
( = 30)
JIA patients clinically inactive
( = 28)
Control group
( = 36)
value

Traditional risk factors

Age, years12.5 (9.5–15.0)14.0 (11.0–16.0)13.4 (12.0–15.0)0.24
BMI, kg/m220.2 (18.3–22.2)20 (16.6–21.7)19.4 (17.3–20.6)0.19
BMI-SDS1.1 (0.1–1.7)0.1 (−0.1–0.5)0.1 (−0.5–0.5)0.01
SBP, mmHg116 (99–127)121 (103–126)112 (103–117)0.03
DBP, mmHg68 (55–71)65 (57–69)64 (57–69)0.20
Total cholesterol, mmol/L4.2 (3.7–4.7)3.9 (3.5–4.4)4 (3.5–4.4)0.48
LDL-cholesterol, mmol/L2.2 (1.8–2.5)2.0 (1.8–2.5)2.0 (1.8–2.4)0.71
HDL-cholesterol, mmol/L1.4 (1.0–1.5)1.3 (1.2–1.6)1.4 (1.1–1.6)0.51
Triglycerides, mmol/L0.7 (0.6–1.2)0.8 (0.5–0.9)0.7 (0.6–0.9)0.52
Glucose, mmol/L4.8 (4.6–5.0)5.0 (4.8–5.1)4.8 (4.6–5.0)0.21
Insulin, mU/mL7.1 (4.8–13.3)7.9 (3.8–10.5)6.6 (4.0–8.8)0.30
HOMA index1.5 (1.0–2.7)1.7 (0.8–2.4)1.4 (0.8–1.9)0.28

Inflammatory markers

hsCRP, mg/L1.2 (0.3–4.9)0.8 (0.1–2.7)0.04 (0.01–0.2)<0.001
Il-6, pg/mL3.6 (1.1–7.4)1.4 (0.4–6.4)0.2 (0.2–0.8)<0.001
TNFα, pg/mL2.5 (0.8–17.9)3 (1.3–32)0.7 (0.7–0.72)<0.001
Adiponectin, g/mL10.9 (8.0–13.9)11.0 (8.0–14.0)12.5 (8.0–16.0)=0.640

Ultrasonographic studies

Brachial artery, mm3.7 (3.3–3.9)3.8 (3.4–4.5)3.6 (3.2–4.2)=0.230
FMD, %7.8 (6.2–9.6)8.1 (2.7–8.9)11.1 (9.2–12.6)<0.001
IMT, mm0.49 (0.43–0.51)0.53 (0.44–0.56)0.42 (0.39–0.45)<0.001
LVMi, g/m2.727.6 (25.1–29.9)27.6 (18.8–29.1)22.9 (19.2–28.3)=0.040

Values are presented as median (interquartile range), SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, HOMA index: index of insulin resistance, FMD: flow mediated dilatation of the right brachial artery, IMT: intima-media thickness of the common carotid arteries, and LVMi: indexed left ventricle mass.
ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis test.
in comparison to the control group in post-hoc test.
clinically active versus inactive groups in post-hoc test.