Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mediators of Inflammation
Volume 2013, Article ID 953841, 19 pages
Research Article

Ubiquitous Transgenic Overexpression of C-C Chemokine Ligand 2: A Model to Assess the Combined Effect of High Energy Intake and Continuous Low-Grade Inflammation

1Unitat de Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Carrer Sant Llorenç 21, 43201 Reus, Spain
2Campus of International Excellence Southern Catalonia, Spain
3Catalan Institute of Oncology and Girona Biomedical Research Institute, Avda de Francia s/n, 17007 Girona, Spain
4Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, C/ Dr. Mallafrè Guasch 4, 43005 Tarragona, Spain
5Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, C/ Dr. Mallafrè Guasch 4, 43005 Tarragona, Spain
6Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040 Madrid, Spain
7Servei de Medicina Interna, Hospital Sant Pau i Santa Tecla, Rambla Vella 14, 43003 Tarragona, Spain

Received 22 July 2013; Revised 30 September 2013; Accepted 15 October 2013

Academic Editor: Donna-Marie McCafferty

Copyright © 2013 Esther Rodríguez-Gallego et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Excessive energy management leads to low-grade, chronic inflammation, which is a significant factor predicting noncommunicable diseases. In turn, inflammation, oxidation, and metabolism are associated with the course of these diseases; mitochondrial dysfunction seems to be at the crossroads of mutual relationships. The migration of immune cells during inflammation is governed by the interaction between chemokines and chemokine receptors. Chemokines, especially C-C-chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), have a variety of additional functions that are involved in the maintenance of normal metabolism. It is our hypothesis that a ubiquitous and continuous secretion of CCL2 may represent an animal model of low-grade chronic inflammation that, in the presence of an energy surplus, could help to ascertain the afore-mentioned relationships and/or to search for specific therapeutic approaches. Here, we present preliminary data on a mouse model created by using targeted gene knock-in technology to integrate an additional copy of the CCl2 gene in the Gt(ROSA)26Sor locus of the mouse genome via homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Short-term dietary manipulations were assessed and the findings include metabolic disturbances, premature death, and the manipulation of macrophage plasticity and autophagy. These results raise a number of mechanistic questions for future study.

1. Introduction

Excessive energy intake is a part of the current human lifestyle that leads to a state of chronic systemic low-grade inflammation, which is thought to play a role in the development of atherosclerosis, cancer, and other noncommunicable diseases. At the same time, it is also plausible that the long-term consequences of prolonged inflammation exacerbate the deleterious effects of continuous nutrient surplus [13].

The immune system and metabolism are closely interconnected [4, 5]. During inflammation, the whole body is under metabolic stress, and energy excess management could compromise the relationships among metabolism, oxidation, and inflammation. We reasoned that searching for an adequate animal model [6] might allow us to better understand disease pathogenesis.

Chemokines are promising candidates for the design of such a model. Some of the functions of chemokines are associated with the migration of immune cells, and chemokines are important for the correct functioning of metabolism. In humans, C-C chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2; formerly referred as MCP-1 or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) could be a marker of inflammation; it is overexpressed in noncommunicable diseases and is involved in a variety of metabolic functions [7]. Actually, CCL2 modifies lipid and glucose metabolism and contributes to insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis [811]. Of note, circulating chemokines cause and maintain metabolic disturbances that may be reversed by anti-inflammatory drugs, and the role of chemokines is likely a causal and predisposing factor [12, 13]. Rather than local overexpression [1417], it is now recognised that CCL2 protein and mRNA are expressed in the vast majority of tissues, suggesting both a systemic production and the ability to respond in situ to inflammatory stimuli [18, 19].

Therefore, we hypothesised that challenging an animal model that systemically overexpresses CCL2 with diets rich in fat and cholesterol could help to assess the role of chronic inflammation in response to excessive energy intake. We then proceeded to integrate a copy of the Ccl2 gene in the Gt(ROSA)26Sor (commonly referred to as ROSA26) locus of the mouse genome via homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells (ES) to generate targeted transgenic mice [2022] that overexpress CCL2 in all tissues. Preliminary data are promising and suggest a number of mechanistic questions for future study.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Animal Handling

All procedures and experimental protocols were examined and approved by the Ethics Review Committee for Animal Experimentation of the Universitat Rovira i Virgili. Basic protocols for tissue collection, diets, allocation concealment and metabolic assessment of the mice have been already described in detail [6, 18, 23]. Strains were backcrossed >10 generations to C57BL/6J mice and maintained homozygously. Littermates without mutations were used as controls (WT). We also provide data from knockouts (KO) of CCL2 (conveniently backcrossed), which were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Sacramento, CA). Dietary experiments began at 10 weeks of age, when all strains display similar phenotypes. To avoid possible effects of immature adipocyte modelling, most results were obtained in different groups after 6 or 14 weeks of treatment (16 and 24 weeksold, resp.). To explore dietary effects, mice from each group were fed either chow (Teklad rodent diet; Harlan, Barcelona, Spain) or a high-fat diet (FuttermittelfürMaüse; SSniff spezial diäten, Soest, Deutschland) and caged indefinitely under supervision. The breeding of all experimental populations was performed in our own facilities, and the progenies were maintained under close surveillance. The animals were not kept under germ-free conditions.

2.2. Targeted Transgenic (TG) Mice

The transgenic model was generated via a gene targeted inducible knock-in (KI), that is, a line with a duplicated gene, approach using standard methods and proprietary technology from Ozgene (Bentley, WA, Australia). The mRNA sequence corresponding to the mouse Ccl2 gene (NM_011333 and ENSMUSG00000035385) is located on chromosome 11. The gene has 3 exons spread over approximately 3 Kb. The gene fragment was obtained from C57BL/6 genomic DNA (PCR primers AGCAAGATGATCCCAATGAGTAGGC and GAGGTGGTTGTGGAAAAGGTAGTGG) to be inserted by gene targeting into the ROSA26 locus. Upstream regulatory elements are important in the transcriptional regulation of Ccl2 gene. Human ubiquitin promoter (Ubic) was chosen for the transgene to produce a high-level of expression. A loxP-flanked STOP cassette prevents the transcription of the gene following the UbiC promoter (See Figure 1 and Supplementary Materials S1 and S2 available online at The STOP cassette can be removed using Crerecombinase. PGK-Neo-SD-IS, a selection cassette, is inserted downstream of the Ccl2 gene to enrich homologous recombination events. The ROSA26 locus is conserved between mice and humans. The location is autosomal (chromosome 6) and is actively transcribed in most tissues (Figure 1). Moreover, epigenetic inactivation is unlikely [21, 2426].

Figure 1: A STOP sequence flanked by loxP sites was inserted between the Ubiquitin promoter and the mouse Ccl2 gene (a). The sequences of both the STOP cassette (bold) and the loxP sites (underlined) are shown later (b). The wild-type allele for Ccl2 gene is located in the region 11 C-E1 of chromosome 11 and the transgenic vector (bottom) is inserted in the ROSA26 locus of chromosome 6 (c). The procedure is designed to avoid chromosomal instabilities.

The combination of gene targeting and ES cell technology exploiting homologous recombination provides advantages over other techniques [2731] (Supplementary Material S3). Mice are available upon request.

2.3. Immunopathology Studies and Assessment of Liver Steatosis

Portions of organs and tissues were either frozen in nitrogen or fixed in 4% phosphate-buffered formalin for 24 h at room temperature, washed twice with water, stored in 70% ethanol at 4°C, and embedded in paraffin for histological analyses. Primary and secondary antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Heidelberg, Germany) and Serotec (Oxford, UK) [18, 32]. Detection was performed with the ABC peroxidase system (Vector, Burlingame, CA) using DAB (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) as the substrate. To assess specificity, primary antibodies were omitted in the controls. Liver steatosis was assessed as previously described [6].

2.4. Laboratory Measurements

We measured murine CCL2 in plasma, serum, and tissues by ELISA (Peprotech, London, UK), according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Recombinant human CCL2 antigen was used as the calibrator for assay standardisation, and we found weak cross-reactivity with other chemokines, especially CCL7. The intraassay coefficients of variation were <3.2%, and the interassay of variation was <9.1%. Other biochemical measurements were performed in automated analysers using commercially available reagents as described [6, 33]. Selected tissues were homogenised using the Precellys 24 system (Izasa, Barcelona, Spain) with prefilled bead tubes in the buffer of choice. Fractions of the homogenised liver were immunoblotted as described [34], using antibodies and reagents from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Heidelberg, Germany).

2.5. Transmission Electron Microscopy

Small pieces of the liver were immediately fixed in a 2% glutaraldehyde solution in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4. Samples were then postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) for 2 h and dehydrated in sequential steps of acetone prior to impregnation in increasing concentrations of the resin in acetone over a 24 h period. Semithin sections (500 nm) were stained with 1% toluidine blue. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were subsequently cut using a diamond knife, double-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined using a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

2.6. Characterisation of Mouse Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages

The methods were performed as previously described [35]. Bone marrow cells were isolated by removing leg bones from WT and TG mice (aged 10 weeks) and were cultured for 24 hours. Floating cells were removed, and the remaining attached cells were analysed. Cells were further cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% inactivated foetal calf serum, 50 μM beta-mercaptoethanol, and 1000 U/mL murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or 25 ng/mL human macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) (ImmunoTools, Friesoythe, Germany) to provide polarised activation of cells into M1 and M2 as a simplified descriptor of their functional plasticity. To assess the effect of activation, macrophages were treated with 100 ng/mL E. coli 055:B5 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 24 hours and were compared with the respective untreated controls. After this treatment, supernatants from M1 (GM-CSF) and M2 (M-CSF) macrophages were tested for the presence of CCL2, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα), and interleukin 10 (IL-10) using ELISA (BioLegend, Inc., Madrid, Spain). Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Barcelona, Spain) and was retrotranscribed using the Reverse Transcription System kit (Applied Biosystems; Invitrogen, Barcelona, Spain). Oligonucleotides for selected genes were designed according to the Roche software for quantitative real-time PCR (Universal Probe Roche library), which was performed using a LightCycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics, Barcelona, Spain). The assays were performed in triplicate, and the results normalised according to the expression level of TATA-binding protein mRNA. C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2 or CD192), TNFα, inhibin beta A (INHBA), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), C-C chemokine receptor type 7 (CCR7), and Egl nine homolog 3 (EGLN3) were chosen as M1 markers. Arginase (ARG), EMR1/F4/80, insulin growth factor-1 (IGF1), IL-10, the mannose receptor CD206, and growth arrest-specific 6 (GAS6) were chosen as M2 markers.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

The normality of the distributions was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov method. Variables were compared using Mann-Whitney tests or Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis adjusted for multiple testing. Unless otherwise indicated, the values in the figures represent the mean and SEM obtained in groups of 8 mice. The χ2 test was used to compare categorical variables. For all measurements, we used either SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) or GraphPad Prism software (

3. Results

3.1. Targeted Transgenic Mice Do Not Display Physical Abnormalities

The resulting mice for the targeted mutation are viable, fertile, and normal in size and weight. The animals do not display apparent behavioural or reproductive defects. The transgene insertion of a single copy occurs at a defined site, which allows for easy genotyping (Figure 2) and eliminates possible instabilities, independent segregation during breeding, and unpredictable positions in the chromosomes.

Figure 2: Simplified strategy for genotyping that includes the sequence of each primer (a), the reaction proposed for each primer (b), and the expected PCR products for each strain (c). The method is designed for the concomitant use of all primers and a representative gel is shown in (d).

An additional advantage of this strategy is the Cre/lox recombination system that facilitates tissue-specific overexpression. The Ubic is conditioned by an Lox-Stop-Lox (LSL) element that is activated by Cre-mediated excision using the appropriate, tissue-specific Cre strain.

3.2. Transgenic Mice Overexpress CCL2 in Selected Tissues, and Circulating Protein Is Increased with respect to Controls

Consistently, transgenic mice displayed more CCL2 protein in all tissues examined with respect to WT animals. The differences increased with age, and there were minor relative differences among tissues (Figure 3). We confirm that CCL2 was immunologically detected in all selected tissues of the transgenic mice. The CCL2 mRNA expression in the transgenic mice was also higher in different types of cells with respect to WT mice. The amount of CCL2 expression was higher after the designed period of exposure to a diet with a high fat content. Of note, the serum and plasma CCL2 were also higher in transgenic mice than in WT mice, which is most likely caused by CCL2 secretion by multiple tissues. In accordance with previous observations, the plasma concentrations differed from the serum concentration. The differences are likely caused by coagulation and handling, but the differences were not statistically significant in transgenic mice. Notably, CCL2 was also detected in KO mice, but with less intensity. This is most likely due to quantitatively minor cross reactivity, as described in the methods.

Figure 3: Overexpression of CCL2 with respect to wild type and knockout was observed in all selected tissues (extracts) in the transgenic mice as measured by ELISA. Differences were also observed in plasma and serum and there was cross-reactivity with similar chemokines that could explain the detection of CCL2 in KO mice (a). CCL2 was also detected by immunochemistry in different types of cells (b). * ; Micrographs in the left column are representative for liver, pancreas, and kidney. Those in the right column were for brain, intestine, and stomach.
3.3. Dietary Factors Influence Body Weight and Adipocyte Size

When mice were fed a regular chow diet, we did not observe significant differences in body weight increase among groups. The cumulative food intake was identical for the three strains examined. In contrast, when fed a high fat diet, both transgenic animals and WT animals developed obesity. Of note, the C57BL/6J male mouse is a commonly used model of diet-induced obesity [36]. The effect of CCL2 overexpression was apparent immediately after the ingestion of the high calorie diet, and the weight increased more rapidly than in WT mice. The absence of CCL2, however, protected the KO mice from excessive weight gain. The lack of significant differences in the food intake excluded any effect of CCL2 on appetite (Figure 4).

Figure 4: The effect of high-fat diet in body weight increase was evident in transgenic and wild-type mice ((a), (b)), but the different increase was immediate after dietary manipulation in transgenic. This effect was negligible in knockout mice (c). The combination of these effects with high-fat diet (d) shows similar results to facilitate comparison. These findings are not due to differences in the cumulative food intake ((e), (f)) indicating that CCL2 probably has no effect on appetite. * .

Overexpression of CCL2 also increased the size of the adipocytes. Data are presented for epididymal adipose tissue (Figure 5), but the effect was similar in other adipose tissues. The adipocyte size was significantly higher in CCL2 transgenic animals compared with WT and KO animals fed with both diets, but the difference was higher when mice were fed a diet with a high caloric content. When different types of adipose tissue were weighed, we found that the mice fed a chow diet showed no significant differences between the strains, with the possible exception of inguinal tissue. Conversely, the addition of fat to the diet resulted in a significant increase in the weight of white adipose tissue from other depots in mice with CCL2 overexpression. Notably, there was no effect on the weight of brown adipose tissue (Figure 6 and Supplementary Material S4). However, these differences among groups in adipose tissues weight disappeared when mice were fed with a high fat diet for 14 weeks. These results are probably indicating an already reported effect of adipose tissue remodelling on the consequences of high-fat dietary intake [37] (Supplementary Material S5).

Figure 5: The size of the adipocytes was significantly higher in transgenic mice than in wild-type and knockout mice and the effect was observed with both dietary interventions regardless of the duration of the dietary treatment (6 or 14 weeks) (a) but it was more intense when mice were fed a high-fat diet. For clarity, values are indicated only for adipocytes in epididymal white adipose tissue. Representative micrographs are shown for transgenic, wild-type, and knockout animals ((b), (c) and (d), resp.) when fed a chow diet and for the corresponding animals fed a high-fat diet ((e), (f), (g)) at 16 and 24 weeks’ old.
Figure 6: The effect of CCL2 expression in the weight of adipose tissue ((a)–(d)) of animals fed either chow (left column) or high-fat diet (right column). Of note, differences among strains were more evident during energy surplus and no change was observed in brown adipose tissue.
3.4. Diet-Induced Disturbances in Glucose and Lipid Metabolism

Glucose tolerance tests (a proxy for insulin resistance) were unaffected in strains fed the chow diet during the experimental period of 6 weeks. However, WT littermates, KO, and transgenic mice displayed abnormal values when fed a high-fat diet, confirming the effect of diet in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and suggesting that this short-term intervention is not adequate to investigate a possible role, if any, of CCL2 in the generation of glucose and lipid disturbances. Moreover, there were no differences among the strains in the plasma glucose levels after 6 hours of fasting, and after 3 hours in the fasting state, we found that the plasma glucose baseline concentrations were significantly higher in CCL2 overexpressing mice with respect to CCL2 deficient animals. This effect was more evident in the transgenic mice (Supplementary Material S6) but differences in plasma glucose disappeared after 14 weeks of dietary treatment suggesting immature adipose tissue remodelling [38].

When these tests were performed in animals fed a high-fat diet for a longer experimental period of 14 weeks in which adipose tissue is already well modelled, the lack of differences in insulin tolerance was maintained, probably indicating that the effect of CCL2 overexpression in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance is negligible.

However, results in the absence of CCL2 indicate that this chemokine may modify glucose metabolism and therefore we cannot discard the effects under a more intense metabolic stress [9]. Variations in plasma cholesterol and triglycerides concentrations were minimal among the strains at 16 weeks old. A high-fat diet significantly increased the amount of circulating cholesterol, an effect that was higher in CCL2 overexpressing mice. Conversely, there were unexpected, and most likely not representative, changes in the plasma triglycerides concentration of these mice as a consequence of dietary manipulations (data not shown).

3.5. The Influence of CCL2 and Dietary Manipulations in the Liver

When fed the chow diet, mice did not display significant differences among strains in the appearance of their liver tissue. The steatosis scores did not detect significant differences among strains, although some minor variations were detected (Figure 7) that did not correlate with the hepatic lipid content (data not shown). When mice were fed a high-fat diet, we found a certain amount of lipid accumulation in WT mice, but this lipid accumulation was significantly more evident in transgenic mice. Conversely, there was no accumulation of lipids in KO mice (Figure 7). Therefore, the effect of CCL2 under these conditions is directly related to the amount of tissue CCL2 disposal; the absence of CCL2 prevents liver steatosis, and overexpression of CCL2 predisposes the liver to steatosis. We also found that the expression of fatty acid synthase in the liver increased significantly in all strains when fed a high-fat diet, but there were no significant differences in the comparisons between transgenic and KO mice. We also explored the activating phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and values did not change as a result of high-fat diet in transgenic mice and were significantly higher in KO mice compared with transgenic mice (Supplementary Material S7).

Figure 7: We found no significant differences among strains in the appearance of liver tissue when mice were fed a chow diet (left column (a), (c), (e); transgenic, wild-type, and knockout mice resp.). Representative micrographs show in the right column that a high fat diet produces steatosis in transgenic mice (b), dispersed lipid droplets in the liver of wild type mice (d), and no change in knockout mice (f).

When the livers were examined for the presence of F4/80 antigen, a widely accepted marker of macrophages, we found that both dietary fat and overexpression of CCL2 modify the size, number and morphology of liver macrophages (Figure 8 and Supplementary Material S8). Of note, F4/80 stained cells were more frequent in KO mice, a finding that merits further study because these results could represent a change in function and could be responsible for the differential effects of CCL2 in liver steatosis. We then explored the influence of both CCL2 and diet in mitochondrial biogenesis. Based on the appearance of the matrix, the mitochondria are healthier in mice fed a chow diet than in those fed a high-fat diet. The matrix was also consistently less electron-dense in transgenic mice. We also found altered fusion dynamics. In transgenic mice fed a chow diet, the process was unbalanced towards mitochondrial fusion, but the dietary manipulation significantly elicited a shift towards fission. The changes were similar in WT mice, but the effect of diet was quantitatively less evident than in transgenic mice. In KO mice, however, there were more mitochondria per cell, and fusion and fission were correctly balanced and apparently not altered by differences in diet. These findings strongly support further mechanistic studies, which may link the expression of CCL2 with mitochondrial biogenesis, inflammation, and energy management. According to our results, these putative mechanisms are related to the autophagic response, which was clearly enhanced in transgenic mice. Conversely, most liver cells in WT and KO displayed no evidence of autophagy (Figure 9).

Figure 8: Dietary fat (right column) and CCL2 expression modify the size, number, and morphology of liver macrophages with respect to those fed a chow diet (left column) as assessed with F4/80 staining. Values for stained area and length of macrophages ((a)–(d)) are illustrated with representative microphotographs from transgenic ((e), (f)), WT ((g), (h)) and KO mice ((i), (j)).
Figure 9: The appearance of mitochondria was affected by the dietary manipulation and the expression of CCL2 as shown in representative microphotographs (a) and these changes were accompanied by a significant effect in fusion-fission balance (b). The number of autophagosomes per cell was counted and was significantly higher in transgenic mice. Further, these were rare in both WT and KO and independent of diet (c). The heterogeneous nature of autophagic elements is illustrated in (d) (photographs obtained in transgenic mice).
3.6. Transgenic Mice That Overexpress CCL2 Die Prematurely When Fed High-Fat Diet

The transgenic mice fed a high-fat diet died prematurely between 10 and 14 months. The mice progressively decreased activity, reduced food intake and the appearance of frailty became evident. There was also a casualty in the transgenic mice fed chow diet, but it was sudden, unexpected, and without a prior decrease in weight or activity. Among the casualties, one was also observed in the WT group fed a high-fat diet (Supplementary Material S9). A full autopsy was performed, and the cause of death was uncertain. There was neither cancer nor arteriosclerosis in these animals, but there were some cutaneous, superficial, and localised lesions in the skin accompanied with local loss of hair. There was also no evidence of sepsis. The only remarkable findings were limited to the spleen and the liver. The size and weight of the spleen was consistently higher in the transgenic mice fed high-fat diet. The presence of splenomegaly in these transgenic mice was consistent with the presence of giant cells that were identified as megakaryocytes (Factor VIII positive staining) and other proliferative signs. The weight of the liver was also higher in the transgenic mice, which is most likely due to the higher presence of steatosis. In the liver, there were signs of regenerative cells and increased apoptosis. Ongoing studies with higher sample sizes and the inclusion of females have been designed to further ascertain this point.

3.7. Bone Marrow Macrophages of Transgenic Mice: Expression of Selected Cytokines and mRNA

The CCL2 mRNA expression in the bone marrow macrophages was higher in transgenic than in WT mice, irrespective of stimulation with either GM-CSF (M1, pro-inflammatory) or M-CSF (M2, phagocytic). The mRNA expression of the selected M2 markers was similar, with either low or undetectable expression in the GM-CSF macrophages without differences between transgenic and WT mice. The expression of the selected M1 markers was practically identical in the GM-CSF macrophages from TG and WT mice, with the notable exception of CCR7. Surprisingly, the expression of this chemokine receptor was significantly lower in TG mice, indicating lower pro-inflammatory activity. The expression of the M1 markers in M-CSF macrophages showed a unique and significant decrease in CCR2 mRNA expression; however, some M2 markers, including CD 206, GAS6, and IGF1, were also underexpressed. IL-10 expression also decreased, but the differences were not statistically significant. The results suggest that CCL2 overexpression may alter macrophage polarisation. Consequently, the secretion of selected cytokines was examined in macrophages that were treated with LPS and were compared with the relevant controls. The CCL2 secretion was higher in TG mice with both treatments compared with the WT mice and was 2–4 fold higher (2–4-fold change) in M-CSF macrophages. The IL-10 secretion was clearly detectable only in LPS-treated animals. The concentration in the supernatant was higher in TG than in WT mice, and the differences were statistically significant in GM-CSF macrophages. Finally, TNFα secretion was ostensibly higher in LPS-treated animals and significantly higher in TG mice with respect to the relevant controls (Figures 10 and 11).

Figure 10: Relative mRNA expression in transgenic mice with respect to WT mice of selected markers for M1 and M2 macrophages in cells treated in vitro with either GC-MSF or M-CSF. Acronyms used were C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2), TNFα, Inhibin, beta A (INHBA), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), C-C chemokine receptor type 7 (CCR7), Egl nine homolog 3 (EGLN3), Arginase (ARG), EGF module-containing mucin-like hormone receptor EMR1 (F4/80), insulin growth factor-1 (IGF1), IL-10, the mannose receptor CD206, and Growth arrest-specific 6 (GAS6).
Figure 11: The relative CCL2 mRNA expression (a) and the secretion in supernatants of selected cytokines in bone marrow-derived macrophages of transgenic and WT cells treated in vitro with either GC-MSF (b) or M-CSF (c).

4. Discussion

The transgenic mice developed in this study systemically overexpress CCL2. These animals were created to assess the combined effect of the recruitment of circulating monocytes in all tissues and the response to the stimuli of high dietary fat and energy ingestion. The hypothesis was that the continuous overexpression of this chemokine could promote or worsen common pathological conditions, and as animal model could be useful for assessing the pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic approaches [39].

Fertility, growth, and physical appearance were identical to the controls. CCL2 overexpression did not result in abnormalities in the mice that were fed a regular chow diet. However, adding fat to the diet during a short period of time caused differences in body weight, adipocyte size, disturbances in glucose and lipid metabolism, premature death, and liver alterations that included a higher predisposition to fatty liver disease and significant changes in mitochondrial biogenesis and autophagy. Additionally, we explored bone marrow macrophages under different in vitro conditions, and we found that CCL2 overexpression affects functional plasticity.

In previous studies, CCL2 has been considered a chemokine secreted by adipose tissue (adipokine), but systemic CCL2 overexpression regulates white adipose tissue (WAT) mass and size without apparent effects in brown adipose tissue (BAT). WAT serves primarily as lipid storage, and BAT is used for heat generation. The balance between the two adipose tissues affects the whole-body energy homeostasis, and the development and severity of obesity [40]. A higher production of CCL2 is not only a consequence of obesity but is most likely an exacerbating factor of diet-induced alterations. The roles of CCL2 in the aetiology of obesity and diabetes, the regulatory mechanisms, and the effect of therapies that inhibit CCL2 production have been recently reviewed [4, 41]. We have also found differences between fat cells in different adipose tissue depots and the heterogeneity of adipocytes within the same depots. Further examination of this issue is necessary because a different pattern of gene expression could explain the differential development of various types of adipose tissue [42, 43]. Moreover, this is closely associated with the pattern of fat distribution, the extent of obesity, and consequently the impact of different fat depots on the severity of metabolic complications [44, 45].

The size and number of hepatic macrophages significantly differs between transgenic and KO mice when detected with antibodies directed against F4/80. Curiously, this is an extracellular antigen of unknown function that belongs to a subgroup of the G-protein-coupled receptors [46]. The changes in macrophages morphology could represent concomitant changes in function and whether the macrophages are resident or recruited. This is further substantiated by the fact that these transgenic mice were prone to develop fatty liver disease and the KO mice were protected. The role of increased CCL2 is not yet understood, but the recruitment of macrophages seems to be important in different animal models. In KO mice there is an increased expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors accompanied by the induction of fatty acid metabolism-related genes and the inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine production [4749]. We confirmed that the effect of fat in the pathogenesis of fatty liver disease [49, 50] is influenced by the amount of available CCL2 and that the linkage between chemokines and hepatic lipid metabolism is plausible.

The characterisation of bone marrow-derived cells in the transgenic mice indicates that CCL2 overexpression affects the transition in the secretory function of macrophages (or the M1-M2 paradigm as a simplified descriptor of the functional plasticity). This is illustrated by differences in GM-CSF and M-CSF, which are cytokines that differentiate macrophages in vitro with distinct morphology and inflammatory function [51, 52]. The modulation of the phenotypic and functional differences in macrophage polarisation by CCL2 overexpression denotes a shift towards lower pro-inflammatory activity [53]. CCL2 decreased the expression of CCR7 in M1 and decreased the expression of CCR2, IGF1, CD206, IL-10, and GAS6 in M2. In cells under LPS treatment, however, CCL2 overexpression increased the secretion of IL-10 and TNFα with respect to WT controls. These changes could represent a quantitatively determinant factor in the development of macrophage-induced metabolic alterations. It should be highlighted that a high percentage of total body resident macrophages are present in the liver and that adipose tissue is a major site for the accumulation of recruited macrophages [54, 55].

Notably, CCL2 is involved, directly and/or through the induced metabolic alterations, in mitochondrial biogenesis and autophagy. We add CCL2 to the growing list of nonessential regulators of mechanisms that divide and fuse mitochondria [56]. The balance between rejuvenation and elimination of damaged mitochondria via autophagy is affected by both the presence of CCL2 overexpression and the increased availability of energy. The antagonistic and balanced activities of the fusion and fission machineries are constantly providing responses to inflammation to tightly regulate homeostasis of the organism [57, 58]. This is expected because mitochondrial diseases are associated with metabolic alterations. Apparently, there is a shift towards fusion in CCL2 overexpression to maximise ATP synthesis. Contrarily, morphological findings in CCL2 deficient mice, which are independent of high-fat diet, suggest a perfect balance [59, 60]. A certain unbalance is expected in inflammatory conditions and other energy-dependent disturbances via mitochondrial dysfunction [61, 62]. This is important because mitochondria and the access to energy (calorie restriction or increased dietary fat) play a pivotal role mediated by the mechanistic target of Rapamycin (MTOR) in deciding whether liver cells live or die [63].

In transgenic mice, autophagy was increased with respect to WT and KO mice, which is particularly important because autophagy affects immune responses as a result of degradative, biogenetic, and secretory activities that respond to various inputs via MTOR [64, 65]. Autophagy might control the infection of certain pathogens but also prevents excessive inflammatory reactions in the host [66]. As shown in autophagy-deficient macrophages, autophagy removes a number of proinflammatory stimuli [6769]. Therefore, increased liver autophagy during CCL2 overexpression could be interpreted as an effort from the host to avoid the deleterious action of continuous inflammation.

Links between autophagy and inflammation have also been found in immune functions affecting several diseases, opening a new dimension in the understanding of the multifactorial basis of noncommunicable diseases. For example, increasing macrophage autophagy protects patients with advanced atherosclerosis [70]. It has also been reported that CCL2 controls the extent of autophagy in human prostate cancer [71], and autophagy is pivotal for the survival and differentiation of monocytes [72].

Finally, CCL2 overexpression resulted in premature death when combined with a high-energy intake. These findings require more extensive examination, and the cause of death remains obscure. Mice progressively lost interest in the environment, reduced activity, and their intake of food decreased. No chronic disease was evident, and there were no signs of sepsis or major infection. It is tempting to consider the possibility of premature aging, and future investigations will include the characterisation of a senescence-associated secretory phenotype, particularly in pro-inflammatory cytokine enrichment [73] and the pro-inflammatory phenotype that accompanies aging [74, 75].

5. Conclusions, Perspectives, and Limitations

This animal model raises a number of questions about the prevalent diseases responsible for limiting the quality of modern life. Additionally, this model provides a link between inflammation and metabolism and suggests targets for the management of diseases in which there is a clear CCL2 overexpression. Specifically, this model can help to uncover the role of CCL2 in mitochondrial dysfunction, autophagy, and functionality of macrophages and aging in combination with excessive energy intake. Information gained could be useful for designing new mechanism-based therapeutic strategies.

None of the described effects appear in mice that are fed a regular diet, and this fact highlights the importance of calorie restriction for health. Therefore, the nutrient-sensing MTOR pathway seems to be crucial for the management of noncommunicable diseases. Consequently, drugs modulating MTOR are obvious candidates for assessment. For example, experiments on cancer, aging, and viral infections strongly suggest that this is the case for metformin [7678]. This antidiabetic drug activates AMPK and inhibits MTOR with potent antiinflammatory actions. The usefulness of rapamycin, an MTOR inhibitor, and similar drugs in cancer prevention has been assayed [79]. Aspirin decreases inflammation, inhibits the MTOR pathway, decreases cancer incidence, and may reduce the burden of atherosclerosis [13, 80]. Lastly, although studies are scarce, angiotensin-II-blockers and beta-blockers, widely used in hypertensive patients, can also prevent the activation of the MTOR pathway and the incidence of chronic diseases [81].

The potential indications for these drugs are mostly related to chronic diseases in which inflammation plays a crucial role. This animal model could be used to further select candidates and suggests a number of mechanistic questions for future study. Particularly, we consider this model as a valuable contribution to our evolving comprehension of the interphase between autophagy and inflammation. However, we acknowledge that care must be taken in analysing the results of studies performed in animal models and that further research effort is necessary to fully characterize our observations. To name a few, possible effects of sex should be studied and metabolic alterations should be confirmed with the use of metabolic cages and more specific methods to detect significant differences. Particularly, CCL2 may have a higher influence if there is a relative contribution from different type of cells, particularly from immune cells [72].


The Unitat de Recerca Biomèdica is part of the Campus of International Excellence Southern Catalonia and is currently being supported by the program of consolidated groups from the Universitat Rovira i Virgili and Grants from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS PI08/1032, PI08/1381, and PI11/2187 PI11/00130). Esther Rodríguez-Gallego is the recipient of a Fellowship from the Generalitat de Catalunya (2012FI_B 00389), Marta Riera-Borrull is the recipient of a Fellowship from the Universitat Rovira i Virgili (2010PFR-URV-B2-58), and Anabel García-Heredia is the recipient of a Fellowship from Insituto de Salud Carlos III (FI12/00133).


  1. M. Cecchini, F. Sassi, J. A. Lauer, Y. Y. Lee, V. Guajardo-Barron, and D. Chisholm, “Tackling of unhealthy diets, physical inactivity, and obesity: Health effects and cost-effectiveness,” The Lancet, vol. 376, no. 9754, pp. 1775–1784, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. Strong, C. Mathers, S. Leeder, and R. Beaglehole, “Preventing chronic diseases: how many lives can we save?” The Lancet, vol. 366, no. 9496, pp. 1578–1582, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Hernández-Aguilera, A. Rull, E. Rodríguez-Gallego et al., “Mitochondrial dysfunction: a basic mechanism in inflammation-related non-communicable diseases and therapeutic opportunities,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2013, Article ID 135698, 13 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. J. Joven, A. Rull, E. Rodríguez-Gallego et al., “Multifunctional targets of dietary polyphenols in disease: a case for the chemokine network and energy metabolism,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 51, pp. 267–279, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  5. G. S. Hotamisligil, “Inflammation and metabolic disorders,” Nature, vol. 444, no. 7121, pp. 860–867, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Joven, A. Rull, N. Ferré et al., “The results in rodent models of atherosclerosis are not interchangeable. The influence of diet and strain,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. e85–e92, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Coll, C. Alonso-Villaverde, and J. Joven, “Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and atherosclerosis: is there room for an additional biomarker?” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 383, no. 1-2, pp. 21–29, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Rull, J. Camps, C. Alonso-Villaverde, and J. Joven, “Insulin resistance, inflammation, and obesity: role of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (orCCL2) in the regulation of metabolism,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2010, Article ID 326580, 11 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Rull, J. C. Escolà-Gil, J. Julve et al., “Deficiency in monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 modifies lipid and glucose metabolism,” Experimental and Molecular Pathology, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 361–366, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Kanda, S. Tateya, Y. Tamori et al., “MCP-1 contributes to macrophage infiltration into adipose tissue, insulin resistance, and hepatic steatosis in obesity,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 1494–1505, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. Kamei, K. Tobe, R. Suzuki et al., “Overexpression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in adipose tissues causes macrophage recruitment and insulin resistance,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 36, pp. 26602–26614, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Rius, C. López-Vicario, A. González-Périz et al., “Resolution of inflammation in obesity-induced liver disease,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 3, article 257, 7 pages, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  13. A. Paul, L. Calleja, J. Camps et al., “The continuous administration of aspirin attenuates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice,” Life Sciences, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 457–465, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. A. Lira, M. E. Fuentes, R. M. Strieter, and S. K. Durham, “Transgenic methods to study chemokine function in lung and central nervous system,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 287, pp. 304–318, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. E. Fuentes, S. K. Durham, M. R. Swerdel et al., “Controlled recruitment of monocytes and macrophages to specific organs through transgenic expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 155, no. 12, pp. 5769–5776, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. M. Stamatovic, P. Shakui, R. F. Keep et al., “Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 regulation of blood-brain barrier permeability,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 593–606, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. Toft-Hansen, R. Buist, X. Sun, A. Schellenberg, J. Peeling, and T. Owens, “Metalloproteinases control brain inflammation induced by pertussis toxin in mice overexpressing the chemokine CCL2 in the central nervous system,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 10, pp. 7242–7249, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. Rodríguez-Sanabria, A. Rull, R. Beltrán-Debón et al., “Tissue distribution and expression of paraoxonases and chemokines in mouse: the ubiquitous and joint localisation suggest a systemic and coordinated role,” Journal of Molecular Histology, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 379–386, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Tous, N. Ferré, A. Rull et al., “Dietary cholesterol and differential monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene expression in aorta and liver of apo E-deficient mice,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 340, no. 4, pp. 1078–1084, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Le, S. Gagneten, T. Larson et al., “Far-upstream elements are dispensable for tissue-specific proenkephalin expression using a Cre-mediated knock-in strategy,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 689–697, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. W. C. Kisseberth, N. T. Brettingen, J. K. Lohse, and E. P. Sandgren, “Ubiquitous expression of marker transgenes in mice and rats,” Developmental Biology, vol. 214, no. 1, pp. 128–138, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Strathdee, H. Ibbotson, and S. G. N. Grant, “Expression of transgenes targeted to the Gt(ROSA)26Sor locus is orientation dependent,” PLoS ONE, vol. 1, no. 1, article e4, 9 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Rull, G. Aragonès, R. Beltrán-Debón et al., “Exploring PPAR modulation in experimental mice,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 952, pp. 253–273, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  24. B. P. Zambrowicz, A. Imamoto, S. Fiering, L. A. Herzenberg, W. G. Kerr, and P. Soriano, “Disruption of overlapping transcripts in the ROSA βgeo 26 gene trap strain leads to widespread expression of β-galactosidase in mouse embryos and hematopoietic cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 3789–3794, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Irion, H. Luche, P. Gadue, H. J. Fehling, M. Kennedy, and G. Keller, “Identification and targeting of the ROSA26 locus in human embryonic stem cells,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1477–1482, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. R. Capecchi, “Altering the genome by homologous recombination,” Science, vol. 244, no. 4910, pp. 1288–1292, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Bradley, M. Evans, M. H. Kaufman, and E. Robertson, “Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines,” Nature, vol. 309, no. 5965, pp. 255–256, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. Doetschman, R. G. Gregg, N. Maeda et al., “Targetted correction of a mutant HPRT gene in mouse embryonic stem cells,” Nature, vol. 330, no. 6148, pp. 576–578, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. F. Kontgen and C. L. Stewart, “Simple screening procedure to detect gene targeting events in embryonic stem cells,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 225, pp. 878–890, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. F. Koentgen, G. Suess, and D. Naf, “Engineering the mouse genome to model human disease for drug discovery,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 602, pp. 55–77, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. Friedrich and P. Soriano, “Promoter traps in embryonic stem cells: a genetic screen to identify and mutate developmental genes in mice,” Genes and Development, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1513–1523, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Segura-Carretero, M. A. Puertas-Mejía, S. Cortacero-Ramírez et al., “Selective extraction, separation, and identification of anthocyanins from Hibiscus sabdariffa L. using solid phase extraction-capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (time-of-flight/ion trap),” Electrophoresis, vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 2852–2861, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. M. Simó, I. Castellano, N. Ferré, J. Joven, and J. Camps, “Evaluation of homogeneous assay for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: limitations in patients with cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic disorders,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1233–1241, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Joven, E. Espinel, A. Rull et al., “Plant-derived polyphenols regulate expression of miRNA paralogs miR-103/107 and miR-122 and prevent diet-induced fatty liver disease in hyperlipidemic mice,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1820, no. 7, pp. 894–899, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  35. D. C. Lacey, A. Achuthan, A. J. Fleetwood et al., “Defining GM-CSF- and macrophage-CSF-dependentmacrophage responses by in vitro models,” Journal of Immunolology, vol. 188, no. 11, pp. 5752–5765, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  36. A. E. Petro, J. Cotter, D. A. Cooper, J. C. Peters, S. J. Surwit, and R. S. Surwit, “Fat, carbohydrate, and calories in the development of diabetes and obesity in the C57BL/6J mouse,” Metabolism, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 454–457, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K. J. Strissel, Z. Stancheva, H. Miyoshi et al., “Adipocyte death, adipose tissue remodeling, and obesity complications,” Diabetes, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 2910–2918, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. V. J. Vieira Potter, K. J. Strissel, C. Xie et al., “Adipose tissue inflammation and reducedinsulinsensitivity in ovariectomizedmiceoccurs in the absence of increasedadiposity,” Endocrinology, vol. 153, pp. 4266–4277, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  39. J. A. Menendez, J. Joven, S. Cufi et al., “The Warburg effect version 2. 0: metabolic reprogramming of cancer stem cells,” Cell Cycle, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1166–1179, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  40. S. Gesta, Y. Tseng, and C. R. Kahn, “Developmental origin of fat: tracking obesity to its source,” Cell, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 242–256, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Panee, “Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) in obesity and diabetes,” Cytokine, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  42. M. Vohl, R. Sladek, J. Robitaille et al., “A survey of genes differentially expressed in subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue in men,” Obesity Research, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1217–1222, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. Gesta, M. Blühet, Y. Yamamoto et al., “Evidence for a role of developmental genes in the origin of obesity and body fat distribution,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 17, pp. 6676–6681, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. H. Vidal, “Gene expression in visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissues,” Annals of Medicine, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 547–555, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. Lafontan and M. Berlan, “Do regional differences in adipocyte biology provide new pathophysiological insights?” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 276–283, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. D. O'Reilly, M. Addley, C. Quinn et al., “Functional analysis of the murine Emr1 promoter identifies a novel purine-rich regulatory motif required for high-level gene expression in macrophages,” Genomics, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1030–1040, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. P. Mandrekar, A. Ambade, A. Lim, G. Szabo, and D. Catalano, “An essential role for monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in alcoholic liver injury: regulation of proinflammatory cytokines and hepatic steatosis in mice,” Hepatology, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2185–2197, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. Marsillach, J. Camps, N. Ferré et al., “Paraoxonase-1 is related to inflammation, fibrosis and PPAR delta in experimental liver disease,” BMC Gastroenterology, vol. 9, article 3, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. Vinaixa, M. Ángel Rodríguez, A. Rull et al., “Metabolomic assessment of the effect of dietary cholesterol in the progressive development of fatty liver disease,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 2527–2538, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. Rull, F. Rodríguez, G. Aragonès et al., “Hepatic monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 is upregulated by dietary colesterol and contributes to liver steatosis,” Cytokine, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 273–279, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  51. G. Li, Y. Kim, and H. E. Broxmeyer, “Macrophage colony-stimulating factor drives cord blood monocyte differentiation into IL-10highIL-12absent dendritic cells with tolerogenic potential,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 8, pp. 4706–4717, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. K. S. Akagawa, “Functional heterogeneity of colony-stimulating factor-induced human monocyte-derived macrophages,” International Journal of Hematology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. T. L. Denning, Y. Wang, S. R. Patel, I. R. Williams, and B. Pulendran, “Lamina propria macrophages and dendritic cells differentially induce regulatory and interleukin 17-producing T cell responses,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1086–1094, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. Naito, G. Hasegawa, Y. Ebe, and T. Yamamoto, “Differentiation and function of Kupffer cells,” Medical Electron Microscopy, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 16–28, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Aouadi, M. Tencerova, P. Vangala et al., “Gene silencing in adipose tissue macrophages regulates whole-body metabolism in obese mice,” Procedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 20, pp. 8278–8283, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  56. S. Hoppins, L. Lackner, and J. Nunnari, “The machines that divide and fuse mitochondria,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 76, pp. 751–780, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. B. Westermann, “Mitochondrial fusion and fission in cell life and death,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 872–884, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. D. C. Chan, “Mitochondrial fusion and fission in mammals,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 22, pp. 79–99, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. A. E. Frazier, C. Kiu, D. Stojanovski, N. J. Hoogenraad, and M. T. Ryan, “Mitochondrial morphology and distribution in mammalian cells,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 387, no. 12, pp. 1551–1558, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. B. Westermann, “Bioenergetic role of mitochondrial fusion and fission,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1817, no. 10, pp. 1833–1838, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. D. C. Chan, “Mitochondria: dynamic organelles in disease, aging, and development,” Cell, vol. 125, no. 7, pp. 1241–1252, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. G. Serviddio, F. Bellanti, G. Vendemiale, and E. Altomare, “Mitochondrial dysfunction in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis,” Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 233–244, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. A. Raffaello and R. Rizzuto, “Mitochondrial longevity pathways,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1813, no. 1, pp. 260–268, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. N. Mizushima, T. Yoshimori, and Y. Ohsumi, “The role of atg proteins in autophagosome formation,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 27, pp. 107–132, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. M. Narita, A. R. J. Young, S. Arakawa et al., “Spatial coupling of mTOR and autophagy augments secretory phenotypes,” Science, vol. 332, no. 6032, pp. 966–970, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. E. F. Castillo, A. Dekonenko, J. Arko-Mensah et al., “Autophagy protects against active tuberculosis by suppressing bacterial burden and inflammation,” Procedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 46, pp. E3168–E3176, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  67. J. Harris, M. Hartman, C. Roche et al., “Autophagy controls IL-1β secretion by targeting Pro-IL-1β for degradation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 11, pp. 9587–9597, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. K. Cadwell, J. Y. Liu, S. L. Brown et al., “A key role for autophagy and the autophagy gene Atg16l1 in mouse and human intestinal Paneth cells,” Nature, vol. 456, no. 7219, pp. 259–263, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. B. Levine, N. Mizushima, and H. W. Virgin, “Autophagy in immunity and inflammation,” Nature, vol. 469, no. 7330, pp. 323–335, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. X. Liao, J. C. Sluimer, Y. Wang et al., “Macrophage autophagy plays a protective role in advanced atherosclerosis,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 545–553, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. H. Roca, Z. Varsos, and K. J. Pienta, “CCL2 protects prostate cancer PC3 cells from autophagic death via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT-dependent survivin Up-regulation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 36, pp. 25057–25073, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. Y. Zhang, M. J. Morgan, K. Chen, S. Choksi, and Z. Liu, “Induction of autophagy is essential for monocyte-macrophage differentiation,” Blood, vol. 119, no. 12, pp. 2895–2905, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. F. Rodier and J. Campisi, “Four faces of cellular senescence,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 192, no. 4, pp. 547–562, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. A. Trifunovic, A. Wredenberg, M. Falkenberg et al., “Premature ageing in mice expressing defective mitochondrial DNA polymerase,” Nature, vol. 429, no. 6990, pp. 417–423, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. A. Salminen, J. Ojala, K. Kaarniranta, and A. Kauppinen, “Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress activate inflammasomes: impact on the aging process and age-related diseases,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 69, no. 18, pp. 2999–3013, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. J. Joven, J. Menéndez, L. Fernandez-Sender et al., “Metformin: a cheap and well-tolerated drug that provides benefits for viral infections,” HIV Medicine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 233–240, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  77. S. Del Barco, A. Vazquez-Martin, S. Cufí et al., “Metformin: multi-faceted protection against cancer,” Oncotarget, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 896–917, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  78. J. A. Menendez, S. Cufí, C. Oliveras-Ferraros, L. Vellon, J. Joven, and A. Vazquez-Martin, “Gerosuppressant metformin: less is more,” Aging, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 348–362, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. I. Mercier, J. Camacho, K. Titchen et al., “Caveolin-1 and accelerated host aging in the breast tumor microenvironment: chemoprevention with rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor and anti-aging drug,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 278–293, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  80. F. V. Din, A. Valanciute, V. P. Houde et al., “Aspirin inhibits mTOR signaling, activates AMP-activated protein kinase, and induces autophagy in colorectal cancer cells,” Gastroenterology, vol. 142, no. 7, pp. 1504–1515, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  81. M. V. Blagosklonny, “Common drugs and treatment for cancer and age-related diseases: revitalizing answers to NCI’s provocative questions,” Oncotarget, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1711–1724, 2012. View at Google Scholar