Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Immune-Endocrine Cross-Talk in Reproductive Biology and Pathology

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 509027 |

Elisabet Aliagas, August Vidal, Laura Texidó, Jordi Ponce, Enric Condom, Mireia Martín-Satué, "High Expression of Ecto-Nucleotidases CD39 and CD73 in Human Endometrial Tumors", Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2014, Article ID 509027, 8 pages, 2014.

High Expression of Ecto-Nucleotidases CD39 and CD73 in Human Endometrial Tumors

Academic Editor: Graça Ferreira-Dias
Received19 Nov 2013
Revised25 Dec 2013
Accepted08 Jan 2014
Published24 Feb 2014


One of the strategies used by tumors to evade immunosurveillance is the accumulation of extracellular adenosine, which has immunosupressive and tumor promoting effects. The study of the mechanisms leading to adenosine formation at the tumor interstitium are therefore of great interest in oncology. The dominant pathway generating extracellular adenosine in tumors is the dephosphorylation of ATP by ecto-nucleotidases. Two of these enzymes acting sequentially, CD39 and CD73, efficiently hydrolyze extracellular ATP to adenosine. They have been found to play a crucial role in a variety of tumors, but there were no data concerning endometrial cancer, the most frequent of the invasive tumors of the female genital tract. The aim of the present work is to study the expression of CD39 and CD73 in human endometrial cancer. We have analyzed protein and gene expression, as well as enzyme activity, in type I endometrioid adenocarcinomas and type II serous adenocarcinomas and their nonpathological endometrial counterparts. High levels of both enzymes were found in tumor samples, with significantly increased expression of CD39 in type II serous tumors, which also coincided with the higher tumor grade. Our results reinforce the involvement of the adenosinergic system in cancer, emphasizing the relevance of ecto-nucleotidases as emerging therapeutic targets in oncology.

1. Introduction

Extracellular adenosine concentration increases under metabolically stressful conditions, notably in the tumor microenvironment [1], where hypoxia is frequently given [2, 3]. Such accumulation of adenosine mediates, through four distinct receptors (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3), complex and diverse effects that lead to tumor immunoescape [4]. This includes cytoprotection and growth promotion of tumor cells [5, 6], angiogenesis increase [7, 8], and suppression of effector (antitumor) T cells [9].

Although cells are provided with adenosine transporters, the main source of this nucleoside in the tumor interstitium is the hydrolysis of extracellular ATP, which also accumulates in tumors, by membrane enzymes known as ecto-nucleotidases [6, 10]. Different families of these enzymes, acting extracellularly, are responsible for the generation of adenosine from adenine nucleotides (i.e., ATP, ADP, or AMP): (1) the ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase (E-NTPDase) family, that includes four plasma membrane-bound members: NTPDase1 (CD39), NTPDase2, NTPDase3, and NTPDase8; these enzymes are differentially expressed and hydrolyze with different affinities nucleoside triphosphates and diphosphates to their monophosphate derivatives (e.g., ATP and ADP to AMP); (2) the ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase (E-NPP) family, capable of hydrolyzing nucleoside triphosphates to monophosphates and pyrophosphate (PPi), such as ATP to AMP and PPi; (3) the alkaline phosphatase (AP) family, that includes ubiquitous enzymes degrading broad range of substrates, such as adenine nucleotides and PPi, releasing inorganic phosphate (Pi); (4) the 5′-nucleotidase family, with only one member attached to the outer plasma membrane, the ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73), a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-linked membrane-bound glycoprotein that efficiently hydrolyses AMP to adenosine [1113].

Two members of ecto-nucleotidases families, the E-NTPDase CD39 and the 5′-nucleotidase CD73, acting sequentially, seem to have a crucial role in tumor-immune cell interaction [6]. They both are expressed not only by infiltrating immune cells but also by tumor cells, and their expression is regulated by hypoxia [10, 14]. Increased CD39 and CD73 expression has been described in various cancer types, mostly in correlation with a poor prognosis [1517]. Both molecules are considered promising therapeutic targets in oncology, and CD73 has already been proven to inhibit tumor growth and metastasis in a breast cancer model in mice [1820]. However, until now there were not available data concerning ecto-nucleotidases expression in endometrial cancer (EC). EC is the most frequent of the invasive tumors of the female genital tract. There are two clinicopathological variants: the estrogen-related, type I, endometrioid carcinoma, and the nonestrogen-related, type II, nonendometrioid carcinoma [21]. Although there are different molecular alterations that have been already identified in EC, with different prevalence between tumors [22, 23], there is need to decipher the complete molecular profile of EC pathogenesis to improve diagnosis and favor the design of new therapeutic strategies.

The aim of the present work was to study the expression of CD39 and CD73 in endometrioid (type I) and serous (type II) EC when compared with nontumoral endometrium. To achieve this objective, protein and gene expression experiments, as well as in situ enzyme activity assays, were performed on human endometrial adenocarcinoma samples and their nontumoral endometrial counterparts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

The ethical principles of this study adhere to the Declaration of Helsinki, and all the procedures were approved by the ethics committee for clinical investigation of Bellvitge Hospital. Endometrial samples from adenocarcinoma (endometrioid and serous types) and their corresponding nontumoral tissue (if present) were obtained from hysterectomy specimens at the Service of Gynecology of Bellvitge Hospital. Fresh samples were cut, embedded in O.C.T. freezing media (Tissue-Tek; Sakura Finetek, Zoeterwoude, The Netherlands), snap-frozen in a Shandon Histobath 2 (Neslab Instruments Inc., USA) at the Service of Pathology, and stored at −80°C until used. Alternatively, endometrial samples were obtained from the Tumor Bank of Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL).

Fifteen endometrioid adenocarcinomas (13 grade 1, 2 grade 2; all FIGO stage I) (56–82 years old, median 61) and fourteen serous adenocarcinomas (grade 3; 9 FIGO stage I, 2 FIGO stage II, and 3 FIGO stage IV) (63–86 years old, median 77), and their adjacent nontumoral endometrium were used in this study.

2.2. Endometrial Touch Prep Technique

Touch preparations of endometrial cancer tissue samples were obtained by lightly pressing the freshly cut tumor surface on clean glass microscope slides, thus generating a tumor cell imprint. Imprints were immediately air-dried and stored at −20°C until further processing. Six endometrioid adenocarcinoma tissue samples were used to generate the touch preparations.

2.3. Immunolabeling Experiments

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence experiments were performed as previously described for human endometrial samples [24]. Briefly, tissue sections of 10 μm thick and touch preparations were fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin mixed with cold acetone (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 2.5 minutes. Fixed samples were rinsed with PBS and preincubated for 1 hour at room temperature (RT) with PBS containing 20% normal goat serum (Gibco, Paisley, UK) and 0.2% gelatin (Merck). Samples were then incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: anti-human CD39 clone BU61 (Ancell Corporation, Minnesota, MN, USA) at 1/500, mouse monoclonal anti-human ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73) clone 4G4 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 1/50, and rabbit monoclonal anti-human cytokeratin 19 (CK19) clone EPR1579Y (Abcam) at 1/200. After three washes in PBS, samples were incubated for 1 hour at RT with the appropriate secondary antibodies: horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse (EnVision + system; DAKO, Carpinteria, USA), Alexa Fluor 488- or 555-goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK). Secondary antibody alone was routinely included as control for the experiments. Nuclei were counterstained with haematoxylin or, alternatively, in fluorescence assays, To-Pro-3 or DAPI (Life Technologies) were used to visualize the nuclei. Samples were mounted with Fluoromount aqueous mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich, Sant Louis, Missouri, MO, USA). The results were observed and photographed under a light Leica DMD 108 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) or, in fluorescence assays, under a Nikon Eclipse E-800 microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) or under a Leica TCS-SL spectral confocal microscope (Leica).

Results from both tissue samples and touch preparations were independently evaluated by at least two observers. Staining distribution was recorded. Label intensity was scored as negative (−), intermediate (+), or strongly positive (++).

2.4. In Situ Enzyme Activity Experiments

For enzyme histochemistry, ADPase and ecto-5′-nucleotidase (AMPase) activities were localized by using the Wachstein/Meisel lead phosphate method [24, 25] in tissue samples and in touch preparations. Briefly, fixed samples were preincubated for 1 hour at RT in 50 mM Tris-maleate buffer, pH 7.4 containing 2 mM and 0.25 M sucrose. Enzyme reaction was carried out for 1 hour at 37°C in the same buffer supplemented with 5 mM , 2 mM , 3% Dextran T250, and 2.5 mM levamisole, as inhibitor of alkaline phosphatases, and in the presence of 200 μM ADP or 1 mM AMP, as substrate. For CD39 and CD73 inhibition experiments, 1 mM NF279 (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, United Kingdom) and 1 mM α, β-meADP (Sigma-Aldrich) were added, respectively, to both preincubation and enzyme reaction buffers. Control assays were performed in the absence of nucleotide. The reaction was revealed by incubating with 1% S v/v for exactly 1 minute. Samples were counterstained with haematoxylin, mounted with Fluoromount aqueous mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich), and observed and photographed as described above.

2.5. Isolation of Membrane Enriched Fraction from Tissue Homogenates

50–100 μg of human tumor (endometrioid and serous endometrial adenocarcinoma) and nontumoral tissue samples were homogenized in a buffer containing 20 mM Hepes, 250 mM sucrose, 0.3 mM PMSF, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM EGTA, and 1 mM MgCl2 (pH 7.4) using a glass homogenizer (VidraFoc, Barcelona, Spain). After homogenization, samples were centrifuged at 600 g for 10 minutes at 4°C in a Beckman JA-20 centrifuge. The pellet was discarded and supernatants were centrifuged at 48,000 g for 20 minutes at 4°C in a Beckman TI-70 centrifuge. The resulting pellets were resuspended in a buffer containing 20 mM Hepes, 0.3 mM PMSF, and 1 mM DTT (pH 7.4). Protein concentration was determined by the method of Lowry et al. [26] using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Samples were kept at −80°C until use.

2.6. Enzyme Activity Assays in Plasma Membrane Enriched Tissue Homogenates

ADPase and AMPase activities were determined by measuring the amount of Pi using the malachite green colorimetric assay, as previously described [27].

2.7. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA from endometrial tumor tissue samples was isolated using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Total isolated RNA (2 μg) was reversely transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using the First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, Thermo Scientific, Chicago, IL, USA).

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to examine the expression of CD39, NTPDase2, and CD73 genes. Designed large-scale TaqMan low-density array (TLDA) microfluidic cards (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) were used. The 384 wells of each card were preloaded with predesigned fluorogenic TaqMan probes and primers for CD39, NTPDase2, and CD73. cDNA (1 μg) combined with TaqMan 2X Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) were loaded into each sample-loading port. qRT-PCR reactions were carried out using the ABI PRISM 7900HT Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Data were collected using the SDS v2.1 software (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed by the comparative Ct (ΔΔCt) quantification method using the Expression Suite v1.0 software (Applied Biosystems). The relative expression levels of CD39, NTPDase2, and CD73 genes were determined using 18S mRNA as an endogenous control for normalization. Results are expressed as the mean of the relative quantification (RQ) of the tested transcripts ( serous adenocarcinoma samples; endometrioid adenocarcinoma samples) ± the standard error of the mean (SEM). Results were obtained from five independent experiments performed using 1 μg of cDNA, all with duplicate measurements. No signal was detected in nontemplate controls.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SigmaStat 3.2 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Values are reported as the mean S.E.M. Student’s t-test was used to compare the means of two independent groups of normally distributed data.

3. Results and Discussion

Extracellular adenosine in tumors, mainly generated by the sequential action of ecto-nucleotidases, has immunosuppressive effects through a broad range of actions, including inhibition of antitumor T-cell function, modification of local interleukin levels, and inhibition of phagocytosis (reviewed in [28]). In this section we show and discuss our results on the expression of the ecto-nucleotidases CD39 and CD73 in type I and type II endometrial carcinomas.

CD39 was immunolocalized in the stroma of both nontumoral and tumoral endometria (Figure 1(a)). For the nonpathological endometrium the expression of CD39 has already been previously described in association with stromal cells and blood vessels [24]. Here we show that label score was significantly higher for both endometrioid and serous types of tumors when compared with the corresponding nontumoral coexisting endometrium (Figure 1(b)). No CD39 labeling was found in endometrial adenocarcinoma epithelia, as demonstrated with the double staining performed with the anti-CD39 and anti-CK19 antibodies (see Supplementary Figure 1 in Supplementary Material available online at

Strong in situ ADPase activity was detected in the tumor stroma, coinciding with the CD39 immunolocalization (Figure 2(a)). This activity was drastically reduced with the NTPDase inhibitor NF279, demonstrating its specificity. Equivalent results were obtained using ATP as substrate for the in situ activity assay (not shown). ADPase activity measured in tumor tissue homogenates demonstrated that serous (grade 3) adenocarcinomas had significantly higher activity than endometrioid (grade 1) adenocarcinomas (Figure 2(b)).

CD73 expression was strongly immunodetected in both types of tumors, in epithelial structures and in the stroma (Figure 3(a)), thus partially colocalizing with CK19 (Supplementary Figure 2). Specific CD73 activity, demonstrated with the inhibitor α, β-meADP, matched the immunolabeled structures (Figure 3(a)). We have already previously demonstrated that the expression and activity of CD73 are abundant in nonpathological endometrium [24, 25]. Consequently, due to the high expression of CD73 in tumoral and nontumoral endometria, label score comparisons were not possible. Moreover, no differences among tumors were observed with the enzyme assays either in tissue slices or in tissue homogenates (not shown).

Immunolabeling and in situ enzyme activity results obtained with the touch prep technique were equivalent to those obtained with tissue slices (Figures 2(c) and 3(b)). The usefulness of the touch prep technique for diagnosis has already been demonstrated in breast cancer with 100% sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of tumor margins at the time of the surgery [29]. This technique has also been previously used to demonstrate by immunolabeling a decreased expression of P2X7 ATP receptor in endometrial cancer cells [30] and also, recently, the relationship between p53 expression and the tumor grade [31]. However, to our knowledge, this is the first report validating the use of touch preps for enzyme activity studies, therefore opening the possibility of performing such studies in cytological samples.

In order to determine if the differences in CD39 protein and ADPase activity between tumor types also involved gene expression changes, quantitative real-time PCR analyses were performed (Figure 4). CD39 gene expression was 2-fold higher in serous endometrial adenocarcinoma than in endometrioid, coinciding with the data obtained with the protein (Figure 4(a)). These gene expression changes did not apply to NTPDase2 (Figure 4(b)), indicating that CD39 upregulation is not a general feature of other members of NTPDase family. No changes were detected in CD73 gene expression between the two tumor types (Figure 4(c)).

These results on endometrial tumors add to the list of human cancers in which CD39 is overexpressed and support the growing body of evidence that CD39 is a potential therapeutic target for cancer immunotherapy [18]. Our results also reinforce the relevance of CD73 in tumors. Antibody-based therapy and pharmacological approaches against CD73 have been reported to significantly inhibit tumor growth and improve antitumor immunity in mouse models [28, 32].

4. Conclusions

Endometrial adenocarcinoma tumors have significantly higher CD39 expression and activity than their nontumoral counterparts. Moreover, stronger activities are associated with type II serous tumors. This also coincides with the higher grade of these tumors, but further studies are needed to establish statistical correlations with the tumor grade in the case of type I endometrioid tumors. The consequences of this high CD39 activity in endometrial tumors are increased levels of AMP, the substrate for CD73, and also highly expressed in these tumors, which will, in turn, generate increased immunosuppressive levels of extracellular adenosine.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors thank the Tumour Bank of Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge (IDIBELL’s Biobank) and the Centres Científics i Tecnològics, Universitat de Barcelona, Campus de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain, for their technical assistance. The authors also thank Gloria Gannaway for her help with English editing and Professor Lluís Jover Armengol for his help with statistics. This study was supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Grant FIS-PI10/00305) to Mireia Martín-Satué and by Generalitat de Catalunya (Grant SGR2009/152).

Supplementary Materials

The supplementary figures demonstrate that CD39 does not colocalize with CK19 (Figure 1) whereas CD73 partially colocalizes (Figure 2).

  1. Supplementary Figures


  1. J. Blay, T. D. White, and D. W. Hoskin, “The extracellular fluid of solid carcinomas contains immunosuppressive concentrations of adenosine,” Cancer Research, vol. 57, no. 13, pp. 2602–2605, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  2. M. V. Sitkovsky, J. Kjaergaard, D. Lukashev, and A. Ohta, “Hypoxia-adenosinergic immunosuppression: tumor protection by T regulatory cells and cancerous tissue hypoxia,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 5947–5952, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. C. Becker, M. H. Andersen, D. Schrama, and P. T. Straten, “Immune-suppressive properties of the tumor microenvironment,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 1137–1148, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Merighi, P. Mirandola, K. Varani et al., “A glance at adenosine receptors: novel target for antitumor therapy,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 31–48, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. Zhou, X. Zhi, T. Zhou et al., “Overexpression of ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73) promotes T-47D human breast cancer cells invasion and adhesion to extracellular matrix,” Cancer Biology & Therapy, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 426–431, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. F. Ghiringhelli, M. Bruchard, F. Chalmin, and C. Rebe, “Production of adenosine by ectonucleotidases: a key factor in tumor immunoescape,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2012, Article ID 473712, 9 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. I. Feoktistov, S. Ryzhov, H. Zhong et al., “Hypoxia modulates adenosine receptors in human endothelial and smooth muscle cells toward an A2B angiogenic phenotype,” Hypertension, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 649–654, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. B. Allard, M. Turcotte, K. Spring, S. Pommey, I. Royal, and J. Stagg, “Anti-CD73 therapy impairs tumor angiogenesis,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 134, no. 6, pp. 1466–1473, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Ohta, E. Gorelik, S. J. Prasad et al., “A2A adenosine receptor protects tumors from antitumor T cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 35, pp. 13132–13137, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. S. Longhi, S. C. Robson, S. H. Bernstein, S. Serra, and S. Deaglio, “Biological functions of ecto-enzymes in regulating extracellular adenosine levels in neoplastic and inflammatory disease states,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 165–172, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. C. Robson, J. Sévigny, and H. Zimmermann, “The E-NTPDase family of ectonucleotidases: structure function relationships and pathophysiological significance,” Purinergic Signalling, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 409–430, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. G. Yegutkin, “Nucleotide- and nucleoside-converting ectoenzymes: important modulators of purinergic signalling cascade,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1783, no. 5, pp. 673–694, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. Zimmermann, M. Zebisch, and N. Sträter, “Cellular function and molecular structure of ecto-nucleotidases,” Purinergic Signalling, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 437–502, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. H. K. Eltzschig, D. Köhler, T. Eckle, T. Kong, S. C. Robson, and S. P. Colgan, “Central role of Sp1-regulated CD39 in hypoxia/ischemia protection,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 224–232, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Stella, L. Bavaresco, E. Braganhol et al., “Differential ectonucleotidase expression in human bladder cancer cell lines,” Urologic Oncology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 260–267, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. M. Künzli, M.-I. Bernlochner, S. Rath et al., “Impact of CD39 and purinergic signalling on the growth and metastasis of colorectal cancer,” Purinergic Signalling, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 231–241, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. di Virgilio, “Purines, purinergic receptors, and cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 72, no. 21, pp. 5441–5447, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Bastid, A. Cottalorda-Regairaz, G. Alberici, N. Bonnefoy, J. F. Eliaou, and A. Bensussan, “ENTPD1/CD39 is a promising therapeutic target in oncology,” Oncogene, vol. 32, no. 14, pp. 1743–1751, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Stagg, U. Divisekera, N. McLaughlin et al., “Anti-CD73 antibody therapy inhibits breast tumor growth and metastasis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 1547–1552, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. B. Zhang, “Opportunities and challenges for anti-CD73 cancer therapy,” Immunotherapy, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 861–865, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. X. Matias-Guiu and J. Prat, “Molecular pathology of endometrial carcinoma,” Histopathology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 111–123, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. Colas, C. Perez, S. Cabrera et al., “Molecular markers of endometrial carcinoma detected in uterine aspirates,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 129, no. 10, pp. 2435–2444, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. A. Soslow, “High-grade endometrial carcinomas—strategies for typing,” Histopathology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 89–110, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. E. Aliagas, A. Vidal, B. Torrejon-Escribano et al., “Ecto-nucleotidases distribution in human cyclic and postmenopausic endometrium,” Purinergic Signalling, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 227–237, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. E. Aliagas, B. Torrejón-Escribano, E. G. Lavoie et al., “Changes in expression and activity levels of ecto-5′-nucleotidase/ CD73 along the mouse female estrous cycle,” Acta Physiologica, vol. 199, no. 2, pp. 191–197, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. O. H. Lowry, N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall, “Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 265–275, 1951. View at: Google Scholar
  27. E. Aliagas, I. Villar-Menendez, J. Sevigny et al., “Reduced striatal ecto-nucleotidase activity in schizophrenia patients supports the ‘adenosine hypothesis’,” Purinergic Signalling, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 599–608, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Stagg and M. J. Smyth, “Extracellular adenosine triphosphate and adenosine in cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 29, no. 39, pp. 5346–5358, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. V. S. Klimberg, K. C. Westbrook, and S. Korourian, “Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 220–226, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. X. Li, X. Qi, L. Zhou et al., “Decreased expression of P2X7 in endometrial epithelial pre-cancerous and cancer cells,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 233–243, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. K. Konstantinos, S. Marios, M. Anna, K. Nikolaos, P. Efstratios, and A. Paulina, “Expression of p53 in imprint smears of endometrial carcinoma,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. G. Forte, R. Sorrentino, A. Montinaro et al., “Inhibition of CD73 improves B cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity in a mouse model of melanoma,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 189, no. 5, pp. 2226–2233, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Elisabet Aliagas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.